View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#2726
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say that people who don helmets without really thinking it through or heeding the limitations of helmet protection as labeled by the manufacturers are starting from a position of "cycling is dangerous," rather than the more sensible, "cycling is not an inherently dangerous activity," POV.
Do helmets provide or not provide some rudimentary protection within their design parameters for people who might engage the protective abilities as tested?
If you are asking me, then yes, I think so. My argument has always been simply that the protection they provide is much less than the general public may think (including cyclists), and that I personally feel that most adults doing general purpose riding probably stand to gain relatively little-to-nothing. And I do think it is a bit logically inconsistent to wear one for riding but not jogging or running. But ultimately, it can be useful in some situations (as I've noted before, I wear one during slippery conditions (especially the first rain in dry Fresno, when all the oil in the road surfaces)) knowing that it probably won't save my life, but might save me a few stitches in a situation where I'm much more likely to go down.
My real concern though is simply educating about what they can and can't do; past that, I don't really care all that much if someone thinks they need one, whether or not they do in reality. Who am I to judge? As long as they don't try to nag me for wearing one, I'm OK with it (I'm even OK with people mentioning it... I realize they are concerned for my safety. But once I've said "no thanks" they need to lay off )
Last edited by sudo bike; 06-25-12 at 02:56 AM.
#2727
Senior Member
You can check the coroner's report here: LINK
As far as I can understand, the recommendations regarding helmets are unsubstantiated. Here are the relevant bits I could find.
The logic seems to be: more deaths without helmet --> helmets save lives
As far as I can understand, the recommendations regarding helmets are unsubstantiated. Here are the relevant bits I could find.
The logic seems to be: more deaths without helmet --> helmets save lives
I think this (missing) information discredits the Coroners recommendation
https://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/na...service=mobile
Last edited by closetbiker; 06-25-12 at 06:41 PM.
#2729
Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Front Range
Posts: 715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the point I was making was the zero speed fall. that's what I was talking about when someone decided to once again paint the world in the widest black and white strokes possible and hijack my intent. I'm not suggesting "straight arming" (not what I said) a high speed fall. I'm saying if an adult falls over at zero miles an hour and doesn't put an arm or a leg out to minimize the impact with the ground I will laugh my ass off, as I did with the chap I saw do this. AND if people think a zero speed fall is why a helmet is needed then they need to pick up golf because cycling is not for them. AGAIN ZERO SPEED FALL EVERYONE, the same speed we stand at.
#2730
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,842
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12770 Post(s)
Liked 7,687 Times
in
4,081 Posts
If I know I'm going down at 0 mph I still try to tuck my arm in and roll over onto my back.
YMMV. Do what you want, wear what you want.
YMMV. Do what you want, wear what you want.
#2731
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting article in the Globe and Mail this morning.
https://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/na...service=mobile
https://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/na...service=mobile
1. It cites some old geezer who fell off a bicycle and split his helmet and claims that his life was thus saved.
2. It claims that helmets save lives:
Originally Posted by Renata D'Aliesio Globe and Mail
But proponents of helmets believe the brain is worthy of protection, likening headgear to seat belts: Both reduce injuries and deaths and are used more often when legislated.
#2732
Senior Member
Interesting article in the Globe and Mail this morning. It pegs Ontarios helmet usage rate at 31%, which places the stat of 26% of cyclists wearing helmets dying in a different perspective.
I think this (missing) information discredits the Coroners recommendation
https://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/na...service=mobile
I think this (missing) information discredits the Coroners recommendation
https://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/na...service=mobile
#2733
Senior Member
Renata D'Aliesio's article lacks any sources for the most important factual claims in it:
1. It cites some old geezer who fell off a bicycle and split his helmet and claims that his life was thus saved.
2. It claims that helmets save lives:
I thought the article was biased and, more importantly, lacked any citations for the more important assertions that she shoe-horned in there among the fear-mongering. The Globe and Mail can do much better and the sub-editor needs to go back to journalism school.
1. It cites some old geezer who fell off a bicycle and split his helmet and claims that his life was thus saved.
2. It claims that helmets save lives:
I thought the article was biased and, more importantly, lacked any citations for the more important assertions that she shoe-horned in there among the fear-mongering. The Globe and Mail can do much better and the sub-editor needs to go back to journalism school.
The number of serious head injuries from cycling has dropped in Canada, to 665 in 2009-10 from 907 in 2001-02, but, according to a yet-to-be published study, it doesn’t appear helmet laws are the chief driver behind the decline. In evaluating data from 1994 to 2008, Canadian researchers found that helmet legislation on its own had no measurable effect on the rate of hospitalizations for cycling head injuries.
Now he's saying, “There is uncertainty whether [wearing helmets], combined with everything else, makes a large difference. Does that mean legislation doesn’t work? I don’t know. It means it’s complicated.”
#2734
Senior Member
Not necessarily, because it is more the conditions of the incident that caused the death that is the more reliable indicator, but people who want to believe in the helmet credit survival to the helmet, even if the helmet had nothing to do with the survival.
Proponents of helmets also like to point to simple things like, more people die without helmets, to convince others. A key element in conveying this belief is to restrict information like wearing rates that show the information to be not as it is. In other words, they use poor arguments, wrapped in deception, just like some BF members do on this thread to justify their mocking of those who choose to go without a lid.
#2735
Senior Member
If the helmet wearing group has a much higher rate of fatality than the non-helmet wearing group, doesn't that mean those wearing helmets were running the greater risk?
Not necessarily, because it is more the conditions of the incident that caused the death that is the more reliable indicator, but people who want to believe in the helmet credit survival to the helmet, even if the helmet had nothing to do with the survival.
Proponents of helmets also like to point to simple things like, more people die without helmets, to convince others. A key element in conveying this belief is to restrict information like wearing rates that show the information to be not as it is. In other words, they use poor arguments, wrapped in deception, just like some BF members do on this thread to justify their mocking of those who choose to go without a lid.
Not necessarily, because it is more the conditions of the incident that caused the death that is the more reliable indicator, but people who want to believe in the helmet credit survival to the helmet, even if the helmet had nothing to do with the survival.
Proponents of helmets also like to point to simple things like, more people die without helmets, to convince others. A key element in conveying this belief is to restrict information like wearing rates that show the information to be not as it is. In other words, they use poor arguments, wrapped in deception, just like some BF members do on this thread to justify their mocking of those who choose to go without a lid.
If the general helmet wearing rate was say 99% or 1%, then you could draw some conclusions. But in this case it's likely too close to be significant. For instance most fatalities were male, and the wearing rate is lower for males too.
#2736
Senior Member
The conclusion that the Cornoer comes to (because 3 times the amount of cyclists die without helmets, helmet use should be mandatory) is as rational as if he had said that males should not be allowed to ride bicycles because males make up 86% of fatalities on bicycles.
#2737
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,659
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,224 Posts
The conclusion that the Cornoer comes to (because 3 times the amount of cyclists die without helmets, helmet use should be mandatory) is as rational as if he had said that males should not be allowed to ride bicycles because males make up 86% of fatalities on bicycles.
#2738
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNoo9ZekHbs I saw this yesterday morning while watching a commercial for a lawyer. It sure got my attention. I always wear a helmet.
#2739
Senior Member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNoo9ZekHbs I saw this yesterday morning while watching a commercial for a lawyer. It sure got my attention. I always wear a helmet.
#2740
Bicikli Huszár
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,116
Bikes: '95 Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNoo9ZekHbs I saw this yesterday morning while watching a commercial for a lawyer. It sure got my attention. I always wear a helmet.
#2742
Senior Member
Majority of people who wear helmets, do so out of the mistaken impression that a helmet will provide some modicum of safety, such safety effects attributed to helmets in very outsize and outlandish proportion to what they are actually good for.
Still, the perception is that if you are wearing a helmet, you are a safe rider (in locations where this might be the case...). A helmet certainly won't keep you from riding safely, right?
So why not wear one? If helmet use is the primary factor in indicating to other, less informed riders and the general public that you are a safe rider, why not wear one simply to indicate that you are among those who ride safely? That you identify as a proficient rider to those who don't know The Savage Truth About Helmets and Those Who Use Them?
Still, the perception is that if you are wearing a helmet, you are a safe rider (in locations where this might be the case...). A helmet certainly won't keep you from riding safely, right?
So why not wear one? If helmet use is the primary factor in indicating to other, less informed riders and the general public that you are a safe rider, why not wear one simply to indicate that you are among those who ride safely? That you identify as a proficient rider to those who don't know The Savage Truth About Helmets and Those Who Use Them?
#2743
just ride
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 485
Bikes: '15 Scott Speedster 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2744
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
very good. this is correct.
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#2745
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Majority of people who wear helmets, do so out of the mistaken impression that a helmet will provide some modicum of safety, such safety effects attributed to helmets in very outsize and outlandish proportion to what they are actually good for.
Still, the perception is that if you are wearing a helmet, you are a safe rider (in locations where this might be the case...). A helmet certainly won't keep you from riding safely, right?
So why not wear one? If helmet use is the primary factor in indicating to other, less informed riders and the general public that you are a safe rider, why not wear one simply to indicate that you are among those who ride safely? That you identify as a proficient rider to those who don't know The Savage Truth About Helmets and Those Who Use Them?
Still, the perception is that if you are wearing a helmet, you are a safe rider (in locations where this might be the case...). A helmet certainly won't keep you from riding safely, right?
So why not wear one? If helmet use is the primary factor in indicating to other, less informed riders and the general public that you are a safe rider, why not wear one simply to indicate that you are among those who ride safely? That you identify as a proficient rider to those who don't know The Savage Truth About Helmets and Those Who Use Them?
My pipe-dream, WRT public perception of helmet use, is to return folks to a time where people let people decide what is best for themselves. Me putting on a helmet to placate the above-mentioned mud-dumb stupid crowd does not further that goal.
#2746
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
So why not wear one? If helmet use is the primary factor in indicating to other, less informed riders and the general public that you are a safe rider, why not wear one simply to indicate that you are among those who ride safely? That you identify as a proficient rider to those who don't know The Savage Truth About Helmets and Those Who Use Them?
#2747
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Since I too ride recumbents the chances of head injury is quite low, especially on my trike. Accident do happen tho and I am prepared. Also as another poster wrote, it is a good example for kids.
#2748
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Yes, I'm sure kids have a great appreciation for an oldster riding a recumbent tricycle and will strive to emulate that example.
#2749
Senior Member
Vancouver is currently hosting Velo City 2012, and as you may guess, along with bike lanes, and bike share, our helmet law is a hot topic.
In this mornings paper is an article featuring a Dutch economist, educator and cycling advocate Hans Voerknecht who is not a fan of helmets.
https://www.theprovince.com/news/News...#ixzz1z6PW4S9o
In a related side bar story, there's a story that says, "Statistics show helmets help save cyclist lives: coroners service"
Read more: https://www.theprovince.com/news/Stat...#ixzz1z6Q7sTZw
of course these are laughable statics, and "prove" nothing of the sort, they just perpetuate the poor argments people use to justify the "importance" of wearing a helmet
In this mornings paper is an article featuring a Dutch economist, educator and cycling advocate Hans Voerknecht who is not a fan of helmets.
Voerknecht said Wednesday that European statistics indicate helmets are not pivotal in preventing injuries and they prevent people from cycling.
... He held up the Vancouver conference guide, which features a cyclist wearing a helmet peddling along with the ocean, the city, the mountains and beautiful blue sky in the background.
“What’s the least attractive thing about this picture?” he said to laughter from the audience. “We all know what it is.”
Voerknecht blamed what he called “the fear industry” for portraying cycling as dangerous, when he said cycling is about fun and freedom, sustainability and health.
... He held up the Vancouver conference guide, which features a cyclist wearing a helmet peddling along with the ocean, the city, the mountains and beautiful blue sky in the background.
“What’s the least attractive thing about this picture?” he said to laughter from the audience. “We all know what it is.”
Voerknecht blamed what he called “the fear industry” for portraying cycling as dangerous, when he said cycling is about fun and freedom, sustainability and health.
In a related side bar story, there's a story that says, "Statistics show helmets help save cyclist lives: coroners service"
New statistics on cyclist deaths compiled by the BC Coroners Service show helmet use helps save lives.
In the 2007 to 2012 (ytd) figures, 68 per cent of those who have a fatal spill (without car involvement) are not wearing a helmet.
Of those who died after some sort of accident involving a vehicle, 55 per cent did not have a helmet on.
In the 2007 to 2012 (ytd) figures, 68 per cent of those who have a fatal spill (without car involvement) are not wearing a helmet.
Of those who died after some sort of accident involving a vehicle, 55 per cent did not have a helmet on.
of course these are laughable statics, and "prove" nothing of the sort, they just perpetuate the poor argments people use to justify the "importance" of wearing a helmet
#2750
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
Why would you care? I can't believe the degree of hatred you have for some one who thinks differently then you do. Talk about being ignorant.