Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Finally found a short top tube cross bike! Ridley Crossbow

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Finally found a short top tube cross bike! Ridley Crossbow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-10, 06:52 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 200

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX, Trek Checkpoint

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Finally found a short top tube cross bike! Ridley Crossbow

Hey guys,

I've been hunting high and low for a cross bike that feels right. I'm about 6'3.5", 200lbs now coming out of winter, with about a 36" pelvic inseam. Apparently i have a short torso and/or arms as top tubes are always too long for me. I generally like the seat tubes of 60cm bikes and the top tubes of 58cm bikes. Until now the best fit i could find was a 60cm Spec Tricross w/a shorter and flipped stem.

Today i stepped by a random shop on my way home and they had a 2010 Ridley Crossbow https://www.ridley-bikes.com/pd/us/en...cross/crossbow. I hopped on it and was like wow, this feels pretty good. The cockpit felt right on, the reach was great. The seat was also in a fine place right off the back, not crazy high or anything. I then checked the size and it was a 56cm!

Basically the geometry boils down to having a 60cm C-T seat tube and a 56cm C-C top tube. Pretty unusual, but it felt great to me. We tried longer stems and it got reachy again. the Stock 110mm was fine.

According to their sizing guide: https://data.ridley-bikes.com/sizes/sizes-en.pdf, i'm right in the leg and height range for the 56cm so i guess i'm not totally off base.

I plan to use this bike 75% for commuting (26 miles each way, but not every day), riding trails and single track, ~15mile road rides w/ roadies at work. I've never cross raced, but i have a friend who does and i'm super eager to try it this season.

The setup on the bike is SRAM Rival shifters and derailuers, gossemer 46/36 cranks, Avid shortys, Shimano RS20 wheels for $1600. A very nice bike, but def high in the cost range for me.
Do you guys think this bike is too racey for commuting decent distances? Any advice?
TXBDan is offline  
Old 05-18-10, 09:19 PM
  #2  
Riding like its 1990
 
thenomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: IE, SoCal
Posts: 3,785
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
So are you saying that you've been looking at too large frames this whole time or that their bike fit is different? So they are listing the bike's size based on the top tube right?

Cool, I always need a shorter TT as well. I have a short reach and it is annoying to have to do short stems and compact bars.

If it fits great, hey, commute, race, ride the thing like heck, that's what it's there for! It's got room for big comfy touring tires for the commute if that's your style. I'm commuting on my Redline conquest with 700x25 road tires and it's a blast. I don't want to ride a slow bike every day.
thenomad is offline  
Old 05-18-10, 10:05 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 200

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX, Trek Checkpoint

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by thenomad
So are you saying that you've been looking at too large frames this whole time or that their bike fit is different? So they are listing the bike's size based on the top tube right?

Cool, I always need a shorter TT as well. I have a short reach and it is annoying to have to do short stems and compact bars.

If it fits great, hey, commute, race, ride the thing like heck, that's what it's there for! It's got room for big comfy touring tires for the commute if that's your style. I'm commuting on my Redline conquest with 700x25 road tires and it's a blast. I don't want to ride a slow bike every day.
Sorry, i was unclear in my excitement. I'm saying that every other bike brand i've tried (almost every one in Boston which is a lot) has had either a "square" geometry where the ST and TT are similar or a "long" geometry where the TT is longer than the ST. BTW, i rode a 2008 Conquest Pro and its TT was quite long.

The Ridley is the first bike i've come across with a TT shorter than the ST, and significantly so. It seems like they size they label a bike refers to its TT instead of ST. The 56cm Crossbow has a 56cm TT and a 60cm ST and seems to fit me well. The only con is its price, but it sure is pretty.
TXBDan is offline  
Old 05-19-10, 08:10 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Fleetdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Madison WI
Posts: 79

Bikes: Gary Fisher Wingra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think it would be fine for most of what you're talking about. I have a Ridley X-fire that I commute on most days and plan to race soon. My commute is only about 6 miles most days but I pretty regularly take a 20 mile ride on it before work and it's not at all uncomfortable. I have not yet taken it on singletrack but plan to try that soon as well.

If it fits and you can afford it then I see no reason not to go for it. Geometry-wise my understanding is that a race oriented cross frame will likely still probably be no more aggressive than many road bikes that aren't considered race bikes.
Fleetdog is offline  
Old 05-20-10, 12:44 PM
  #5  
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Posts: 5,182

Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride my Ridley X-Fire to work everyday (30 miles RT) and use it for club rides and century rides on the weekend.




Last edited by NoRacer; 05-20-10 at 12:52 PM.
NoRacer is offline  
Old 05-21-10, 10:07 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 200

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX, Trek Checkpoint

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Nice! I'm picking up mine tomorrow. They're swapping out to wider handlebars and adding cross levers. got a heck of a deal, too.
TXBDan is offline  
Old 06-12-11, 10:33 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 614
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sorry to resurrect an old thread, but does anyone else know of some tall ST OR HT/short TT CX geo bikes like the ridley? I am in the same boat as the OP... I currently ride a 64cm BD bike (first bike purchase), and am near the max seatpost (85cm bb to seat), but that puts me way too stretched out with a 610TT... have been looking at ridleys.. anything else to look for?
adam_mac84 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CampioneDItalia
Classic & Vintage
13
08-25-17 04:16 AM
Ride or Die
Fitting Your Bike
6
08-15-13 08:30 AM
Dylansbob
Commuting
4
08-22-12 04:00 PM
rpfleger
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
12-10-11 01:06 PM
MitchL
General Cycling Discussion
20
10-13-10 07:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.