CycloCross Bicycle Purchase - Help
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
CycloCross Bicycle Purchase - Help
I am considering the Kona Jake The Snake and Bianchi Axis.
Also is the Bianchi Cross Concept worth the extra money as a general racing bicycle than the two above.
What are the opinions of these bicycles for racing and general riding.
Also is the Bianchi Cross Concept worth the extra money as a general racing bicycle than the two above.
What are the opinions of these bicycles for racing and general riding.
#2
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i race a 2001 kona major jake frame with no stock parts. having said that, most of my teammates ride jts's [we were sponsored by kona this year]. i think it's an amsolutely amazing race bike. with the upgrade to a carbon fork [to save weight rather than for comfort], it is well-nigh the perfect amateur race rig.
the things i like about the axis: 1. it has a nice steep head and seat angle, very racy. 2. it has a carbon fork 3. i like the colour.
the things i don't like about the axis: 1. the crankset. it is ****e. (a) it is a triple, which is useless in a race and more specifically, a distinct liability when the going gets muddy. (b) it uses a square-taper bottom bracket that will flex and break in race conditions. (c) it is extremely low-quality. 2. the bike has insane gearing for a race bike. it uses a mtb rear derailleur and an 11-32 cassette. in a race, if you need a gear smaller than what you can fet with a 27t cog, you're better off on foot. the upshot is that, with the mtb gearing, your derailleur has to throw a whole lot of chain, making for sloppy shifts, particularly in the muck. 3. i doubt whether the wheels are up to the rigours of racing.
in contrast, the kona has road gearing and a really nice 38/48 truvativ cyclo-cross double crankset with a splined bottom bracket.
in my opinion, you'd have to swap out too much on the axis to make it as effective a race bike as the kona. i think it's a bit pricier, too.
nb: this is a race opinion.
the things i like about the axis: 1. it has a nice steep head and seat angle, very racy. 2. it has a carbon fork 3. i like the colour.
the things i don't like about the axis: 1. the crankset. it is ****e. (a) it is a triple, which is useless in a race and more specifically, a distinct liability when the going gets muddy. (b) it uses a square-taper bottom bracket that will flex and break in race conditions. (c) it is extremely low-quality. 2. the bike has insane gearing for a race bike. it uses a mtb rear derailleur and an 11-32 cassette. in a race, if you need a gear smaller than what you can fet with a 27t cog, you're better off on foot. the upshot is that, with the mtb gearing, your derailleur has to throw a whole lot of chain, making for sloppy shifts, particularly in the muck. 3. i doubt whether the wheels are up to the rigours of racing.
in contrast, the kona has road gearing and a really nice 38/48 truvativ cyclo-cross double crankset with a splined bottom bracket.
in my opinion, you'd have to swap out too much on the axis to make it as effective a race bike as the kona. i think it's a bit pricier, too.
nb: this is a race opinion.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
velocipedio:
Your statement is very near to reading my thoughts and concerns about the Bianchi Axis. I also like the celeste color.
I will take "another" closer look at the Kona JTS. I've read reviews and most riders describe it as amazing.
Thank You,
Your statement is very near to reading my thoughts and concerns about the Bianchi Axis. I also like the celeste color.
I will take "another" closer look at the Kona JTS. I've read reviews and most riders describe it as amazing.
Thank You,
Last edited by wildjim; 03-03-05 at 01:56 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southwest New Hampshire
Posts: 363
Bikes: TiSport Road frame with Campagnolo Daytona/Centaur + Record/Open Pro wheels | 2002 Bianchi Volpe | 2003 Giant TCR 2 w/ Sun ME14A rims/Ultegra 6500 hubs/ Bianchi SL Centaur (currently being refurbished)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only owner of an Axis that I actually know runs ONE ring for racing.
He lost his chain over and over and got lapped in his first race, he learned.
That being said, I like the Axis a lot, but run one 44 up front or maybe 38-48 double or even, if you can put one together, a 36-48. I know FDs can shift this, though it's not a standard item. BTW check out the new Centaur compact FD! Take a look at it in person, it's so much like a MTB derailleur, it's amazing. Haven't ridden that yet, no one I know is biting.
About wheels, yeah, it annoys me to see things like paired-spoke wheels stock on cyclocross bikes.
This just shows how the marketing of cyclocross bikes is getting away from what works on the track.
Maybe stock triples are also a symptom.
He lost his chain over and over and got lapped in his first race, he learned.
That being said, I like the Axis a lot, but run one 44 up front or maybe 38-48 double or even, if you can put one together, a 36-48. I know FDs can shift this, though it's not a standard item. BTW check out the new Centaur compact FD! Take a look at it in person, it's so much like a MTB derailleur, it's amazing. Haven't ridden that yet, no one I know is biting.
About wheels, yeah, it annoys me to see things like paired-spoke wheels stock on cyclocross bikes.
This just shows how the marketing of cyclocross bikes is getting away from what works on the track.
Maybe stock triples are also a symptom.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I am leaning towards the Kona JTS.
What price should I expect to pay?
Is the Kona JTS available online?
I have a great dealer in my area "Pedal Pushers" but I would like to get an idea of how much I should offer for a 2005 model.
What price should I expect to pay?
Is the Kona JTS available online?
I have a great dealer in my area "Pedal Pushers" but I would like to get an idea of how much I should offer for a 2005 model.
#6
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
the jts srp is $1100. dealer cost is about $770. you won't get anything lower than about $975, and i think a fair price at this time of year is $1000. you can't buy new, complete kona bikes online [and i wouldn'r recommend it even if you could]. try the bike. make sure it fits.
typically, you want a cyclo-cross frame to be a little smaller than your road frame, but this is a reference point, and not a hard-and-fast rule.
typically, you want a cyclo-cross frame to be a little smaller than your road frame, but this is a reference point, and not a hard-and-fast rule.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Looziana
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I had to pay full retail for my 2003 JTS. It was not in stock at the local LBS and had to be ordered. Same with the Axis. LBSs here do not stock cross bikes and insist on charging retail prices for anything that is special-ordered.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945
Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's ********, imo, you should get a discount on anything that is custom ordered as the shop doesn't have to deal with the bike sitting on their floor.
Regarding the original question, I love my 05 JTS! Alas it's been decked out with 23mm slicks and only used for indoor training during the winter, can't wait to get the knobbies on there and go tear up the town once the temps start to rise.
The only complaints I have with the bike are:
1) I was shocked to discover that the stock tires are wire bead and quite heavy. Light tires and tubes would save almost a 1/2 a pound.
2) the stock peddles (shimano 505) suck, I have 515's on my XC bike that are way nicer. Unfortunately one is seezed on so I can't switch them onto my JTS.
3) the stock saddle is way to mushy and heavy, right now I've got a Serfas ARC on there, I might get a Flite for it if I like the one I just put on my XC bike.
4) the stock Avid brake pads blow, before I get back out into the real world on my JTS I'll upgrade to some Kool Stop or MEC pads.
On the upside:
1) the frame looks and rides great
2) the P2 fork rides super, I was amazed at how well it soaks up bumps and vibrations
3) the wheels are still quite true despite giving them a beating. I expected them to be destroyed in no time
4) the drivetrain works perfectly
5) I can keep up with the roadies with slicks on my JTS!
Regarding the original question, I love my 05 JTS! Alas it's been decked out with 23mm slicks and only used for indoor training during the winter, can't wait to get the knobbies on there and go tear up the town once the temps start to rise.
The only complaints I have with the bike are:
1) I was shocked to discover that the stock tires are wire bead and quite heavy. Light tires and tubes would save almost a 1/2 a pound.
2) the stock peddles (shimano 505) suck, I have 515's on my XC bike that are way nicer. Unfortunately one is seezed on so I can't switch them onto my JTS.
3) the stock saddle is way to mushy and heavy, right now I've got a Serfas ARC on there, I might get a Flite for it if I like the one I just put on my XC bike.
4) the stock Avid brake pads blow, before I get back out into the real world on my JTS I'll upgrade to some Kool Stop or MEC pads.
On the upside:
1) the frame looks and rides great
2) the P2 fork rides super, I was amazed at how well it soaks up bumps and vibrations
3) the wheels are still quite true despite giving them a beating. I expected them to be destroyed in no time
4) the drivetrain works perfectly
5) I can keep up with the roadies with slicks on my JTS!
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by velocipedio
the jts srp is $1100. dealer cost is about $770. you won't get anything lower than about $975, and i think a fair price at this time of year is $1000. you can't buy new, complete kona bikes online [and i wouldn'r recommend it even if you could]. try the bike. make sure it fits.
typically, you want a cyclo-cross frame to be a little smaller than your road frame, but this is a reference point, and not a hard-and-fast rule.
typically, you want a cyclo-cross frame to be a little smaller than your road frame, but this is a reference point, and not a hard-and-fast rule.
I am sure of my Bicycle size(53cm) and the JTS size 52cm seems perfect.
If I buy it locally I will purchase it from Pedal Pushers in Severna Park Maryland as the owner(Rod) is "always" so helpful to me and everyone I feel obligated to purchase a bicycle from them.
He always says he will give me a good deal as I browse the store and Kona is the main line carried.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
velocipedio:
Thank You again for your insight and help. . .
I've ordered the Kona Jake The Snake for $1050 on the street, course or trail. I should receive it by next weekend.
Thank You again for your insight and help. . .
I've ordered the Kona Jake The Snake for $1050 on the street, course or trail. I should receive it by next weekend.
Last edited by wildjim; 03-18-05 at 03:33 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Looziana
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Congrats Jim
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by tbobby
Congrats Jim
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
I will take your advice and talk with them this weekend about the setup as it will be another week before the JTS arrives.
I am open to all suggestions - Thank You
#13
human
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: living in the moment
Posts: 3,562
Bikes: 2005 Litespeed Teramo, 2000 Marinoni Leggero, 2001 Kona Major Jake (with Campy Centaur), 1997 Specialized S-Works M2, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by KrisA
That's ********, imo, you should get a discount on anything that is custom ordered as the shop doesn't have to deal with the bike sitting on their floor.
__________________
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
when walking, just walk. when sitting, just sit. when riding, just ride. above all, don't wobble.
The Irregular Cycling Club of Montreal
Cycling irregularly since 2002
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 247
Bikes: 2016 Tom Kellogg steel Spectrum all-road, '89 Eisentraut Rainbow Traut, '81 Marinoni Special, 2018 Ritchey Road Logic, 2006 Ritchey Breakaway Cross, 2009 custom Joe Wells alu Tsunami CX, '71 Favorit (Czech Rep) Special, 2012 Co-Motion Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Originally Posted by velocipedio
i race a 2001 kona major jake frame with no stock parts. having said that, most of my teammates ride jts's [we were sponsored by kona this year]. i think it's an amsolutely amazing race bike. with the upgrade to a carbon fork [to save weight rather than for comfort], it is well-nigh the perfect amateur race rig.
the things i like about the axis: 1. it has a nice steep head and seat angle, very racy. 2. it has a carbon fork 3. i like the colour.
the things i don't like about the axis: 1. the crankset. it is ****e. (a) it is a triple, which is useless in a race and more specifically, a distinct liability when the going gets muddy. (b) it uses a square-taper bottom bracket that will flex and break in race conditions. (c) it is extremely low-quality. 2. the bike has insane gearing for a race bike. it uses a mtb rear derailleur and an 11-32 cassette. in a race, if you need a gear smaller than what you can fet with a 27t cog, you're better off on foot. the upshot is that, with the mtb gearing, your derailleur has to throw a whole lot of chain, making for sloppy shifts, particularly in the muck. 3. i doubt whether the wheels are up to the rigours of racing.
in contrast, the kona has road gearing and a really nice 38/48 truvativ cyclo-cross double crankset with a splined bottom bracket.
in my opinion, you'd have to swap out too much on the axis to make it as effective a race bike as the kona. i think it's a bit pricier, too.
nb: this is a race opinion.
the things i like about the axis: 1. it has a nice steep head and seat angle, very racy. 2. it has a carbon fork 3. i like the colour.
the things i don't like about the axis: 1. the crankset. it is ****e. (a) it is a triple, which is useless in a race and more specifically, a distinct liability when the going gets muddy. (b) it uses a square-taper bottom bracket that will flex and break in race conditions. (c) it is extremely low-quality. 2. the bike has insane gearing for a race bike. it uses a mtb rear derailleur and an 11-32 cassette. in a race, if you need a gear smaller than what you can fet with a 27t cog, you're better off on foot. the upshot is that, with the mtb gearing, your derailleur has to throw a whole lot of chain, making for sloppy shifts, particularly in the muck. 3. i doubt whether the wheels are up to the rigours of racing.
in contrast, the kona has road gearing and a really nice 38/48 truvativ cyclo-cross double crankset with a splined bottom bracket.
in my opinion, you'd have to swap out too much on the axis to make it as effective a race bike as the kona. i think it's a bit pricier, too.
nb: this is a race opinion.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by tbobby
Congrats Jim
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
Don't let them cut the steerer tube on that fork until you are certain that the bars will be at a comfortable height for you.
As I re-visit my decision and read the advice here I am very pleased the Kona Jake The Snake overall. My other considerations are Empella, Ridley, or Bianchi Cross Concept. The Bianchi Axis's do all design is what steers me away from it and most likely gives it such a loyal follwing from others.
Thanks again to Velocipedio for the racing insight. . .
I also purchased a Giant XTC; which I rode to the shop. Nice MTB. . . I now know of Rapid Rise. . .
Last edited by wildjim; 03-21-05 at 04:39 PM.
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 247
Bikes: 2016 Tom Kellogg steel Spectrum all-road, '89 Eisentraut Rainbow Traut, '81 Marinoni Special, 2018 Ritchey Road Logic, 2006 Ritchey Breakaway Cross, 2009 custom Joe Wells alu Tsunami CX, '71 Favorit (Czech Rep) Special, 2012 Co-Motion Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I have an empella with an Alum fork. Nice bike, but only for racing. Too stiff to be comfortable for long rides, and no bottle mounts. But good geometry- steep angles combined with longish chainstays, high bottom bracket. The flat bottomed top tube is great for carrying, really does make it easier. It's also quite light- the fat downtube is stiff, but very thin walled and prone to dents. I have a couple in mine after 4 years of racing it, no big deal, but still... I dont know about the ridley, but it looks pretty much the same. I think it might not have a replaceable derailleur mount like the empella. Check it to see- that would be the dealbreaker for me on that one. My other cross bike is a Columbus EL steel thing from a local builder with a Winwood carbon fork. Nice bike too, but doesnt feel quite as "dialed in" for racing as the Empella. Hard to describe but just not as confident on places like off camber muddy slopes although it seems to climb a little better (shorter chainstays, maybe?). If I could, I'd build a bike using the Empella geometry with some kind of oversize modern steel tubing. I'm just not a fan of Aluminum frames, especially for cyclocross. I got the Empella used and cheap, no complaints but steel is rea... crap I hate that saying. whatever, just a preference. Before you buy, you might want to take a road trip to check out College Park bikes- they have several cross models including a steel Lemond Poprad that is worth checking out.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I have already sealed the deal on the Kona Jake The Snake; which should workout for now. I may go custom next year. I have built a few bicycles so that is an comfortable option.
What are your thoughts about pedals?
I like Crank Brothers and use them on all of my bicycles.
What are your thoughts about pedals?
I like Crank Brothers and use them on all of my bicycles.
#19
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 247
Bikes: 2016 Tom Kellogg steel Spectrum all-road, '89 Eisentraut Rainbow Traut, '81 Marinoni Special, 2018 Ritchey Road Logic, 2006 Ritchey Breakaway Cross, 2009 custom Joe Wells alu Tsunami CX, '71 Favorit (Czech Rep) Special, 2012 Co-Motion Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Crank brothers. good choice, l have several sets of eggbeaters and candies. Go with the eggbeaters on the cross bike, easier to get in/out and shed mud better than anything out there.