Different caliper reach front and rear
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tucson,AZ
Posts: 5
Bikes: 1997 Specialized Rockhopper FS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Different caliper reach front and rear
I'm in the process of converting a 1989 Trek 8500 mountain bike frame to ride on 700c wheels with dual pivot caliper brakes. The frame has 6mm bolt mounts on both the front and rear but they have different reach lengths. The front is 51mm and the rear 59mm. Ideally I would like them to match, does anyone know why they don't? The dropouts are resting on the axle.
Second, does anyone know of an affordable brake set with a reach range that covers both the front and rear of my frame. I would like the brakes to match and I don't want to use the brakes with 55-70+ range.
Third, what do you think about filing the rear drop out to decrease the rear reach to a more common 57mm?
Thanks.
Second, does anyone know of an affordable brake set with a reach range that covers both the front and rear of my frame. I would like the brakes to match and I don't want to use the brakes with 55-70+ range.
Third, what do you think about filing the rear drop out to decrease the rear reach to a more common 57mm?
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I'm far from an expert but I have noticed that the rear 700c tire is very close to the seat stay on my hybrid bike and if you filed down the slots, i would imagine that you might even hit the tire to the seat stay.
I would say that filing the dropouts is best done to correct slight frame alignment issues rather than allowing for brake reach unless its required.
I would say that filing the dropouts is best done to correct slight frame alignment issues rather than allowing for brake reach unless its required.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Non matching brake reaches were par for the course for many decades. One reason has to do with the sliding a wheel into horizontal dropouts vs. the fork's vertical entry. That went away as vertical became normal for the rear, and bike and brake companies wanted to simplify things by using the same brake front and rear.
Even then it isn't rare for the reaches to be different, but at least within the range of a single brake, which yours might be if you buy 47-59 reach brakes like these.
Even then it isn't rare for the reaches to be different, but at least within the range of a single brake, which yours might be if you buy 47-59 reach brakes like these.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tucson,AZ
Posts: 5
Bikes: 1997 Specialized Rockhopper FS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Even then it isn't rare for the reaches to be different, but at least within the range of a single brake, which yours might be if you buy 47-59 reach brakes like these.
I was looking at the brakes that you linked to earlier but the Tektro website calls the "57 mm long reach arms" but then list the dimensions as 47-59. Can the dimensions of the brake be different than the reach?
Thanks for the information about the non matching brake reaches. The frame has vertical dropouts but it's good to know that it used to be common.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I expect your 8500 was built for cantilever brakes and the 6 mm holes in the fork crown and brake bridge were intended mostly for fender mounts, not caliper brakes, so Trek didn't pay a lot of attention to "reach".
#6
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Also, the 8500 was designed around 26" wheels. Bastardizing it with 700c wheels and caliper brakes might be do-able, but you shouldn't be surprised if you have to run non-standard parts or jury-rig it to get it all to work.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Also be aware that there's a difference between front and rear brakes that can affect reach measurements, so you have to be careful. On the front wheel the rim rises ahead of the fork reducing the actual brake reach slightly. On the rear wheel of many bikes the opposite is true, increasing the reach. Unfortunately for you that can increase the disparity possibly causing you to have to mix brakes. Not a crisis, but makes shopping a bit harder.
BTW- if your bike has canti brake bosses as Hillrider suggests it might, you're probably better off with canti or V-brakes depending on the lever throw.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Constant tinkerer
+1 Those bridges were never meant for brakes, so that's why the reach is different. I have never bastardized a 26" frame to 700c but it's so tempting due to the availability of old cheap MTBs. I have been unable to find a cheap hybrid in my size for commuting, something like an old Trek 720 Multi-Track.
If you go through with this project I'm curious to see how it turns out. I was looking up long reach brakes the other day, they're expensive! For the price of the brakes you might be able to just find an old hybrid and ride that instead.
Yes, it has canti studs but those are designed around 26" wheels, not 700c wheels. OP is planning to put on 700c wheels and switch to caliper brakes.
If you go through with this project I'm curious to see how it turns out. I was looking up long reach brakes the other day, they're expensive! For the price of the brakes you might be able to just find an old hybrid and ride that instead.
Yes, it has canti studs but those are designed around 26" wheels, not 700c wheels. OP is planning to put on 700c wheels and switch to caliper brakes.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,430 Posts
I should have the first sentence more carefully. That's a horse of an entirely different color.
The OP has a choice. He can go caliper and live with the reach issue without complaining. Or he can use the Mavic adapter 26" to 700c canti brake adapter (if they still make it) or a similar item from another company. I know a number of people who use these and they're all pretty happy. Some even report better braking than the original.
The OP has a choice. He can go caliper and live with the reach issue without complaining. Or he can use the Mavic adapter 26" to 700c canti brake adapter (if they still make it) or a similar item from another company. I know a number of people who use these and they're all pretty happy. Some even report better braking than the original.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tucson,AZ
Posts: 5
Bikes: 1997 Specialized Rockhopper FS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the input, everyone.
I couldn't believe that the mounts were meant for caliper brakes, it makes sense that they're for fenders.
FastJake - You're right they are expensive and since the frame cost me 10 dollars it's probably not worth it.
FBinNY - I never heard of 26-700c canti brake adapters. I think that's the route I'll take.
I couldn't believe that the mounts were meant for caliper brakes, it makes sense that they're for fenders.
FastJake - You're right they are expensive and since the frame cost me 10 dollars it's probably not worth it.
FBinNY - I never heard of 26-700c canti brake adapters. I think that's the route I'll take.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,430 Posts
here's a picture of a set, I think not by Mavic, but at least you'll see what you're looking for.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 02-13-12 at 10:25 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lunker
Classic & Vintage
3
07-02-15 08:43 AM