Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Two years of commuting and for the first time ...

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Two years of commuting and for the first time ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-10, 01:10 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,585 Times in 2,344 Posts
I get stopped a lot in my car. one night after a night shift (3 am?) I was driving on the highway in the left lane and no one else was on the road. I doubt I was speeding - just highway speed. anyway a copy pulls me over and he's very casual smoking a big ole cigar and he starts grilling me and asked how I was feeling. I told him tired and hes asked where you coming from? where you going ? where you work? he then said stay out of the left lane cuz its dangerous especially late at night, most accidents occur in the left lane. he didn't even check my license, etc. I think they ask those questions as part of a standard operating procedural script and sometimes those simple questions can be a way to catch someone in a lie which can lead to other inquiries and car searches for contraband, etc
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 01:33 PM
  #27  
One Man Fast Brick
 
hubcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,121

Bikes: Specialized Langster, Bianchi San Jose, early 90s GT Karakoram, Yuba Mundo, Mercier Nano (mini velo), Nashbar Steel Commuter, KHS Tandemania Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
If the officer had any reason to believe you were involved in any sort of crime, he should have told you. Or not released you. Something along the lines of "Well, I stopped you because there was a burglary in the area..." Honestly, though, it sounds as if you were stopped because it was a slow night, and you were an excuse to pass some time.
And unless the specific criminal on the loose is suspected to be on a bicycle, the officer should also be pulling over all the cars that go by.
hubcap is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 07:17 PM
  #28  
Frame Catastrophizer
 
mikewille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 450

Bikes: Surly Instigator

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RogerB
As far as you know...
A day or two later there was a story in the paper about the "groper"
detailing a bunch of different incidents and his description. Apparently
the guy had a cast on his arm(that's the first thing the cops looked at,
my right arm)
mikewille is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 09:24 PM
  #29  
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 70 Posts
"Probable Cause" should mean something. For it to mean something, citizens must continually assert their rights, lest they are eroded. If law enforcement stops and detains someone without probable cause, it behooves that person to push back as they see fit, within reason. If law enforcement persists in detament and arrest still without probable cause, it is "law enforcement" that is on the wrong side of the law, and, in an ideal world, justice will be served, in due course. Then there's reality...

Last edited by old's'cool; 04-08-10 at 09:57 PM. Reason: typo
old's'cool is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 09:34 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have all sorts or reasons why I might be out and about in the middle of the night, unless I'm breaking a law why do you suppose it's okay that a person be stopped and compelled to inform law enforcement as to his activities? It's absolutely none of their business, unless I'm breaking a law why should I be stopped. If I'm breaking a law, by all means detain/arrest me but until such time I will not explain why I'm out, where I was or where I'm going. I will furnish my ID and if detained or bullied assert my right and insist that if I am to be detained, what are the charges else am I free to go. If you want to assert that "might is in fact right" and give me a hard time, then go ahead and arrest me...I dont care, I have relatives and close friends that are attorneys to fight and file complaint/suit if I am and can prove unlawful maltreatment..and it wont cost me a dime. I know my rights and will assert them..politely.

"If you get stopped and are not doing anything wrong, just answer politely"? no thanks, I'll be polite, I'm always polite but unless I'm in breach of the law, my business is my own!! You do realize that a police officer is not a judge or a citizens patron right? If I'm in breach of the law then by all means arrest me, else let me be.."citizen" actually means something..or it should.
Moozh is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 09:37 PM
  #31  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Artkansas
Twice, since moving to Little Rock I've had cops pull me over to tell me to get on the sidewalk. The first one ended up getting a reprimand from their sargent and I discovered that it was illegal to ride a bike on the sidewalk in a business district in Little Rock. The second one got a complete refusal to take their advice, specifically because again I was in a business district and would not have a cop order me to do something illegal. He eventually gave up and drove on.

I used to get pulled over regularly when riding on the freeway between Genessee and Sorrento Valley in San Diego. I would explain the situation and the law to the highway patrol officer and promise that they would see the "bicycles must exit" sign at the next exit. They would accompany me down the hill and I would point at the "bicycles must exit" sign and wave to them as I exited.
There are now Bikes on Shoulder signs in that area. Just another thing to acknowledge that bikes belong.
genec is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 10:19 PM
  #32  
Big Ol' Varmint
 
nice_marmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 106

Bikes: 2015 Rodriguez Adventure, 2009 Kona Dew, 2007 Redline Conquest Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
1. None of your buisness where I'm coming from or going to and I'll ride whatever time I please.
2. Am I free to go?
3. Ask to see THEIR ID
4. If you are not free to go, ask why you are being detained.
If you've been stopped for no apparent reason, politely asking whether you are being detained and why is a really good way to get a cop to leave you alone. I wouldn't say "none of your business" or ask to see the policeman's ID, since it tends to get them upset.
nice_marmot is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:10 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
nanter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by woodway
My son is a Seattle police officer and he works third watch (evening and overnight hours). He has told me several times that when he sees someone out at 3am he always stops them to find out what they are up to because "generally people who are out at 3am are up to no good". This assesment comes from long experience. If it was your car/home that had just been broken into, you would be happy that the officer was stopping people at 3am and asking a few simple questions - just doing his job. It's too bad you got stopped because you were just trying to get home, but you really cannot blame the officer for wanting to check you out and it sounds like you were asked a few simple questions and left to go on your way.

For those of you who want to give the cops a bad time, all I can say is if you heard 1/10th of the stories that my son has to tell, you would cut them a little slack. They deal with situations and people that the rest of us would never want to. If you get stopped, are not doing anything wrong just answer politely, you'll soon be back on your way - no harm no foul.
I'm sorry, but your son is out of line stopping people without probable cause just because they happen to be out at a certain time of day. This is the United States of America - we don't have curfews here, and we have a rule of law that says that law enforcement does not have carte blanche to harass innocent citizenry without cause.

It is *not* his job to randomly stop people. It is his job to enforce the law to the best of his ability while obeying it himself. That he is too lazy to perform his job within its proscribed boundaries puts all of our civil liberties at risk.
nanter is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:26 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Nigal
I would have asked what his probable cause was for detaining you. Jesus, he may as well have asked you in a German accent to, "Please produce your papers.".
Nigal, just so you know, probable cause is the standard for arrest. Reasonable suspicion is the standard for detention. Reasonable suspicion is much less than probable cause.
hopperja is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:39 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
People should be thankful that the police are doing their job and asking questions. It's called being proactive and looking, yes looking for people who could potentially be criminals. OP, sorry, but being out riding a bike at 0330 is suspicious. It doesn't mean you've done something wrong, but it looks odd. The officer stopped you, asked some questions, determined you weren't a threat/criminal and let you go on your merry way. I can guarantee he didn't run out of questions, he ran out of reason to waste his time or yours.
bsd13 is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:45 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
nanter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bsd13
People should be thankful that the police are doing their job and asking questions. It's called being proactive and looking, yes looking for people who could potentially be criminals. OP, sorry, but being out riding a bike at 0330 is suspicious. It doesn't mean you've done something wrong, but it looks odd. The officer stopped you, asked some questions, determined you weren't a threat/criminal and let you go on your merry way. I can guarantee he didn't run out of questions, he ran out of reason to waste his time or yours.

Riding a bicycle at 3:30 is suspicious?! Is driving a car at 3:30 suspicious too? Let me guess, it's not. Or do you suggest that every single automobile out at 3:30 be stopped and its driver interrogated?

It's attitudes like these that have to change if people are going to accept bicycling as a legitimate alternative to the automobile for transportation. As a physician, I suppose being on the way home from shift work at 3:30 my behavior is suspicious. In a car, though, it wouldn't be suspicious.

It's pretty sad that this kind of auto-centrism is being displayed with such ignorance on a bicycle commuting forum.
nanter is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:45 PM
  #37  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nanter
I'm sorry, but your son is out of line stopping people without probable cause just because they happen to be out at a certain time of day. This is the United States of America - we don't have curfews here, and we have a rule of law that says that law enforcement does not have carte blanche to harass innocent citizenry without cause.

It is *not* his job to randomly stop people. It is his job to enforce the law to the best of his ability while obeying it himself. That he is too lazy to perform his job within its proscribed boundaries puts all of our civil liberties at risk.
Over 200 years of case law says they (police) do indeed have the right to stop and ask people questions. Unless you're detained you have the right to walk away and refuse to answer.
bsd13 is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:56 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nanter
Riding a bicycle at 3:30 is suspicious?! Is driving a car at 3:30 suspicious too? Let me guess, it's not. Or do you suggest that every single automobile out at 3:30 be stopped and its driver interrogated?

It's attitudes like these that have to change if people are going to accept bicycling as a legitimate alternative to the automobile for transportation. As a physician, I suppose being on the way home from shift work at 3:30 my behavior is suspicious. In a car, though, it wouldn't be suspicious.

It's pretty sad that this kind of auto-centrism is being displayed with such ignorance on a bicycle commuting forum.
This has nothing to do with bicycling vs. driving. Don't turn it into a car/driver vs. bike/rider issue. It's not. This is about an officer who saw something that seemed out of place to him and he did his job and investigated it. It really is as simple as that. The cop did exactly what we, the general public, pay him to do.

If the same cop tomorrow night were to let someone ride on by without saying a word and then that rider murdered someone you'd ask "Where the hell were the cops and why the hell weren't they doing their job?!"

As far as not being suspicious at 0330 in a car... Depends where you are and what you're doing. I've been pulled over at 0200 and asked a few questions. Guess what... I answered and went on my way. It took 5 minutes of my time. Absolutely painless, and I daresay I'm the rule and NOT the exception when it comes to being stopped by the police.
bsd13 is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:01 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by nanter
I'm sorry, but your son is out of line stopping people without probable cause just because they happen to be out at a certain time of day. This is the United States of America - we don't have curfews here, and we have a rule of law that says that law enforcement does not have carte blanche to harass innocent citizenry without cause.

It is *not* his job to randomly stop people. It is his job to enforce the law to the best of his ability while obeying it himself. That he is too lazy to perform his job within its proscribed boundaries puts all of our civil liberties at risk.
Nanter,

1- you obviously don't know what you're talking about. Police need probable cause to arrest you. They only need reasonable suspicion to detain you.

2- some cities do have curfews for juveniles. That means police can detain anyone who is out after curfew because they look like they could be a juvenile.

3- you weren't there so you don't have any basis to criticize if the stop was justified. You only know one side of the story. In case you weren't aware, every story has two sides.

And the rest of you who think this was an unwarranted detention... don't complain today about the officer doing his job and then complain tomorrow because he didn't want to help you when you suddenly find yourself a victim.

Last edited by hopperja; 04-09-10 at 12:30 AM.
hopperja is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:01 AM
  #40  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nice_marmot
If you've been stopped for no apparent reason, politely asking whether you are being detained and why is a really good way to get a cop to leave you alone. I wouldn't say "none of your business" or ask to see the policeman's ID, since it tends to get them upset.
Nothing wrong with asking a cop for ID. The trick is asking for it at the appropriate time. That is to say when they have concluded their business with you not the very moment you lay eyes on them.
bsd13 is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:08 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by woodway
My son is a Seattle police officer and he works third watch (evening and overnight hours). He has told me several times that when he sees someone out at 3am he always stops them to find out what they are up to because "generally people who are out at 3am are up to no good". This assesment comes from long experience. If it was your car/home that had just been broken into ...
He really pulls over every single car he sees on the road after 3am?

If someone is breaking into cars/homes it seems far more likely that their 'getaway' vehicle is a car/truck rather than a bike. Sure there have been a few well-publicized cases of some burglar or bank robber who took off on a bike. But the reason they've been well-publicized is because it's so unusual and therefore considered newsworthy.

Now if the officer in the original post had some specific reason to suspect that there was a bicyclist (or someone fitting the OPs description) in the area who had committed a crime, then the stop would be justified. But profiling based on just being different and stopping someone with no evidence of wrong-doing is not justifiable.
prathmann is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:09 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
TuckamoreDew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I live close to one of the sin strips in my city and the small time dealers and pimps often ride around at night doing their rounds on bicycles. No licence plates, you see. I've often expected the cops to stop me but they never have. Mostly, these guys are easy to spot. For one thing, none of them ever seem to wear bike helmets.
TuckamoreDew is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:17 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
... But the reason they've been well-publicized is because it's so unusual and therefore considered newsworthy....
And you know this how? I suppose you've read every case submitted to the prosecutor's office in that jurisdiction and know from that experience that bicycles are an unusual getaway...

You see, therein lies the problem. People get on these boards and say things as if they're experts when what they think they know about the topic at hand is speculation at best. If you are a law-abiding citizen and really knew what was happening in your community, you wouldn't think twice about a police officer detaining you and asking a few questions.
hopperja is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:21 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
... Now if the officer in the original post had some specific reason to suspect that there was a bicyclist (or someone fitting the OPs description) in the area who had committed a crime, then the stop would be justified....
Right, because stopping him for an equipment or moving violation (ie, a traffic stop, which is usually not criminal) wouldn't be justified. Tell that to the next police officer who stops you and see how far that gets you.
hopperja is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 12:43 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hopperja
"But the reason they've been well-publicized is because it's so unusual and therefore considered newsworthy"

And you know this how? I suppose you've read every case submitted to the prosecutor's office in that jurisdiction and know from that experience that bicycles are an unusual getaway...
Because I've seen them reported in the 'Odd News of the Day' section of news reports.

Originally Posted by hopperja
"Now if the officer in the original post had some specific reason to suspect that there was a bicyclist (or someone fitting the OPs description) in the area who had committed a crime, then the stop would be justified."

Right, because stopping him for an equipment or moving violation (ie, a traffic stop, which is usually not criminal) wouldn't be justified. Tell that to the next police officer who stops you and see how far that gets you.
Note that my comment above explicitly refers to the situation *in the Original Post* where there was no mention by the officer of any equipment violation or any traffic violation of any kind by the cyclist. The officer just asked him a bunch of questions and then sent him on his way. That kind of questioning is justified if the officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed and that the individual questioned might have some involvement.
prathmann is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 02:30 AM
  #46  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by woodway
My son is a Seattle police officer and he works third watch (evening and overnight hours). He has told me several times that when he sees someone out at 3am he always stops them to find out what they are up to because "generally people who are out at 3am are up to no good". This assesment comes from long experience. If it was your car/home that had just been broken into, you would be happy that the officer was stopping people at 3am and asking a few simple questions - just doing his job. It's too bad you got stopped because you were just trying to get home, but you really cannot blame the officer for wanting to check you out and it sounds like you were asked a few simple questions and left to go on your way.

For those of you who want to give the cops a bad time, all I can say is if you heard 1/10th of the stories that my son has to tell, you would cut them a little slack. They deal with situations and people that the rest of us would never want to. If you get stopped, are not doing anything wrong just answer politely, you'll soon be back on your way - no harm no foul.
That's pretty discrimatory to say that people out after 3 are generally up to no good. Obviously without knowing whether there was probable cause in this case it is hard (perhaps there was a report of break-in or something of that nature). However, as someone who works third shift, I would find it incredibly offensive to be pulled over merely by virtue of the hours that I keep.
cubs1982 is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 04:45 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
BigDaddyPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsfield, MA
Posts: 633

Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Cross 2008 Schwinn Super Sport 1972 SS. Surly Pacer Rando bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have been pulled over once during my 5+ years commuting. It was because rear blinky had fallen off and I hadn't noticed. Cop informed me of this, and then put his lights on, and paced me from about 30 yds back through an incredibly dark stretch of my commute until I was safely home. I gots no issues.
BigDaddyPete is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 05:37 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Nigal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hopperja
Nigal, just so you know, probable cause is the standard for arrest. Reasonable suspicion is the standard for detention. Reasonable suspicion is much less than probable cause.
OK, I can agree with that. So swap out those terms and it still comes up the same. Simply being out at 3am is not enough reason to detain and question someone.
Nigal is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 05:40 AM
  #49  
Hot in China
 
azesty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: China
Posts: 961

Bikes: Giant Lava

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have been commuting for a number of years in Australia (7 years in the last 10 I was there) and now one year in China. I have never been stopped by a cop.

I have, like most Chinese, ridden on the wrong side of the road at night sans lights and helmet past cops. The only surprise they register is that I am not Chinese.

Very few cops here have any English, though I did have my bag searched one day in the main square by two cops, one in uniform, the other in full SWAT gear with automatic weapon (a Kalashnikov variant), sidearm, flack jacket, knee and elbow pads etc. The uniform guy had excellent English. The first question gave me cause for concern, the conversation went something like this:

Cop: Hello sir.
Me: Hi.
Cop: Do you have your passport with you?
Me: Ah, no. Its in my friends apartment where I am staying. (I was in trouble now, as it is required that you carry it, but nobody in the expat community does).
Cop: Do you mind if I have a look in your bag sir?
Me: Not at all.

I dropped to one knee as I took my bag off my back and put it on the ground. I pulled the zip open and showed him a nearly empty bag.

Cop: Thank you very much, you can go now.

It was, unknown to me, some anniversery of some problem. There was a chance that I had a banner or something in my bag. Once it was established that I didnt they lost interest in me.

Not a nice situation though. In another country, when a guy with an automatic weapon asks to search your bag, you comply.

z
azesty is offline  
Old 04-09-10, 05:41 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Nigal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bsd13
People should be thankful that the police are doing their job and asking questions. It's called being proactive and looking, yes looking for people who could potentially be criminals. OP, sorry, but being out riding a bike at 0330 is suspicious. It doesn't mean you've done something wrong, but it looks odd. The officer stopped you, asked some questions, determined you weren't a threat/criminal and let you go on your merry way. I can guarantee he didn't run out of questions, he ran out of reason to waste his time or yours.
Hey, why stop there. If stopping and questioning people without cause is good police work let's knock on a few doors and randomly search houses. Especially high crime, poorer neighborhoods. You never know what they may have in their.
Nigal is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.