View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#476
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I've been talking about the ability of a helmet to save lives - in particular, to save the lives of cyclists struck by speeding (45+ MPH) vehicles. The "serious accident" stuff hasn't been adequately defined here, and is irrelevant to my line of discussion anyway. I'm not sure why you bring it up with me.
#477
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
I don't believe that is the case. I think you are seeing what you expect to see, rather than what I have presented.
Last edited by Six jours; 12-23-14 at 02:06 PM.
#479
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Am I allowed to wear a bicycle helmet? I hear they can protect me from anything!
But seriously, this is just two people disagreeing without really making it personal. Hard to believe that can exist on this thread, I know...
But seriously, this is just two people disagreeing without really making it personal. Hard to believe that can exist on this thread, I know...
#480
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
That's if you're really worried about that level of risk. It's not enough for me to wear one driving, or walking, and not enough to worry about while riding if I'm not wearing one. But, in fast traffic, like the other guy says, preventing any injury in a high-speed interaction with cars is a good thing
#481
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
You could wear one in the car, since traumatic brain injuries are almost as likely in a car on car crash as with a car-bike collision. (.65 times as likely). And, given that slip and falls are the most common cause of TBI, wearing one while walking on a sidewalk -again, the most likely of the slip and fall scenarios - might be a good idea.
That's if you're really worried about that level of risk. It's not enough for me to wear one driving, or walking, and not enough to worry about while riding if I'm not wearing one. But, in fast traffic, like the other guy says, preventing any injury in a high-speed interaction with cars is a good thing
That's if you're really worried about that level of risk. It's not enough for me to wear one driving, or walking, and not enough to worry about while riding if I'm not wearing one. But, in fast traffic, like the other guy says, preventing any injury in a high-speed interaction with cars is a good thing
As for being worried about the level of risk on the bike, for most of my life I wasn't. But then several things conspired to make me worried, and because I truly don't believe bicycle helmets offer serious protection, the only real solution was to stop riding with cars.
#482
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
six
Faulty analogy on your part. Unlike cars bikes do NOT have seat belts and shoulder harrness plus air bags. All cyclist have is a helmet, and some mountain bikers wear arm pads.
Faulty analogy on your part. Unlike cars bikes do NOT have seat belts and shoulder harrness plus air bags. All cyclist have is a helmet, and some mountain bikers wear arm pads.
#483
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
The analogy is not faulty. It's not even an analogy - it's comparing risk directly. Even with the seat belts, airbags and other safety features considered you're still ~ .65 times as likely to suffer traumatic brain injury in a collision driving a car.
#484
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
I doubt that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and don't take a ER/morgue trip afterwards is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes.
#485
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
How did you come up with that stat for "car crashes"? Does it derive only from ER data? Are you including "car crashes" that do not involve any trip to the ER or morgue trip for the car occupants, where they walk away uninjured?
I doubt that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and don't take a ER/morgue trip afterwards is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes.
I doubt that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and don't take a ER/morgue trip afterwards is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes.
#486
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Iowa University study Traumatic Brain Injuries Caused by Motor Vehicle Crash (MVC) - 2007-2009 which I first brought up in the last thread, post 7924
Do you think that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and walk away uninjured or with insignificant injuries is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes?
#487
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
As I suspected, the statistics are based only on accidents involving hospital cases, not on total number of crashes that includes those that do not involve hospital treatment.
Do you think that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and walk away uninjured or with insignificant injuries is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes?
Do you think that the percentage of all cyclists involved in a "crash" with a car and walk away uninjured or with insignificant injuries is anywhere near as low as that for the occupants of vehicles involved in all auto crashes?
We're talking about a conditional probability to begin with. "When you have a collision", the chances of suffering TBI. You can add "and hospitalized" to be precise.
#488
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
A great point is being made here. All of the wonderful "studies" DO NOT include crashes that are never reported. IMO they are probably a huge majority. Helmets did their job, and no big fuss was made about the accident.
#489
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Yes, I've been harping on in along those lines. Restrict the scope exclusively to fatalities doesn't give you the full picture of risk. Fatalities occur in a very small portion of crashes, very small even in comparison to hospitalizations even further paired down to brain injuries. Who really knows how many more there were that weren't serious enough for the hospital, even hit from behind incidents? But just from the sheer size of the ratio of just the recorded accidents and all fatalities, chances are overwhelming that you would say, "a lot of them". And in those cases, there is no convincing rationale to say that helmets did not provide some protection.
#490
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Yes, I've been harping on in along those lines. Restrict the scope exclusively to fatalities doesn't give you the full picture of risk. Fatalities occur in a very small portion of crashes, very small even in comparison to hospitalizations even further paired down to brain injuries. Who really knows how many more there were that weren't serious enough for the hospital, even hit from behind incidents? But just from the sheer size of the ratio of just the recorded accidents and all fatalities, chances are overwhelming that you would say, "a lot of them". And in those cases, there is no convincing rationale to say that helmets did not provide some protection.
#491
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
I like
But that is the point. If helmets did their job, the riders never went to an emergency room and their accident never showed up in the "studies".
In a true life adventure when I was knock down by a pick up and hit my head, since no injury occured, it was not reported to the police. I didnt go to the emergency ward, and of course I was never included in studies.
The bottom line here is the fact the anti helmet crowd can quote "studies" and "research papers" till they are blue in the face. But the fact is they are totally flawed since they dont include unreported accidents like mine where a helmet prevented injury.
But that is the point. If helmets did their job, the riders never went to an emergency room and their accident never showed up in the "studies".
In a true life adventure when I was knock down by a pick up and hit my head, since no injury occured, it was not reported to the police. I didnt go to the emergency ward, and of course I was never included in studies.
The bottom line here is the fact the anti helmet crowd can quote "studies" and "research papers" till they are blue in the face. But the fact is they are totally flawed since they dont include unreported accidents like mine where a helmet prevented injury.
#492
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Your construct that helmeted riders are unscathed/uninjured and not in need of medical care after a bicycle accident/fall/crash at any different rate than unhelmeted riders is just that: guesswork.
Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 12-26-14 at 08:23 AM.
#494
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
I have absolutely no doubt that the overwhelming majority of bicycle accidents go "unreported". I also have no doubt that that has always been the case, though. Trying to attribute it to helmet use is incredibly inane.
#495
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Beyond that, it's interesting that you now dismiss all studies and statistics on the matter. That's fine - I'm in essentially the same place - but now you're left using your own personal experiences to justify telling everyone else what they should do.
Good luck with that.
#496
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
And so again, nobody is telling anyone not to wear a helmet. Some of us are just pointing out that the protective benefit of helmets is not nearly as large as some of you would have us believe, that it's perfectly possible to ride in ways that negate the need for protective gear (and that some of us have decades of cycling experience without ever suffering a strike to the head/helmet), and that obnoxious helmet-nannying is unproductive at best.
#497
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Some are just pointing out that the protective benefit of helmets is not nearly as small as some would have folks believe, that it's not perfectly possible to ride in ways that negate the need for PPE, and that obnoxious helmet-nay-saying is unproductive at best.
-mr. bill
-mr. bill
#498
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
What statistical study ever recorded, measured or provides a clue on the type of equipment worn/not worn when cyclists were NOT injured "seriously" enough in bicycle accidents/falls/crashes to require a hospital visit?
#500
Tractorlegs
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185
Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
42 Posts