Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50
  1. #1
    sport fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cross Check - too heavy?

    My LBS are trying to talk me out of a Cross Check - the weight weenies! I'm not looking for a high end racing bike, what I love about the Cross Check is that it's something I can use for everything - single track, cross, commuting, touring, even fixed gear. CC is my friend.

    Is it really that heavy? Was it enough to put anyone else off going for this wonderful Surly? What did you get instead?

    Other options I was looking at: Lemond Poprad, Planet X Kaffenback. Any comments?
    Learn to Build Your Own Website | Twitter: @AMcDermott
    '04 Trek 4300, '07 Surly Cross Check, '08 Giant Bowery (stolen)
    Bike info | Pics of CrossCheck (touring) | CrossCheck component list Touring pics: 2005 | 2006 | 2008

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I looked into the same purchase recently and just ordered a cross check frame and fork for $303 from edina bike shop: http://edinabike.com/page.cfm?PageID...ils&sku=FM0442

    As far as a complete bike goes, I think the poprad is a better value. My LBS quoted me a price for a poprad about $1,100 for a 2006. compared to the complete cross check, the poprad has a better wheel set, brifters rather than barcons, and better components.

    Lemond's tech department told me that the frame is 3.7# or about 1/2 pound lighter than the cross check. If you also throw in the fork, then the poprad is about 1 pound lighter than the cross check in total. However, IMHO, 1 pound difference is totally nothing in terms of speed or performance. 1 pound is a good dump or 2/3 of a water bottle.

    There is a price for light weight and that is risk of failure. Does anyone remember George Hincapie's (spelling?) steerer tube breaking during Paris Rubaix? IMHO (again) light weight for a non-elite racer is a complete wast of time. All risk and no reward, and higher prices too. Get the bike you want and blow past someone on an ultralight racing machine with a smile on your face and a wallet full of money.

  3. #3
    Senior Member sfcrossrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    My Bikes
    Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
    Posts
    2,760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mine is in the 18-19 pound range with Ultegra, XT and DurAce goodies. I also have a carbon post and a bar end shifter (single up front). I built a crosscheck so i could enjoy my bike year round. When the season is over I turn her into a touring rig and ride along the coast. It's a great cross frame and an awesome do all frame.

    That said... I'm wanting a Vanilla something bad!

  4. #4
    ♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯ -=(8)=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
    My Bikes
    Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
    Posts
    7,906
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do a search on the great Cross-Check and see if you can
    find two posts saying anything bad about them.
    The Swiss Army Knife of bicycles
    As a former CrossX owner the weight is not that bad and
    if you ride alot on bad roads and such it can actually be
    of some benefit as far as comfort and stability goes.
    A great bike.
    -ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"

  5. #5
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,249
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamr22
    I looked into the same purchase recently and just ordered a cross check frame and fork for $303 from edina bike shop: http://edinabike.com/page.cfm?PageID...ils&sku=FM0442

    As far as a complete bike goes, I think the poprad is a better value. My LBS quoted me a price for a poprad about $1,100 for a 2006. compared to the complete cross check, the poprad has a better wheel set, brifters rather than barcons, and better components.

    Lemond's tech department told me that the frame is 3.7# or about 1/2 pound lighter than the cross check. If you also throw in the fork, then the poprad is about 1 pound lighter than the cross check in total. However, IMHO, 1 pound difference is totally nothing in terms of speed or performance. 1 pound is a good dump or 2/3 of a water bottle.

    There is a price for light weight and that is risk of failure. Does anyone remember George Hincapie's (spelling?) steerer tube breaking during Paris Rubaix? IMHO (again) light weight for a non-elite racer is a complete wast of time. All risk and no reward, and higher prices too. Get the bike you want and blow past someone on an ultralight racing machine with a smile on your face and a wallet full of money.
    +1

    Tim
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Being in Ireland I'm going to assume that the Cross Check will cost you a fair amount of money. How much does it cost? What other options is the LBS offering?

    You might want to check out some of the frames frome Mercian or other British builders. They might be able to build you something like the Cross Check that is a lot higher quality for just a little bit more money.

    http://www.merciancycles.com/

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tim (cs1): What does "+1" mean? do you have any pix of your waterfords? whish I could afford one.

  8. #8
    Tiocfáidh ár Lá jfmckenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    The edge of b#
    My Bikes
    A whole bunch-a bikes.
    Posts
    5,410
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    ^^ +1 basically means "I agree". In essence it reiterates your point.

    Cross Checks are the Cadillac of cross bikes. They are very nice and you will be happy with it.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    My Bikes
    Bianchi San Jose, Specialized p.2, Haro x4
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even though I don't have one (out of my price range). I really liked the cross-check. My current bike is steel and as they say, steel is more forgiving. I rode an aluminum hybrid bike for a bit and my P.2 is aluminum as well. I like the way my steel bike feels.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seeing as the Crosscheck is £300 this side of the pond, it isn't something i'd go for. For a little more money you could get Mercian/Witcomb/Whoever to build you a frame, in a better quality steel to your specific dimensions.

  11. #11
    sport fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was quoted 500 euros ($635 USD!) for a Cross Check (frame only) in my LBS. Built up with Tiagra, 850 euros, excluding wheels.

    They were trying to talk me into a Kona "Jake the Snake". Holding the Jake... well, I've see heavier water bottles - empty! The comparison was to a Surly Steamroller, and they said the Cross Check was even heavier again than the Steamroller.

    You guys are right though, every single thing I've read about the Cross Check has been positive. I'm going to ring that Edina Bike crowd and see if I can convince them to ship international.

    Some of the other stuff they were suggesting - a complete Trek 520 (great bike) - 1,275 euros (1,619.43 USD), complete Ridgeback Element 800 euros (1,016.26 USD) (I've never heard of this one, but I like Ridgebacks, especially Velocitys). I asked them for a price on a built up Poprad.
    Learn to Build Your Own Website | Twitter: @AMcDermott
    '04 Trek 4300, '07 Surly Cross Check, '08 Giant Bowery (stolen)
    Bike info | Pics of CrossCheck (touring) | CrossCheck component list Touring pics: 2005 | 2006 | 2008

  12. #12
    sport fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For the record, my correspondance with Surly and Planet X... If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know

    Surly first:

    Quote Originally Posted by Alrocket
    Have you any experience with 5'6-7 riders on the Crosscheck? Any pedal clearance problems on 700c wheels?

    My other question is about the Surly 4130 cro-moly steel. I haven't
    found much information on it online - do you have any links or
    documentation? How does it compare with Reynolds 853 etc?

    Thanks for your help
    Quote Originally Posted by Surly email
    Hi Al,
    Tubing: our tubing is the same diameter and wall thickness as Reynolds
    631. Ours is not air hardened, but this does not affect ride quality at
    all, only the general 'toughness' of the metal, or resistance to dents.
    However, this tubing is thick enough not to warrant such a feature; an
    853 tubeset would benefit because it is much thinner-walled. In fact,
    we used 631 on our original frames and had problems with availability,
    price, and material strength. When we switched to our own tubing, tube
    related warranty claims completely disappeared. Our tubing is better
    than name brand tubes of the same dimensions and alloy.
    Toe overlap: this skirts on the sizing issue, so it's a good starting
    place for size discussion.
    My guess is yes, you will have a certain amount of T.O. There are
    design limitations that make T.O. more of a problem on any smaller frame
    that uses larger wheels, limits that simply cannot be avoided. You
    can't make the bike too long or add too much rake to the fork because it
    will not fit or handle well. Also, there are a lot of other issues that
    go into determining T.O.: foot size, foot placement on the pedal (using
    platforms vs. clipless for example), tire size, fenders, and crank arm
    length all make a big difference in how much T.O. any person
    experiences. My personal opinion about T.O. is that although annoying,
    it is almost never dangerous. First, your foot and wheel have to be in
    the right position, and steering angle while riding is usually shallower
    than the T.O. angle. Also, most riders choose some sort of freewheeling
    drivetrain, which means you can stop your feet momentarily if you really
    need to. The only time I have ever found T.O. to be both unavoidable
    and potentially problematic is riding fixed gear offroad. And even so,
    I have never crashed or even come close, at least due to T.O. That
    said, I'd like to reiterate that T.O. will be more pronounced on smaller
    frames using larger wheels.
    Size: there are 3 main things that are true or any sizing theory.
    >Effective top tube length. Not true TT, but effective, sometimes
    called virtual TT (see attachment). Compare the ETT of a bike or two
    you find comfy to the the specs of same for the Crosscheck. This will
    give you a good idea which size is closest to that you already find
    comfy.
    >Standover height. Know your true pubic bone height (crotch to floor in
    socks). This is the minimum clearance you need to be able to stand over
    the frame, and is listed in our specs also. Use in conjunction with
    ETT.
    >Personal preferrence. There are a lot of things that make a person
    feel the fit is right or not, and this is not an absolute. I prefer
    longer top tubes, for instance. Think about wat position feels most
    comfy to you. If you like to be stretched out, perhaps a larger frame.
    Keep in mind that component choice plays a big role in this. Pick the
    closest frame size and change the stem or bar if necessary.

    Hope all this helps
    Planet X, re: Kaffenback.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alrocket
    It was suggested that I investigate the Kaffenback, particularly your "Budget Build"! Is this still available?
    I'm looking for something with a Tiagra or better set (depending on budget), steel frame with rack eyelets, strong > wheels (I'm 15 stone) My budget is about 800 euro (negotiatable).

    I am 5'7 short, 29" inseam, heavy upper body (front row rugby player) so I'd be looking at the smaller end of the range.

    So let me know what you think, if you have any suitable frames in stock, and if I can't afford the built up I'll consider frame on it's own.

    Cheers
    Quote Originally Posted by Planet X
    Due to product availability, we're not doing super-budget stuff right
    now.

    We're onto 105 10spd now, and we're looking at £699 built up with a
    spec like this:-

    Kaffenback frame
    Kaffenback fork
    6061 planet x 42cm bar
    Anti Gravity seatpost
    Seatclamp
    Planet X 2 bolt stem (110, 120, 130mm)
    Selle Italia Initiale Saddle
    105 10spd cassette
    105 10spd chain
    105 10spd front mech and 31.8mm clamp.
    105 10spd rear mech
    105 10spd STi shifter/brake lever with brake and gear cables
    105 10spd crankset
    on-one retro cross canti's or tektro mini v's
    Xero wheelset
    Conti Top Touring tyres
    Learn to Build Your Own Website | Twitter: @AMcDermott
    '04 Trek 4300, '07 Surly Cross Check, '08 Giant Bowery (stolen)
    Bike info | Pics of CrossCheck (touring) | CrossCheck component list Touring pics: 2005 | 2006 | 2008

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    My Bikes
    Dawes Kalahari, Puch Prima Super Sport, Graham Weigh 853
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamr22
    Get the bike you want and blow past someone on an ultralight racing machine with a smile on your face and a wallet full of money.
    That wallet full of money might slow you down a lot!
    And the aerodynamics of a pocket full of green doesn't bare thinking about!

  14. #14
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I recently discovered the thrill of riding ATV trails on my fixed Cross-Check. She now sports big old 700x42 IRC knobbies

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/fixedty...7594288056971/

    I've got another Check set up for touring. Next spring I'm pretty sure I'll build another one, targetting a old fat fart cyclo-cross look
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    dobber, what kind of handlebars are those? can you ride on the brake hoods comfortably?

  16. #16
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alrocket
    I was quoted 500 euros ($635 USD!) for a Cross Check (frame only) in my LBS. Built up with Tiagra, 850 euros, excluding wheels.

    They were trying to talk me into a Kona "Jake the Snake". Holding the Jake... well, I've see heavier water bottles - empty! The comparison was to a Surly Steamroller, and they said the Cross Check was even heavier again than the Steamroller.

    You guys are right though, every single thing I've read about the Cross Check has been positive. I'm going to ring that Edina Bike crowd and see if I can convince them to ship international.

    Some of the other stuff they were suggesting - a complete Trek 520 (great bike) - 1,275 euros (1,619.43 USD), complete Ridgeback Element 800 euros (1,016.26 USD) (I've never heard of this one, but I like Ridgebacks, especially Velocitys). I asked them for a price on a built up Poprad.
    Damn, that's pricey! I picked up a Long Haul Trucker from this place in Germany for a lot less. Their Cross Check, after shipping, will be 100 euro less than your store. That's a huge amount. http://www.bike-components.de/catalo...0bdd603ce7eea8

  17. #17
    The Rabbi seely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    4,957
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At my shop, we will build you a NICE Crosscheck for around $1000. Picking your parts wisely its not hard. Truvativ components combined with a Shimano barcon driven drivetrain equates to a very nice bike at an affordable price. Figure the frame weighs less than 1lbs more than a Poprad. You're talking miniscule weight differences and a much more versatile bike. The quality is fantastic as well. Very nicely finished frame, albeit basic.
    commuter turned bike mechanic turned commuter (also a Velocity USA employee, but this is my personal account)

  18. #18
    sport fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikes are stupid expensive in this country

    Seely, I've sent on a PM, see what your LBS can do for me. Are you on commission?
    Learn to Build Your Own Website | Twitter: @AMcDermott
    '04 Trek 4300, '07 Surly Cross Check, '08 Giant Bowery (stolen)
    Bike info | Pics of CrossCheck (touring) | CrossCheck component list Touring pics: 2005 | 2006 | 2008

  19. #19
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamr22
    dobber, what kind of handlebars are those? can you ride on the brake hoods comfortably?
    On-One Midge bars, and yes I ride the hoods quite comfortably. My hands rest more on the outboard side of the hoods, which I find gives me better support.

    You'll note that I have the bars mounted quite high.

    1. Because I just do't bend like I use to
    B. All I've read about the Midges suggest the higher mounting as it better facilitates getting into the drops
    Last edited by dobber; 09-19-06 at 06:24 AM.
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  20. #20
    Ride the Road Daily Commute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
    Posts
    4,059
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by -=£em in Pa=-
    Do a search on the great Cross-Check and see if you can
    find two posts saying anything bad about them.
    The Swiss Army Knife of bicycles
    As a former CrossX owner the weight is not that bad and
    if you ride alot on bad roads and such it can actually be
    of some benefit as far as comfort and stability goes.
    A great bike.
    I commute (but don't race) on a cross check. As to commuting, the cross check has the braze-on's needed for a rack and saddle bags. At some of the racing cyclocross bikes don't have those. That puts the cross check well above the others for commuting purposes. As to racing, I'll leave that to people who have actually raced.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alrocket
    Bikes are stupid expensive in this country

    Seely, I've sent on a PM, see what your LBS can do for me. Are you on commission?
    Once you pay shipping and customs your $1000 Cross Check will end up being a $1600 Cross Check. Seriously, check the link I gave you, they are the cheapest prices in Europe.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alrocket
    Bikes are stupid expensive in this country
    Umm, wrong!. Like I said get a custom builder to build a frame for you. Magnitudes better than a Crosscheck and magnitudes cheaper by the looks of it. Don't let English artisans fall by the wayside for the sake of some everyman bike.

  23. #23
    sport fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    highly: I'll give one a call tomorrow, you're right, I shouldn't leave the option unexplored.

    Honestly I didn't see any prices on the few sites I had a look at, and from experience, no list price usually == very expensive.
    Learn to Build Your Own Website | Twitter: @AMcDermott
    '04 Trek 4300, '07 Surly Cross Check, '08 Giant Bowery (stolen)
    Bike info | Pics of CrossCheck (touring) | CrossCheck component list Touring pics: 2005 | 2006 | 2008

  24. #24
    Portland, OR i_r_beej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    My Bikes
    Cannondale: '94 R400; Lemond Poprad '06; Specialized Epic Marathon '06; Specialized Stumpjumper '89; Redline Proline Pro Cruiser '10
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When i was shopping for a cyclocross bike to ACTUALLY use for cyclocross (*gasp!*) my decision came down to the Cross Check or the LeMond Poprad. I ultimately decided on the Poprad primarily for the (perceived) better quality of the materials and components-- 105 and Bontrager component mix, True Temper Platinum OX tubing and US fabricated frame.

    As for weight, one of the guys at Surly (such nice folks) let me know that the "Cross Check complete" weighs in at 25.4 lbs for a 52cm frame with their Tiagra spec.

    Not too bad. My aluminum Cannondale F700 weighs in at about 25lbs.

    However, the Poprad has been criticised for weighing about 21.5lbs! Whatever-- there's just no pleasing magazine editors.

    That said, if you're going to be lifting a bike "suitcase-style" over barriers at a full run, a few pounds might make a difference by lap 5 or six.


    But weight was low on my list of priorities. You see how the weight drops quickly with better quality components.

    Oh-- and as for the "brifters" somehow being better than bar-end shifters... whatever. Bar-ends plus aero brake levers are lighter and simpler and cheaper than brifters. But slightly less convenient to use. When by 105 brifters succumb to cold, rain and mud i'll replace them with aero levers and bar-ends. And use the money i saved on booze.

  25. #25
    Portland, OR i_r_beej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    My Bikes
    Cannondale: '94 R400; Lemond Poprad '06; Specialized Epic Marathon '06; Specialized Stumpjumper '89; Redline Proline Pro Cruiser '10
    Posts
    318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dobber
    On-One Midge bars, and yes I ride the hoods quite comfortably. My hands rest more on the outboard side of the hoods, which I find gives me better support.

    You'll note that I have the bars mounted quite high.

    1. Because I just do't bend like I use to
    B. All I've read about the Midges suggest the higher mounting as it better facilitates getting into the drops
    Dobber-- i run Midge bars too. Best thing since... sliced bread, i suppose! Is that Salsa stem the 40-degree rise? I recently decided that i neede more height and got the 15-degree. I'm not sure that it was enough.

    And yeah-- higher mounting for Midges is better. When riding off-road (or in traffic) i'm in the drops all the time. Better control and it just feels more "secure" there as opposed to riding on the hoods of the levers.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •