Alas not everyone shares our love of vintage bicycles...
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ontario
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Can't gauge the industry nor engineering by the price tag, business is business like anywhere else, just cause it costs a lot doesnt mean its any better then another bike somewhere else. Whats top of the line anyway? People eventually learn about that in quite a few different ways, though experience is the best teacher.
#27
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
70 Posts
Originally Posted by i-timy
after calculated for inflation, $185 in 1961 = about $1300 in 2010..
There is something broken with that calculator for bikes - I remember it calculating that $500 in 1972 would be about $2600 today. But $500 in 1972 would buy you a really sweet top of the line racing bike. $2600 today barely gets you into mid-range. You'd have to spend more than 5 times that much to get top of the line bike today. Hence why I don't own a new top of the line racing bike.
#28
soonerbills
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Okieland
Posts: 935
Bikes: 25 at last count. One day I'll make a list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As I ride my Varsity I get passed by Cf'er's just shaking their heads.
All the while I just keep wearing my goofy grin
All the while I just keep wearing my goofy grin
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana, AR
Posts: 691
Bikes: 2016 Giant Escape, Univega Viva Sport, Centurion Sport DLX, Trek 420, Schwinn Sierra, Schwinn Hurricane
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love the old bikes. You love the old bikes... WE love the old bikes.
Thank god not everyone loves the old bikes. Or we'd not be able to afford 'em.
Thank god not everyone loves the old bikes. Or we'd not be able to afford 'em.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To some it's more about riding than bikes. Most actual racers I know (whether automobile, motorcycle, or bicycle) have very little sentimental attachment to their old equipment. It was always about getting the latest and greatest and going faster. It's totally understandable.
A lot of the folks that are completely besides themselves over old racing bikes have never really pedaled one in anger, in which case a lot of the shortcomings are not as evident.
A lot of the folks that are completely besides themselves over old racing bikes have never really pedaled one in anger, in which case a lot of the shortcomings are not as evident.
Couldn't have said it any better.
Johnnybee.
#31
Vello Kombi, baby
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Je suis ici
Posts: 5,188
Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 80 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Can't see why everyone should like C&V bikes. I mean, it's basically an aesthetic decision to like them, though we can talk all we want about ride quality, cost, etc. (and these things do factor in), I think so much of it boils down to the aesthetics. We just like the way they look and ride. Obviously there are going to be differences in aesthetic opinion.
Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
#33
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,443 Posts
I suppose maintaining old bikes requires knowledge that is becoming rare, so they're not for everyone. You have to know where the parts are at good prices, and you have to know repair techniques and be your own mechanic. My LBS in Millburn doesn't do any repairs to steel frames any more.
I was in there last week and admired the CF bikes. I decided I really would enjoy having one, and it would not diminish my love for steel bikes. But I can't justify the cost right now, and I don't know when I will. Maybe a bargain of a used bike will come my way when I don't expect it to. I can wait. And if that happens, it won't replace the steel bike. I doubt a CF bike will last a lifetime the way a steel bike will.
I was in there last week and admired the CF bikes. I decided I really would enjoy having one, and it would not diminish my love for steel bikes. But I can't justify the cost right now, and I don't know when I will. Maybe a bargain of a used bike will come my way when I don't expect it to. I can wait. And if that happens, it won't replace the steel bike. I doubt a CF bike will last a lifetime the way a steel bike will.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is something broken with that calculator for bikes - I remember it calculating that $500 in 1972 would be about $2600 today. But $500 in 1972 would buy you a really sweet top of the line racing bike. $2600 today barely gets you into mid-range. You'd have to spend more than 5 times that much to get top of the line bike today. Hence why I don't own a new top of the line racing bike.
I stand by my numbers.
#35
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,443 Posts
It depends on what you consider to be top of the line and how necessary it is to get top of the line. The curve of diminishing returns is much longer and flatter than it used to be. How much of a performance difference is there between a $2600 bike and a top of the line bike? Little, I would guess, and in the physical condition of most good riders, it is probably imperceptible. Therefore, $2600 really is functionally near the top of the line.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#36
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,514
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,398 Times
in
2,093 Posts
I couldn't figure out how anyone expects to be comfortable downshifting those inboard paddles from anything but the drops. I had to raise my hand off the hood every time I needed to push the paddle for a downshift, and the paddle was difficult to push, no less. It doesn't make sense for touring bikes...
...but someone else thought it did.
To each their own.
-Kurt
#37
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I don't dispute the inflation calculation. But the owner had the use of the bike for how many years? What would it have cost to rent it for that period?
I wonder if the difference is that back then the market price was set between serious (whether amateur or professional) racers, versus now a large number of well heeled poseurs are adding to the demand and are hence helping set the price?
I wonder if the difference is that back then the market price was set between serious (whether amateur or professional) racers, versus now a large number of well heeled poseurs are adding to the demand and are hence helping set the price?
I've wondered about that...but I'm leaning towards a different theory - looking at racing bikes through the early 80's, they hadn't changed much since 1950. Same 531 or Columbus tubing, same lugged construction, similar Campagnolo components...and Campgnolo didn't have much competition and only gradually made changes to their gear. By comparison today you almost have a technology war going on with consumers expecting new and improved products every year (look at 11-speeds, eletronic shifting, sub 15-lb bikes). That could be driving prices up. In some ways it's a shame though. I bet a lot cycling enthusiasts managed to scrape together $500 back in '72 but I can't imagine too many people coming up with $14,000 for a bicycle today.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#38
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I wasn't arguing with your numbers based on the Consumer Price Index. Just that bicycle prices have dramatically outpaced the index over time. I don't see how you dispute that.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#39
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,443 Posts
But it really doesn't matter, Kommisar89. As I said, the tail at the top end is longer but less steep. You actually get more for your money when spending up to maybe $2000 than you used to spend the equivalent amount in the past. There's not much need to spend more than that. The difference is that there's more OPPORTUNITY to spend more than that, and that didn't exist, for the most part.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#41
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
It depends on what you consider to be top of the line and how necessary it is to get top of the line. The curve of diminishing returns is much longer and flatter than it used to be. How much of a performance difference is there between a $2600 bike and a top of the line bike? Little, I would guess, and in the physical condition of most good riders, it is probably imperceptible. Therefore, $2600 really is functionally near the top of the line.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#42
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,443 Posts
Yeah, I rode a Varsity (before I sold it) downhill at high speed, no-hands. I felt totally secure on that boat. The brakes weren't bad, either!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#43
Bottecchia fan
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
I just tried Campagnolo's new Super Record 11-style Ergos, which were fitted to a touring bike.
I couldn't figure out how anyone expects to be comfortable downshifting those inboard paddles from anything but the drops. I had to raise my hand off the hood every time I needed to push the paddle for a downshift, and the paddle was difficult to push, no less. It doesn't make sense for touring bikes...
...but someone else thought it did.
To each their own.
-Kurt
I couldn't figure out how anyone expects to be comfortable downshifting those inboard paddles from anything but the drops. I had to raise my hand off the hood every time I needed to push the paddle for a downshift, and the paddle was difficult to push, no less. It doesn't make sense for touring bikes...
...but someone else thought it did.
To each their own.
-Kurt
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#44
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531
Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Yeah, I rode a Varsity (before I sold it) downhill at high speed, no-hands. I felt totally secure on that boat. The brakes weren't bad, either!
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
27 Posts
Can't see why everyone should like C&V bikes. I mean, it's basically an aesthetic decision to like them, though we can talk all we want about ride quality, cost, etc. (and these things do factor in), I think so much of it boils down to the aesthetics. We just like the way they look and ride. Obviously there are going to be differences in aesthetic opinion.
Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
Explaining C&V to many riders is like trying to explain the Stooges to a Celine Dion fan. They're just not going to get it. That's okay, I don't have to listen to Celine.
JMOs
Chombi
#46
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times
in
910 Posts
I agree on the function part. I have friends who raced, competitively, and sponsored. A bike was gear, pure and simple; made to be used until something better made them .1mph faster, somehow.
Mention "bike" and some will rattle off the latest, greatest stuff they just got. Others have either dropped their bike off in the shop, or are about to, or just got it back, wouldn't know what BB they had if their lives depended on it; they probably know more about their bike shoes than the bike.
We get along fine. They let me ride their bikes, and I let them ride mine.
Mention "bike" and some will rattle off the latest, greatest stuff they just got. Others have either dropped their bike off in the shop, or are about to, or just got it back, wouldn't know what BB they had if their lives depended on it; they probably know more about their bike shoes than the bike.
We get along fine. They let me ride their bikes, and I let them ride mine.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
#49
juneeaa memba!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: boogled up in...Idaho!
Posts: 5,632
Bikes: Crap. The box is not big enough...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I know, I know. I have said this before, but let me rephrase it in context and say it again. A person can buy a $5000 bike every year, ride the pee outta it all year, and throw it away at the end of the year. Every.year.for.the.rest.of.his.life. And not spend as much as one quintuple bypass costs. It ain't about the bike, it is about the engine.
That said, I have a lot of vintage bikes, and I like to ride 'em all.
That said, I have a lot of vintage bikes, and I like to ride 'em all.
#50
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 18
Bikes: Schwinn Frontier
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Newbie here and ever since I decided to go with an old 3 or 5 speed......my wife says she thinks I might be obsessed. I'm on this site daily, checking CL locally for potentials and cities that I'm not going to buy from just to see what old bikes are out there.
Today I looked at a 74 Suburban (10 speed but I figured why not) that was in pretty bad shape and was waaaay overpriced. The guy I called didn't know the frame size and said it "hadn't been ridden in quite a while" and it showed. I'm going on a 45 minute drive this week to check out a $25 black Austrian Sears three speed that's just been cleaned and tuned. And I'm pretty pumped.
This is a great site.
Today I looked at a 74 Suburban (10 speed but I figured why not) that was in pretty bad shape and was waaaay overpriced. The guy I called didn't know the frame size and said it "hadn't been ridden in quite a while" and it showed. I'm going on a 45 minute drive this week to check out a $25 black Austrian Sears three speed that's just been cleaned and tuned. And I'm pretty pumped.
This is a great site.
Last edited by mazr; 03-24-10 at 07:40 PM.