View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#426
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
In closetbiker's case, that wasn't a benefit that did anything to justify wearing helmets.
Last edited by njkayaker; 12-20-14 at 10:29 AM.
#427
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Just for those keeping score at home:
In post #378 , JoeyBike asks "Is anyone here claiming that helmets don't mitigate injury?:
In post #386 , njkayaker replies "People do make such claims in these threads regularly."
In post #397 I wrote "I'm still looking for you to back up your claim that some people here have stated that helmets cannot prevent injury."
And then in #411 , nj replies with "I made no such claim!"
Mconlonx is right, again: trying to engage njkayaker in conversion is a complete waste of time.
In post #378 , JoeyBike asks "Is anyone here claiming that helmets don't mitigate injury?:
In post #386 , njkayaker replies "People do make such claims in these threads regularly."
In post #397 I wrote "I'm still looking for you to back up your claim that some people here have stated that helmets cannot prevent injury."
And then in #411 , nj replies with "I made no such claim!"
Mconlonx is right, again: trying to engage njkayaker in conversion is a complete waste of time.
in the specific case of car-bike collisions, you believe that there is no protection afforded by helmets. In that case, you answer your own challenge to the other fellow.
#428
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
I don't want any trivial sutures in my scalp. I have $6000 deductable and better things to do than visit Instant Care.
But so far, 45 years cycling and skating without my helmet touching Mother Earth. So i see both sides of the argument. And i like wearing hats, even Styrene hats.
But so far, 45 years cycling and skating without my helmet touching Mother Earth. So i see both sides of the argument. And i like wearing hats, even Styrene hats.
#429
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,849
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
Have you seen the helmet cam video that is on the internet in the last few days that show a rider going along at a good clip when UNEXPECED AND SUDDENLY a deer jumps in front of him and takes him down? Hmmmmm------better make sure your bungee cord is hooked up before you ride.
When the wind picks up I walk down the middle of the street, though. Less chance of getting nailed by falling tree branches that way.
#430
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
Speaking of being really careful and aware, I just met a guy who has a really nice 3-wheel recumbent "tadpole" trike that he only uses on the local bike path that is flat as a pancake and rides around 12 mph. He religiously wears a helmet. He made me realize that there are certain cycling situations where I would likely NOT bother wearing a helmet. (And it kinda made me want a tadpole trike dagnabbit)
#431
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,849
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
Speaking of being really careful and aware, I just met a guy who has a really nice 3-wheel recumbent "tadpole" trike that he only uses on the local bike path that is flat as a pancake and rides around 12 mph. He religiously wears a helmet. He made me realize that there are certain cycling situations where I would likely NOT bother wearing a helmet. (And it kinda made me want a tadpole trike dagnabbit)
I wouldn't mind having a go-fast recumbent. I'd have to get a 1st floor apartment or house with a garage first, though.
#432
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Well, actually, what you said is what you said, as noted in the post to which you are responding. Being as you not only cannot back up what you said, but even claim that what you said is not actually what you said, I can't imagine any reason to continue trying to converse with you.
#433
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Regarding that, didn't you yourself say "There are still folks deluded enough to believe that a bicycle helmet is effective protection against being struck by a motor vehicle. Those of us on planet Earth realize that there is no way to protect against motor vehicles, other than to avoid them entirely."
in the specific case of car-bike collisions, you believe that there is no protection afforded by helmets. In that case, you answer your own challenge to the other fellow.
in the specific case of car-bike collisions, you believe that there is no protection afforded by helmets. In that case, you answer your own challenge to the other fellow.
I am not aware of anyone on this forum who does not believe that a helmet can mitigate injury. The debate is about how much mitigation, and what types of injury. Some folks (you, for instance) appear to believe that a bicycle helmet has nearly miraculous protective abilities, including the ability to protect the brain when the cyclist is struck by a car moving at freeway speeds. Others of us (me, for instance, who has personally attended high speed bicycle/automobile interactions in which the cyclist was in several pieces) find that optimistic at best. Hence the thread.
#434
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Speaking of being really careful and aware, I just met a guy who has a really nice 3-wheel recumbent "tadpole" trike that he only uses on the local bike path that is flat as a pancake and rides around 12 mph. He religiously wears a helmet. He made me realize that there are certain cycling situations where I would likely NOT bother wearing a helmet. (And it kinda made me want a tadpole trike dagnabbit)
#435
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Also, where do you get "which is the norm" for high speed interactions? I think that's dubious, but I could admit error if there's anything solid to support that.
Last edited by wphamilton; 12-21-14 at 08:52 PM.
#436
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
I hate to be the one to break the news to the world greatest cyclist that seem to post here, but the fickle finger of fate can and will reach out and goose you when you least expect it. A slick spot, a instant flat, loose gravel, or maybe a dog can put you on the ground. But then maybe these worlds greatest cyclist they NEVER go down have a bungee cord hooked to a cloud that will keep them from hitting the ground. The bungee cord idea is as believeable as thinking they will never crash.
Have you seen the helmet cam video that is on the internet in the last few days that show a rider going along at a good clip when UNEXPECED AND SUDDENLY a deer jumps in front of him and takes him down? Hmmmmm------better make sure your bungee cord is hooked up before you ride.
Have you seen the helmet cam video that is on the internet in the last few days that show a rider going along at a good clip when UNEXPECED AND SUDDENLY a deer jumps in front of him and takes him down? Hmmmmm------better make sure your bungee cord is hooked up before you ride.
You are welcome to worry about all those things. Maybe you fall regularly because of them. Maybe you even hit your head. But your experience is not mine, nor anyone else's. It is the height of arrogance to believe that your experience is universal and that therefore your solutions are appropriate for every cyclist.
#437
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Hold up there. Would you say that after being struck by a car, in the cases where there is NO fatality let alone multiple causes, that it would still be delusional to expect the helmet to provide effective protection?
Also, where do you get "which is the norm" for high speed interactions? I think that's dubious, but I could admit error if there's anything solid to support that.
Also, where do you get "which is the norm" for high speed interactions? I think that's dubious, but I could admit error if there's anything solid to support that.
Just for clarification: in my experience, when a cyclist is struck by a car at high speed, there are multiple causes of death. A helmet, in that situation, is superfluous. It is certainly possible, though outside of my personal experience, that a cyclist could be struck by a vehicle at high speed and not suffer life-threatening injury to any part of the body other than the head, and that the life-threatening injury to the head could be mitigated by a bicycle helmet. It is my opinion, based upon my personal experience, that such an incident is so rare that trying to prepare for it is similar to trying to prepare for a meteorite strike. IOW, you are welcome to prepare for it. I don't see the need.
#438
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Now if only the helmeteers would offer everyone else the same courtesy.
#439
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
Well, actually, what you said is what you said, as noted in the post to which you are responding. Being as you not only cannot back up what you said, but even claim that what you said is not actually what you said, I can't imagine any reason to continue trying to converse with you.
#440
Senior Member
I've stated more than once that if a helmet does nothing else except mitigate "minor" injuries, for me, that's enough reason alone to wear one. There are plenty of people here who wear a helmet for this reason and plenty of bare-headers who have no issue with helmeteers who wear a helmet for such reasons.
#441
Senior Member
#442
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
Context is important here. We were not speaking of the fellow knocked off in a "right hook" or other low-speed incident. We were speaking of the high-speed "hit from behind" scenario, which appears to be becoming more common these days, at least in my neighborhood. "The norm" is nothing more than my personal experience, which is not vast, but is not inconsequential either.
#444
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
I've stated more than once that if a helmet does nothing else except mitigate "minor" injuries, for me, that's enough reason alone to wear one. There are plenty of people here who wear a helmet for this reason and plenty of bare-headers who have no issue with helmeteers who wear a helmet for such reasons.
#445
Senior Member
I believe that a new rider who takes a safety class will ride safer than a new rider who merely purchases and uses a helmet. But don't let that stop you from attributing to me things I never said. Seems to be something you are skilled at and like doing.
As is typical, it doesn't really address the point I was making, which is: despite your comment otherwise, this is a benefit over which people argue here.
#446
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Context is important here. We were not speaking of the fellow knocked off in a "right hook" or other low-speed incident. We were speaking of the high-speed "hit from behind" scenario, which appears to be becoming more common these days, at least in my neighborhood. "The norm" is nothing more than my personal experience, which is not vast, but is not inconsequential either.
Just for clarification: in my experience, when a cyclist is struck by a car at high speed, there are multiple causes of death. A helmet, in that situation, is superfluous. It is certainly possible, though outside of my personal experience, that a cyclist could be struck by a vehicle at high speed and not suffer life-threatening injury to any part of the body other than the head, and that the life-threatening injury to the head could be mitigated by a bicycle helmet. It is my opinion, based upon my personal experience, that such an incident is so rare that trying to prepare for it is similar to trying to prepare for a meteorite strike. IOW, you are welcome to prepare for it. I don't see the need.
Just for clarification: in my experience, when a cyclist is struck by a car at high speed, there are multiple causes of death. A helmet, in that situation, is superfluous. It is certainly possible, though outside of my personal experience, that a cyclist could be struck by a vehicle at high speed and not suffer life-threatening injury to any part of the body other than the head, and that the life-threatening injury to the head could be mitigated by a bicycle helmet. It is my opinion, based upon my personal experience, that such an incident is so rare that trying to prepare for it is similar to trying to prepare for a meteorite strike. IOW, you are welcome to prepare for it. I don't see the need.
I view anything over around 30 mph as high speed, and I would think that all types of collisions should be included in "high speed interactions" between cars and bikes. Particularly I would not dismiss side touches and right and left hooks, since these are much more common that getting run down from behind.
If you're thinking only along the lines of getting run down from behind by a truck at highway speeds then a helmet isn't of much use.
#447
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-s...l#post16324884
Originally Posted by mconlonx
Personal experience. And we offer a free safety course with the purchase of a new bike, but 99% of buyers don't follow through. They will spend money on a helmet, though.
And wearing a helmet doesn't really make people "ride safer" anyway (that isn't what they are supposed to do). And there isn't any reason one can't do both.
Many anti-helmeteers argue that bicyclists never really fall which makee the "minor cuts" benefit moot.
Last edited by njkayaker; 12-22-14 at 12:53 PM.
#448
Senior Member
You said it here:
https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-s...l#post16324884
(Yes, "no one" was an exaggeration.)
And wearing a helmet doesn't really make people "ride safer". And there isn't any reason one can't do both.
https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-s...l#post16324884
(Yes, "no one" was an exaggeration.)
And wearing a helmet doesn't really make people "ride safer". And there isn't any reason one can't do both.
#450
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
Just for clarification: in my experience, when a cyclist is struck by a car at high speed, there are multiple causes of death. A helmet, in that situation, is superfluous. It is certainly possible, though outside of my personal experience, that a cyclist could be struck by a vehicle at high speed and not suffer life-threatening injury to any part of the body other than the head, and that the life-threatening injury to the head could be mitigated by a bicycle helmet. It is my opinion, based upon my personal experience, that such an incident is so rare that trying to prepare for it is similar to trying to prepare for a meteorite strike. IOW, you are welcome to prepare for it. I don't see the need.