The essence of cyclist rights/reasons to take the lane?
08-14-07, 03:48 PM
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The essence of cyclist rights/reasons to take the lane?
I think this passage (slightly edited) from another thread succinctly describes the essence of cyclist rights and practical safety reasons to take the lane, when it is appropriate to do so.
What do you think?
Blocking traffic is unlawful conduct for any driver. The question concerns whether or not there is sufficient clear sight distance to safely overtake the cyclist. If there is, the cyclist should accommodate such overtaking, but if there is not, then the cyclist is entitled by law to occupy a lateral position that prevents such dangerous overtaking, because, if that danger actually materializes, he will be caught in the tangle and may well be the only person injured, even though the fault is that of the overtaking motorist.
08-14-07, 04:01 PM
#2
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The ironic thing is that there is a message going around the SDCBC that basically outlines the same issues with the general response of motorists... that of the motorist believing that they own the road and therefore cyclists should get out of the way. This attitude is somewhat emphasized by road designed for 50MPH motor traffic.
If we expect motorists to act in any other way (ie properly)... surface street roads should not be built to resemble freeways and motorists must be reminded of their responsibilities to drive in a proper lawful manner. This responsibility must include the use of the brake pedal by the motorist when cycling traffic dictates. (oddly enough, motorists generally don't seem to have too much problem slowing down for other motorists... as evidenced by the twice a day "rush hour" display on every major freeway. )
If we expect motorists to act in any other way (ie properly)... surface street roads should not be built to resemble freeways and motorists must be reminded of their responsibilities to drive in a proper lawful manner. This responsibility must include the use of the brake pedal by the motorist when cycling traffic dictates. (oddly enough, motorists generally don't seem to have too much problem slowing down for other motorists... as evidenced by the twice a day "rush hour" display on every major freeway. )
08-14-07, 04:52 PM
#3
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
JF's quote says as a cyclist I'm entitled by law to occupy a lateral position that prevents such dangerous overtaking.
But just because you are entitled doesn't mean that it's always the wisest choice or that you'll reap the bet results.
But just because you are entitled doesn't mean that it's always the wisest choice or that you'll reap the bet results.
08-14-07, 10:58 PM
#4
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
sightlines and dangerous overtaking?
that's it?
weak. it doesn't jive with your pet powerweave technique either, head.
paltry and incomplete. not accurate or all-encompassing at all.
that's it?
weak. it doesn't jive with your pet powerweave technique either, head.
paltry and incomplete. not accurate or all-encompassing at all.
08-15-07, 04:06 AM
#5
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times
in
1,044 Posts
I think What a toady!
08-15-07, 07:49 AM
#6
Senior Member
The "essence" of cyclists' right to take the primary lane position derives from our right to use the roadway as vehicle operators, the safety benefits of increased visibility and hazard clearance near the center of a travel lane, and the reality that side-by-side operation of a bicycle and a motor vehicle in a single lane is often undesirably unsafe and should be discouraged in such situations. These situations are affected by everything from road design and maintenance to the speeds and destinations of the road users involved.
08-15-07, 09:50 AM
#7
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What do I think?
He's right, as far as he takes it in that one paragraph. There are many other reasons to take the lane. Some even related to passing, even in situations where effective sight-lines are present.
He's right, as far as he takes it in that one paragraph. There are many other reasons to take the lane. Some even related to passing, even in situations where effective sight-lines are present.
08-15-07, 10:05 AM
#8
-=Barry=-
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If we are talking about a lane that is not wide enough for a motorists and cyclists to safely share side by side John is basically correct. But if there is extra width (bike lane or shoulder) then things get a little tweedier. Technically a cyclist is not entitled by law to take this kind of lane but has to make a case that there is a “hazard” they are avoiding by leaving the right side of the roadway. Steve’s response is a better articulation of that case and the hazards that are being avoided.
08-15-07, 10:08 AM
#9
hill hater
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127
Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Partially right. Heres why i take the lane at various points on various roads. When coming to a intersection/stoplight esp when turning left or going strait with a right turn strait and left turn lane. Simply put i do not want to be stuck trying to cross multiple lanes of traffic for my turn. Coming up on narrow bridges etc. Buddy of mine nearly fell off the jhonson road over pass going over 21. No car involved his chain decided to snap and he lost control. His bike ended up in the median on 21 while he hung on to the railing.
Now Why i take the lane in areas where passing is not safe etc.
It is not to force a 2 ton car to pass me safely sorry that will not ever happen they ither will or they wont. I take the lane so that i have more room to move over to the right when a driver passes to closely and i know they are going to do so. Instead of having a foot or 2 to work with i have 4 or more feet to work with.
