Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

A couple of unimportant questions.

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

A couple of unimportant questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-11, 02:40 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Posts: 115

Bikes: Soma Stanya Build, Trek build, Miyata 312, Miyata 710, Nashbar Toure MT, Giant hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Amesja
I'm just the opposite. I never really preferred James over Jim until the last few years, but I have ALWAYS hated Jimmy. It always has seemed like such a pejorative to me. I have a few cousins who insist on calling me that and it always annoys the heck out of me
You and I feel the same about Jimmy. I said they called me that, not that I liked it. They called me Jimmy as a kid and I too have cousins who still call me that. Not good. However, I still have a fondness for Dr Jimmy for some strange reason.

My guess is that others are getting sick of this Jim diversion.
DrJim is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 03:05 PM
  #27  
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,401

Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
He did say they were unimportant questions...
Amesja is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 03:20 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Posts: 115

Bikes: Soma Stanya Build, Trek build, Miyata 312, Miyata 710, Nashbar Toure MT, Giant hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Amesja
He did say they were unimportant questions...
Good point. I feel better.
DrJim is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 03:39 PM
  #29  
aka: Mike J.
 
treebound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: between Milwaukee and Sheboygan in Wisconsin
Posts: 3,405

Bikes: 1995 Trek 520 is the current primary bike.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 39 Posts
It's only unimportant until something falls off, kind of like the medical field.
__________________
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Life happens, don't be a spectator.
treebound is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 05:18 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Precession. That's the word I was looking for. Thanks y'all!

As for the straight legged forks, I suppose it's an aero thing, but visually lacks a bit of grace on a road bike to my eyes.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 05:28 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
For the 'Jims'. I had to look this up: https://names.mongabay.com/male_names.htm

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 05:47 PM
  #32  
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times in 232 Posts
This place is a regular Jim-nasium. And as one of the Jims I'd say Jim knowsium what he's talking about. But this is waaaay off topic.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 06:27 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You usually use the term precession when you want to describe a trajectory. I don't think the question is really about the path so much as it is about whay you would thread the device one way, versus another way. The answer to that has to do with the forces on the device, not the path of one object around the other.

I am not saying you won't see precessio. I am saying that precession does not answer the question.
Mike Mills is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 06:57 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Posts: 115

Bikes: Soma Stanya Build, Trek build, Miyata 312, Miyata 710, Nashbar Toure MT, Giant hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
You usually use the term precession when you want to describe a trajectory. I don't think the question is really about the path so much as it is about whay you would thread the device one way, versus another way. The answer to that has to do with the forces on the device, not the path of one object around the other.

I am not saying you won't see precessio. I am saying that precession does not answer the question.
I can only say that you are wrong. Go get out your old physics book and reread the places where precession is discussed. I believe you will find that precession is not discussed at all in regard to trajectories but is a central feature in the discussion of rotating bodies. Look at any discussion of spinning tops for example. I assume you mean by trajectories the path that bodies take under the influence of gravity. The only place where precession might come into play there would be the rotation of spinning bodies such as bullets and shells.

In this case we are dealing with a mechanical phenomenon that is a precession. The animated diagram that was posted earlier is a good representation of what is going on and you might try the experiment I suggested with a pencil. I tried it myself just to satisfy myself. You can hold one end of the pencil loosely with one hand (make a little hole with your thumb and forefinger) and rotate the other end in a circle like I suggested. You will clearly see that the pencil rotates in the direction opposite to the direction that you are rotating the free end. That's what i'm talking about.
DrJim is offline  
Old 09-02-11, 09:03 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm not going to engage in a pissing contest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession

In the examples you cite you are talking about the movement of the pencil inside the ring or the direction of the spin axis of the top over time. Movement over time = trajectory or path.

Last edited by Mike Mills; 09-03-11 at 11:11 AM.
Mike Mills is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
huggy
Bicycle Mechanics
9
07-25-19 01:13 PM
Jiggle
Bicycle Mechanics
20
08-13-17 07:46 PM
Bart L
Tandem Cycling
1
07-03-15 03:36 PM
molsen
Bicycle Mechanics
2
06-17-13 01:06 PM
rhern213
Bicycle Mechanics
21
02-23-13 02:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.