Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1
    Senior Member dbikingman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Spokane/Tri-Cities WA
    My Bikes
    mountain bike, road bike
    Posts
    1,335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Tired of the muscle weights more then fat agruement

    First off it doesn't weigh more. If you have a pound of fat or a pound of muscle you still only have a pound It is a density issue, muscle is 7 times more dense then fat. So equal size cubes of muscle and fat would have the muscle weighing 7 times more.

    But, here is my rant. People are always saying your weight loss is slowing or stopped because you are gaining mucsle. Unless you are in the gym lifting, most likely lifting would have to be your primary goal and not cycling, you are toning your muscles but not building many new ones.

    Here's my logic. Say you weigh 350 and have 40% body fat, that is 210 of lean muscle. At 35% body fat you have about 247 of lean muscle. If you got down to a sleek 12% and didn't lose any body fat you would still weigh 235. Typically, you are going to lose muscle when you lose weight. Exercise helps to reduce the amount muscle lost, but to gain muscle is not easy. Your muscles may respond better to effort but that is through training not added muscle.

    As a clyde you have more lean muscle then the skinnys have weight

    Is my logic flawed? Done with rant for the day.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    46
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE]Say you weigh 350 and have 40% body fat, that is 210 of lean muscle/QUOTE]

    Don't forget you have organs, bones, fluid and other stuff inside you too, not just fat and muscle.

    I just watched "Pumping Iron" and couldn't believe that Arnold Schwarzenegger only weighed 15 pounds more than me when he was in his prime, he was huge! It really shows the density/volume differences between fat and muscle. BTW he was 6'2" @ 240 lbs. I am 6'2" @ 225 lbs

  3. #3
    Senior Member deraltekluge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    My Bikes
    Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
    Posts
    1,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dbikingman View Post
    First off it doesn't weigh more. If you have a pound of fat or a pound of muscle you still only have a pound It is a density issue, muscle is 7 times more dense then fat. So equal size cubes of muscle and fat would have the muscle weighing 7 times more.
    Seven times? Not hardly!

    Muscle is a little denser than water, fat is a little less dense than water. The ratio between the two is about 1.18, not 7.

  4. #4
    Downtown Spanky Brown bautieri's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Camp Hill, Pennsyltucky
    My Bikes
    07 Raliegh Grand Sport 98ish Mongoose Manuever
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes and no.

    If the measurements go down and weight stays the same then yes weight loss (not fat loss) is stalled. Argument stands. Your complaint is with people who whose measurements are not changing while weight remains the same then blaming muscle mass.

    Depending on genetics and training type yes it is easy to put on muscle mass to a point. Pushups for example are one of the best (and most overlooked) exercises that do not require any gym equipment so that argument is out of the way too. As are dips and pull ups, you know, all those exercises we hated in gym class . Yes clydes may have more lean muscle mass than skinnies have weight altogether, did you think that extra 150lbs is moving itself?

    An yes in the sense that a pound of feathers is the same as a pound of iron.

    Just relax a bit then keep on doing what works for you

  5. #5
    Perma-n00b Askel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Da UP, eh.
    My Bikes
    Kona Hoss, Kona Jake, Trek 1500
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One thing I really miss about being in the 300lb. range was that with the number of calories it took to maintain that mass, all I had to do was just show up at the gym with any consistency and I'd add muscle like crazy...

    I guess I'm in agreement with the whole BS line that people give about increasing their muscle mass to justify their lack of progress, but it is still possible to increase your fitness while staying at the same weight. But it's still no excuse for not losing weight.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    My Bikes
    2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
    Posts
    1,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have been finding that im putting on a lot of leg muscle and while i havent been taking measurements i have been noticing a different fit to my clothes. My pants are looser at the waist and tighter in the thighs.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Iowa City, IA
    My Bikes
    2008 Surly LHT, 2008 Trek 7.2fx
    Posts
    433
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pound for pound lead is no heavier than air. Pound for pound I am no heavier than Lance Armstrong. Uh?
    2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    2008 Trek 7.2fx

  8. #8
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,019
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    If you prefer, it can be looked at as a body volume density argument. You are losing volume less quickly because as you reduce the lower density fat, you are increasing both the higher density muscle tissue AND Bone mass. This is particularly true if you're doing load bearing exercise like weights or strength training using body mass. You aren't losing weight, but you are losing inches shows a correlation of .95 to this theory, by the way.

    Put another way, the weight you lose in fat is going to the leg muscles. I have thigh measurements like the skinny guys have waist measurements, almost, for example.
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    2014 Salsa Vaya 2, 2013 Trek Stache 8
    Posts
    243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless you are in the gym lifting, most likely lifting would have to be your primary goal and not cycling, you are toning your muscles but not building many new ones.
    I have built a crazy amount of muscle in just a few months by spending an average of 1-2 hours per week lifting weights. Usually 3 sets @ 10 reps. I never took measurements but I would say my arms and legs are the same size or bigger than they were when I was 323lbs in February. I'm 265 now and have problems finding shirts with big enough sleeves to be comfortable. I'm not trying to brag (well, maybe a little), but a significant amount of muscle can be gained with light/moderate weight training in a short amount of time even though cardio was my main focus. This picture was taken exactly 3 months after my first trip to the gym. I was nothing but flab before.


  10. #10
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,942
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gearhead82 View Post
    I have built a crazy amount of muscle in just a few months by spending an average of 1-2 hours per week lifting weights. Usually 3 sets @ 10 reps. I never took measurements but I would say my arms and legs are the same size or bigger than they were when I was 323lbs in February. I'm 265 now and have problems finding shirts with big enough sleeves to be comfortable. I'm not trying to brag (well, maybe a little), but a significant amount of muscle can be gained with light/moderate weight training in a short amount of time even though cardio was my main focus. This picture was taken exactly 3 months after my first trip to the gym. I was nothing but flab before.

    There are 2 ways of lifting weights, you can lift heavy weights a few times, or light weights many times, for example at work I lift and carry boxes, the total weight per shift is around 6,000lbs Now that's only half the story though, there are about 600 pieces. Some will weigh one pound, some will weigh considerable more, but the average is around 10lbs. Both will build muscle and strength, but the many reps at light weights will not build bulky muscles. This is more important for women then men, a guy who looks like Arnie is fine, a woman that looks like Arnie,

  11. #11
    Thread Killer evblazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Marfan Syndrome-Clyde-DFW, TX
    My Bikes
    Fuji Touring Xtracycle, Merlin Road, Bacchetta Giro 26 (Sold), Challenge Hurricane, Cruzbike Sofrider
    Posts
    1,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dbikingman View Post
    But, here is my rant. People are always saying your weight loss is slowing or stopped because you are gaining mucsle. Unless you are in the gym lifting, most likely lifting would have to be your primary goal and not cycling, you are toning your muscles but not building many new ones.
    Yeah I love that line especially after
    Well meaning coworker: Wow you look like you have lost alot of weight you have been cycling alot
    EV: Yeah I'll be at 500 _Hours_ of cycling for the year by the end of the month lots of good cardio
    WMCW: Oh wow that is alot how much weight have you lost lately
    EV: .....Zero
    WMCW: Oh............................... it must be muscle replacing fat has your size changed alot? I bet you have lost a few inches
    EV: Nope
    WMCW: Oh well maybe it just moved around a bit you look great *slinks off*
    EV: Thanks

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NE Tennessee
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Circuit / Diamondback Sorrento
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I started riding, I didn't lose much weight but I lost inches around my waist. I look thinner but my legs bulked up quite a bit so I think that there is something to the fat loss muscle gain argument.
    Old enough to know better and old enough to forget that I do.

  13. #13
    grilled cheesus aham23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    8675309
    My Bikes
    2010 CAAD9 Custom, 06 Giant TCR C2 & 05 Specialized Hardrock Sport
    Posts
    6,933
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Askel View Post
    One thing I really miss about being in the 300lb. range was that with the number of calories it took to maintain that mass, all I had to do was just show up at the gym with any consistency and I'd add muscle like crazy...

    I guess I'm in agreement with the whole BS line that people give about increasing their muscle mass to justify their lack of progress, but it is still possible to increase your fitness while staying at the same weight. But it's still no excuse for not losing weight.
    i agree. most of the time when the statement is made it is being used as an excuse. pure and simple. later.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Near Sacramento
    Posts
    4,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by aham23 View Post
    i agree. most of the time when the statement is made it is being used as an excuse. pure and simple. later.
    I agree with that. I even used it once myself. I'm so ashamed
    -------

    Some sort of pithy irrelevant one-liner should go here.

  15. #15
    Grammar Cop Condorita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Papa Smurf's Lair
    My Bikes
    in my sig line
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    then = sequence
    than = alternative
    That which does not kill me has made a massive tactical blunder.
    Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen. Louis L'Amour
    '07 Giant Cypress WSD "Radagast the Beige-and-Black" * '97 (?) Bianchi Premio "Orion" * '09 Trek Allant "The Black Pearl"

  16. #16
    Banned. Mr. Beanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Upland Ca
    My Bikes
    Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
    Posts
    20,031
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    So like all my friends say I looked bigger when I was at 220 lbs. So like I'm 245 now and fat so I think like fat weighs more than muscle!

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    My Bikes
    Trek Madone 5.9 SL
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As everyone mentioned a LBS = LBS no matter what the object. The only time that the "muscle weighs more than fat" is when a "FAT" person weighs less than a "SKINNIER" person. When I was bodybuilding, I carried about 4-6% bodyfat; therefore, my mass was more compact and dense. Often times, I weighed a lot more than other people who were visually much larger.

    Overall fat is not as dense as muscle and takes up more space; thereby, giving the observer more mass to "SEE". This is the reason that people say "Muscle weighs more than Fat".
    "Everything is possible, the impossible just takes a bit longer."

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wogsterca View Post
    This is more important for women then men, a guy who looks like Arnie is fine, a woman that looks like Arnie,
    Why?
    I want to live.

  19. #19
    Time Trialist & Duathlete mtv8dmarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Claremont, CA
    My Bikes
    Custom built road bike & custom built TT bike
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damnable View Post
    Why?
    I personally think it's a preference and something to do with our male egos. I don't particularly want to think a woman can snap me in half like a twig. I also don't like the look of over built women. Women that are fit is one thing, ripped is another.

    That all being said I'll just say that before I started cycling almost 2 years ago I weighed upwards of 220. The fat came off quickly and since I was already muscular in a cycling sense from my former years the muscles reappeared as the fat burned off. A year later I settled at a steady 182. I've added a little muscle to my legs but overall I just trimmed down.

    If I look at my driver's license picture when I was 220, I look much heavier than now.

  20. #20
    Rabbit Habbit! Jerry in So IL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Johnston City, IL
    My Bikes
    Specialized Sirrus 08
    Posts
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First of all, its in your DNA. Ben, you don't set what you weight, your Mom and Dad have already.

    Second, are body image of ourselves is very important. If you don't have a good one, its all up hill.

    Jerry
    I'll be needing that for squirels and such....

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mtv8dmarine View Post
    I personally think it's a preference and something to do with our male egos. I don't particularly want to think a woman can snap me in half like a twig. I also don't like the look of over built women. Women that are fit is one thing, ripped is another.
    Well at least you are honest and say that it is your opinion and not generalised. Do you think it's an inferiority thing with other men as well? I'm curious as well, how 'overbuilt' does a woman have to be to become unattractive? Follow the link I am about to post. It's Hayley Bateup, who is just about the fittest woman in Australia currently and a bit of a rolemodel for me. Is she too buff for you?
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/bri...641575872.html

    But suggesting that women do not do heavy weights but instead to lighter with higher reps so they don't get bulky muscles is irresponsible. Firstly, it's not true. Secondly, it goes against medical opinions of better overall health for women. Thirdly, like most physical characteristics, some women will naturally have higher or lower muslce mass than others. I have a lot of respect for women with a lot of muscle because I know they have to work so much harder for it than men.

    But mainly brining up body image and physical characteristics in such a way, especially of those who obviously worked hard for it and who do not have too much fat, isn't in the spirit of this forum.

    And even if it was meant as a jest, it's not funny.
    Last edited by damnable; 10-25-08 at 09:58 PM.
    I want to live.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    536
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    nothing tastes as good as fit feels....

    nothing tastes as good as fit feels....

    nothing tastes as good as fit feels....

    aw, I fell better already!

  23. #23
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,942
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damnable View Post
    Well at least you are honest and say that it is your opinion and not generalised. Do you think it's an inferiority thing with other men as well? I'm curious as well, how 'overbuilt' does a woman have to be to become unattractive? Follow the link I am about to post. It's Hayley Bateup, who is just about the fittest woman in Australia currently and a bit of a rolemodel for me. Is she too buff for you?
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/bri...641575872.html

    But suggesting that women do not do heavy weights but instead to lighter with higher reps so they don't get bulky muscles is irresponsible. Firstly, it's not true. Secondly, it goes against medical opinions of better overall health for women. Thirdly, like most physical characteristics, some women will naturally have higher or lower muslce mass than others. I have a lot of respect for women with a lot of muscle because I know they have to work so much harder for it than men.

    But mainly brining up body image and physical characteristics in such a way, especially of those who obviously worked hard for it and who do not have too much fat, isn't in the spirit of this forum.

    And even if it was meant as a jest, it's not funny.
    So your saying that all women should be out there trying to lift as high a weight as possible? It's probably a safe bet that your example in the photo doesn't. Looks pretty athletic though, but you don't need huge bulky muscles for that.

    I don't know about medical opinion, but let me give an illustration, which proves my point. Look at the guy who delivered your new 52" LCD TV had no problem even though the TV is over 100lbs and he doesn't look like a body builder. It's the 300 other pieces on the truck that averaged 10lbs each that have helped to build strength day after day, that allow that occasional heavier lift. Of course knowing the right techniques for lifting things beyond your abilities helps, gravity can be your best friend and your worst enemy when lifting. How do I know this? I'm the guy who at 2AM put that TV in the truck in the first place, also without a problem, and I definitely don't look like Arni either

    For healthy living you need some fat, and women actually need a little more then men do, if your fat store is too low, that's not healthy either. Even though it is the Hollywood ideal.

  24. #24
    Triathlon in my future??? flip18436572's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Southwest Iowa
    My Bikes
    Junk, that is why I am here. :-)
    Posts
    2,193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For the women to get "over buff" they usually need help with drugs for their bodies to produce the extra muscle mass. I looked at your picture and that looks like a very fit or athletic build with a decent amount of body fat for a female. She is probably under the "standard" for women for body fat percentage, but that is always different for each person. The general rule is very good for the general public, but that is not the same for full time/professional athletes.

    I know of a ironman triathlete who is probably still at the 15% body fat, as she is not a weight lifter. But, she can complete the full ironman in a great time, and also has a full time job as a dental assistant. I think she would love to win the lottery and work on her fitness full time, as some of these other people can do.

    Should everyone lift weights - in my opinion yes. Do they all need to be doing the same type of weight lifting? Abosolutely not!!!.
    2007 Jamis Ventura Comp
    2006 Jamis Explorer 2.0
    2000 Specialized Hardrock (bought used)
    Swim, Bike, Run and sounds like fun

  25. #25
    Time Trialist & Duathlete mtv8dmarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Claremont, CA
    My Bikes
    Custom built road bike & custom built TT bike
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by damnable View Post
    Well at least you are honest and say that it is your opinion and not generalised. Do you think it's an inferiority thing with other men as well? I'm curious as well, how 'overbuilt' does a woman have to be to become unattractive? Follow the link I am about to post. It's Hayley Bateup, who is just about the fittest woman in Australia currently and a bit of a rolemodel for me. Is she too buff for you?
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/bri...641575872.html
    I don't think the rest of your response was meant for me so I'll answer what I think was. =) To me, there's a difference between fit and bodybuilders. Fit is attractive, women with bodybuilding physiques are not. I guess I just prefer the body of a woman to have a certain softness not some 12 pack ab 22" bicep muscular experiment. Other people may find that attractive, I don't. That's all I was trying to say.
    Last edited by mtv8dmarine; 10-26-08 at 10:33 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •