Slower traffic must 'turn out to the right'
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Slower traffic must 'turn out to the right'
I came across this from Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. Does 148(6) suggest that I can't take the lane if it's impeding faster traffic? It's news to me. Is this a common provision in other jurisdictions? Can anyone explain what 'turn out to the right' actually means?
Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.
Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."
Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.
Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."
Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
What dx-man said. The key to the meaning is the "turn out to the left" phrase: it has to be the same thing except being left. (In the US, "turning out" means pulling-off out of the travel lane.)
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
I suspect this is one of those laws that originated before roads were striped with lanes. Keeping right/turning out right meant to move your vehicle out of the center of the roadway, not out of the right lane. I don't think it precludes taking the lane or requires gutter-hugging to invite a close pass, but I'm neither a lawyer nor Canadian, so I don't really have any bacon on the line here.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,729
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,594 Times
in
1,437 Posts
I suspect this is one of those laws that originated before roads were striped with lanes. Keeping right/turning out right meant to move your vehicle out of the center of the roadway, not out of the right lane. I don't think it precludes taking the lane or requires gutter-hugging to invite a close pass, but I'm neither a lawyer nor Canadian, so I don't really have any bacon on the line here.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: AB, Canada
Posts: 375
Bikes: Trek 1220 - Araya R200 - Specialized StumpJumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyone been "overtaken by an equestrian travelling at a greater speed" lately?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
They way I understand it and the way the concept is applied in rural areas of the US is if you're impeding traffic, pull over and the let them pass when the opportunity presents itself. On long climbing roads there are often lanes that allow pulling over and slowing if necessary to let the traffic accumulated behind to pass. On a bike, I take the lane as I deem appropriate, and then allow those behind to pass when a reasonable (as judged by me) opportunity presents itself. The issue, of course, is what others and the law might deem appropriate, but these disagreements very rarely escalate past a bit of horn honking, name calling, or finger "pointing".
#10
Senior Member
DE law: § 4125. Turning off roadway by slow-moving vehicle. On a 2-lane highway where passing is unsafe because of traffic in the opposite direction or other conditions, a slow-moving vehicle, behind which 5 or more vehicles are formed in line, shall turn off the roadway wherever sufficient area for a safe turnout exists, in order to permit the vehicles following to proceed. As used in this section, a slow-moving vehicle is one which is proceeding at a rate of speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and place.
Link: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title21/...03/index.shtml
Note that in Delaware "roadway" does not include the shoulder or berm which is what I interpret to be a safe area for turnout. I'll occasionally use a driveway or turn off onto another road depending on how much traffic I'm delaying.
#11
Senior Member
At least in 1990, in California required that you pull over and let faster traffic pass on mountain roads when 6 or 7 cars were backed up behind. I partially recall this because I missed this question on my drivers license exam. As I have not lived in CA for 11 years now, I have no need to recall the exact number.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
At least in 1990, in California required that you pull over and let faster traffic pass on mountain roads when 6 or 7 cars were backed up behind. I partially recall this because I missed this question on my drivers license exam. As I have not lived in CA for 11 years now, I have no need to recall the exact number.
The law in DE and PA states that you should "turn out" to the right and off the road. What good does moving right in the lane if it still doesn't allow for safe passing? As slow traffic if moving right meant safe passing, you probably should have been there all along.
DE law: § 4125. Turning off roadway by slow-moving vehicle. On a 2-lane highway where passing is unsafe because of traffic in the opposite direction or other conditions, a slow-moving vehicle, behind which 5 or more vehicles are formed in line, shall turn off the roadway wherever sufficient area for a safe turnout exists, in order to permit the vehicles following to proceed. As used in this section, a slow-moving vehicle is one which is proceeding at a rate of speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and place.
Link: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title21/...03/index.shtml
Note that in Delaware "roadway" does not include the shoulder or berm which is what I interpret to be a safe area for turnout. I'll occasionally use a driveway or turn off onto another road depending on how much traffic I'm delaying.
DE law: § 4125. Turning off roadway by slow-moving vehicle. On a 2-lane highway where passing is unsafe because of traffic in the opposite direction or other conditions, a slow-moving vehicle, behind which 5 or more vehicles are formed in line, shall turn off the roadway wherever sufficient area for a safe turnout exists, in order to permit the vehicles following to proceed. As used in this section, a slow-moving vehicle is one which is proceeding at a rate of speed less than the normal flow of traffic at the particular time and place.
Link: https://delcode.delaware.gov/title21/...03/index.shtml
Note that in Delaware "roadway" does not include the shoulder or berm which is what I interpret to be a safe area for turnout. I'll occasionally use a driveway or turn off onto another road depending on how much traffic I'm delaying.
I suspect the Canadian law corresponds to this CA law (most states have a similar law).
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21753.htm
21753. Except when passing on the right is permitted, the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall safely move to the right-hand side of the highway in favor of the overtaking vehicle after an audible signal or a momentary flash of headlights by the overtaking vehicle, and shall not increase the speed of his or her vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. This section does not require the driver of an overtaken vehicle to drive on the shoulder of the highway in order to allow the overtaking vehicle to pass.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-11-13 at 01:04 PM.
#14
Senior Member
The Canadian law doesn't have this phrase.
I suspect the Canadian law corresponds to this CA law (most states have a similar law).
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21753.htm
I suspect the Canadian law corresponds to this CA law (most states have a similar law).
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21753.htm
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Since it doesn't make any sense that the overtaking vehicle is required to leave the roadway,"turn out" can't reasonably be interpreted to mean different things for the two vehicles.
<overtaking vehicle> shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary
#16
Senior Member
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,364 Times
in
945 Posts
Note that new CA law (1997) says a drivers should get to the right lane to get out of the way if the guy behind flashes his lights at you - How obnoxious is that? Says that if you are driving the speed limit in the left lane and some scofflaw speeds up behind you and flashes his lights you are to get out of his way. Although, I do not see this happening on my bike, but I suppose it could as much as many other things called out in A&S.
It's the case in most states in the US.
Last edited by njkayaker; 10-11-13 at 06:46 PM.
#19
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,980
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,047 Posts
I believe flashing headlights as a signal to "Get outta da way dumkopf!" was made illegal in Germany about ten years; last time I was driving in Germany the fast boys in the left lane would leave their left turn indicator on as a signal to "Get outta da way dumkopf!"
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
I take the Pollyanna approach and assume they are speeding to the hospital with a medical emergency. Even if I'm wrong at that moment, drivers like that will eventually speed to the hospital, it's just likely to be in an ambulance.
#22
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
I came across this from Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. Does 148(6) suggest that I can't take the lane if it's impeding faster traffic? It's news to me. Is this a common provision in other jurisdictions? Can anyone explain what 'turn out to the right' actually means?
Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.
Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."
Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
Rules for Passing
According to the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, vehicles travelling on Ontario's roadways must pass each other safely. Faster vehicles must yield to slower moving vehicles on the road. All vehicles must appropriately position themselves for safe passing.
Section 148(6), states "Every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle or equestrian travelling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle or equestrian to pass and the vehicle or equestrian overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision."
Section 148(8), states "No person in charge of a vehicle shall pass or attempt to pass another vehicle going in the same direction on a highway unless the roadway, (a) in front of and to the left of the vehicle to be passed is safely free from approaching traffic; and (b) to the left of the vehicle passing or attempting to pass is safely free from overtaking traffic."
This isn't a bicycle ordinance, it's a general traffic regulation not specificly aimed at bike lanes.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeffy1021
Northern California
21
06-23-10 09:46 AM