Old 01-03-17, 04:00 PM
  #19  
Doge
Senior Member
 
Doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,479

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3378 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
The issue with tubulars being that you have to glue them on near perfectly or you're going to get some bad CRR that can/will negate any other benefits.

Plus, you have to be careful about the tubular tubes. Continental, for example, doesn't even use latex. More CRR.
I glue them perfectly. That is the point.
Glueing FMB.jpg

There are lots of reasons to use clinchers. The test was not about convenience, it was about performance.
The implication was that riding the tubeless in the real world would be a better performing wheel set than a tubular.

For performance $2,000 wheel set in best tubular will be better than $2,000 in anything else. The exact configuration I'd use for the $2K depends on the application. That Tony Martin can win a world ITT on smooth flat roads on clinchers - I get. I think he could have done so on tubulars too.
Doge is offline