Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety > Vehicular Cycling (VC)
Reload this Page >

Simple Question - Are There ANY Women Advocating for Vehicular Cycling?

Search
Notices
Vehicular Cycling (VC) No other subject has polarized the A&S members like VC has. Here's a place to share, debate, and educate.

Simple Question - Are There ANY Women Advocating for Vehicular Cycling?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-09, 11:15 PM
  #26  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by bsut
Have you met Keri Caffrey, or read any of her items on her Commute Orlando blog?
^ Yes. Her.

She's made several instructional videos on CommuteOrlando and is active in the blogosphere when people as VC questions.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 07:22 AM
  #27  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times in 1,044 Posts
Originally Posted by ChipSeal
"Filigree" at Lovely bicycle! is an advocate for vehicular cycling.
I didn't see anything about vehicular cycling (I didn't look too hard) but it is a very intelligent and interesting site about bicycling. The blogger has an appreciation for the aesthetics of bicycling for pleasure and practicality. Good pictures too.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 07:46 AM
  #28  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
I didn't see anything about vehicular cycling (I didn't look too hard) but it is a very intelligent and interesting site about bicycling. The blogger has an appreciation for the aesthetics of bicycling for pleasure and practicality. Good pictures too.
I did note with interest that there seemed to be a preference for paths in the photos... not too many are "on road."
genec is offline  
Old 10-09-09, 07:46 AM
  #29  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
a few caveats (applicable to both men and women):

bike infrastructure and vehicular cycling are not mutually incompatible.

vehicular cyclists can support and endorse bikelanes and bike master plans that facilitate lawful road bicycling behaviors.

vehicular cyclists aren't against bike infrastructure, only idiots rally against bike infrastructure.

Gene in San Diego is a good example of a vehicular cyclist that also endorses facilities. i believe he considers himself a vehicular cyclist but also recognizes the unpalatability of high speed, high volume roads and bike traffic without modifications to facilitate bike travel.

Last edited by Bekologist; 10-09-09 at 08:10 AM.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 11:58 PM
  #30  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
I did note with interest that there seemed to be a preference for paths in the photos... not too many are "on road."
Maybe it just isn't as safe to be whipping out the camera while in traffic.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 12-12-09, 09:55 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MIAMI, OK
Posts: 119

Bikes: TE CLONE AND TE CLONE WITH JACKSHAFT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've thought about this and came up with the following:

1. Women are looking for security when doing anything. Say a women bikes to the grocery store. How many times has she been told to watch for strangers? Would that not figure in to this question?

2. Women who ride may not have a buddy to ride with.

3. The crux of the biking problem may be vanity ie "Does this bicycle make me look fat?"

Dogbitteneear
dogbitteneear is offline  
Old 12-13-09, 04:48 AM
  #32  
The Professor
 
akohekohe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Center Sandwich, New Hampshire
Posts: 899

Bikes: Alex Moulton Double Pylon, Surly Big Dummy, Alex Moulton GT, AZUB TiFly

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sggoodri
I know plenty of women roadies who both prefer to avoid high-traffic roads and dislike bike-specific infrastructure. They prefer vehicular cycling over depending on mode-separated facilities, but they choose routes that feature less potential for social friction. How should one classify them? I still consider them vehicular cyclists.

Even the most die-hard female vehicular cyclists have better things to do than waste time and energy arguing about facilities, especially online. They tend to focus more on harassment prevention and legal issues, if anything, and are more consensus-oriented. Or they have better social lives.
The SA article: "Women were less likely than men to try on-street bike lanes and more likely to go out of their way to use “bike boulevards,” quiet residential streets with special traffic-calming features for bicycles." I think you raise a good issue about harassment and I think this confounds the issue of women and traffic. Unfortunately, women out riding on bicycles often have to endure being "hit on" by other road users which is not something men usually have to put up with, so it is not strange that they might prefer quieter residential streets with less "potential for social friction" as you put it.
akohekohe is offline  
Old 02-01-10, 03:49 AM
  #33  
Your scars reveal you
 
tallard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Citizen of Planet Earth
Posts: 406

Bikes: My Brodie's dead, start hunting for a new cycle before March arrives

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Randya, to answer your query, to which oh so few females here even answered ???
I am an almost vehicular cyclist, I've been a courrier in Montreal, I've cycled, toured and commuted on 4 continents plus the Caribbean (which I consider separate), I prefer faster traffic roadways over slower traffic, am against most cycling infrastructure (I find they promote incompetence), and have been riding helmetless for 40 years.

But then again, I've always been a tomboy, will never have kids, weigh 225 lbs, on a 5'7 frame, so boy do I look fat on my cycle compared to all the skinnies out there! Maybe I just scare drivers! I can stare a driver down and sometimes even interpose myself in front of traffic on purpose. So maybe I don't count cuz I'm not an average female cyclist?

But I NEVER cycle with female friends, cuz all my female friends are riding slower and in places where I have no interest in riding. And the reason so few of my girlfriends cycle at all??
2 points:
-Cuz they're unfit
-and they're chicken chit

In almost all sporting activities, I prefer male companions. Girls are raised differently, I think women could have more road smarts and confidence, IF they were raised to not fear. But that's not reality.

As for VC, my style is similar but personalised: I only take a lane on narrow streets, traffic jams, straight-way through intersections, downhill, or anytime I'm going near traffic speed, and left turns, I don't give way to backed up traffic unless there is a nice 100% safe shoulder to aside to (I hate weaving cyclists), and I'm accustomed to motorists brushing up to me so close that my open jacket swats their vehicle.

Last edited by tallard; 02-01-10 at 04:48 AM.
tallard is offline  
Old 02-01-10, 05:02 AM
  #34  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
my girlfriends are chicken chit!

hey, that's the spirit of 'vehicular' cycling! everyone else is too scared to ride, must be a personal problem.

high speeds, high volumes of distracted drivers on cellphones, agressive driving, every hundreth driver yelling something out the window at the slow bicyclists,


it could also be a lack of respect from motorists or agressive behavior towards bicyclists that turn them off from a lot of road riding.

would you say 'you're chicken chit'! to your grandmother?
Bekologist is offline  
Old 02-01-10, 09:37 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Posts: 3,770

Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
a few caveats (applicable to both men and women):

bike infrastructure and vehicular cycling are not mutually incompatible.

vehicular cyclists can support and endorse bikelanes and bike master plans that facilitate lawful road bicycling behaviors.

vehicular cyclists aren't against bike infrastructure, only idiots rally against bike infrastructure.
+1

In my experience, vehicular riders in general and commuters and other utility riders in particular can be especially effective advocates for useful cycling infrastructure in that they (ok, we) are also willing to be critical of problematic "improvements."
gcottay is offline  
Old 02-14-10, 06:39 PM
  #36  
LET'S ROLL
 
1nterceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NEW YORK, NY - USA
Posts: 4,782

Bikes: 2014 BMC Gran Fondo, 2013 Brompton S6L-X

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 306 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 33 Posts
To answer your question, yes. She can even stop traffic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMJUt6E9XN8

https://planetgreen.discovery.com/tv/...de-marlow.html

Originally Posted by randya
...and don't you ever wonder why that is?

If we want to boost the number of cyclists and make the streets safer for cyclists, we need to forget about the Type A Alpha Male Racer Boys and their 'needs', and focus on what women want.


https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...ts-on-the-road

https://www.newwest.net/city/article/...ays/C108/L108/

(sorry about the cross post, but I'm sort of interested in what sort of response this receives here as opposed to out in the general forum)

1nterceptor is offline  
Old 02-14-10, 10:40 PM
  #37  
Lug Princess
 
Veloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Easthaven Isle, ME
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I enjoy vehicular cycling and prefer it to trails and paths. I am a 31 year old female with less than a year of proper cycling experience, who is not very athletic or tough. I ride in a skirt, because that's what I tend to wear off the bike. And I don't care about the politics of any of it - I just do what feels best. I simply find roads more convenient, more fun, and more liberating than paths when it comes to transportation. I do go on trails when I feel like being in nature, but I do not use them for transport.

Here is one post that mentions VC:
https://lovelybike.blogspot.com/2010/...-road-new.html

and here is one complaining about mandated bike trails, with a female friend in Vienna:
https://lovelybike.blogspot.com/2009/...t-on-town.html


Originally Posted by genec
I did note with interest that there seemed to be a preference for paths in the photos... not too many are "on road."
I don't feel it's safe to pose for photos in the middle of the road, in the midst of moving traffic : )

The theme of my website is not advocacy of any sort, but beautiful bicycles and interesting scenery (usually nature or architecture) to which I get via cycling. I happen to like VC, but I don't "advocate it" or feel the need to photograph myself performing it, as I see nothing of interest in the images this would produce.

For example, we cycled to this destination through the city, on the road:
https://lovelybike.blogspot.com/2009/...le-island.html
but didn't take pictures until we got there - because the destination was of interest, not the route.

Hope that makes sense.

Last edited by Veloria; 02-15-10 at 01:20 AM.
Veloria is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BikesAndHumans
Living Car Free
2
07-11-16 11:07 AM
GTizzy
Advocacy & Safety
2
09-30-13 09:10 AM
Bekologist
Advocacy & Safety
38
11-17-11 05:10 PM
folder fanatic
Advocacy & Safety
66
04-01-10 10:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.