Originally Posted by
cooker
I don't think Kunstler was suggesting all car activity was going to be replaced by bikes, rather that use of cars was going to change. That could include people switching to other modes of commuting to work, or driving less for recreational or other purposes.
Vehicle sales dropped almost by half during the recession, so some of that "bouncing back" is simply delayed replacement, so if trucks were the most popular vehicle prior to the recession, it makes sense that many of the people who are replacing their aging vehicles are replacing trucks with trucks. Also, the reduction in driving is probably a more urban phenomenon, so you would probably expect that any "rebound" has more of a suburban/rural flavour, where more people drive trucks.
I'm not sure the "40 year slump" in bikes is directly relevant here. The huge bike boom in the 1970s was mostly recreational, not transportational, and it occurred while cars were also booming. It's not like people were choosing bikes over cars back then.
Make relevant what you want and disregard what you like. That is what forums like this are for. 1.1 percent is less than 9 out of 10 households with a car. As far as the increase in urban cycling it still must be pretty small. And with the migration trends in the US it shouldn't get much larger I wouldn't think. From a group on your side of the political spectrum.
Americans Flee The Northeast Because It's The Northeast
And one maybe not:
Why are Americans fleeing the Northeast? | New York Post
In truth not much has changed in 20 years has it?