Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Why Sheldon's U-locking technique is the best

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Why Sheldon's U-locking technique is the best

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-09, 06:08 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Why Sheldon's U-locking technique is the best (tacoed wheel pix)

Sheldon Brown always said: Lock your wheel through the rear triangle. Good advice for more than one reason.




I locked my bike in a risky place (see attached photos). But - it looks like the pretzeled wheel spread the impact force to the dropouts smoothly, and the chainstays are still straight.

If the bike were locked directly to the top or seat tube, both the wheel and frame would be toast.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Image480.jpg (62.6 KB, 510 views)
File Type: jpg
hilliard_bent_wheel.jpg (47.5 KB, 510 views)
antonyfhilliard is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 07:54 PM
  #2  
pedaling furiously
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Niagara Region, Ontario
Posts: 110

Bikes: 08 Jamis Aurora

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rocked by the red rocket? Unpossible!
pubb is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 08:50 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Parked with the back wheel sticking out in the bus's path? Whoops!
exarkuhn15 is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 09:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had never stumbled on Sheldon's locking method before, but I get it and am glad it worked out <mostly> for you. The only downside occurs to me based on something I did a few weeks ago. I was hearing this low speed clicking in my rear wheel, exactly once per rotation (I could tell by looking at the label on the rim going by). Above a certain speed you couldn't hear it as the wind noise would drown it out, but it was certainly audible, coasting or pedaling at low speeds. If I walked my bike I couldn't hear it, so it had to be something to do with load. If I put practically all my weight on the seat while walking the bike I could produce the sound, but still couldn't narrow it down. I had my bike up on the stand to do a little maintenance a week or so later and I finally saw it. The rim was noticably "fatter" along a 4 inch section, but just on one side. On closer examination I had a growing crack clear through the machined braking surface that was spreading circumferentially in my 13 year old Mavic 217. I replaced the rim but was interested in investigating the failure. Was the rim cracked because I had worn the braking surface too thin or was it just a happenstance structural failure? So I hacksawed the section out of the rim and then sawed it again right at the center of the crack. The thickness of the rim was certainly adequate, barely different in thickness from the braking surface that hadn't been "braked on". It just had a crack that was spreading around the rim, probably about 4 inches long and almost unseeable when the rim was uninflated, but clear through the braking surface but you wouldn't know unless you examined the section with a jeweler's loop. Glad to not have found that failure out the hard way.

What does this have to do with locking your rear bike wheel through the rear triangle but not around a frame tube or stay? I was simply amazed at how few hacksaw strokes it took to get through the rim. So a thief with a common hacksaw could easily walk off with your whole bike in proabably a minute, albeit with a ruined rim, tire, and tube, but still a nice piece of pilfering.
RaleighComp is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 09:48 PM
  #5  
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RaleighComp
I had never stumbled on Sheldon's locking method before, but I get it and am glad it worked out <mostly> for you. The only downside occurs to me based on something I did a few weeks ago. I was hearing this low speed clicking in my rear wheel, exactly once per rotation (I could tell by looking at the label on the rim going by). Above a certain speed you couldn't hear it as the wind noise would drown it out, but it was certainly audible, coasting or pedaling at low speeds. If I walked my bike I couldn't hear it, so it had to be something to do with load. If I put practically all my weight on the seat while walking the bike I could produce the sound, but still couldn't narrow it down. I had my bike up on the stand to do a little maintenance a week or so later and I finally saw it. The rim was noticably "fatter" along a 4 inch section, but just on one side. On closer examination I had a growing crack clear through the machined braking surface that was spreading circumferentially in my 13 year old Mavic 217. I replaced the rim but was interested in investigating the failure. Was the rim cracked because I had worn the braking surface too thin or was it just a happenstance structural failure? So I hacksawed the section out of the rim and then sawed it again right at the center of the crack. The thickness of the rim was certainly adequate, barely different in thickness from the braking surface that hadn't been "braked on". It just had a crack that was spreading around the rim, probably about 4 inches long and almost unseeable when the rim was uninflated, but clear through the braking surface but you wouldn't know unless you examined the section with a jeweler's loop. Glad to not have found that failure out the hard way.

What does this have to do with locking your rear bike wheel through the rear triangle but not around a frame tube or stay? I was simply amazed at how few hacksaw strokes it took to get through the rim. So a thief with a common hacksaw could easily walk off with your whole bike in proabably a minute, albeit with a ruined rim, tire, and tube, but still a nice piece of pilfering.
just wondering, was that a rim alone, or a rim built into a wheel? I've heard tell (no experience myself) that because a wheel puts a compressive force on the rim it's harder to cut. Also, have you tried to hacksaw through a tire?
fuzz2050 is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 09:53 PM
  #6  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by RaleighComp
I replaced the rim but was interested in investigating the failure... So I hacksawed the section out of the rim and then sawed it again right at the center of the crack.

What does this have to do with locking your rear bike wheel through the rear triangle but not around a frame tube or stay? I was simply amazed at how few hacksaw strokes it took to get through the rim. So a thief with a common hacksaw could easily walk off with your whole bike in proabably a minute, albeit with a ruined rim, tire, and tube, but still a nice piece of pilfering.
Did you cut the rim while it was still laced to the hub or not?
[edit]aww. Fuzz beat me to it

You shouldn't be surprised that it was easy to cut through some aluminum.
hairnet is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 09:57 PM
  #7  
thompsonpost
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Somewhere a bus has a black streak down the side.
 
Old 12-15-09, 10:06 PM
  #8  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's not going to make a difference. A thief could easily just deflate the tire and just cut the rim with little trouble. Mind you, they couldn't ride it out and if they were to go to such extremes it would be more work than just taking another bike without a U-Lock.
KTse is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:11 PM
  #9  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by KTse
It's not going to make a difference. A thief could easily just deflate the tire and just cut the rim with little trouble. Mind you, they couldn't ride it out and if they were to go to such extremes it would be more work than just taking another bike without a U-Lock.
The spokes, not the tire.
hairnet is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:25 PM
  #10  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by KTse
It's not going to make a difference. A thief could easily just deflate the tire and just cut the rim with little trouble. Mind you, they couldn't ride it out and if they were to go to such extremes it would be more work than just taking another bike without a U-Lock.
nope, a rim is under compression, can't cut it without the blade/saw/grinder binding and possibly breaking.
you can of course cut all the spokes to relieve the tension, which is why one actually wants to lock the wheel and the frame to an immobile object.

mind you, cutting spokes requires some skill and eye protection, since they're under 100kg/f of force. you cut, they go flying.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:25 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hairnet
The spokes, not the tire.
I don't see how tensioned spokes would be hard to cut? Brass/aluminum vs steel hacksaw; hacksaw wins.
KTse is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:28 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
just wondering, was that a rim alone, or a rim built into a wheel? I've heard tell (no experience myself) that because a wheel puts a compressive force on the rim it's harder to cut. Also, have you tried to hacksaw through a tire?
The rim was de-laced before cutting. I can visualize how that might be correct about it being harder to cut a rim on a laced wheel as the rim would probably bite on the hacksaw blade.
RaleighComp is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:35 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I guess if you really wanted to obtain a good bike via bike thievery you would just go around with Park cable cutters and an allen wrench. Steal a bunch of handlebars with expensive shifters and levers on them(probably 30 seconds of effort per bike), sell the bars and shifters on eBay and then go to your LBS and buy whatever you wanted. Plus you would have enough handlebar tape and grips to last a lifetime;-)
RaleighComp is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:35 PM
  #14  
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I think consensus is that the Sheldon method can easily be defeated if the thief first deflates and then removes the tire (which would be difficult to hacksaw through), then proceeds to cut the spokes, using a hacksaw, or else a pair of small bolt cutters, then they can easily saw through the rim and walk away with your bike.

Does anyone disagree?
fuzz2050 is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:45 PM
  #15  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
I think consensus is that the Sheldon method can easily be defeated if the thief first deflates and then removes the tire (which would be difficult to hacksaw through), then proceeds to cut the spokes, using a hacksaw, or else a pair of small bolt cutters, then they can easily saw through the rim and walk away with your bike.

Does anyone disagree?
lol, sounds easy enough
KTse is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 10:47 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
I think consensus is that the Sheldon method can easily be defeated if the thief first deflates and then removes the tire (which would be difficult to hacksaw through), then proceeds to cut the spokes, using a hacksaw, or else a pair of small bolt cutters, then they can easily saw through the rim and walk away with your bike.

Does anyone disagree?
You still have to cut the tire and tube. Maybe if you can just move the bike a little bit while it's locked you can harness the power of maybe a passing bus to weaken the rim and detension the spokes for you.
RaleighComp is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:29 PM
  #17  
Human Powered Vehiclist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
I think consensus is that the Sheldon method can easily be defeated if the thief first deflates and then removes the tire (which would be difficult to hacksaw through), then proceeds to cut the spokes, using a hacksaw, or else a pair of small bolt cutters, then they can easily saw through the rim and walk away with your bike.

Does anyone disagree?
Yeah, but you're still destroying the wheel which is one of the most expensive components to the bike. But I still agree with your logic to a point. Regardless of that, putting a U-lock around the rear wheel like that causes it to rest on the chain which means you get grease on your lock and most likely all over your hands when you're messing around with it. Personally I don't like having to wash my hands frequently when I'm using my bike as a form of transportation. That's why I prefer to lock aroud the frame and away from the chain. But hey, that's just me.

Despite where you put the lock, I would hardly think Sheldon Brown would recommend locking your bike anywhere near the path of a bus. But again,I can see how an effed up wheel is a pretty good deterrent towards theft.
Jay D is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:42 PM
  #18  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay D
Regardless of that, putting a U-lock around the rear wheel like that causes it to rest on the chain which means you get grease on your lock and most likely all over your hands when you're messing around with it. Personally I don't like having to wash my hands frequently when I'm using my bike as a form of transportation
I've never had my hands get greasy from this. I usually have the non drive side of the bike locked against the pole, or whatever. The U-lock hardly even touches the chain.

I think the reason locking the rim works is because the common thief may have a failed attempt at cutting the rim and he'll probably be too stupid to realize the spokes are what cause the difficulty.
hairnet is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:45 PM
  #19  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Depending on location I will often use Sheldon's method to lock up my bike but it usually looks more like this... thinking that the Sheldon method might make some tweaker think they can remove or cut through the wheel.

Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:49 PM
  #20  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
I think this is the first time I've seen someone lock their cranks
hairnet is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:50 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use OnGuard skewers and seat bolt, primarily for the convenience. I then just U-lock my top tube to a fixed object and don't have to worry about my seat or wheels.
RaleighComp is offline  
Old 12-15-09, 11:59 PM
  #22  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by hairnet
I think this is the first time I've seen someone lock their cranks
It's easier to do with a single chain ring (I took this picture as a demonstration shot) and it puts the shackle in a place where it is harder to f with... even if you cut through the cable the little double pinned shackle is still in a place where it makes the bike un-rideable and then there is still that pesky rear shackle you have to deal with.

I have locking or allen keyed skewers and seat bolts on just about every bike I ride so the thief that wants my ride is gonna need to bring a full tool kit and hope I don't catch him / her in the act.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 12-16-09, 12:03 AM
  #23  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
I have also used the mini shackle to lock the crank arm to the chainstay on some bikes in addition to using the shackle on the rear wheel... my biggest theft risk is from folks who are looking for a bike they can steal easily and ride away on.

The best locking strategy is to lock up next to a nicer bike that only has a cable lock on it...

One shackle is enough of a deterrent for opportunistic thieves but I would prefer not to have my parts stripped off my bike.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 12-16-09, 12:22 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by AEO
nope, a rim is under compression, can't cut it without the blade/saw/grinder binding and possibly breaking.
If I were the thief, and couldn't get my hands on a city bus then I'd use a cordless recip saw. Having used recip saws to cut computer hard drives in half using Wood & Nails blades (!), I have no doubt they would handle this task easily too. It might require a longer-shackle lock, but I'll stick with locking the rear wheel and frame.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 12-16-09, 12:45 AM
  #25  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver

The best locking strategy is to lock up next to a nicer bike that only has a cable lock on it...
I used to lock next to a Specialized [Allez?] that was secured with a cable lock while I locked both wheels together with a mini U lock. I don't see that bike around anymore though.
hairnet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.