Specialties T.A. Cyclotouriste (a.k.a. Pro 5 Vis) History/Info
#51
Senior Member
Colonel thank you, I do plan to run the tandem as a double and the TA chart for a Tandem might be for a triple at 127 mm ( I noticed that the chart says a double with Shimano is 115 mm and 118.5 mm with # 344 T.A. spindle.
Also the rear Drum brake Hub spacing on this Gitane Tandem is 124 mm with a 5 speed freewheel, does the wider rear hub effect the width of the BB spindle?
Also the rear Drum brake Hub spacing on this Gitane Tandem is 124 mm with a 5 speed freewheel, does the wider rear hub effect the width of the BB spindle?
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
#53
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montara, CA
Posts: 215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
TA Pro 5 vis crank arm length
I've been trying to sort out more or less what was the original production dates of this crank. I understand it might be being made again but I havent confirmed.
In the meantime, I'm compiling a bunch of TA Cyclotourist info in one thread as I haven't seen some of it here, let alone in one place. I can find a lot of reading on them. Here's some of what I've learned (feel free to let me know if you think any of it is incorrect)
- work well with 115-118mm ISO (but JIS seems to work too) square taper bottom brackets. 120 or 123.5 to run it as a triple. The taper is apparently proprietary so it might be best to use a TA spindle if possible.
- 50.4 bcd
- can be finicky with front derailleurs as you need a flat cage due to the clearance between the outer part of the outer ring and the crank arm. click here to see
- they have a very narrow Q-Factor, perhaps the narrowest for a double.
- to remove the rings you must remove the arm, can be a pain
- the chain rings are very hard/durable and are available in increments of 1 between 26 (possible 25 at one point)-64. The large ones however have too much flex for racers, which is part of the reason why they were not used in that capacity. Outer chain wheels can have anywhere from 40-64 teeth, middle and inner 26-50.
- can be run as a double or a triple.
- available in lengths of 165, 170, 172.5, 180.
- they are aluminum allow, very light, english pedal threads.
-According to Sutherland's 3rd Edition, the TA extractor threads are 23mm X 1mm, and you need either a TA or Var 408 puller or a Park CPP-1.
some similar cranks are Sugino PX (no longer made), VO Grand Cru, Stronglight 49d, Williams AB.77 and I'm sure more.
Phew, that was a lot. Anyhow, who the heck can tell me when they began and ended production?
#55
Senior Member
Within the past month or so on eBay, I saw saw an orphan drive-side Shimano AX Dyna-Drive with the 50.4 bcd system. Couldn't believe my eyes! Seller alleged it was part of the first-wave Shimano Deer's Head group. In case you are wondering, Dyna-Drive aka AX was the system with the 1" pedal spindle that located the rider's foot at the axis of the pedal.
I guess here it is:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/shimano1982/pages/10.html
Deore group, as it seems.
I guess here it is:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/shimano1982/pages/10.html
Deore group, as it seems.
Last edited by Drakonchik; 01-01-12 at 11:23 AM.
#56
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NEK of Vermont
Posts: 18
Bikes: '63 Raleigh Gran Sport, '72 Lambert Pro, '79 Motobecane Grand Jubile, '83 Trek 850, '23 Blix Vika + Flex
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
TA cranks / Viscount / Lambert
Thought I would see this. A triple TA was the perfect swap for the original double crank on my '72 Lambert Pro. The chain rings were all interchangeable but the TA had a much nicer finish. Still running the TA with all the Lambert parts stashed away. I also remember buying a spare inner chain ring because I was sure it was so light it would eventually break - it hasn't so far.
Thought I would see this. A triple TA was the perfect swap for the original double crank on my '72 Lambert Pro. The chain rings were all interchangeable but the TA had a much nicer finish. Still running the TA with all the Lambert parts stashed away. I also remember buying a spare inner chain ring because I was sure it was so light it would eventually break - it hasn't so far.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times
in
404 Posts
I never researched that, cool. Someone once told me that the 49D stood for 1949 Double chainring, an evolution of the 33S (1933 Single chainring) (Is 33 the right #?) and I never questioned it, particularly as I cannot right now recall a 1933 front derailleur.
Anyway, no idea why I like the Stronglight so much more than the better-looking TA's. For 5-pin cranks I've always only used a single chainring anyway, as not having a spider means side to side flex of the ring, scraping the front derailleur, in my experience (YMMV).
Anyway, no idea why I like the Stronglight so much more than the better-looking TA's. For 5-pin cranks I've always only used a single chainring anyway, as not having a spider means side to side flex of the ring, scraping the front derailleur, in my experience (YMMV).
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#58
Senior Member
The "D" in 49d stands for duralumin (aluminum).
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
#59
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NEK of Vermont
Posts: 18
Bikes: '63 Raleigh Gran Sport, '72 Lambert Pro, '79 Motobecane Grand Jubile, '83 Trek 850, '23 Blix Vika + Flex
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
TA cranks / Lambert
__________________
'63 Huffy Mark 10 = '63 Raleigh Gran Sport
'63 Huffy Mark 10 = '63 Raleigh Gran Sport
#62
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NEK of Vermont
Posts: 18
Bikes: '63 Raleigh Gran Sport, '72 Lambert Pro, '79 Motobecane Grand Jubile, '83 Trek 850, '23 Blix Vika + Flex
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Just found a pair of Lambert brake levers and handlebar unit. Wish I had the hubs and bottom unit but I replaced them with Phils years ago; might have a 'groupo' then.
Wish I knew how to upsize photo but here is the Lambert with TA rings.
Wish I knew how to upsize photo but here is the Lambert with TA rings.
__________________
'63 Huffy Mark 10 = '63 Raleigh Gran Sport
'63 Huffy Mark 10 = '63 Raleigh Gran Sport
#64
bring back ASCII art
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread dig!
Just doing a little bit of research on these and their clones. I'm considering ~maybe~ lashing out on a set of Sugino PXs presently set up with a triple for a late 60s/70s period Randonneur build of mine.
Can anyone say with any certainty if the crank bolt sets are interchangeable between the Specialites and the PXs? Considering if I do go this route, I may convert it to a double with new 'rings from Boulder Cycle and see I would require different bolts.
Just doing a little bit of research on these and their clones. I'm considering ~maybe~ lashing out on a set of Sugino PXs presently set up with a triple for a late 60s/70s period Randonneur build of mine.
Can anyone say with any certainty if the crank bolt sets are interchangeable between the Specialites and the PXs? Considering if I do go this route, I may convert it to a double with new 'rings from Boulder Cycle and see I would require different bolts.
#66
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#67
No one cares
Thread Starter
i also have both PX and TA cranks and change the chain rings around universally.
__________________
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
#68
bring back ASCII art
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks guys.
Knowing the that rings were interchangeable, I guess it would follow that the bolts & spacers would be fine. I guess I was fairly confident, but didn't want to leave anything to chance. Shipping from the US really hits the overall purchase cost to us Down Under.
Nice to hear it from people who've run the combo.
Knowing the that rings were interchangeable, I guess it would follow that the bolts & spacers would be fine. I guess I was fairly confident, but didn't want to leave anything to chance. Shipping from the US really hits the overall purchase cost to us Down Under.
Nice to hear it from people who've run the combo.
#69
Junior Member
Does anyone know when TA stopped making cranks with the closed pedal hole? I have a complete original Singer from 75 with the closed pedal holes.
1975 Alex Singer
I also have a Gitane tandem with the TA cranks with closed pedal holes. I have not taken the time to date the Gitane yet. The tandem also has four chainrings, I assume that this is a custom mod. but I have not taken it apart yet to inspect.
Thanks,
Chris
1975 Alex Singer
I also have a Gitane tandem with the TA cranks with closed pedal holes. I have not taken the time to date the Gitane yet. The tandem also has four chainrings, I assume that this is a custom mod. but I have not taken it apart yet to inspect.
Thanks,
Chris
#70
Senior Member
Schwinn used TA Pro 5 vis cranksets w/Cyclotouriste chainrings on the S/S Tourer, Sports Tourer and Paramount Tandem from '68 through '76. I know that in the case of Schwinn models using these cranks that the pedal eye plugs were eliminated from the crank arms some time in early to mid-'71. Since Schwinn was a large customer and these were in short supply at the time I believe this paralleled TA production. Perhaps Singer had an inventory of '71 and earlier crank arms that lasted them for awhile?
Last edited by Metacortex; 08-02-15 at 02:57 PM.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
Some Lambert/TA copy marginalia for anyone interested:
I found a Lambert TA-copy crank on eBay for reasonable and decided to use it on my 1x8 IGH Lambert project, got the right size chainring either from someone here or Boulder Bikes, mounted the ring on the bottom side of the crank to improve the chainline and clearance for my chainguard and rode it around awhile. Long story short, the 5 bolt holes on the 50.4 BCD crank arm are slightly off-center in relation to the crank spindle and the chain tensions and de-tensions with each revolution as you ride, since the chainring is subtly moving forward and back depending on where you are in the spin cycle!
Not something you'd expect from early 70s industrial England, eh? At any rate, it's not something you'd notice if you were running it on a derailleur bike. I rotated the ring to all five possible positions, this is the most centered I could get. Pic shows a little out-of roundness here, but it looks worse in person.
Also, the crank puller threads are 22x1, so the standard (not TA) tool is what works there.
I found a Lambert TA-copy crank on eBay for reasonable and decided to use it on my 1x8 IGH Lambert project, got the right size chainring either from someone here or Boulder Bikes, mounted the ring on the bottom side of the crank to improve the chainline and clearance for my chainguard and rode it around awhile. Long story short, the 5 bolt holes on the 50.4 BCD crank arm are slightly off-center in relation to the crank spindle and the chain tensions and de-tensions with each revolution as you ride, since the chainring is subtly moving forward and back depending on where you are in the spin cycle!
Not something you'd expect from early 70s industrial England, eh? At any rate, it's not something you'd notice if you were running it on a derailleur bike. I rotated the ring to all five possible positions, this is the most centered I could get. Pic shows a little out-of roundness here, but it looks worse in person.
Also, the crank puller threads are 22x1, so the standard (not TA) tool is what works there.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 08-01-15 at 11:31 PM.
#72
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
#73
Senior Member
Anyone ever use a TA with a current Campy or Shimano 10 speed? I have a really nice TA crank I pulled off an 1982 Stumpjumper. It's looking for a new home.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
thanks for the clarifications/edits Southpaw! That helps. What i'm really looking for is the production dates though, or maybe just an idea of when they began being producted!
btw, i forget that I used to own yet another copy or similair crank. A Milremo.
it's cottered, steel arms, and actually had TA rings. RHM has it now. I have the rings.
btw, i forget that I used to own yet another copy or similair crank. A Milremo.
it's cottered, steel arms, and actually had TA rings. RHM has it now. I have the rings.
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Some Lambert/TA copy marginalia for anyone interested:
I found a Lambert TA-copy crank on eBay for reasonable and decided to use it on my 1x8 IGH Lambert project, got the right size chainring either from someone here or Boulder Bikes, mounted the ring on the bottom side of the crank to improve the chainline and clearance for my chainguard and rode it around awhile. Long story short, the 5 bolt holes on the 50.4 BCD crank arm are slightly off-center in relation to the crank spindle and the chain tensions and de-tensions with each revolution as you ride, since the chainring is subtly moving forward and back depending on where you are in the spin cycle!
Not something you'd expect from early 70s industrial England, eh? At any rate, it's not something you'd notice if you were running it on a derailleur bike. I rotated the ring to all five possible positions, this is the most centered I could get. Pic shows a little out-of roundness here, but it looks worse in person.
Also, the crank puller threads are 22x1, so the standard (not TA) tool is what works there.
I found a Lambert TA-copy crank on eBay for reasonable and decided to use it on my 1x8 IGH Lambert project, got the right size chainring either from someone here or Boulder Bikes, mounted the ring on the bottom side of the crank to improve the chainline and clearance for my chainguard and rode it around awhile. Long story short, the 5 bolt holes on the 50.4 BCD crank arm are slightly off-center in relation to the crank spindle and the chain tensions and de-tensions with each revolution as you ride, since the chainring is subtly moving forward and back depending on where you are in the spin cycle!
Not something you'd expect from early 70s industrial England, eh? At any rate, it's not something you'd notice if you were running it on a derailleur bike. I rotated the ring to all five possible positions, this is the most centered I could get. Pic shows a little out-of roundness here, but it looks worse in person.
Also, the crank puller threads are 22x1, so the standard (not TA) tool is what works there.