Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety > Vehicular Cycling (VC)
Reload this Page >

Should pedal bicycles be licensed?

Notices
Vehicular Cycling (VC) No other subject has polarized the A&S members like VC has. Here's a place to share, debate, and educate.

Should pedal bicycles be licensed?

Old 10-22-11, 12:57 PM
  #1  
nealhe
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should pedal bicycles be licensed?

Hello All,

Should pedal bicycles be licensed?


https://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16_7/vc39001.htm


The fees collected could be used for provident purposes to benefit the
cycling community at large.


With more money safer facilities could be constructed.


If cyclists use the roads why should they not pay as motorists do?


Are we freeloaders?


Cheers,


Neal
nealhe is offline  
Old 10-29-11, 09:16 AM
  #2  
NoRacer
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Posts: 5,182

Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No.

Your vision of the complete population of bicycle riders is limited. There are people who are lower income that depend on bicycles for transportation. The fee for licensing a bike, for them, would be better placed elsewhere in their budget.

Once you start licensing, then you'll want to require insurance. See above statement.

Bicycles incur negligible damage to roads. Heavy trucks and utility vehicles (ones that need to use jacks for stability) and motor vehicle crashes incur the most.
NoRacer is offline  
Old 10-29-11, 07:05 PM
  #3  
hagen2456
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 1,832

Bikes: A load of ancient, old and semi-vintage bikes of divers sorts

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nealhe View Post
Hello All,

Should pedal bicycles be licensed?


https://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16_7/vc39001.htm

The fees collected could be used for provident purposes to benefit the
cycling community at large.

With more money safer facilities could be constructed.

If cyclists use the roads why should they not pay as motorists do?

Are we freeloaders?

Cheers,
Neal
I'm not sure about how these things are arranged in the USA, but I believe it's mostly taxes of divers sorts that pay for the roads. Thus, everybody who pays any form of tax, contributes.
hagen2456 is offline  
Old 10-29-11, 07:20 PM
  #4  
crawstuff
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southern Redneckistan
Posts: 46

Bikes: An inexpensive newer bike with stem shifters and stuff

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NOOOO!
Why would you need to? How would you determine the process and fees?
I'm pretty sure my fair share of the costs for the road is already paid for. Where i live i don't really see the state adding infrastructure for where i ride, and the things they should be doing that would improve my safety improves everyone else's too.
crawstuff is offline  
Old 10-29-11, 09:32 PM
  #5  
Mark Stone
Tractorlegs
 
Mark Stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,119

Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
No. The funding for bicycle projects is already there. We don't need an influx of funds, we need current funds spent more wisely. Also, the vest majority of bicyclists drive cars too. Therefore, most of us are already paying license fees once - it would be absurd to make us pay it twice. Thirdly, as NoRacer alluded to, it places undue burden on lower income people that have to use bicycles for transportation. I think it would make just as much sense to license feet.
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Mark Stone is offline  
Old 11-02-11, 05:01 PM
  #6  
Fargo Wolf
Resident smartass.
 
Fargo Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC, Canada
Posts: 488
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
This is far from a new idea. Cagers and non cyclists are usually the loudest about demanding that cyclist have a license, number plate and insurance. It won't happen because it would be a nightmare logistically, just to set it all up. And that's on top of NoRacer's point about adding to the financial burden of very low income people.
Fargo Wolf is offline  
Old 11-02-11, 07:49 PM
  #7  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,704

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10129 Post(s)
Liked 2,223 Times in 1,535 Posts
Originally Posted by nealhe View Post
Hello All,

Should pedal bicycles be licensed?


https://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16_7/vc39001.htm


The fees collected could be used for provident purposes to benefit the
cycling community at large.


With more money safer facilities could be constructed.


If cyclists use the roads why should they not pay as motorists do?


Are we freeloaders?


Cheers,


Neal
Motorists don't pay to use the roads... they may think they do but they do not. Fees collected barely pay for the licensing services themselves.

Motorists pay for the privilege of using heavy, fast, powered, machines on public streets, not for the use of the street itself.
genec is offline  
Old 11-02-11, 08:20 PM
  #8  
2manybikes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,961

Bikes: 2 many

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1192 Post(s)
Liked 222 Times in 106 Posts
I have liscence plates for two states R.I. and Mass. on bicycles from the early 1950s. They were registered. Why did they stop?

How much can you charge a guy who buys a $25 bike?? Five dollars? Just to do the paperwork and keep track of the fees, is easily more than $5. Then the plates cost something. For every bike taxed and liscenced the state would probably lose a few dollars. It would probably have to be the same as a car to make money, or even just cover the costs. My car registration is $60 every two years. For my $5 bike? For my $80 trike? For my FREE rain bike? $60 every two years for my free bike? You're kidding?

The reduced road wear, and reduced carbon footprint should be a rebate paid to cyclists for saving the road wear and tear, and saving the planet. The health beneifts should get cyclists a discount on their health insurance. And car registration should be free if you ride a bike enough miles.

Last edited by 2manybikes; 11-02-11 at 08:29 PM.
2manybikes is offline  
Old 11-03-11, 03:26 AM
  #9  
Snowman219
VICTORY IS MINE!
 
Snowman219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ogden, UT
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tractorlegs View Post
No. The funding for bicycle projects is already there. We don't need an influx of funds, we need current funds spent more wisely. Also, the vest majority of bicyclists drive cars too. Therefore, most of us are already paying license fees once - it would be absurd to make us pay it twice. Thirdly, as NoRacer alluded to, it places undue burden on lower income people that have to use bicycles for transportation. I think it would make just as much sense to license feet.

Right now an octopus just inked it's Spongebob shorts.
Snowman219 is offline  
Old 11-03-11, 03:59 AM
  #10  
yifeng vivi
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 86

Bikes: carbon road bike,mtb bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it is a good idea,but not effective.maybe long time later.......
yifeng vivi is offline  
Old 11-03-11, 05:30 AM
  #11  
JacktheFlash
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 76
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No, but it will come to pass as another tax revenue source, something to further suffocate the honest citizens.
JacktheFlash is offline  
Old 11-07-11, 08:30 PM
  #12  
crawstuff
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southern Redneckistan
Posts: 46

Bikes: An inexpensive newer bike with stem shifters and stuff

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec View Post
Motorists don't pay to use the roads... they may think they do but they do not. Fees collected barely pay for the licensing services themselves.

Motorists pay for the privilege of using heavy, fast, powered, machines on public streets, not for the use of the street itself.
+1
i had not thought about that last paragraph
crawstuff is offline  
Old 11-08-11, 05:08 AM
  #13  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,025

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
back in the 1920's the US supreme court upheld states could, indeed should regulate and license both motor vehicle operators and their vehicles for the large dangers inherent and damages they cause to infrastructure.

Bicycling has long been held as an American fundamental freedom, supported by the privileges and indemnities clause of the US constitution. as to affirmation of our right to travel by bicycle, Swift V. the city of Topeka (at the state supreme court level but a compelling authority) affirmed over a hundred years ago that travel by bicycle is a fundamental freedom in the United States.

Cries to license bicyclists don't hold any legal water. Licensing schemes are also a disincentive to bike transportation, and not cost effective. There is no merit in specious calls to license bikes for revenue.

Last edited by Bekologist; 11-08-11 at 05:24 AM.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 11-08-11, 09:26 AM
  #14  
imi
aka Timi
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,039

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 45 Posts
Originally Posted by snowman219 View Post
right now an octopus just inked it's spongebob shorts.
WHAT!?!?!?
imi is offline  
Old 11-08-11, 05:57 PM
  #15  
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's been proven to be a "loss leader", as the retail industry says it; just ask NY State.

As was said above, motorists don't pay for the roads through their fees; they just pay for the privilege of operating a potentially deadly weapon on public roads. (PUBLIC roads, as in BELONGING TO ALL OF US.)

I would like to see some protocol for ensuring proper conduct on the roads; but obviously, we haven't found it YET, just look at traffic deaths every year. As far as I'm concerned, when traffic deaths are in just double digits, THEN they can talk to us about our presence on the road.
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 11-08-11, 07:44 PM
  #16  
Chief
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 379

Bikes: SR, Bianchi, Raleigh, Bertin, Kona, Schwinn, Eisentraut, Zunow, Columbine, Naked, Nishiki, Phillips, Specialized, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Short answer... NO!

Long answer... Google some terms like "freedom of movement" and "right to travel", then read some of the concepts behind the right of a free people to move about for their private interests on public roadway. When you apply sound logic, it becomes obvious.
Chief is offline  
Old 11-08-11, 09:46 PM
  #17  
bhchdh 
Senior Member
 
bhchdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hampton Roads VA
Posts: 1,788

Bikes: '07 Trek 520, '09 Gary Fisher Triton, '04 Trek 8000, '85 Trek 500, '84 Trek 610, '85 Trek 510, '88 Trek 660, '92 Trek 930, Trek Multitrack 700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No
__________________
"When I hear another express an opinion, which is not mine, I say to myself, He has a right to his opinion, as I to mine; why should I question it. His error does me no injury, and shall I become a Don Quixot to bring all men by force of argument, to one opinion? If a fact be misstated, it is probable he is gratified by a belief of it, and I have no right to deprive him of the gratification."

T. Jefferson
bhchdh is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 06:56 AM
  #18  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,291
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2692 Post(s)
Liked 458 Times in 316 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
Bicycling has long been held as an American fundamental freedom, supported by the privileges and indemnities clause of the US constitution. as to affirmation of our right to travel by bicycle, Swift V. the city of Topeka (at the state supreme court level but a compelling authority) affirmed over a hundred years ago that travel by bicycle is a fundamental freedom in the United States.
It appears to be a bit more complicated than that.

https://www.bicyclelaw.com/road-right...or-a-privilege
njkayaker is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 08:20 AM
  #19  
imi
aka Timi
 
imi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,039

Bikes: Bianchi Lupo (touring) Bianchi Volpe (commuter), Miyata On Off Road Runner

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 45 Posts
Has anyone ever been banned from recreational bicycling?
I've never heard of this, and if not, it would suggest that bicycling is a right, not a privilege that can be withdrawn.
Wouldn't it?

edit: but yeah, as njkayaker said, it's probably more complicated than that.
imi is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 10:28 AM
  #20  
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
njk's link is telling; it affirms the history (thanks, Bob Mionske), and also points out that there are views other than our own that are as legally compelling, should the issue get to that point.

Bottom line: if cyclists are required to be licensed, we LOSE part of our right to travel, in exchange for. . . what? Some ethereal protection from vigilante drivers? Being treated as 2nd-class citizens because we don't worship at the altar of the almighty car? Licensing, historically, revokes a right to the more limited classification of "privilege".

My first thought is, self-policing, as MTB'ers are often encouraged to do; but that's a little tough in a nation that lives by the mantra, "I'M GROWN, I CAN DO WHAT I PLEASE, AND I DON'T HAVE TO TAKE **** FROM ANYBODY!"

I'm open to suggestions; we need to keep this away from the politicians and lawyers (except for, maybe, Magas and Mionske. . .lol)
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 10:29 AM
  #21  
Chief
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 379

Bikes: SR, Bianchi, Raleigh, Bertin, Kona, Schwinn, Eisentraut, Zunow, Columbine, Naked, Nishiki, Phillips, Specialized, Giant

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's only complicated if you entertain the ramblings of a lawyer. Listen to one long enough, and you may start to doubt that 2+2 is exactly 4!

If human powered travel is not a basic right in a free country, then the opposite becomes true... it is some sort of "priviledge" that can be regulated, permitted, licensed, fined, taxed & endlessly controlled by the state!

If a person wants to believe they do not have a right, then it becomes true for them, and power is given to the state agency that "gives" out the priviledge.

Think back to the last time you (or someone you know) was pulled over by the law. How did you answer the question "Where are you going?"... how quickly (& mindlessly) was the right to privacy forfeited to the state?

Keep riding your bike like a free citizen!
Chief is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 04:35 PM
  #22  
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Who's confused? The people who make the laws, and that's because they listen to the rustle of money in their ears first.

Answering a cop's questions abridges your rights? Really? Sorry, but your privacy gets checked at your front door in society; you enter the public domain, and your right to privacy is subjugated to the right of society to be orderly. Questioning you isn't the same as going through your pockets.
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 04:42 PM
  #23  
zonatandem
Senior Member
 
zonatandem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,017

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 6 Posts
. . . and also license/tax shoes so we can have more sidewalks?
zonatandem is offline  
Old 11-09-11, 08:14 PM
  #24  
gcottay
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Posts: 3,770

Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
This cyclist already pays many thousands of dollars in taxes, voted yesterday to increase his school tax bill and does not wish to register and pay a fee for his bikes.
gcottay is offline  
Old 11-10-11, 05:25 AM
  #25  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,025

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
It appears to be a bit more complicated than that.

https://www.bicyclelaw.com/road-right...or-a-privilege
my brief was accurate, on point and, well, a brief. but thanks for pulling up an article that affirms my framing of the rights versus privileges nature of riding a bike in the US.



yes, we must remain on point and roust out any specious or duplicitous calls to license cyclists. it is an affront to the law, and affront to justice and an affront to common sense.

bikes don't break bridges, bikes don't cause potholes, bikes don't go out of control at the hands of a drunk driver and take out a family in their station wagon.
Bekologist is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.