Predictions for the fall of the Auto Age
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks for the good link. The conclusions printed in the article are at odds with your own conclusions.
VMT is still below the peak last reached almost 10 years ago, so this trend has continued through times of changing economic conditions and volatile gas prices. The article concludes that "the driving boom is over." I would say that constitutes "significant changes in our relationship with cars" and coincides with Kunstler's prediction. So maybe, upon closer examination, he was right after all, and five years sooner than he said!
[HR][/HR]
Quote from: Vehicle Miles Traveled: A New Look at Our Evolving Behavior - dshort - Advisor Perspectives
VMT is still below the peak last reached almost 10 years ago, so this trend has continued through times of changing economic conditions and volatile gas prices. The article concludes that "the driving boom is over." I would say that constitutes "significant changes in our relationship with cars" and coincides with Kunstler's prediction. So maybe, upon closer examination, he was right after all, and five years sooner than he said!
[HR][/HR]
Quote from: Vehicle Miles Traveled: A New Look at Our Evolving Behavior - dshort - Advisor Perspectives
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Every individual goes through specific processes of decision making. Still there are patterns of influence, cultural thought, etc. All you can really do is consider one factor at a time, or a several factors in tandem, and loosely consider that the particular scenario you imagine may apply to all, many, or just some people and situations. There is too much variation 'out there' to really hypothesize accurately in any meaningful way. Large scale data collection and statistical analysis makes it seem as if we can understand large aggregates in a meaningful way, but I believe this is an artifact of our mind's ability to digest relationships between numbers and project assumptions onto the people and situations whose data was used to generate those numbers.
#128
Time to Fly!
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
12 Posts
College,
I believe you are more focused on the real cause now rather than the symptoms as so many others seem to be. They blame the technology for the condition that birthed the technology.
C.S. Lewis is right it is a natural condition for us to avoid the massive effort close contact with others require. Because of that those that can or could always look for a way to add distance to those contacts. Hence the Roman devised word from 2000 years ago that we get Suburbs from.
Technology from horse and wagon to bicycles and finally cars are simply off shoots to wanting to keep others at arms length.
Nothing we have come up with so far addresses this natural desire for space better than the car. And until they find a way to give people that same physical separation with other forms of transportation private vehicles will be with us long after people pushing for a return to foot and pedal power are passed away.
But we are also good at rationalizing. Some say we haven't returned to miles driven in 10 years as an indication cars are on the decline. Yet at the same time the fact that Bicycle Sales to adults is still lower this year than it was in 1973 doesn't effect their contention that cycling in the U.S. Is on the rise.
I believe you are more focused on the real cause now rather than the symptoms as so many others seem to be. They blame the technology for the condition that birthed the technology.
C.S. Lewis is right it is a natural condition for us to avoid the massive effort close contact with others require. Because of that those that can or could always look for a way to add distance to those contacts. Hence the Roman devised word from 2000 years ago that we get Suburbs from.
Technology from horse and wagon to bicycles and finally cars are simply off shoots to wanting to keep others at arms length.
Nothing we have come up with so far addresses this natural desire for space better than the car. And until they find a way to give people that same physical separation with other forms of transportation private vehicles will be with us long after people pushing for a return to foot and pedal power are passed away.
But we are also good at rationalizing. Some say we haven't returned to miles driven in 10 years as an indication cars are on the decline. Yet at the same time the fact that Bicycle Sales to adults is still lower this year than it was in 1973 doesn't effect their contention that cycling in the U.S. Is on the rise.
But as I said, this is not a new revelation about the souls of people. See Robert Frost's "Mending Wall", for example. Human souls are old things, and they haven't changed since they were first new.... we still prefer comfort, ease, and the illusion of safety to real wisdom or self-understanding.
I'll venture a guess that in five hundred or one thousand years, there will be no more automobiles. But it won't be because people will have changed; they'll still seek what is easy and individualistic. As it relates to transportation, at least, only the technology and source(s) of energy will have changed.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
College, would that be like having 200 virtual friends you have never met but talk to by computer? Or maybe your smart phone?
#130
Time to Fly!
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
12 Posts
Hmmm.... I spent my years on Façadebook just like everyone else. I quit years ago because it left me feeling unfulfilled and frustrated. I am not the kind of person who enjoys superficial friviality. My joys are deep and my sorrows are deep. Facebook was not a good fit for me!
While superficial.... as a former user(abuser?) I can recognize people's addiction to social media as at least *some* desire for relationship. Even if incredibly superficial, engaging in it seems to imply a desire for connection. In other words.... at least it's the right idea and my heart wants to give people credit for that.
My hope is, even someone with a tiny amount of emotional sensitivity can eventually be honest with themself that Facebook fails to give us what we really need and long for. If they adapt in a healthier direction, that will be wisdom gained.
I see automobiles as much more subtle. Much more enabling toward self-isolation and relationship aversion. Possibly because there is still a little stigma associated with social media shut-ins, yet NO stigma associated with abuse of automobiles (in the relational sense).
In fact.... there's rather a stigma if you *don't* own an auto wouldn't you agree? Ever gotten a dirty look or been treated like a space cadet because you choose to bike instead of drive? There is TONS of stigma for driving in a way that is respectful of others. At or below the speed limit? Actually stopping at the stop signs? Give bikes or pedestrians the right of way?.... I get tailgated, honked at, stink eyed and flipped off all the time for doing those things.
Prevailing attitudes are (and what I used to believe and practice years ago) that as a 'Merican, your auto and the roads are for you and your needs and your pleasures, damn everyone else. If you act contrary to this, there is stigma against you. This is what I mean.... far more subtle, the social pressure to be Pro-auto makes it far more cammoflaged a trap.
Believe me, it's a hard sell to convince anyone that their car is a primary factor in why their lives suck. Lots of people know their life sucks, but haven't a clue why. I only try to share my experiences with people I love because I know how lonely and frustrating it is to have a life that sucks.
Last edited by Bikeforumuser0019; 05-30-15 at 08:06 PM. Reason: clarity
#131
Prefers Cicero
Vehicle sales dropped almost by half during the recession, so some of that "bouncing back" is simply delayed replacement, so if trucks were the most popular vehicle prior to the recession, it makes sense that many of the people who are replacing their aging vehicles are replacing trucks with trucks. Also, the reduction in driving is probably a more urban phenomenon, so you would probably expect that any "rebound" has more of a suburban/rural flavour, where more people drive trucks.
I'm not sure the "40 year slump" in bikes is directly relevant here. The huge bike boom in the 1970s was mostly recreational, not transportational, and it occurred while cars were also booming. It's not like people were choosing bikes over cars back then.
#132
Prefers Cicero
Yes, I am a firm believer that there is usually a "thing behind the thing" when it comes to people and their behavior. Most people are not even aware that they are isolating themselves. Cars are inherently isolating.... for example imagine yourself at a red light for a long period of time, or in a traffic jam on a freeway. You are physically very close to many people, yet exquisitely isolated. Would you make eye contact with the person stuck in traffic next to you. Or would you avoid eye contact because it feels "awkward"? Most people pull back from and try to escape even *very* tiny amounts of relational uncomfortableness, such as in this example. Living in the suburbs is even better, as you can drive your car directly into your garage, close the door, and you can effectively never have to so much as look at or speak to your neighbors.
But as I said, this is not a new revelation about the souls of people. See Robert Frost's "Mending Wall", for example. Human souls are old things, and they haven't changed since they were first new.... we still prefer comfort, ease, and the illusion of safety to real wisdom or self-understanding.
I'll venture a guess that in five hundred or one thousand years, there will be no more automobiles. But it won't be because people will have changed; they'll still seek what is easy and individualistic. As it relates to transportation, at least, only the technology and source(s) of energy will have changed.
But as I said, this is not a new revelation about the souls of people. See Robert Frost's "Mending Wall", for example. Human souls are old things, and they haven't changed since they were first new.... we still prefer comfort, ease, and the illusion of safety to real wisdom or self-understanding.
I'll venture a guess that in five hundred or one thousand years, there will be no more automobiles. But it won't be because people will have changed; they'll still seek what is easy and individualistic. As it relates to transportation, at least, only the technology and source(s) of energy will have changed.
Last edited by cooker; 05-30-15 at 08:37 PM.
#133
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I don't think Kunstler was suggesting all car activity was going to be replaced by bikes, rather that use of cars was going to change. That could include people switching to other modes of commuting to work, or driving less for recreational or other purposes.
Vehicle sales dropped almost by half during the recession, so some of that "bouncing back" is simply delayed replacement, so if trucks were the most popular vehicle prior to the recession, it makes sense that many of the people who are replacing their aging vehicles are replacing trucks with trucks. Also, the reduction in driving is probably a more urban phenomenon, so you would probably expect that any "rebound" has more of a suburban/rural flavour, where more people drive trucks.
I'm not sure the "40 year slump" in bikes is directly relevant here. The huge bike boom in the 1970s was mostly recreational, not transportational, and it occurred while cars were also booming. It's not like people were choosing bikes over cars back then.
Vehicle sales dropped almost by half during the recession, so some of that "bouncing back" is simply delayed replacement, so if trucks were the most popular vehicle prior to the recession, it makes sense that many of the people who are replacing their aging vehicles are replacing trucks with trucks. Also, the reduction in driving is probably a more urban phenomenon, so you would probably expect that any "rebound" has more of a suburban/rural flavour, where more people drive trucks.
I'm not sure the "40 year slump" in bikes is directly relevant here. The huge bike boom in the 1970s was mostly recreational, not transportational, and it occurred while cars were also booming. It's not like people were choosing bikes over cars back then.
And one maybe not: Why are Americans fleeing the Northeast? | New York Post
In truth not much has changed in 20 years has it?
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While superficial.... as a former user(abuser?) I can recognize people's addiction to social media as at least *some* desire for relationship. Even if incredibly superficial, engaging in it seems to imply a desire for connection. In other words.... at least it's the right idea and my heart wants to give people credit for that.
I see automobiles as much more subtle. Much more enabling toward self-isolation and relationship aversion. Possibly because there is still a little stigma associated with social media shut-ins, yet NO stigma associated with abuse of automobiles (in the relational sense).
In fact.... there's rather a stigma if you *don't* own an auto wouldn't you agree? Ever gotten a dirty look or been treated like a space cadet because you choose to bike instead of drive? There is TONS of stigma for driving in a way that is respectful of others. At or below the speed limit? Actually stopping at the stop signs? Give bikes or pedestrians the right of way?.... I get tailgated, honked at, stink eyed and flipped off all the time for doing those things.
Prevailing attitudes are (and what I used to believe and practice years ago) that as a 'Merican, your auto and the roads are for you and your needs and your pleasures, damn everyone else. If you act contrary to this, there is stigma against you. This is what I mean.... far more subtle, the social pressure to be Pro-auto makes it far more cammoflaged a trap.
Believe me, it's a hard sell to convince anyone that their car is a primary factor in why their lives suck. Lots of people know their life sucks, but haven't a clue why. I only try to share my experiences with people I love because I know how lonely and frustrating it is to have a life that sucks.
While superficial.... as a former user(abuser?) I can recognize people's addiction to social media as at least *some* desire for relationship. Even if incredibly superficial, engaging in it seems to imply a desire for connection. In other words.... at least it's the right idea and my heart wants to give people credit for that.
I see automobiles as much more subtle. Much more enabling toward self-isolation and relationship aversion. Possibly because there is still a little stigma associated with social media shut-ins, yet NO stigma associated with abuse of automobiles (in the relational sense).
In fact.... there's rather a stigma if you *don't* own an auto wouldn't you agree? Ever gotten a dirty look or been treated like a space cadet because you choose to bike instead of drive? There is TONS of stigma for driving in a way that is respectful of others. At or below the speed limit? Actually stopping at the stop signs? Give bikes or pedestrians the right of way?.... I get tailgated, honked at, stink eyed and flipped off all the time for doing those things.
Prevailing attitudes are (and what I used to believe and practice years ago) that as a 'Merican, your auto and the roads are for you and your needs and your pleasures, damn everyone else. If you act contrary to this, there is stigma against you. This is what I mean.... far more subtle, the social pressure to be Pro-auto makes it far more cammoflaged a trap.
Believe me, it's a hard sell to convince anyone that their car is a primary factor in why their lives suck. Lots of people know their life sucks, but haven't a clue why. I only try to share my experiences with people I love because I know how lonely and frustrating it is to have a life that sucks.
I also agree it will be hard to convince anyone that the car they wanted so much they took out a loan for caused their life to suck as you say. Just as an private observation my sister drove a mass transit bus till she retired. She never took the bus to work even when she could. And one of the most common things she said she had heard from her customers was, "As soon as I can get a car I will never ride the bus again.
Now it quite possibly could be the unwillingness to try and connect with others in a complicated dance of social interaction. But I wonder how much of that is fear of getting close to people who want to hurt or take from you. That being money, goods or simply taking advantage of others. The media may exacerbate these feelings when we see people killing each other in Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburg, Cleveland and yes LA almost every night. And who shoots most of them? Neighbors, or at least that is who is being reported as doing the killings. So yes a car may give you some feeling of separation or even protection. But like your original statement I don't think cars are the cause but rather what people see as the solution to those complicated social interactions. As one poster put it earlier we tend to live in places we see as more socially acceptable or at least strive to move to such places. As you posted it is Natural.
#135
Sophomoric Member
This would make a good thread of its own. I hope you will start one. We should have a number of people who are trying to drive less, and they must have their reasons.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#136
Sophomoric Member
Yes, I am a firm believer that there is usually a "thing behind the thing" when it comes to people and their behavior. Most people are not even aware that they are isolating themselves. Cars are inherently isolating.... for example imagine yourself at a red light for a long period of time, or in a traffic jam on a freeway. You are physically very close to many people, yet exquisitely isolated. Would you make eye contact with the person stuck in traffic next to you. Or would you avoid eye contact because it feels "awkward"? Most people pull back from and try to escape even *very* tiny amounts of relational uncomfortableness, such as in this example. Living in the suburbs is even better, as you can drive your car directly into your garage, close the door, and you can effectively never have to so much as look at or speak to your neighbors.
But as I said, this is not a new revelation about the souls of people. See Robert Frost's "Mending Wall", for example. Human souls are old things, and they haven't changed since they were first new.... we still prefer comfort, ease, and the illusion of safety to real wisdom or self-understanding.
I'll venture a guess that in five hundred or one thousand years, there will be no more automobiles. But it won't be because people will have changed; they'll still seek what is easy and individualistic. As it relates to transportation, at least, only the technology and source(s) of energy will have changed.
But as I said, this is not a new revelation about the souls of people. See Robert Frost's "Mending Wall", for example. Human souls are old things, and they haven't changed since they were first new.... we still prefer comfort, ease, and the illusion of safety to real wisdom or self-understanding.
I'll venture a guess that in five hundred or one thousand years, there will be no more automobiles. But it won't be because people will have changed; they'll still seek what is easy and individualistic. As it relates to transportation, at least, only the technology and source(s) of energy will have changed.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#137
Sophomoric Member
Just as an aside: from the U.S. Census site; The combined rate of bicycle commuting for the 50 largest U.S. cities increased from 0.6 percent in 2000 to 1.0 percent in 2008–2012.
That leaves 99 percent that don't get to work or school by bike. Or about what it was when I commuted by bicycle in the 70s.
That leaves 99 percent that don't get to work or school by bike. Or about what it was when I commuted by bicycle in the 70s.
Tandempower, same can be said for older cars. Used car sales soared at the beginning of the recession and make up a majority of the vehicles on our roads.
The point is the F series truck is on top of the new car sales "again" just like it was before the recession. It is not an economical vehicle to drive nor is it all that different from the F series before the recession.
When I commuted to work and College in the 70s bicycles represented less than 4 percent of choices people made for transportation. 40 years later where are we?
The point is the F series truck is on top of the new car sales "again" just like it was before the recession. It is not an economical vehicle to drive nor is it all that different from the F series before the recession.
When I commuted to work and College in the 70s bicycles represented less than 4 percent of choices people made for transportation. 40 years later where are we?
I don't know if it is a trap. But maybe I see people as more aware than some do. I see people as having made the choice because they wanted to, they budgeted it and see an advantage that they don't have without it. They can live where they want and not be limited in the direction they have to find work, education for their kids, Work in one direction and school in another. I get your point about the stigma but to most of the people I know I am the bicycle guy. Then they also know I have access to a car if I so choose.
I also agree it will be hard to convince anyone that the car they wanted so much they took out a loan for caused their life to suck as you say. Just as an private observation my sister drove a mass transit bus till she retired. She never took the bus to work even when she could. And one of the most common things she said she had heard from her customers was, "As soon as I can get a car I will never ride the bus again.
Now it quite possibly could be the unwillingness to try and connect with others in a complicated dance of social interaction. But I wonder how much of that is fear of getting close to people who want to hurt or take from you. That being money, goods or simply taking advantage of others. The media may exacerbate these feelings when we see people killing each other in Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburg, Cleveland and yes LA almost every night. And who shoots most of them? Neighbors, or at least that is who is being reported as doing the killings. So yes a car may give you some feeling of separation or even protection. But like your original statement I don't think cars are the cause but rather what people see as the solution to those complicated social interactions. As one poster put it earlier we tend to live in places we see as more socially acceptable or at least strive to move to such places. As you posted it is Natural.
I also agree it will be hard to convince anyone that the car they wanted so much they took out a loan for caused their life to suck as you say. Just as an private observation my sister drove a mass transit bus till she retired. She never took the bus to work even when she could. And one of the most common things she said she had heard from her customers was, "As soon as I can get a car I will never ride the bus again.
Now it quite possibly could be the unwillingness to try and connect with others in a complicated dance of social interaction. But I wonder how much of that is fear of getting close to people who want to hurt or take from you. That being money, goods or simply taking advantage of others. The media may exacerbate these feelings when we see people killing each other in Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburg, Cleveland and yes LA almost every night. And who shoots most of them? Neighbors, or at least that is who is being reported as doing the killings. So yes a car may give you some feeling of separation or even protection. But like your original statement I don't think cars are the cause but rather what people see as the solution to those complicated social interactions. As one poster put it earlier we tend to live in places we see as more socially acceptable or at least strive to move to such places. As you posted it is Natural.
To build something sucky, and then to despise it because it sucks--not very logical!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 05-31-15 at 08:58 AM.
#138
Prefers Cicero
Make relevant what you want and disregard what you like. That is what forums like this are for. 1.1 percent is less than 9 out of 10 households with a car. As far as the increase in urban cycling it still must be pretty small. And with the migration trends in the US it shouldn't get much larger I wouldn't think. From a group on your side of the political spectrum. Americans Flee The Northeast Because It's The Northeast
And one maybe not: Why are Americans fleeing the Northeast? | New York Post
In truth not much has changed in 20 years has it?
And one maybe not: Why are Americans fleeing the Northeast? | New York Post
In truth not much has changed in 20 years has it?
In any event, a right wing columnist distorting demographic data to support his low tax bias doesn't have much to do with this thread, nor is it on my "side of the political spectrum".
Last edited by cooker; 05-31-15 at 08:59 AM.
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
He was correct. I misunderstood the assignment. I was realistic about the expectations of future progress. Twenty five years from today.... a full 20% of the cars produced this year will still be on the road. Expect very little change.
#140
Sophomoric Member
In 1968..... a drafting assignment in High School... was to draw a futurist automobile... as one would expect to be produced in in the year 2000. I got a C... as the teacher thought my drawing resembled the THEN current model Oldsmobile Toronado.
He was correct. I misunderstood the assignment. I was realistic about the expectations of future progress. Twenty five years from today.... a full 20% of the cars produced this year will still be on the road. Expect very little change.
He was correct. I misunderstood the assignment. I was realistic about the expectations of future progress. Twenty five years from today.... a full 20% of the cars produced this year will still be on the road. Expect very little change.
An actual car from model year 2000:
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Roody, some valid points. But .5 to .6 percent increase in 30-40 years is still pretty slow.
I agree the way they design busses and bus services are bad. As my sister often said, a driver can never be in trouble for being late, running cold, but they can be cited for running hot, being early.
Still cars aren't going away in our lifetime and the cars people prefer and drive have stayed pretty constant since the op's post. And if they continue as they are today the only difference will be how they are powered.
They are still building new roads and in my area new freeways and if your so oft lament of more roads only means more cars is true then what results do you expect?
I agree the way they design busses and bus services are bad. As my sister often said, a driver can never be in trouble for being late, running cold, but they can be cited for running hot, being early.
Still cars aren't going away in our lifetime and the cars people prefer and drive have stayed pretty constant since the op's post. And if they continue as they are today the only difference will be how they are powered.
They are still building new roads and in my area new freeways and if your so oft lament of more roads only means more cars is true then what results do you expect?
#142
Prefers Cicero
Last edited by cooker; 05-31-15 at 09:18 AM.
#143
Sophomoric Member
Roody, some valid points. But .5 to .6 percent increase in 30-40 years is still pretty slow.
I agree the way they design busses and bus services are bad. As my sister often said, a driver can never be in trouble for being late, running cold, but they can be cited for running hot, being early.
Still cars aren't going away in our lifetime and the cars people prefer and drive have stayed pretty constant since the op's post. And if they continue as they are today the only difference will be how they are powered.
They are still building new roads and in my area new freeways and if your so oft lament of more roads only means more cars is true then what results do you expect?
I agree the way they design busses and bus services are bad. As my sister often said, a driver can never be in trouble for being late, running cold, but they can be cited for running hot, being early.
Still cars aren't going away in our lifetime and the cars people prefer and drive have stayed pretty constant since the op's post. And if they continue as they are today the only difference will be how they are powered.
They are still building new roads and in my area new freeways and if your so oft lament of more roads only means more cars is true then what results do you expect?
Also, remember that roads are used by vehicles other than cars--notably bicycles, trucks, and buses.
Is your region covered by a Complete Streets regulation? These require that new streets (or rebuilt streets) must be designed to be shared by cars, buses, bikes, and pedestrians. My area is covered on three levels--statewide, county, and city. But these regulations are even more effective in areas that have ongoing new road construction, such as where you live.
I want to go off-topic for just a minute. I just want to say that even though I almost always disagree with you, I find your thoughtfulness and respect on the forum to be very enjoyable. You pretty much always show that one can disagree without being disagreeable. I try to do the same, but often fall short. So thanks very much!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 05-31-15 at 09:18 AM.
#144
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Posted thought or opinions from outside of that spectrum might be considered a troll or maybe even an insult by some members of that LCF spectrum who wish to control/direct all "discussion" on this list.
#145
Prefers Cicero
True, this thread (as are much of the recent "discussion"on LCF) is mostly about the "imaginative" speculation and conjuring of posters from the Age of Aquarius to New Age Political Correctness spectrum.
Posted thought or opinions from outside of that spectrum might be considered a troll or maybe even an insult by some members of that LCF spectrum who wish to control/direct all "discussion" on this list.
Posted thought or opinions from outside of that spectrum might be considered a troll or maybe even an insult by some members of that LCF spectrum who wish to control/direct all "discussion" on this list.
#146
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#147
Sophomoric Member
Not funny, not cute, not appreciated. You express no opinions of your own. You just assault the opinions of others. So boring.
What do you think about the topic? Or if you have no actual thoughts or opinions, if you are a pure reactionary, silence is golden.
What do you think about the topic? Or if you have no actual thoughts or opinions, if you are a pure reactionary, silence is golden.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 05-31-15 at 09:44 AM.
#148
Prefers Cicero
#149
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
I already stated that the "topic" as discussed on this list is is mostly about the "imaginative" speculation and conjuring of posters from the Age of Aquarius to New Age Political Correctness spectrum. My opinion is that the topic of discussion is just another naval gazing/P&R exercise with little if any practical relevance to anyone Living Car Free or bicycling.
Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 05-31-15 at 10:08 AM.
#150
Sophomoric Member