Factors that affect saddle tilt?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Factors that affect saddle tilt?
As noted I this lengthy post,
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vi...sh-ending.html
I just built up my Schwinn Paramount with a new Brooks Pro. Having read in various places that many people find they need to have the Brooks nose angled upward, I was not surprised to discover same thing, even though my plastic saddles are all level, although I am surprised at how significant the upward tilt is. I have a second bike, with a shallower seat tube angle but more seat-handlebar drop where the upward tilt of the leather saddle is considerably less. In addition, when riding in a more aggressive position-- in drops or on hoods --the saddle feels right as pictured, but if I sit up almost straight, soft pedaling with hands on top of bar or no-handed, I feel like I could use even more upward tilt. So I am sort of curious about what factors folks have found effect leather saddle angle.
https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vi...sh-ending.html
I just built up my Schwinn Paramount with a new Brooks Pro. Having read in various places that many people find they need to have the Brooks nose angled upward, I was not surprised to discover same thing, even though my plastic saddles are all level, although I am surprised at how significant the upward tilt is. I have a second bike, with a shallower seat tube angle but more seat-handlebar drop where the upward tilt of the leather saddle is considerably less. In addition, when riding in a more aggressive position-- in drops or on hoods --the saddle feels right as pictured, but if I sit up almost straight, soft pedaling with hands on top of bar or no-handed, I feel like I could use even more upward tilt. So I am sort of curious about what factors folks have found effect leather saddle angle.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
Your personal comfort decides. That is a pretty extreme upward tilt though. I'd do some longer rides, 30 miles or so, to assess the tilt.
Factors - how your pelvis is built, how much soft tissue and where, preference for riding position, tension of the saddle.
Factors - how your pelvis is built, how much soft tissue and where, preference for riding position, tension of the saddle.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,996 Posts
Whether you plan to have children.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
A big factor is how much your slide your butt forward or backward as the terrain changes. If your butt is planted in one position on the saddle all the time, then a slight upward tilt is OK. If you like to slide backwards and forwards to use different muscles at different times, then a more level or even very slightly downward tilt is common.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,522
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
635 Posts
Also having to tilt a saddle to somewhat extreme angels for comfort usually indicates a worn out or bad saddle choice to small or too big. A good saddle should feel comfy and nice with a good deal of support at the basically correct horizontal angel.
#6
Senior Member
Reach can be a big contributor, I'd try setting the saddle as far back as possible and lowing the height a hair to compensate for the extra setback.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
I have unusually long arms and legs (and feet) for a six-footer, and my saddles all tilt nose down just a bit. How much depends on the shape of the saddle. My top tubes are all between 57.5 and 60.5 cm, with seat tubes between 61 and 65cm. Each one of these bikes is set so I could ride it a century in pretty decent comfort.
Just my one data point.
Everyone fits a little different.
Just my one data point.
Everyone fits a little different.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
I noted it in your other thread but didn't want to say it. Saddle adjustment is a personal thing.
But, yours is quite far forward too. I would move it back a bit and tilt the nose up just above
horizontal, and start from there.
But, yours is quite far forward too. I would move it back a bit and tilt the nose up just above
horizontal, and start from there.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
FWIW, while googling around for I for on the subject, I came across a thread referencing this and other shots of Sheldon Brown bikes with up tipped Brooks saddles. So I guess I am not the only one. it does look weird, though.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Forksbent, MN
Posts: 3,190
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 301 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
Agree, newer saddles have you sliding quite a bit more than when they are broken in. Setting a belt or brooks dead flat for break in seems to make it take longer since you don't find a point to "divot" quite as quickly, and being a little slippery also doesn't help settling into a single spot.
With a new to me belt, I usually put the front up a bit more than normal. It lets my sit bones divot the seat (takes a while). Then I'll flatten it out just a bit to allow me to use multiple saddle positions when needed. The divots are still there to do most the riding on, but I have more options for sliding to the front if I want to do a "hammy climb" when the quads are toasted.
With a new to me belt, I usually put the front up a bit more than normal. It lets my sit bones divot the seat (takes a while). Then I'll flatten it out just a bit to allow me to use multiple saddle positions when needed. The divots are still there to do most the riding on, but I have more options for sliding to the front if I want to do a "hammy climb" when the quads are toasted.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,303
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
33 Posts
I've thought about this a lot, largely because I tilt my saddles in a relatively severe nose-down orientation - enough to make many people cringe.
I used to ride with the saddle just slightly tilted, but now I find I like more downward tilt for several reasons:
1) riding the drops mostly, always pedaling with the foot fully extended, shoulders down, derriere up.
2) using the saddle more as a balance point than a "seat"
3) counteracting rearward forces from mashing
3) the curve of the saddle
4) the size of the bike
5) individual anatomy
It adds up to personal preference, based on how you ride, what you ride, how you pedal, and your own skeleton.
I used to ride with the saddle just slightly tilted, but now I find I like more downward tilt for several reasons:
1) riding the drops mostly, always pedaling with the foot fully extended, shoulders down, derriere up.
2) using the saddle more as a balance point than a "seat"
3) counteracting rearward forces from mashing
3) the curve of the saddle
4) the size of the bike
5) individual anatomy
It adds up to personal preference, based on how you ride, what you ride, how you pedal, and your own skeleton.
__________________
- Auchen
- Auchen
#14
Senior Member
#15
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I don't know how much of this has been studied 'scientifically.' I have only vague impressions and suspicions based on personal experience. Based on that, I'm thinking there must be something about the shape of the sit bones, as well as the various factors already discussed. It's commonly observed that ideal saddle width is related to saddle-to-handlebar drop; that is, if you like your handlebar much lower than your saddle, you'll want a narrower saddle. This is partly due, I think, to the way the pelvis is tilted forward.
But anatomy is not the only factor. The lower your handlebar, the more of your weight is supported by your arms. If you're accustomed to supporting much of your weight on your arms and you take your hands off the bar, the redistribution of weight is going to pull your pelvis forward and off the saddle; so you tilt the saddle to offset this.
Taking all this together, I wonder: if you prefer your saddle pointed downward, shouldn't you perhaps be riding a narrower saddle? If you have your saddle pointed severely upward, perhaps you should get a slightly wider one?
Fore/aft positioning of the saddle relative to the pedals, and fore/aft positioning of the handlebar, are of course related factors that I am consciously ignoring at the moment.
But anatomy is not the only factor. The lower your handlebar, the more of your weight is supported by your arms. If you're accustomed to supporting much of your weight on your arms and you take your hands off the bar, the redistribution of weight is going to pull your pelvis forward and off the saddle; so you tilt the saddle to offset this.
Taking all this together, I wonder: if you prefer your saddle pointed downward, shouldn't you perhaps be riding a narrower saddle? If you have your saddle pointed severely upward, perhaps you should get a slightly wider one?
Fore/aft positioning of the saddle relative to the pedals, and fore/aft positioning of the handlebar, are of course related factors that I am consciously ignoring at the moment.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
Last edited by rhm; 04-15-14 at 06:49 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,996 Posts
Sometimes it is easy to see what is going on without the rider.
With this bike, there is decent drop from the saddle to the bars. To the point where the rider will probably refer the tops or the hoods as a typical hands position. Not a bad thing at all. If the rider is cramped between the saddle and the bars I could see the saddle being angled to compensate, even the other extreme, angled up to prevent creeping forward.
It was mentioned that other saddles are different. Some are not built for a leather Brooks.
Final thought, even if you set all your saddles to the same setback from the bottom bracket, if the saddles are not all the same make and model, you will not necessarily be in the same position. There are no C&V saddle standards. (There are now some UCI saddle standards, and one is the saddle is to be essentially level)
#17
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 423 Times
in
282 Posts
Final thought, even if you set all your saddles to the same setback from the bottom bracket, if the saddles are not all the same make and model, you will not necessarily be in the same position. There are no C&V saddle standards. (There are now some UCI saddle standards, and one is the saddle is to be essentially level)
Different set-up and fitting on a new generation compact frame vs. classics. Of course its all subjective but there's definitely a different 'base set-up' for body position between generations.
This is a good guideline:
Setup | Selle Anatomica
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
I have a 40 year old Brooks Pro that is my go to saddle. It is nearly flat for best comfort. On my other bikes, I have tried a number of different saddles based on what was available. None are as comfortable so I started looking for more Brooks saddles. I have have a Pro with large rivits which I don't like as well because I can feel them and a brand new Swift which is not broken in. The Flite is also used with it flat but I can only last about 30 miles on it. I have no idea how long the old brooks is good for.
My other issue is with the post, a Campy SR. It is up against the stop and the saddle is flat! Has anyone else run into the same issue? This is on my Colnago Superissimo so the ST is not exactly relaxed!
My other issue is with the post, a Campy SR. It is up against the stop and the saddle is flat! Has anyone else run into the same issue? This is on my Colnago Superissimo so the ST is not exactly relaxed!
#20
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 423 Times
in
282 Posts
In the OP's pic, is that the correct seat post cradle pitch for that frame? If so and a mid-1980's, my guess it was originally fitted with a saddle having a plastic sub-base. With the new saddle I probably would swap the post for something with a micro tilt adjustability.
Last edited by crank_addict; 04-15-14 at 12:26 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,830 Times
in
1,996 Posts
+1 indeed
Different set-up and fitting on a new generation compact frame vs. classics. Of course its all subjective but there's definitely a different 'base set-up' for body position between generations.
This is a good guideline:
Setup | Selle Anatomica
Different set-up and fitting on a new generation compact frame vs. classics. Of course its all subjective but there's definitely a different 'base set-up' for body position between generations.
This is a good guideline:
Setup | Selle Anatomica
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1608 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,223
Bikes: 2012 Moots VaMoots-74 Peugeot Mixtie U018-73 Peugeot U018
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
I agree that having my Brooks Swift titled slightly upwards helps in the comfort zone!
__________________
Moots VaMoots 2012-Peugeot Mixte 1974-Peugeot Mixte 1973
Moots VaMoots 2012-Peugeot Mixte 1974-Peugeot Mixte 1973
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
+1 indeed
Different set-up and fitting on a new generation compact frame vs. classics. Of course its all subjective but there's definitely a different 'base set-up' for body position between generations.
This is a good guideline:
Setup | Selle Anatomica
Different set-up and fitting on a new generation compact frame vs. classics. Of course its all subjective but there's definitely a different 'base set-up' for body position between generations.
This is a good guideline:
Setup | Selle Anatomica
So video does bear out some up tilt for selle saddles. I played around a bit with set back ( not much since Brooks rails permit so little fore-aft movement) and saddle height per various recs and now have saddle closer to level thatn before -- more nose up than the 1/4 inch the video suggests as a staring point, but considerably less than it was before. Feels ok on the trainer but we'll see next time I go for ride.
#25
Senior Member
If I am in the drops, my B-17 is good with upward tilt. If I'm on the horns or the bar tops, a flat setting is much better. On the other hand, my Belgian Lepper set at flat fits me in any position. Perhaps I should ride the B-17 for 5K miles and see if it evolves. Yea right ....!
__________________
Vitus 979, Simplon 4 Star, Gazelle Champion Mondial, Woodrup Giro, Dawes Atlantis
Vitus 979, Simplon 4 Star, Gazelle Champion Mondial, Woodrup Giro, Dawes Atlantis