View Single Post
Old 05-14-08, 09:35 AM
  #6  
noisebeam
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
regarding traffic flow, noisebeam, the general consensus is that at higher speed differentials, greater traffic seperation is desired for all sorts of reasons.


this is widely accpeted in the transportation engineering community.


Sharrows in the USA need to morph into unmistakeable signs to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists have FULL use of the lane.
I still don't think they should only be used on low speed roads. There are many roads over 30mph that would benefit with easily implemented sharrows - roads that would unlikely be widened anytime soon. There are also roads that are over 30mph that would not benefit with traffic separation - for example roads with frequent intersections.

Al
noisebeam is offline