Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

does bike fit change as you lose weight?

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

does bike fit change as you lose weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-10, 07:17 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
garethzbarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kimpo, S. Korea
Posts: 696

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Expert 09, Custom 2013 Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
does bike fit change as you lose weight?

It seems like bike fit should change as you lose weight b/c less belly will change your center of gravity while leaning forward right?

I wonder b/c I'm 99% sure I need to change out my stem but wonder if I should keep it for when I lose more weight and can bend over easier or sell it. I know that when I got my 1st bike I could barely lean over enough while riding without pain. I lost close to 40lbs and now I find myself leaning over the bars sometimes. I have another 40 or so lbs to lose.
garethzbarker is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 08:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yes, it does. It also changes the more you ride and the more flexible you get.

When I first started riding I rode more upright and had my stem angled upward slightly. My bars were about even with my saddle height. I had to have it that way because if I bent over any further I couldn't breathe.

Now that I've lost some weight (not at my goal yet, though) I am more comfortable riding in a lower position. My stem is angled down, and my bars are about 2" lower than my saddle. I have no problem riding 5-6 hours in that position.
IAmCosmo is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 01:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IAmCosmo
Yes, it does. It also changes the more you ride and the more flexible you get.

When I first started riding I rode more upright and had my stem angled upward slightly. My bars were about even with my saddle height. I had to have it that way because if I bent over any further I couldn't breathe.

Now that I've lost some weight (not at my goal yet, though) I am more comfortable riding in a lower position. My stem is angled down, and my bars are about 2" lower than my saddle. I have no problem riding 5-6 hours in that position.
+1 that and would add that I've also raised the saddle height. Not sure if it's because I'm carrying less built in saddle padding or my legs are more flexible.
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
As your fitness increases, you can tolerate a wider variety of bikes sizes and styles.

I'm not sure your ideal bike-fit changes much. The bike that fit you properly when you were starting to ride should still fit now. Your ability to adapt to a more aerodynamic position has increased, and if you want to update the fit, go ahead.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 02:02 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
IMO, no! I just think one is more comfortable with less weight on the saddle for along period of time. Never had a problem with flexibility though, that's more ride time related.

But why not swap stems? Why not go for most comfort possible. Losing some gut won't make that much of a difference.

Take a look at my bike, pretty upright. Does that mean other riders with a step stem race setup will be faster or climb better? Nope! Only diffreence I see is that I will be more comfy on a century riding my bike than I would if I were riding it with a long steep stem.

BTW, stems are pretty cheap. Why not keep both?
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 07:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Hot Potato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Western Chicagoland
Posts: 1,824
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, "loosing weight" covers a lot of situations, doesn't it?'

But if you mean you are overweight and have a big gut, buy a bike, enjoy riding it, then drop some serious weight and watch the gut shrink, then:

No, it just becomes possible for you to ride in the drops a lot better/easier. This is assuming your position on the hoods is ideal. Then you loose weight, and find you can tolerate the drops longer, and then even keep your power output up in the drops. Before you loose weight, the drops are miserable. At least that was my experience.

I have three road bikes. Two professionaly fit. One bought and fit by myself. The two pro fits started out miserable for me in the drops. The bike I bought and fit myself I made the saddle position the same as a pro fit, but the reach and handlebar hieght I chose based purely on comfort. The self fitted bike has a longer reach, and higher handlebar height. I dropped a bunch of weight (40 lbs?), and now the drops on the self fitted bike are doable for long periods heading into the wind. On the pro fit bikes, I can still only do it for short stints.

My height hasn't changed, nor my leg length, nor my arm length. Jus the amount of gut that interferes with getting lower and more aerodynamic has changed, and for the better. I can't say for certain ift after another 40 lbs weight loss that I might be able to switch to a racer fit, but that is not what I am after right now.

Last edited by Hot Potato; 01-20-10 at 07:11 PM.
Hot Potato is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 08:18 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
garethzbarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kimpo, S. Korea
Posts: 696

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Expert 09, Custom 2013 Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
here's why i think the way i do: at the moment I am experiencing the very common 'numbness' in hands. It's probably due to too much weight on them. It it very doubtful it is due to flexibility. since the weight of the body is unevenly distributed and I packing a bunch of upper body weight it seems like as I lose upper body mass there should be less pressure on my hands. seems like fit is not only a function of proportions but also weight distribution. know what i mean? it might not be a big deal for most people but for people packing over 50 lbs of belly it could matter.

btw mr beanz did you see that guy with the dog again?
garethzbarker is offline  
Old 01-20-10, 11:06 PM
  #8  
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by garethzbarker
btw mr beanz did you see that guy with the dog again?
Nope not yet, it's been pouring here and we only ride the trail on weekends!
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Old 01-21-10, 06:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
exile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 2,896

Bikes: Workcycles FR8, 2016 Jamis Coda Comp, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
It might but not by much i'd think.
exile is offline  
Old 01-21-10, 07:30 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cobourg Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,206

Bikes: ParleeZ5/Parlee Chebacco/Trek Farley/Cannondale Slice/Burley Tandem

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
It does in regards to flexability.
youcoming is offline  
Old 01-24-10, 08:59 PM
  #11  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by garethzbarker
here's why i think the way i do: at the moment I am experiencing the very common 'numbness' in hands. It's probably due to too much weight on them. It it very doubtful it is due to flexibility. since the weight of the body is unevenly distributed and I packing a bunch of upper body weight it seems like as I lose upper body mass there should be less pressure on my hands. seems like fit is not only a function of proportions but also weight distribution. know what i mean? it might not be a big deal for most people but for people packing over 50 lbs of belly it could matter.
It could be weight. Or it could be you are stretching too far, and need to raise the stem, or adjust the saddle.
 
Old 01-26-10, 01:57 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 188

Bikes: `09 Tarmac Comp, `09 FSR XC Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The only discussion I'm seeing here is flexibility and gut talking.

What about the tickness of your ass? I mean some asses have a few inches in thickness of fat depending on size... if you lose it, then you are now sitting 1-2-3 inches LOWER... that ruins your fit IMO.

I know that I had to lower my seat a bit when i got my first set of padded bike shorts earlier last year. I had been fitted without padded bike shorts. Same applies to changing bike shoes, the pedals won't move but the thickness of your shoe/clip mount can affect your fit.

Cheers,
Roby!
roby is offline  
Old 01-26-10, 09:12 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Pinyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 1,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My weight really only impacts saddle and handlebar height. Generally, the heavier I am, the lower the saddle goes (extra "me" padding), and the higher I tend to want to put the handlebars (prevents...gut mashing).

Weight does nothing for how far forward or backward I place my saddle or handlebars. Although...when I'm in really, really good riding shape, I tend to want to stretch forward just a little bit more. But I think that has more to do with abdominal strength and efficiency, than weight.
Pinyon is offline  
Old 01-26-10, 09:24 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Herbie53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roby
The only discussion I'm seeing here is flexibility and gut talking.

What about the tickness of your ass? I mean some asses have a few inches in thickness of fat depending on size... if you lose it, then you are now sitting 1-2-3 inches LOWER... that ruins your fit IMO.

I know that I had to lower my seat a bit when i got my first set of padded bike shorts earlier last year. I had been fitted without padded bike shorts. Same applies to changing bike shoes, the pedals won't move but the thickness of your shoe/clip mount can affect your fit.

Cheers,
Roby!
I say yes (see #3 in this thread). I've moved my saddle up between two and three centimeters over the course of losing ~40#.
Herbie53 is offline  
Old 02-03-10, 12:11 AM
  #15  
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
The more fit I get the tighter geometry I want.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 07:16 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
BikeArkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maumelle, AR
Posts: 1,075

Bikes: 2012 Scorpion FX trike, 2016 Catrike 700

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The progression of my bike geometry has followed my weight. Three years ago, at 260# my seat was lower, my handlebar even with the seat and I could not ride in the drops.
Now, at 220# the handlebar is lower than the seat, the seat is up and I ride in the drops when needed, such as into the wind or in a sprint with some of my riding friends.
I think this is a "natural" progression.
BikeArkansas is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 09:53 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I haven't changed it yet and I've lost 15 pounds since I started. I thought bike fitting was based on height? I should go get refit.
bobfromwaco is offline  
Old 02-04-10, 01:56 PM
  #18  
Subjectively Insane
 
MilitantPotato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 801

Bikes: '09 Rodriguez Adventurer Custom, '08 Trek 7.3Fx

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BikeArkansas
The progression of my bike geometry has followed my weight. Three years ago, at 260# my seat was lower, my handlebar even with the seat and I could not ride in the drops.
Now, at 220# the handlebar is lower than the seat, the seat is up and I ride in the drops when needed, such as into the wind or in a sprint with some of my riding friends.
I think this is a "natural" progression.

Same here.
Although I lowered my seat a bit, had overly tight calve muscles that I've mostly sorted now.
MilitantPotato is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeOK
Fitting Your Bike
15
07-19-17 11:44 PM
Billy1111
Fitting Your Bike
3
08-16-14 09:49 PM
Juan Foote
Road Cycling
10
06-21-12 12:16 PM
GFish
Fifty Plus (50+)
39
04-15-12 08:21 PM
dbikingman
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
8
08-18-10 08:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.