Originally Posted by
Six jours
No. I believe that a helmet cannot save a life when there are multiple causes of death, which is the norm for high speed bicycle/automobile interactions....
Hold up there. Would you say that after being struck by a car, in the cases where there is NO fatality let alone multiple causes, that it would still be delusional to expect the helmet to provide effective protection?
Also, where do you get "which is the norm" for high speed interactions? I think that's dubious, but I could admit error if there's anything solid to support that.