Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-13, 04:39 PM   #1
asmac
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto ON CA
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Posts: 947
Slower traffic must 'turn out to the right'

I came across this from Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. Does 148(6) suggest that I can't take the lane if it's impeding faster traffic? It's news to me. Is this a common provision in other jurisdictions? Can anyone explain what 'turn out to the right' actually means?

Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.

Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."

Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
asmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 07:30 PM   #2
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,789
NAL, but I interpret that to mean "move right" if you are taking the lane; what does the OHTA say about the rights of bikes on the road?
DX-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 08:06 PM   #3
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,429
What dx-man said. The key to the meaning is the "turn out to the left" phrase: it has to be the same thing except being left. (In the US, "turning out" means pulling-off out of the travel lane.)
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 09:36 PM   #4
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
The 'turn out' language in the law, is weird.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 10:03 PM   #5
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris516 View Post
The 'turn out' language in the law, is weird.
Welcome to Canada!
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 11:11 PM   #6
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,148
I suspect this is one of those laws that originated before roads were striped with lanes. Keeping right/turning out right meant to move your vehicle out of the center of the roadway, not out of the right lane. I don't think it precludes taking the lane or requires gutter-hugging to invite a close pass, but I'm neither a lawyer nor Canadian, so I don't really have any bacon on the line here.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 11:24 PM   #7
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
I suspect this is one of those laws that originated before roads were striped with lanes. Keeping right/turning out right meant to move your vehicle out of the center of the roadway, not out of the right lane. I don't think it precludes taking the lane or requires gutter-hugging to invite a close pass, but I'm neither a lawyer nor Canadian, so I don't really have any bacon on the line here.
I agree with this view. It's basic rules of the road - pass to the left, move right to be passed (right, but not off the road).
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-13, 11:43 PM   #8
gerald_g 
Senior Member
 
gerald_g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: AB, Canada
Bikes: Trek 1220 - Araya R200 - Specialized StumpJumper
Posts: 374
Anyone been "overtaken by an equestrian travelling at a greater speed" lately?
gerald_g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 07:29 AM   #9
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,942
They way I understand it and the way the concept is applied in rural areas of the US is if you're impeding traffic, pull over and the let them pass when the opportunity presents itself. On long climbing roads there are often lanes that allow pulling over and slowing if necessary to let the traffic accumulated behind to pass. On a bike, I take the lane as I deem appropriate, and then allow those behind to pass when a reasonable (as judged by me) opportunity presents itself. The issue, of course, is what others and the law might deem appropriate, but these disagreements very rarely escalate past a bit of horn honking, name calling, or finger "pointing".
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 08:32 AM   #10
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 9,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
I agree with this view. It's basic rules of the road - pass to the left, move right to be passed (right, but not off the road).
The law in DE and PA states that you should "turn out" to the right and off the road. What good does moving right in the lane if it still doesn't allow for safe passing? As slow traffic if moving right meant safe passing, you probably should have been there all along.

DE law: § 4125. Turning off roadway by slow-moving vehicle. On a 2-lane highway where passing is unsafe because of traffic in the opposite direction or other conditions, a slow-moving vehicle, behind which 5 or more vehicles are formed in line, shall turn off the roadway wherever sufficient area for a safe turnout exists, in order to permit the vehicles following to proceed. As used in this section, a slow-moving vehicle is one which is proceeding at a rate of speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and place.

Link: http://delcode.delaware.gov/title21/...03/index.shtml

Note that in Delaware "roadway" does not include the shoulder or berm which is what I interpret to be a safe area for turnout. I'll occasionally use a driveway or turn off onto another road depending on how much traffic I'm delaying.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 11:15 AM   #11
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,603
At least in 1990, in California required that you pull over and let faster traffic pass on mountain roads when 6 or 7 cars were backed up behind. I partially recall this because I missed this question on my drivers license exam. As I have not lived in CA for 11 years now, I have no need to recall the exact number.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 11:32 AM   #12
jputnam
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Posts: 1,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerald_g View Post
Anyone been "overtaken by an equestrian travelling at a greater speed" lately?
A couple of months ago, grinding up a hill... but I was on the pavement, and he was galloping up the unpaved shoulder, so he passed to my right while I moved left to leave more room.
jputnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 12:59 PM   #13
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
At least in 1990, in California required that you pull over and let faster traffic pass on mountain roads when 6 or 7 cars were backed up behind. I partially recall this because I missed this question on my drivers license exam. As I have not lived in CA for 11 years now, I have no need to recall the exact number.
CA still has that law but it requires a designated place to pull-over into.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejack951 View Post
The law in DE and PA states that you should "turn out" to the right and off the road. What good does moving right in the lane if it still doesn't allow for safe passing? As slow traffic if moving right meant safe passing, you probably should have been there all along.

DE law: § 4125. Turning off roadway by slow-moving vehicle. On a 2-lane highway where passing is unsafe because of traffic in the opposite direction or other conditions, a slow-moving vehicle, behind which 5 or more vehicles are formed in line, shall turn off the roadway wherever sufficient area for a safe turnout exists, in order to permit the vehicles following to proceed. As used in this section, a slow-moving vehicle is one which is proceeding at a rate of speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and place.

Link: http://delcode.delaware.gov/title21/...03/index.shtml

Note that in Delaware "roadway" does not include the shoulder or berm which is what I interpret to be a safe area for turnout. I'll occasionally use a driveway or turn off onto another road depending on how much traffic I'm delaying.
The Canadian law doesn't have this phrase.

I suspect the Canadian law corresponds to this CA law (most states have a similar law).

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21753.htm

Quote:
21753. Except when passing on the right is permitted, the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall safely move to the right-hand side of the highway in favor of the overtaking vehicle after an audible signal or a momentary flash of headlights by the overtaking vehicle, and shall not increase the speed of his or her vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. This section does not require the driver of an overtaken vehicle to drive on the shoulder of the highway in order to allow the overtaking vehicle to pass.

Last edited by njkayaker; 10-11-13 at 01:04 PM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 01:07 PM   #14
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 9,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
The Canadian law doesn't have this phrase.

I suspect the Canadian law corresponds to this CA law (most states have a similar law).

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21753.htm
Yeah, I realized after I reread the Canadian law that it isn't saying to turn off the roadway. It reads much more like the law you've quoted, which ends with a statement that clarifies its intent as a law that does NOT require the "passee" to drive off the roadway.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 01:20 PM   #15
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejack951 View Post
Yeah, I realized after I reread the Canadian law that it isn't saying to turn off the roadway. It reads much more like the law you've quoted, which ends with a statement that clarifies its intent as a law that does NOT require the "passee" to drive off the roadway.
Note that the overtaking vehicle is also required to "turn out" too (just like the vehicle being passed is required to do) but in the opposite direction.

Since it doesn't make any sense that the overtaking vehicle is required to leave the roadway,"turn out" can't reasonably be interpreted to mean different things for the two vehicles.

Quote:
<overtaking vehicle> shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 03:16 PM   #16
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,603
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 03:26 PM   #17
spivonious
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Posts: 1,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
That matches the law in most of Europe (AFAIK). I find it's best to get out of the way of speeders; who knows what other laws they want to break?
spivonious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 04:14 PM   #18
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
Yes, you legally have to move over even if the other person is speeding. The fact that another person is breaking the law doesn't mean you can also break the law. Anyway, your speedometer likely reads high (it's common), which means you might think somebody is speeding when they aren't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spivonious View Post
That matches the law in most of Europe (AFAIK). I find it's best to get out of the way of speeders; who knows what other laws they want to break?
It's the case in most states in the US.

Last edited by njkayaker; 10-11-13 at 06:46 PM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 04:49 PM   #19
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by spivonious View Post
That matches the law in most of Europe (AFAIK). I find it's best to get out of the way of speeders; who knows what other laws they want to break?
I believe flashing headlights as a signal to "Get outta da way dumkopf!" was made illegal in Germany about ten years; last time I was driving in Germany the fast boys in the left lane would leave their left turn indicator on as a signal to "Get outta da way dumkopf!"
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 06:08 PM   #20
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerald_g View Post
Anyone been "overtaken by an equestrian travelling at a greater speed" lately?
That had me laughing. I can see a horse galloping at 40mph(top speed), when off the road. But not on the road.

Last edited by Chris516; 10-11-13 at 09:19 PM.
Chris516 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-13, 06:35 PM   #21
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by spivonious View Post
That matches the law in most of Europe (AFAIK). I find it's best to get out of the way of speeders; who knows what other laws they want to break?
I take the Pollyanna approach and assume they are speeding to the hospital with a medical emergency. Even if I'm wrong at that moment, drivers like that will eventually speed to the hospital, it's just likely to be in an ambulance.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-13, 04:40 PM   #22
Rollfast
Not That Senior A Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Bikes:
Posts: 3,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmac View Post
I came across this from Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. Does 148(6) suggest that I can't take the lane if it's impeding faster traffic? It's news to me. Is this a common provision in other jurisdictions? Can anyone explain what 'turn out to the right' actually means?

Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.

Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."

Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
I believe this has to mainly do with roads with multiple lanes in one direction. In my area there are lanes incorporated into some stretches of rural highways with single lanes to turn out and allow swifter traffic to move ahead. Farm vehicles and other slow moving vehicles can turn out and drivers who prefer to go slower can also.

This isn't a bicycle ordinance, it's a general traffic regulation not specificly aimed at bike lanes.
__________________
Smile at miles with TWO Rollfasts! And stay cool and hydrated!
Rollfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.