Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Alas not everyone shares our love of vintage bicycles...

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Alas not everyone shares our love of vintage bicycles...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-10, 03:43 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
divineAndbright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Can't gauge the industry nor engineering by the price tag, business is business like anywhere else, just cause it costs a lot doesnt mean its any better then another bike somewhere else. Whats top of the line anyway? People eventually learn about that in quite a few different ways, though experience is the best teacher.
divineAndbright is offline  
Old 03-23-10, 09:54 PM
  #27  
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 70 Posts
Originally Posted by i-timy
after calculated for inflation, $185 in 1961 = about $1300 in 2010..
I don't dispute the inflation calculation. But the owner had the use of the bike for how many years? What would it have cost to rent it for that period?
Originally Posted by Kommisar89
There is something broken with that calculator for bikes - I remember it calculating that $500 in 1972 would be about $2600 today. But $500 in 1972 would buy you a really sweet top of the line racing bike. $2600 today barely gets you into mid-range. You'd have to spend more than 5 times that much to get top of the line bike today. Hence why I don't own a new top of the line racing bike.
I wonder if the difference is that back then the market price was set between serious (whether amateur or professional) racers, versus now a large number of well heeled poseurs are adding to the demand and are hence helping set the price?
old's'cool is offline  
Old 03-23-10, 10:12 PM
  #28  
soonerbills
 
soonerbills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Okieland
Posts: 935

Bikes: 25 at last count. One day I'll make a list

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As I ride my Varsity I get passed by Cf'er's just shaking their heads.
All the while I just keep wearing my goofy grin
soonerbills is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 02:12 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana, AR
Posts: 691

Bikes: 2016 Giant Escape, Univega Viva Sport, Centurion Sport DLX, Trek 420, Schwinn Sierra, Schwinn Hurricane

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love the old bikes. You love the old bikes... WE love the old bikes.

Thank god not everyone loves the old bikes. Or we'd not be able to afford 'em.
Fasteryoufool is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 04:37 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ragooch
To some it's more about riding than bikes. Most actual racers I know (whether automobile, motorcycle, or bicycle) have very little sentimental attachment to their old equipment. It was always about getting the latest and greatest and going faster. It's totally understandable.

A lot of the folks that are completely besides themselves over old racing bikes have never really pedaled one in anger, in which case a lot of the shortcomings are not as evident.

Couldn't have said it any better.


Johnnybee.
JohnnyBee is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 05:50 AM
  #31  
Vello Kombi, baby
 
Poguemahone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Je suis ici
Posts: 5,188

Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Can't see why everyone should like C&V bikes. I mean, it's basically an aesthetic decision to like them, though we can talk all we want about ride quality, cost, etc. (and these things do factor in), I think so much of it boils down to the aesthetics. We just like the way they look and ride. Obviously there are going to be differences in aesthetic opinion.

Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"

Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
Poguemahone is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 06:14 AM
  #32  
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
bonechilling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Frankly, anyone who says that Ultegra ten speed shifts better than nine is out of their mind.
bonechilling is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 06:36 AM
  #33  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,443 Posts
I suppose maintaining old bikes requires knowledge that is becoming rare, so they're not for everyone. You have to know where the parts are at good prices, and you have to know repair techniques and be your own mechanic. My LBS in Millburn doesn't do any repairs to steel frames any more.

I was in there last week and admired the CF bikes. I decided I really would enjoy having one, and it would not diminish my love for steel bikes. But I can't justify the cost right now, and I don't know when I will. Maybe a bargain of a used bike will come my way when I don't expect it to. I can wait. And if that happens, it won't replace the steel bike. I doubt a CF bike will last a lifetime the way a steel bike will.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 07:23 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kommisar89
There is something broken with that calculator for bikes - I remember it calculating that $500 in 1972 would be about $2600 today. But $500 in 1972 would buy you a really sweet top of the line racing bike. $2600 today barely gets you into mid-range. You'd have to spend more than 5 times that much to get top of the line bike today. Hence why I don't own a new top of the line racing bike.


I stand by my numbers.
i-timy is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 07:31 AM
  #35  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,443 Posts
It depends on what you consider to be top of the line and how necessary it is to get top of the line. The curve of diminishing returns is much longer and flatter than it used to be. How much of a performance difference is there between a $2600 bike and a top of the line bike? Little, I would guess, and in the physical condition of most good riders, it is probably imperceptible. Therefore, $2600 really is functionally near the top of the line.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 07:39 AM
  #36  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,514

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,398 Times in 2,093 Posts
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Frankly, anyone who says that Ultegra ten speed shifts better than nine is out of their mind.
I just tried Campagnolo's new Super Record 11-style Ergos, which were fitted to a touring bike.

I couldn't figure out how anyone expects to be comfortable downshifting those inboard paddles from anything but the drops. I had to raise my hand off the hood every time I needed to push the paddle for a downshift, and the paddle was difficult to push, no less. It doesn't make sense for touring bikes...

...but someone else thought it did.

To each their own.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 08:55 AM
  #37  
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520

Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by old's'cool
I don't dispute the inflation calculation. But the owner had the use of the bike for how many years? What would it have cost to rent it for that period?
I wonder if the difference is that back then the market price was set between serious (whether amateur or professional) racers, versus now a large number of well heeled poseurs are adding to the demand and are hence helping set the price?

I've wondered about that...but I'm leaning towards a different theory - looking at racing bikes through the early 80's, they hadn't changed much since 1950. Same 531 or Columbus tubing, same lugged construction, similar Campagnolo components...and Campgnolo didn't have much competition and only gradually made changes to their gear. By comparison today you almost have a technology war going on with consumers expecting new and improved products every year (look at 11-speeds, eletronic shifting, sub 15-lb bikes). That could be driving prices up. In some ways it's a shame though. I bet a lot cycling enthusiasts managed to scrape together $500 back in '72 but I can't imagine too many people coming up with $14,000 for a bicycle today.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 08:58 AM
  #38  
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520

Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by i-timy
I stand by my numbers.
I wasn't arguing with your numbers based on the Consumer Price Index. Just that bicycle prices have dramatically outpaced the index over time. I don't see how you dispute that.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 08:59 AM
  #39  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,443 Posts
But it really doesn't matter, Kommisar89. As I said, the tail at the top end is longer but less steep. You actually get more for your money when spending up to maybe $2000 than you used to spend the equivalent amount in the past. There's not much need to spend more than that. The difference is that there's more OPPORTUNITY to spend more than that, and that didn't exist, for the most part.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 09:07 AM
  #40  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by soonerbills
As I ride my Varsity I get passed by Cf'er's just shaking their heads.
All the while I just keep wearing my goofy Wool Socks
Fix'd that for ya


You'll get em on the downhill... nothing rolls like 45 pounds of Steel
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 09:12 AM
  #41  
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520

Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
It depends on what you consider to be top of the line and how necessary it is to get top of the line. The curve of diminishing returns is much longer and flatter than it used to be. How much of a performance difference is there between a $2600 bike and a top of the line bike? Little, I would guess, and in the physical condition of most good riders, it is probably imperceptible. Therefore, $2600 really is functionally near the top of the line.
It depends on how you measure performance...for most non-professional racers I suspect you are right. For Professional racers there is probably an important difference. Where it counts most though, parked outside of Starbucks, the $14,000 bike wins hands down. It's sort of like asking whether granite countertops in your kitchen perform any better than laminate countertops. I can prepare my dinner just as well on either. Not that this is something limited to bicycles. When I was growing up a well to do person's house just looked like a bigger version of my family's house. Today it looks like a Roman villa and is priced accordingly.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 09:12 AM
  #42  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times in 1,443 Posts
Yeah, I rode a Varsity (before I sold it) downhill at high speed, no-hands. I felt totally secure on that boat. The brakes weren't bad, either!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 09:13 AM
  #43  
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520

Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
I just tried Campagnolo's new Super Record 11-style Ergos, which were fitted to a touring bike.

I couldn't figure out how anyone expects to be comfortable downshifting those inboard paddles from anything but the drops. I had to raise my hand off the hood every time I needed to push the paddle for a downshift, and the paddle was difficult to push, no less. It doesn't make sense for touring bikes...

...but someone else thought it did.

To each their own.

-Kurt
Interesting, I'll have to drop by the LBS and check that out. I haven't had the opportunity to try the 11-speed levers but I always really liked the older Ergo levers.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 09:14 AM
  #44  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Yeah, I rode a Varsity (before I sold it) downhill at high speed, no-hands. I felt totally secure on that boat. The brakes weren't bad, either!
...and you can actually drive through carbon fiber bikes
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 05:00 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Chombi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Poguemahone
Can't see why everyone should like C&V bikes. I mean, it's basically an aesthetic decision to like them, though we can talk all we want about ride quality, cost, etc. (and these things do factor in), I think so much of it boils down to the aesthetics. We just like the way they look and ride. Obviously there are going to be differences in aesthetic opinion.

Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
I think most of us C&Vers are not planning on developing Lance Armstrong wattage and win the TDF next year, so I don't really see any problem with choosing a bike mostly for aesthetics. as long as it can still go pretty fast, look good and work good. That's why It makes more sense to me to spend my hard earned money on classic bikes and parts instead of a brand new, ultra high tech, seconds saving, top of the line Trek, Pinarello or BMC. I don't think I'll ever enjoy those bikes as much as my classics. I also assume that most of us C&Vers are not 18-25 year old Olympic possibilities anyway, so the returns on spending thousands of dollars on the latest bikes will be negligable.
JMOs

Chombi
Chombi is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 05:32 PM
  #46  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times in 910 Posts
I agree on the function part. I have friends who raced, competitively, and sponsored. A bike was gear, pure and simple; made to be used until something better made them .1mph faster, somehow.

Mention "bike" and some will rattle off the latest, greatest stuff they just got. Others have either dropped their bike off in the shop, or are about to, or just got it back, wouldn't know what BB they had if their lives depended on it; they probably know more about their bike shoes than the bike.

We get along fine. They let me ride their bikes, and I let them ride mine.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 05:34 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
...and you can actually drive through carbon fiber bikes
Yeah, what can't you drive through?
Picchio Special is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 05:36 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Picchio Special
Yeah, what can't you drive through?
Well, a Continental ...
Picchio Special is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 06:17 PM
  #49  
juneeaa memba!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632

Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I know, I know. I have said this before, but let me rephrase it in context and say it again. A person can buy a $5000 bike every year, ride the pee outta it all year, and throw it away at the end of the year. Every.year.for.the.rest.of.his.life. And not spend as much as one quintuple bypass costs. It ain't about the bike, it is about the engine.

That said, I have a lot of vintage bikes, and I like to ride 'em all.
luker is offline  
Old 03-24-10, 06:18 PM
  #50  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 18

Bikes: Schwinn Frontier

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Newbie here and ever since I decided to go with an old 3 or 5 speed......my wife says she thinks I might be obsessed. I'm on this site daily, checking CL locally for potentials and cities that I'm not going to buy from just to see what old bikes are out there.

Today I looked at a 74 Suburban (10 speed but I figured why not) that was in pretty bad shape and was waaaay overpriced. The guy I called didn't know the frame size and said it "hadn't been ridden in quite a while" and it showed. I'm going on a 45 minute drive this week to check out a $25 black Austrian Sears three speed that's just been cleaned and tuned. And I'm pretty pumped.

This is a great site.

Last edited by mazr; 03-24-10 at 07:40 PM.
mazr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.