Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Senior Member bigwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
    Posts
    1,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Is '54 Schwinn A Reasonable Guess For This?

    I am a glutten for punishment and couldn't resist this when I saw it. The track-style dropouts are kind of a sweet feature.

    Believe it or not, the headset is still incredibly smooth

    The serial # on the L rear dropout is "M470347"
    Thoughts and comments on what it may be and build suggestions would be appreciated

    (I'm thinking a high-gloss, *** metal black enamel would knock em' dead, accompanied by brilliant white accents and fire engine red pinstripes)


    http://


    http://


    http://

    http://
    Last edited by bigwoo; 09-22-07 at 04:39 PM.
    "Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right, They just seem a little weird"

    BICYCLE- The simplest and noblest machine:And they're all fun to ride, really

  2. #2
    Chrome Freak Rabid Koala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    1971 Chrome Paramount P-13, 1973 Gitane Tour de France, 1974 Raleigh Professional
    Posts
    3,187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Based on the front chainwheel, it looks like a Huffy to me!
    1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
    1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
    1973 Gitane Tour De France
    1974 Raleigh Professional
    1991 Waterford Paramount
    Litespeed Tuscany
    Holland Titanium

  3. #3
    Senior Member bigwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
    Posts
    1,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rabid Koala View Post
    Based on the front chainwheel, it looks like a Huffy to me!
    Interesting! I was taking a guess that the handlebar grips may be original, and they are the old tire-rubber grips stamped "Schwinn". But, somebody could have replaced the original grips at some point.

    I thought that the serial # was very likely Schwinn, but Huffy could have stamped theirs back there too eh....??
    Last edited by bigwoo; 09-22-07 at 04:40 PM.
    "Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right, They just seem a little weird"

    BICYCLE- The simplest and noblest machine:And they're all fun to ride, really

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,138
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If its a Schwinn the rear facing rear drop out indicate it is pre-WW2. They were not used after the war. Roger

  5. #5
    Keeper of the SLDB BobHufford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    My Bikes
    '75 Schwinn Paramount P-10, '86 Ritchey Commando, '87 Schwinn Cimarron, '91 Trek 990, '87 Schwinn High Sierra, '73 Schwinn Super Sport, '4? Schwinn New World, '76 Swing Bike.
    Posts
    1,629
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's not a Schwinn (I couldn't tell you what it is), but I like it. Especially the wishbone seat stay treatment. Your paint scheme ideas sound great ...

    Bob

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,138
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually I had a Monark with the rear wishbone like that. Roger

  7. #7
    Senior Member bigwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
    Posts
    1,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the compliments and suggestions on what it may be guys,

    I guess I'm going to have to hope that we have a ballooner expert in our group.

    I do have 3 more questions:
    Were MARK 60 hubs specific to any particular makes?? Could this MARK 60 have any relation to the old steering wheel rotator contactors on the first automobiles??
    And, do we have any Patent experts in the house??

    I was able to gently scrub some of the corrosion away on the front hub and found that it is stamped "MARK 60 MADE IN USA PAT NO 313100C"

    I guess this is a toughie for me because I can see similarities between many bikes from the 30's up to the early 50's, at which point they really seem to diverge from each other. I sure do wish that the original fenders and head badge were still there. I'll bet the head badge was sweet



    http://

    http://
    Last edited by bigwoo; 09-23-07 at 10:51 AM.
    "Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right, They just seem a little weird"

    BICYCLE- The simplest and noblest machine:And they're all fun to ride, really

  8. #8
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,730
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm pretty sure it is a pre-war (due to the rear-facing drops) Columbia. The rear stay treatment screams Westfield Manufacturing, as does the single chainstay-to-BB joint, BB cup dustcaps, headset, headtube badge rivets, and fork crown.

    Oh, and Columbias were poster childs for bent Ashtabula cranksets, as yours indeed exhibits.

    Chainwheel is a '70s replacement.

    -Kurt

  9. #9
    Keeper of the SLDB BobHufford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    My Bikes
    '75 Schwinn Paramount P-10, '86 Ritchey Commando, '87 Schwinn Cimarron, '91 Trek 990, '87 Schwinn High Sierra, '73 Schwinn Super Sport, '4? Schwinn New World, '76 Swing Bike.
    Posts
    1,629
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Excel Mark 60 hub. Patented 1964. Patent number 3131008.

    http://tinyurl.com/226mq4 (you may need to add a browser plug in to view the TIFF images)

    Bob

  10. #10
    Senior Member Bikedued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,935
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    People are generally lazy, I bet those cranks came with the Huffy chainweel. The frame does look very much like a 30's columbia though.,,,,BD
    "Whale. Oil. Beef. Hooked!" The Rumjacks

  11. #11
    Non Tribuo Anus Rodentum and off to the next adventure (RIP) Stacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    9,163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd build it as a Klunker, in homage to the early MTB pioneers. But that's just me.

  12. #12
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,730
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikedued View Post
    People are generally lazy, I bet those cranks came with the Huffy chainweel. The frame does look very much like a 30's columbia though.,,,,BD
    Doubt it - I'd put a bet to it that the ring was replaced and the original crankarms retained. Note that the drive-side bearing race dustcap is not present - a sure sign of the replacement (the drive-side dustcaps made it a bear to remove and install the lockring/raceway for the chainwheel).

    Also, even though Huffys do have their reputation, I'd be much more surprised to see a Huffy with a bent crankarm then a Columbia. I've had experience with 7 Columbia cranksets (5 + 1 tandem someone made from a pair), and not a single crankset of the lot wasn't bent.

    -Kurt

  13. #13
    Senior Member bigwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
    Posts
    1,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for all of the suggestions folks

    Kurt, I was thinking that you've got a good eye and nailed it and that over the years, somebody just kept replacing parts as they wore out. (I don't know the story of this bike because the guy selling it was just going to take it to the scrap heap)

    This other gentleman with a stable of them sent me some photos of a 1931-3 and it appears to be an exact match of the frame/fork and handle bars anyways: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA:IT&ih=001

    Thanks for the help
    Last edited by bigwoo; 09-24-07 at 08:32 AM.
    "Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right, They just seem a little weird"

    BICYCLE- The simplest and noblest machine:And they're all fun to ride, really

  14. #14
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,730
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigwoo View Post
    Thanks for all of the suggestions folks

    Kurt, I was thinking that you've got a good eye and nailed it and that over the years, somebody just kept replacing parts as they wore out. (I don't know the story of this bike because the guy selling it was just going to take it to the scrap heap)

    This other gentleman with a stable of them sent me some photos of a 1931-3 and it appears to be an exact match of the frame/fork and handle bars anyways: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA:IT&ih=001

    Thanks for the help
    Actually, I believe there's a bit more searching to do - it IS a Columbia, but the auction isn't a direct match for it - note the straight downtube and the absence of that small kink in the curvature of the rear stay. Funny thing, my '80s Columbia-made Western Flyer reproduction has that same small kink.

    Take care,

    -Kurt

  15. #15
    Senior Member meatwad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Absolutely not 30s. Possibly 40s. Most likely 50s.

    Ive seen a mid fifties monark like that. Not to be confused with the frame the super cruisers had.

    Closest is the western flyer repo but with rear facing dropouts. Oddly I don't think Ive acutally seen a vintage western flyer that actually looks like the repo.

    Looks like it was made by columbia with the exception of the place where the kickstand goes.On the columbia badged bikes this was a tube.

    Anyway 50s columbia or huffy based monark is my guess.

  16. #16
    Senior Member meatwad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  17. #17
    Senior Member Bikedued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,935
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My 55 Columbia has that exact same open bottom where the kickstand bolts on. It has the exact same forks. Rear facing dropouts were not on Columbia's by the time mine was made, and possibly back as
    far as early 50's. The serial number would help a lot? Left dropout I believe? If not, on the right. I forgot to look at mine that closely Rear facing dropouts say it's older. No telling how old without a s/n though.,,,,BD
    "Whale. Oil. Beef. Hooked!" The Rumjacks

  18. #18
    Senior Member bigwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
    Posts
    1,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikedued View Post
    The serial number would help a lot? Left dropout I believe? If not, on the right. Rear facing dropouts say it's older. No telling how old without a s/n though.,,,,BD

    Thanks, The serial # on the L rear dropout is "M470347"

    And thank you meatwad, that sure does look like a match. I never realized that many of the ballooners were very similar with only subtle differences
    "Mommy's all right, Daddy's all right, They just seem a little weird"

    BICYCLE- The simplest and noblest machine:And they're all fun to ride, really

  19. #19
    Senior Member Bikedued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,935
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1949 model, probably a "standard" which meant no rack or tank, very much like mine. Yes that pic was a slight match, but that doesn't mean that is the bike was unfortunately. Columbia made a a LOT of bikes and like Murray or Huffy, they also made them for others too.,,,,BD

    The clearer picture. Different forks?

    http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/447.htm

    HEre's a 48 model with a different kickstand mount, and different dropouts they make a point of showing. I don't
    think they would have gone back to rear facing. That still makes me think it's older. The serial number is a possibility
    for 1963, but they had moved on to another frame style I believe.

    http://www.nostalgic.net/pictures/742.htm
    Last edited by Bikedued; 09-25-07 at 06:29 AM.
    "Whale. Oil. Beef. Hooked!" The Rumjacks

  20. #20
    Senior Member Grand Bois's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pinole, CA, USA
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stacey View Post
    I'd build it as a Klunker, in homage to the early MTB pioneers. But that's just me.
    Not just you.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Bikedued's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,935
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That would look awesome, I agree.,,,,BD
    "Whale. Oil. Beef. Hooked!" The Rumjacks

  22. #22
    Senior Member meatwad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    216
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    <<Yes that pic was a slight match, but that doesn't mean that is the bike was unfortunately>>

    Slight match ? More like exactly the same. There is not one thing different about his frame with the one I offered. What about that frame tells you that it is different than what he has?

    Like I said its 50s columbia built. Any more specific than that is a matter of argueing what headbadge might have been stuck on a frame that might have been sitting around for a while.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •