Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Max Heart Rate Question

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Max Heart Rate Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-12 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
MAK
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 107
From: Delaware

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Max Heart Rate Question

I'm 60 years old. According to "the formula" (220-age=max heart rate), my max should be 160. I don't use my HR monitor on the road (80-100 miles per week) but do when I'm doing a spinning class. I find it extremely difficult to reach and maintain 80% (134 bpm) and literally impossible to maintain 90% (144 bpm) other than for a very short time. I'm working hard and at 125 bpm or so I feel the effort and and have that great working really hard feeling. BTW...My monitor registers the same numbers as the bike computer so I know that the numbers are accurate.

My questions. I know that formulas don't always fit everyone, so how does one (or should one) factor in a relatively low resting heart rate of 54 bpm?
Is there another formula that factors in the resting rate?

It seems to me that for me to reach 134 bpm I'm doing 250% of my resting rate while someone my age with a resting rate of 72 bpm would only be doing around 185% of their resting rate.
MAK is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-12 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 289
From: Vancouver, BC
The formula is reasonable for populations not individuals. If you want to know your max you'll need to measure it when you're going all out. Find a hill you can climb steadily at a hard pace for a few minutes and then sprint all out until you can't go any more. Your peak HR should come just after you stop.

Alternatively, it's probably better to structure your intervals around your threshold HR. There is a sticky at the top of this subforum (https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...threshold-test) for measuring your threshold HR.
gregf83 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-12 | 02:49 AM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,651
Likes: 3
From: Uncertain
Maximum HRs vary widely between individuals. I'm 57, I still see numbers in the 180s occasionally. As Greg says, it's more useful to work out your threshold and base your training on that.

And having a low resting HR does not mean you will necessarily have a low maximum. My own resting HR is currently 48. So my max is about 380% of the resting rate. But that will have zero relevance to you because of the individual variations.
chasm54 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-12 | 05:07 AM
  #4  
jmX's Avatar
jmX
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 2
From: Orange, CA

Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv

Resting hr has nothing to do with max hr. My resting rate is 45, max hr I've seen on my garmin is 183.

You need to figure out your max by doing a physical test of some sort. I'm sure most cycling training books have a procedure in them for getting your max and setting up your zones.
jmX is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-12 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
Chaco's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Encinitas CA

Bikes: Scott CR1 Team

I'm 64, and my max is 171. The formula says it should be 156. I hit 165 to 172 on 2 out of 3 rides.
So, as pointed out above, you have to experiment. Also, I found as I got into better shape, my max appeared to rise. It didn't, but my ability to go all out increased.
Chaco is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-12 | 07:34 AM
  #6  
FrenchFit's Avatar
The Left Coast, USA
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757
Likes: 25

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

59.5, yo. Mine hit 203 spinting on the treadmill, and I wasn't at my maximum. My guess is my max is around 210, but haven't been there under circumstances I was able to verify. Cruising heartrate seems to be 140-150. I think the formula is fairly useless; how hard I'm breathing, sweating and what my legs are saying is a better measure for me.
FrenchFit is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-12 | 12:52 PM
  #7  
TANC's Avatar
Roubaix for me !!
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Central NC

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix and Allez

As others have said, you can't pay much attention to the formula. By formula, my MHR should be about 164, but it is impossible to get mine over about 145. My resting heart rate is about 55. Now I AM on beta blockers, which have a significant impact on heart rate, so if you take any medications, therein may lie your issue. I just did a 10 mile timetrial at Charlotte Motor Speedway last week, and I was all out for the 10 miles, and it never got over 145, but it stayed around 140 the entire ride. That's higher than my road rides. It usually stays about 125 -135 on those.
TANC is offline  
Reply
Old 07-23-12 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
MAK
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 107
From: Delaware

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

I'm a bit confused? (No surprise) I understand that many of you have exceeded the formula by a large number but...I thought that the formula provided the safe max rate. I could probably push and hit the 190s or low 200s but it seems like it would be just before the heart attack killed me.

I will look into the threshhold HR.

Thank you all for responding.
MAK is offline  
Reply
Old 07-23-12 | 09:52 PM
  #9  
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 491
Originally Posted by MAK
I'm a bit confused? (No surprise) I understand that many of you have exceeded the formula by a large number but...I thought that the formula provided the safe max rate. I could probably push and hit the 190s or low 200s but it seems like it would be just before the heart attack killed me.

I will look into the threshhold HR.

Thank you all for responding.
At your age, doesn't it make more sense to get a heart stress test by your doctor? That will give you a base number to work with and you can find out if there are any problems lurking in the background.

Just my 0.02
eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-12 | 02:21 AM
  #10  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,651
Likes: 3
From: Uncertain
Originally Posted by MAK
I'm a bit confused? (No surprise) I understand that many of you have exceeded the formula by a large number but...I thought that the formula provided the safe max rate. I could probably push and hit the 190s or low 200s but it seems like it would be just before the heart attack killed me.
Er, what? In your initial post your concern was that no matter how hard you worked, you couldn't get your HR up to your theoretical max of 160. But now you could probably push hard enough to get it to 200? Confused is the word...
chasm54 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-12 | 08:03 AM
  #11  
Chaco's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Encinitas CA

Bikes: Scott CR1 Team

The formula is nothing but that - a quick, inaccurate, shorthand way to calculate your max HR. It's a starting point, nothing more.
Since I hit my max fairly routinely, I was concerned that, at age 64, I was putting myself in some danger. But I did some research and asked my doc, and since my underlying heart health is very good, there is no real danger. You won't be able to stay at max HR for very long, either. Your body will force you to slow down.

However, you probably should pay very close attention to any symptoms while you're at that rate -- dizziness, chest pain, anything other than what you'd expect going at that rate. And you should probably get an OK from your doc before you make this a habit.

If getting to your max HR were dangerous, you'd have to have a fleet of ambulances at every race.
Chaco is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-12 | 08:55 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
I don't want to turn this thread into something the OP doesn't want, but I have some questions that fall along the same lines.....

How should Max Heartrate be calculated at home/home gym?

There is the 2x20 method.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...threshold-test
My only issue with this is, if you don't know the number you are trying to reach, you will not get a constant HR and the test results are suppose to be a constant number (not a range).



There is the one at beginner triathlete.
https://www.beginnertriathlete.com/cm...?articleid=633
The warm-up is 15 minutes of cycling, moving through the different gears, always keeping the cadence above 90 RPMS. Do a few short sprints to get your heart rate up and ready for the test!





You should start out in a gear that you can maintain 90 RPMS in. Make sure you remember what gear you started in.
  • The 30 minute TT begins.

  • At 10 minutes into the test, hit the 'Lap' button on your heart rate monitor, to get the average heart rate over the final 20 minutes of the test.

  • The average for the final 20 minutes is your Lactate Threshold or LT.

  • You should finish knowing you gave it everything you had.
15 minutes easy cool down.


This would be great, but the HR monitor doesn't do lap HR.


There are other methods described at beginner triathete.
https://www.beginnertriathlete.com/cm...?articleid=405

All of this leaves me a little confused.
RWBlue01 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-12 | 10:54 PM
  #13  
MAK
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 107
From: Delaware

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Originally Posted by chasm54
Er, what? In your initial post your concern was that no matter how hard you worked, you couldn't get your HR up to your theoretical max of 160. But now you could probably push hard enough to get it to 200? Confused is the word...
I see your point but my intent was to describe a rate while working extremely hard but not totally out of control. The numbers did not describe pushing myself like a maniac to complete exhaustion.
MAK is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-12 | 10:57 PM
  #14  
MAK
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 107
From: Delaware

Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.

Originally Posted by Chaco
The formula is nothing but that - a quick, inaccurate, shorthand way to calculate your max HR. It's a starting point, nothing more.
Since I hit my max fairly routinely, I was concerned that, at age 64, I was putting myself in some danger. But I did some research and asked my doc, and since my underlying heart health is very good, there is no real danger. You won't be able to stay at max HR for very long, either. Your body will force you to slow down.

However, you probably should pay very close attention to any symptoms while you're at that rate -- dizziness, chest pain, anything other than what you'd expect going at that rate. And you should probably get an OK from your doc before you make this a habit.

If getting to your max HR were dangerous, you'd have to have a fleet of ambulances at every race.
Thank you. That is the type of answer I was looking for.
MAK is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GravelMN
Training & Nutrition
1
05-12-16 10:26 AM
Campag4life
Road Cycling
57
06-06-14 10:34 AM
Omega359
Road Cycling
253
09-11-10 08:01 PM
tallmantim
Training & Nutrition
9
05-09-10 10:39 PM
Barrettscv
Fifty Plus (50+)
17
03-21-10 09:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.