Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Help please

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help please

    I just found this forum and it looks like there are quite a few very knowledgeable people on it so I thought that I would join and hopefully obtain some valuable information.

    My wife and I are both 60 and just starting to ride since being in our teens.

    At this point my anticipation is that we will be riding paved trails and city stuff- nothing really "off road" unless it is a dirt trail.

    I have uncovered one of my sons old bikes, a Schwinn Sprint 10 speed in the basement and my wife was trying an old mountain bike. She found it too hard to pedal-- possibly the knobby tires-or what ever. In any event, we found a used Diamondback outlook at a store over the weekend in excellent shape and they changed the tires to some type of semi slick tire. It seems to ride much easier, however, the tires "look" small. They are 26 in but actually measure 25" across diaganally. She is not sure about the bike. They also had a Giant Hybrid -entry level' (new) but it was quite a bit more-- twice the price.

    Questions- would the Diamondback be a good bike for a year or so to make sure she is going to continue with this and then get a better bike or should I look for a better one now? This one just looks small, but it fits her well-- I just want riding to be easy for her. I also have a Schwinn World, but she doesn't like the narrow tires and forward lean.

    Since I dion't want to spend a great deal on bikes now, am I better to take the Schwinn Sprint in for a tune and adjustments, and tires- since they are dry as crackers-- about 100.00 or should I look for a used bike for myself as well? I have ridden the Schwinn about 4 miles so far-- a couple of times-- I can tell it is dryed up-- stands to reason. If a different bike- what kind.

    Also, what kind of luck have you had with bike racks? I want toi get a 2" receiver hitch type. I have seen the Thule type and Yakima and the Saris looks good. I have never used one so I am not sure what is additional hype or really necessary.

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the bike fits- and it can be pedalled- buy it.

    The first bike is never the one you stay with so that first bike has to be ridable. If it doesn't fit-too hard to ride- hurts the back after 5 minutes and it will be sold next year and not replaced.

    Same on the bike for you.

    Once you have got fit(ter)- got over the butt ache- done your first 25 mile trip and THEN found that the bikes aren't really suitable- decide what you do want and go and look for new bikes.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  3. #3
    Email for new group DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Send email to dnvrfox@aol.com for new group
    Posts
    20,887
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You need to give bicycling a fair chance.

    That means a decent, well-fitting bike - it doesn't have to be real expensive - but one that you sort of fall-in-love with.

    If you are new, and don't know what you are doing, I would not recommend buying a used bike unless you have a friend who is knowledgeable. Also, visit some local bike shops and see what is available. My daughter-in-law just bought a cruiser bike with a basket and loves it - 7 speed internal hub.

    If you were just learning to eat Mexican food, and I gave you a plate of used, old cold, poorly prepared food, you would quickly determine that Mexican food was not for you.

    same with bicycling.
    Almost gone from the 50+ forum. - Email me at dnvrfox@aol.com for another fun new group of 50+ folks

  4. #4
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Crystal River and Hernando, Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO 105
    Posts
    13,785
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelpri View Post
    It seems to ride much easier, however, the tires "look" small. They are 26 in but actually measure 25" across diaganally.
    Read this --> http://sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html
    My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO carbon 105

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That information on the tires is great.

    I am just wondering though, (since I really do not know) wouldn't a larger tire be easier to roll? It's just that these tires on the Diamondback look so small especially next to a 10 speed-- and the Hybrids seem to have the 700 (something) tires. It makes sense that they would be easier-- but I can always be wrong. It might be the size of the cranks as well. I just really want this to be an easy bike for my wife to peddle. I am hoping that the Diamondback is a fairly good quality bike.

    I am also wondering if investing 100.00 in the olsd Sprint is smart-- I guess I will need a better seat as well- the original is very hard.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BlazingPedals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Middle of da Mitten
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
    Posts
    7,218
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelpri View Post
    the tires "look" small. They are 26 in but actually measure 25" across diaganally.
    That's normal. Think about it, the wheel would measure differently for different widths of tire, and would only be a true 26" with ONE width, which IIRC is 26x1.9". I'm guessing your wife's tires are marked 26x1.5 or thereabouts. For road use, I consider anything over 1 1/4 to be "fat." I sometimes run a 26x1 on the back of my recumbent; same rim but with the skinny tire the overall wheel only measures a bit over 24" tall.

  7. #7
    It's MY mountain DiabloScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Mt.Diablo
    Posts
    5,546
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelpri View Post
    Also, what kind of luck have you had with bike racks? I want toi get a 2" receiver hitch type. I have seen the Thule type and Yakima and the Saris looks good. I have never used one so I am not sure what is additional hype or really necessary.

    Thanks in advance.
    Bike racks for your car are essential unless you never drive them anywhere or unless you have a cargo space big enough but those you mention probably cost more than the bikes you're considering.

    All newcomers don't want to spend too much money before they find out if they're going to like cycling long term. You don't have to spend a lot of money on new bikes but it's really easy to throw away too much on old bikes that you'll never be happy with - so proceed with caution.
    http://diabloscott.blogspot.com/

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The tires actually say 26 x 38 32-- is that correct?

  9. #9
    Email for new group DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Send email to dnvrfox@aol.com for new group
    Posts
    20,887
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelpri View Post
    I am also wondering if investing 100.00 in the olsd Sprint is smart-- I guess I will need a better seat as well- the original is very hard.
    Most bike seats that the folks on this forum use are "hard." I don't know if your bike seat is especially hard due to age, or if it has always been that way.

    The reason for a hard seat is that, on longer rides, you want your weight supported on your "sit bones" - your ischial (sp?) tuberosities. You don't want a lot of flesh in contact with a seat, as it will rub and cause sores, etc.

    For shorter rides, it likely makes little difference.

    Sometimes finding a seat that you like and fits you takes some time and effort.
    Almost gone from the 50+ forum. - Email me at dnvrfox@aol.com for another fun new group of 50+ folks

  10. #10
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,758
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Larger wheels roll a little easier, but not so much that you would notice it in casual riding. If the tires are smooth enough to roll freely, they should be just fine.

    You can spend quite a bit on bike racks, but the Bell hitch racks sold at Walmart and similar stores for around $100 will do a fine job of carrying your bikes around. That's what I have.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •