Heart Rate
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
During nearly all of my 40 cycling years, my training has been by mileage. I never used a heart monitor, and on a rare occasion might check my heart rate just by counting. This year though, I decided to go for speed (intensity), and I use the semi-quantitative, standardized, but personally relavant system of (Borg’s) Relative Perceived Exertion (RPE), with my own particular adaptation; see PS at the end of that long post.
To the OP, I would say, read up on heart-rate training in general and try to find ways of setting your zones based on lactate threshold or the various approximations of LT. Use these rather than maxHR. There's not a lot of point in knowing your maxHR, it can be really difficult to find, and I tend to think if it's that hard it might not be safe unless you really know your cardiac state of health. This might be a red herring and I am not an expert, but I like to take a conservative approach.
Also, read up on polarization training, papers and a video by a gent named Seidel. It's a little technical but the gist is that very effective human training can come from riding a high percentage of your time in a strenuous but conversational zone, and a low percentage a little above where you feel like your breathing can't keep up (near or a little above lactate threshold)…
There are several threads on it in the Training forum, and there's more about determining your zones. The polarization zones are set up based on first knowing your Friel (Joe Friel's heart rate zone system) zones. It's not hard, just a little measurement and a little easy percentages math.
You can estimate LT based on rules of thumb as well, but the problem is the same as with the 220-age equation: if you are a slow beater, what a rule says is your LT could actually be your max and then "standard zones" would be too aggressive for you. If you are a fast beater, you would find zones that are not aggressive enough for you and not experience effective training.
My view is, that with some understanding, it can nearly all depend on you.
Also, read up on polarization training, papers and a video by a gent named Seidel. It's a little technical but the gist is that very effective human training can come from riding a high percentage of your time in a strenuous but conversational zone, and a low percentage a little above where you feel like your breathing can't keep up (near or a little above lactate threshold)…
There are several threads on it in the Training forum, and there's more about determining your zones. The polarization zones are set up based on first knowing your Friel (Joe Friel's heart rate zone system) zones. It's not hard, just a little measurement and a little easy percentages math.
You can estimate LT based on rules of thumb as well, but the problem is the same as with the 220-age equation: if you are a slow beater, what a rule says is your LT could actually be your max and then "standard zones" would be too aggressive for you. If you are a fast beater, you would find zones that are not aggressive enough for you and not experience effective training.
My view is, that with some understanding, it can nearly all depend on you.
BTW, Road Fan and I rode together this summer.
…I usually ride solo according to schedules on well known routes so on these organized rides it’s a treat to be lost to time and place, and to have companions as nice as the Road Fans to chat with, from bicycling topics such as technical details and training techniques, to life style items such a music and travel. It’s particularly interesting, as inhabitants of Bike Forums to discuss the other correspondents we know and read, either personally, or as “E-entities.”…
Last edited by Jim from Boston; 11-19-15 at 07:39 AM.
#28
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It may be for you, but it isn't for most people. There's a distribution of around two standard deviations around the supposed norm. At 61 I still see HRs above 180 from time to time. According to that formula my max should be 165, which is barely above my lactate threshold.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It may be for you, but it isn't for most people. There's a distribution of around two standard deviations around the supposed norm. At 61 I still see HRs above 180 from time to time. According to that formula my max should be 165, which is barely above my lactate threshold.
#30
Don from Austin Texas
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,211
Bikes: Schwinn S25 "department store crap" FS MTB, home-made CF 26" hybrid, CF road bike with straight bar, various wierd frankenbikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's wise advice from your doctor.
However just so people understand, what a doctor may tell you about how high you should limit your heart rate and your max are two different things. Someone's maximum heart rate is the absolute highest it can register. In other words it's the limit on how fast the heart muscle can work. Unlike resting heart rate which can drop through training, max isn't affected by how fit we are. It does decrease with age though.
It's difficult to reach your max. For example one test involves a very long hill where you shift to a progressively harder gear one minute at a time. You do this over a five minute or so period after you are thoroughly warmed up and physically stressed. When your cadence starts to drops down and you can't maintain it, you shift again one more time, stand up and sprint all out for 20 seconds or so. You may see spots, have tunnel vision, and be lightheaded. But that's your max. If you measured it properly, no matter what you do it won't be exceeded.
However just so people understand, what a doctor may tell you about how high you should limit your heart rate and your max are two different things. Someone's maximum heart rate is the absolute highest it can register. In other words it's the limit on how fast the heart muscle can work. Unlike resting heart rate which can drop through training, max isn't affected by how fit we are. It does decrease with age though.
It's difficult to reach your max. For example one test involves a very long hill where you shift to a progressively harder gear one minute at a time. You do this over a five minute or so period after you are thoroughly warmed up and physically stressed. When your cadence starts to drops down and you can't maintain it, you shift again one more time, stand up and sprint all out for 20 seconds or so. You may see spots, have tunnel vision, and be lightheaded. But that's your max. If you measured it properly, no matter what you do it won't be exceeded.
Don in Austin
Last edited by Don in Austin; 11-19-15 at 10:15 PM. Reason: typo
#31
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,179 Times
in
1,469 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yesterday I found that when my heart rate was hovering around 155 and had been there for about 10 minutes that I could not carry on a conversation. It was only after I got my heart rate back down below 150 that I could carry on.