Rear mount a Cyclocomputer?
10-18-07, 01:33 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 29
Bikes: they own me
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rear mount a Cyclocomputer?
Hi all,
First time post here, hope this forum is the right one.
My Question> Can a Cyclocomputer be mounted on the rear for trainer use?
Just getting into riding and a buddy kind of laughed at my vintage Puegoet that i was riding at a "Coffe ride" (almost killed me) and offered his Cinelli to try. So i thought i would put mine on a trainer and was wondering if i can rear mount it.
thanks,
DD
First time post here, hope this forum is the right one.
My Question> Can a Cyclocomputer be mounted on the rear for trainer use?
Just getting into riding and a buddy kind of laughed at my vintage Puegoet that i was riding at a "Coffe ride" (almost killed me) and offered his Cinelli to try. So i thought i would put mine on a trainer and was wondering if i can rear mount it.
thanks,
DD
10-18-07, 01:40 PM
#2
slacker..
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 94
Bikes: '92 Schwinn PDG Series OS 26, '05 Jamis Eclipse set up as TT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah you just have to get longer cables. I know Sigma makes a specific Rear wheel mount.
10-18-07, 01:45 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,678
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Long cable as mentioned or wireless that has the range, I use VDO CD3 DS on our tandem rear wheel running 2 computers with no problems the VDO wireless has a 15' range so no problem from any rear wheel.
__________________
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
10-18-07, 02:54 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Cat Eye's Astrale is a wired cyclometer with a rear wheel pickup and cadence so it is particularly suited for trainer use.
10-18-07, 03:10 PM
#5
Enjoying the ride
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 38
Bikes: Trek 850, Giant OCR2, Scattante Race, Giant TCR Advanced Pro 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been using the Astrale for several years and it's always been mounted to the rear tire. Back when I first got it I had read somewhere that cyclometers were supposed to be mounted to the rear wheel. I've learned since then that this is not as important as I once thought.
10-18-07, 05:24 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
One low cost possibility is to use a regular "front wheel pickup" cyclometer and mount the handlebar bracket on the top tube a few inches ahead of the saddle. That way, a regular length wire will reach the rear wheel and the pickup switch can be mounted on the chainstay or seatstay.
Yes, you will have to read it sideways and, yes, you will have to look straight down to see it but, on a trainer, so what?
Yes, you will have to read it sideways and, yes, you will have to look straight down to see it but, on a trainer, so what?
10-18-07, 09:23 PM
#7
Tom (ex)Builder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814
Bikes: Specialized Allez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Um...just for the record, I spliced in some extra wire, soldered connections with heat shrink over them, to reach the rear wheel for my wife's recumbent. No problems.
__________________
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
10-19-07, 07:05 AM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 78
Bikes: 2000 Specialized Hardrock A1 FS Comp, 2002 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If your "friend" laughs at your bike again, push his Cinelli in front of a moving SUV.
10-19-07, 08:08 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
This can be done but the splices have to be carefully made and very well sealed against dirt and moisture. The pickup "signal" is very weak and any additional resistance will cause faulty or erratic readings.
10-19-07, 09:04 AM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most wireless do not have the range to mount on the rear wheel. Cayeye and Blackburn have models that rear mount with cadence which is nice for indoor work.
10-19-07, 02:37 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 29
Bikes: they own me
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks everyone! i'll give it a shot this weekend, I put a wireless on the Cinelli and my buddy gave me another computer that has a long enough wire so i can mount it in the rear.
10-20-07, 07:23 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, if you aren't using your bike in a trainer, what are the advantages to mounting the pickup on the rear wheel? Just curious.
Caruso
Caruso
10-20-07, 07:40 AM
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 29
Bikes: they own me
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am putting it on a trainer.....read the first post
Wireless > Cinelli
rear wired > Puegoet
DD
Wireless > Cinelli
rear wired > Puegoet
DD
10-20-07, 11:23 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Caruso
10-21-07, 07:55 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
If you want cadence, rear pickup cyclometers are more common since the wires are going there anyway. Other than that, you are right, there is no advantage and it makes the wires more vulnerable.
10-25-07, 10:40 AM
#16
Broom Wagon Fodder
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,384
Bikes: Fuji Supreme; Kona Wo; Nashbar road frame custom build; Schwinn Varsity; Nishiki International; Schwinn Premis, Falcon Merckx, American Flyer muscle bike, Motobecane Mulekick
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times
in
30 Posts
Last winter I mounted a $9.99 Target bike computer on the rear wheel of my trainer-bike. I cut the wire between the pickup and the computer, spliced in a 4 foot section and installed the 'puter on the bars. The hardest part was getting the correct spacing from the chainstay to the spoke-mounted magnet. I put a section of hose over the chainstay and zip-tied my pickup to that. Super easy to do and everything worked just great first time.
10-25-07, 10:52 AM
#17
Formerly Known as Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 6,249
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
10-25-07, 06:58 PM
#18
Skybird
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Posts: 229
Bikes: 2006 Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling 
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
10-25-07, 07:08 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling . The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
10-25-07, 07:30 PM
#20
Old Fogy
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murray, Utah
Posts: 1,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a 1985 Schwinn Sprint on my trainer. No trick at all to mount the pickup for a cheap Schwinn cyclocomputer on the chain stay. Wires were long enough.
Incidentally, if you do have to lengthen the wire, don't worry about signal strenght. It is not some magical, mysterious electronic signal, it is simply an on/off switch on the sensor.
Incidentally, if you do have to lengthen the wire, don't worry about signal strenght. It is not some magical, mysterious electronic signal, it is simply an on/off switch on the sensor.
10-25-07, 07:51 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling . The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.Al
Last edited by Al1943; 10-26-07 at 08:48 AM.
10-25-07, 07:55 PM
#22
Sister Annie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hauraki Plains District, New Zealand
Posts: 1,519
Bikes: Retro Hercules adult tricycle, 1953 Hercules ladies roadster, 1950s Wearwell fixed gear 'Club' pathracer, 1980s Malvern Star 'Super Star', 1980s Healing GTX-105 Arabesque, 1980's Morrison Concorde & etc & etc.......
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
__________________
OMNIPOTENS aeterne Deus, qui nos secundum imaginem Tuam plasmasti, et omnia bona, vera, pulchra, praesertim in divina persona Unigeniti Filii Tui Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quaerere iussisti, praesta quaesumus ut, per intercessionem Sancti Isidori, Episcopi et Doctoris, in peregrinationibus per interrete factis et manus oculosque ad quae Tibi sunt placita intendamus et omnes quos convenimus cum caritate ac patientia accipiamus. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
OMNIPOTENS aeterne Deus, qui nos secundum imaginem Tuam plasmasti, et omnia bona, vera, pulchra, praesertim in divina persona Unigeniti Filii Tui Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quaerere iussisti, praesta quaesumus ut, per intercessionem Sancti Isidori, Episcopi et Doctoris, in peregrinationibus per interrete factis et manus oculosque ad quae Tibi sunt placita intendamus et omnes quos convenimus cum caritate ac patientia accipiamus. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
10-26-07, 04:02 AM
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
10-26-07, 06:05 PM
#24
Skybird
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Upstate SC, USA
Posts: 229
Bikes: 2006 Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wouldn't that tend to make the rear computer OVER estimate distance, since the rear wheel, being smaller, would have to go round and round more times to cover the same distance? That would be just the opposite of what I observed.
12-29-10, 12:52 PM
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know I am replying late to this thread, but I too have a front mount sensor that i want to mount to the rear wheel so that i can get a speed readout while on my wind trainer. I followed the advice above, but to no avail...splicing the wires did not work. After a few hours a swearing and cursing I went to the local Cyclepath shop for help. Apparently, for some cyclecomputers, there is an invisible coating on the copper wires that must be burned off prior to splicing. If you peel away the protective plastic casing, then hit the wires with a cirgarette lighter you will be able to splice in an extension wire no problemo. They also said that old headphone wire works the best. Hope this helps you and saves you some aggrivation. I wish this solution had been posted somewhere before I wasted a few hours "discovering" it the hard way. To think, I almost went out and spent $100 on a new rear mount speedo...
Cheers.
Cheers.