View Single Post
Old 11-12-15, 10:10 AM
  #11  
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
I'm watching to see if we get anyone in here living life-long license-less in the state of California... because I reckon it impossible. We have a skeleton of a mass transit system, 90% of the roads have no accommodations for cyclists, and (I know this gets thrown around a lot) but everything is too spread out. My wife has a short commute to work-- just 28 miles one way, by freeway. I rode it on the bike, it's 33 by surface streets, and I was in a bike line for less than 5 of those miles.

So California, two kids, work commute... yeah, we need licenses. I maybe could have lived car free at 23, though. But I drove to Vegas to get married at 20, so I guess maybe I couldn't.
Los Angeles and San Francisco actually rank among the highest for carfree populations in North America.

L.A.?s Real Growth Is in Car-Free and Car-Lite Families | Streetsblog Los Angeles

Car-Free Households Are Booming in San Francisco | Streetsblog San Francisco
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline