Conversion to disc brakes
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Order
Can a bike designed for cantis or centerpulls be converted to disc brakes (i.e., with the proper tabs welded on)?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Order
Can a bike designed for cantis or centerpulls be converted to disc brakes (i.e., with the proper tabs welded on)?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Order
Can a bike designed for cantis or centerpulls be converted to disc brakes (i.e., with the proper tabs welded on)?
Thank you. I started thinking about that about ten minutes ago. Don't know much about disk brakes myself, but they can't cost more than a new wheel set every two years. Yep, I figured that one eleven minutes ago. My plan is to convert just the front brake if it's possible, by just getting a new fork with disk brake mountings and the brake. Maybe that will be cheaper than having a custom welding. So, I'm off to the archives.
#5
Year-round cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
On the rear wheel, it means brazing new tabs. Probably not overly expensive, especially if you have connections. It's the repainting that costs a lot, so think about it only if your bike is due for repainting. In the front, you need a new beefier fork. Will you be able to match the colour? That being said, there are drawbacks to such a conversion:
– The typical rear brake (installed on top of the chainstay) limits severely your selection of rear racks. So a proper rack costs more.
– In the front, a disc-brake-compatible fork will be beefier, therefore will have less shock-absorbing capacities.
– The typical rear brake (installed on top of the chainstay) limits severely your selection of rear racks. So a proper rack costs more.
– In the front, a disc-brake-compatible fork will be beefier, therefore will have less shock-absorbing capacities.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Blue Order quick, edit your post to include the words "patent pending". After browsing through countless online catalogs I've determined that you're the first to think of this. Also, I've determined if I look at one more BMX fork I'm going to puke.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 130
Bikes: VooDoo Limba, 2000 GF Kai Tai, old lugged fixies
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any LBS will be able to give you a price on the adaptors for these conversions. Can't remember off the top of my head what brands, but they do exist, and are available front or rear, and are specific to 29" and 26" frames. Unsure if anything would be available for cross bikes though.
#8
Non Tribuo Anus Rodentum and off to the next adventure (RIP)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Michel Gagnon
On the rear wheel, it means brazing new tabs. Probably not overly expensive, especially if you have connections. It's the repainting that costs a lot, so think about it only if your bike is due for repainting. In the front, you need a new beefier fork. Will you be able to match the colour? That being said, there are drawbacks to such a conversion:
– The typical rear brake (installed on top of the chainstay) limits severely your selection of rear racks. So a proper rack costs more.
– In the front, a disc-brake-compatible fork will be beefier, therefore will have less shock-absorbing capacities.
– The typical rear brake (installed on top of the chainstay) limits severely your selection of rear racks. So a proper rack costs more.
– In the front, a disc-brake-compatible fork will be beefier, therefore will have less shock-absorbing capacities.
???
Shock absorbing capacities are a function of fork valving, spring rates (and/or air pressure) and oil viscosity not fork "beefiness".
It is possible to set up many forks to deliver a desirable ride quality regardless of tube diameter or braking type.
#9
LF for the accentdeprived
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^^^ Umm, the others are not talking about suspension forks. Just plain old rigid forks. I'm not sure anyone would notice a harsher ride from a disc compatible fork, but it's not unimaginable.
#10
Year-round cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm aware that the original poster was talking about a rigid fork, but all rigid forks aren't created equal.
For instance, the first bike is an old Peugeot and the second one is a Norco Monterey with disc brakes. The fork of the first one is slimmer and has a gracious curve near the bottom, so it will follow much better the irregularities of the road than the fork of the second bike.
There are two effects of that:
1. On a bumpy road covered with snow (mud or sand), front wheel adherence will be better, resulting in better control of the bike (I tested that one personally)
2. Riding the bumpy road or a gravel road with a flexible fork will be more comfortable on the hands.
For instance, the first bike is an old Peugeot and the second one is a Norco Monterey with disc brakes. The fork of the first one is slimmer and has a gracious curve near the bottom, so it will follow much better the irregularities of the road than the fork of the second bike.
There are two effects of that:
1. On a bumpy road covered with snow (mud or sand), front wheel adherence will be better, resulting in better control of the bike (I tested that one personally)
2. Riding the bumpy road or a gravel road with a flexible fork will be more comfortable on the hands.