Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

giant sedona hybrid

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

giant sedona hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-04, 11:34 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
giant sedona hybrid

i am having a hard time choosing between the 17" and 19" frame size. I am 5'9" 200 pounds 30"inseam. I have ridden both frames and on paved trail they both ride a bit different. I will be riding paved trail 90% of time. The 17" frame feels comfortable if I was riding offroad and I can turn sharp easier,,but the 19" frame feels maybe,slightly,better as a long distance paved road riding bike. On the 19" the seat post is down almost to the bottom. Confused about which bike to get,I feel like i am between both sizes. I guess I can adjust seat,handlebars accordingly,,any more advice on which is best suited for me?
charlesk is offline  
Old 12-30-04, 02:09 PM
  #2  
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
  1. The Sedona is a COMFORT bike, not really intended for any real offroad activity. Fireroads are fine, singletrack - not so much.
  2. I can't see you. Therefore I can't determine what size you need, photographs won't help. You need to have your LBS size you to the bike and ultimately go with what feels best.
Just a side note the Giant Cypress with it's 700c wheels is a hybrid, not the Sedona which has 26" wheels.
__________________

Last edited by Raiyn; 12-30-04 at 03:36 PM.
Raiyn is offline  
Old 12-30-04, 02:39 PM
  #3  
Huachuca Rider
 
webist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,275

Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It seems there is a really wide difference between the two bikes. I agree with Raiyn. Check with the LBS and go with what feels best.

I just sold my Sedona DX. Really enjoyed it on fire trails and even crossed a few washes with it. Found I was just not comfortable roughing it.
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
webist is offline  
Old 12-30-04, 02:47 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would normally say to go with the smaller frame so the bike will be easier to move around on to balance yourself, but since Raiyn said this is a comfort bike, I'm not sure if that applies
.:MTB:. is offline  
Old 12-30-04, 04:03 PM
  #5  
Shimano Certified
 
mtbikerinpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,849

Bikes: 92 Giant Sedona ATX Custom

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Its a Comfort Bike
Hehe, yes it is comfortable, but they mask a lot of the potential with the lower models. Go for the top model, it is a great design. I have been using my 1992 Sedona ATX (20.5 inch) for fire roads, road tours, XC races Free ride sessions... Good frame. The stock forks are pretty bland and heavy, the derailieurs are alright but will hold up fine. The big thing is they are nice handling and easily upgradable.

Last edited by mtbikerinpa; 12-30-04 at 04:25 PM.
mtbikerinpa is offline  
Old 12-30-04, 11:55 PM
  #6  
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mtbikerinpa
Hehe, yes it is comfortable, but they mask a lot of the potential with the lower models. Go for the top model, it is a great design. I have been using my 1992 Sedona ATX (20.5 inch) for fire roads, road tours, XC races Free ride sessions... Good frame. The stock forks are pretty bland and heavy, the derailieurs are alright but will hold up fine. The big thing is they are nice handling and easily upgradable.
What a difference 13 years makes. The frame may be OK but it's crippled by the adjustable stem (I don't recommend this for ANYONE going offroad much less a 200+ pounder) low rent suspension seatpost (even the slightly better model on the TOL* version is lacking) If he's serious about offroading it he'll get a real MTB and put slicks on it for the road. Seeing as how he wishes to do the opposite it's not that much of an issue.
__________________
Raiyn is offline  
Old 12-31-04, 01:08 PM
  #7  
Shimano Certified
 
mtbikerinpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,849

Bikes: 92 Giant Sedona ATX Custom

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
The big thing is they are nice handling and easily upgradable.
As I said, Potential.
Mine started the same way.

Last edited by mtbikerinpa; 12-31-04 at 01:17 PM.
mtbikerinpa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.