Sources for Reviews and Recommendations
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sources for Reviews and Recommendations
What sources, be they magazines or on the Internet, would offer reviews and guides to the latest mountain bikes?
#3
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
EOT!
The mags usually say nothing but good things about a new bike. MTBR has some unbiased reviews but you do have to wade through some biased ones too. For example, there are some reviews on MTBR that will say something like "I just got X and it's the superist evar!". You can ignore those as there hasn't been enough time for the newness to wear off and a true evaluation to occur. I also mostly ignore the "new" riders as they don't have much experience.
The mags usually say nothing but good things about a new bike. MTBR has some unbiased reviews but you do have to wade through some biased ones too. For example, there are some reviews on MTBR that will say something like "I just got X and it's the superist evar!". You can ignore those as there hasn't been enough time for the newness to wear off and a true evaluation to occur. I also mostly ignore the "new" riders as they don't have much experience.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bike Lover,
I appreciate your comments.
What I really could use is some sort of comprehensive comparison chart of all the 2008 mountain bikes. From there I could wade through and highlight the most promising bikes that meet my specs. I'm savvy enough to recognize overly glowing or trash reviews.
One requirement I have is a ChromeMoly frame. No aluminum, carbon fiber or titanium for me. Another is all Shimano components.
I appreciate your comments.
What I really could use is some sort of comprehensive comparison chart of all the 2008 mountain bikes. From there I could wade through and highlight the most promising bikes that meet my specs. I'm savvy enough to recognize overly glowing or trash reviews.
One requirement I have is a ChromeMoly frame. No aluminum, carbon fiber or titanium for me. Another is all Shimano components.
#5
POWERCRANK addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Acton, West London, UK
Posts: 3,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
mtbr - but the only really meaningful reviews will always be a year old. Ignore the positive ones, read the negative ones, test ride, take it all with a big pinch of salt and then make your own mind up.
Alternatively, for bike/parts reviews, then either trawling the internet via a google search or, if the bike I'm interested in is on long term review, in DirtRag and Bike magazines I'll read those. Either way I try not to buy without checking form, fit and function first.
Alternatively, for bike/parts reviews, then either trawling the internet via a google search or, if the bike I'm interested in is on long term review, in DirtRag and Bike magazines I'll read those. Either way I try not to buy without checking form, fit and function first.
__________________
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waterloo, ONT
Posts: 1,417
Bikes: Road: Trek 1.5 (2007). Mountain: Santa Cruz Chameleon (2008). Beater: Peugeot Recorde du Monde (1850)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think it's as easy as "look at this chart" as bikes are made for different purposes. You might come across an XC chart (such as on MTBR.com) or a Freeride HT chart, but I doubt a chart of ALL 2008 bikes.
Another option is to ask the people here what they would recommend. Explain what you want and how you want it (other than just frame material!). Many people here tend to know what they're talking about... just ignore me!
#7
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with Zan, about ignoring him/her at least . If you post what you are looking for I'm sure suggestions will abound. XC/AM/SS/HT/FS, the acronyms are endless.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waterloo, ONT
Posts: 1,417
Bikes: Road: Trek 1.5 (2007). Mountain: Santa Cruz Chameleon (2008). Beater: Peugeot Recorde du Monde (1850)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Love you too.
#9
Should be riding
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: C-dale- moutain, Pedal Force RS- Campy Record, Quiring Ti XTR, Red line Monocog, S E F@r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Zan, the smiley was intended to represent I was joking. I realised I was agreeing with someone who said to ignore what they were saying. The whole concept was amusing to me.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waterloo, ONT
Posts: 1,417
Bikes: Road: Trek 1.5 (2007). Mountain: Santa Cruz Chameleon (2008). Beater: Peugeot Recorde du Monde (1850)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also meant my "love you too" in a playful spirit, no worries. Here, I'll try with your style: .
Now we both understand!
Now we both understand!