Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Well well well. Clinchers are faster than tubulars.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Well well well. Clinchers are faster than tubulars.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-15, 11:04 AM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,138

Bikes: 2 many

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1266 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times in 169 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
When you win the SSWC you win the "Golden Speedo" as well as a free tattoo.

Turn down the volume if you're at work
Video from last year: https://vimeo.com/110743294
With it being in Louisville there's a TON of locals from here in that video. Mo Bruno Roy won last year - you see her at the end as well as throughout in her 5th Element homage costume. Lots of great people in that video.

Quick shot of Ellen S - she holds the record for most consecutive second place finishes ever. She noted that more than once as I drove her to Jingle Cross last year.
That's my kind of bike race. Well OK......it was 40 years ago.
2manybikes is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:08 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
I'm curious to see how the new Clements perform as well. I had a bit of a talk with Donn on the phone about them a couple of weeks back. The thing is, in general, with such a low air volume on a cross tire in order to keep any tire seated at the bead under cornering stress in cross as a tubeless you have to have one helluva stiff sidewall. Totally changes the tire reaction. Eliminates a lot of the reason running low pressure is used for.

Take a supple tubular at 19 psi and simply play with it - loading weight on it and seeing how the tire deforms, etc. Then do the same with a clincher/tubeless setup. Just not the same. Won't ever be until they figure out a way to "weld" that tire bead to the rim....oh wait....we did...we call it tubular.
I think tubeless may get to the point where they can replace tubed clinchers and offer something in between tubed and tubular. At that point they will become a very attractive option for us, weekend warriors.

For professionals and high level amateurs, I don't know. Somehow I don't see Dugast, Challenge or FMB making tubeless tires any time soon. And as long as the tire options stay limited so will the users.
FrozenK is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:12 AM
  #128  
Banned
 
BoSoxYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
Posts: 7,281

Bikes: 07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by FrozenK
I think tubeless may get to the point where they can replace tubed clinchers and offer something in between tubed and tubular. At that point they will become a very attractive option for us, weekend warriors.
Tubeless for road has it's merits, but not for cyclocross.
BoSoxYacht is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:18 AM
  #129  
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by UnfilteredDregs
In other words find the exact pressure that results in the lowest crr per tire, then compare. Makes sense if so, then a rider can choose brand/model/size dependent upon their weight and how they ride.
One might point out that drum-tested crr decreases as pressure increases for all tires. That includes "bumpy-drum" testing. There is no "lowest crr" at anything under maximum sidewall pressure. Which pressure of course varies with the tire, though pressure is never varied between tires in testing. Which is not to say that each tire doesn't have an optimum pressure below maximum for a particular use, which will vary with the tire. However the drum-tested crr at that optimum pressure may not be of much interest, since the tire is being run at sub-optimum drum crr for other reasons, like surface texture. OTOH, if the surface is perfectly smooth and hard, pump 'em up as much as you dare.
__________________
Results matter
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:21 AM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
When you win the SSWC you win the "Golden Speedo" as well as a free tattoo.

Turn down the volume if you're at work
Video from last year: https://vimeo.com/110743294
With it being in Louisville there's a TON of locals from here in that video. Mo Bruno Roy won last year - you see her at the end as well as throughout in her 5th Element homage costume. Lots of great people in that video.

Quick shot of Ellen S - she holds the record for most consecutive second place finishes ever. She noted that more than once as I drove her to Jingle Cross last year.



Spectator holding sign:

"God Hates Single Speeds"


LOL
woodcraft is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:26 AM
  #131  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
Tubeless for road has it's merits, but not for cyclocross.
^ - this. It just wont be the choice in cyclocross anytime in the near future. Hell Challenge has approached me a couple times about making my 38W rim open into the mtb market as a less expensive mtb tubular carbon rim. They say the market in Europe for mtb tubulars is amazing on the top end but no one in the US will consider anything other than tubeless.

Every year I watch riders try cyclocross. They start on the clinchers they have, then some try tubeless and go that way for a year or two. Then they try someone's tubular or try demo wheels that I have and then I get a big order from them on Monday morning. There is simply no other discipline where it makes as big of a difference.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:34 AM
  #132  
Senior Member
 
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
^ - this.
I've been riding road tubeless for a little over 10k...as far as flat protection goes it's been fantastic, ride quality has been nice. I can't help but wonder, "Why not go tubular, using sealant?" Functionally, sealant wise, I don't see what the difference between tubeless and true tubular would be.

Sure, I can't slap a tube in, in case of all out failure, but that's a total suck scenario with tubeless anyway that I'm willing to hedge against...Might as well just carry another tire.

Any thoughts on that?
UnfilteredDregs is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:36 AM
  #133  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by UnfilteredDregs
I've been riding road tubeless for a little over 10k...as far as flat protection goes it's been fantastic, ride quality has been nice. I can't help but wonder, "Why not go tubular, using sealant?" Functionally, sealant wise, I don't see what the difference between tubeless and true tubular would be.

Sure, I can't slap a tube in, in case of all out failure, but that's a total suck scenario with tubeless anyway that I'm willing to hedge against...Might as well just carry another tire.

Any thoughts on that?
Didn't follow any of that - you talking road? Tubeless is fine on the road. I would ride that before tubular for the vast majority of road riding that people here do. That being said I personally prefer running tubes.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:37 AM
  #134  
Senior Member
 
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Didn't follow any of that - you talking road? Tubeless is fine on the road. I would ride that before tubular for the vast majority of road riding that people here do. That being said I personally prefer running tubes.
Yeah...road, why not sealant with tubular instead of tubeless?
UnfilteredDregs is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 11:55 AM
  #135  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
^ - this. It just wont be the choice in cyclocross anytime in the near future. Hell Challenge has approached me a couple times about making my 38W rim open into the mtb market as a less expensive mtb tubular carbon rim. They say the market in Europe for mtb tubulars is amazing on the top end but no one in the US will consider anything other than tubeless.

Every year I watch riders try cyclocross. They start on the clinchers they have, then some try tubeless and go that way for a year or two. Then they try someone's tubular or try demo wheels that I have and then I get a big order from them on Monday morning. There is simply no other discipline where it makes as big of a difference.
I wouldn't consider tubulars for mtb, for the obvious reasons (flats happen in mtb) Plus, mountainbike tubeless works with no hassle. I can set Maxxis on Stans Rims with a floor pump and I have a plethora of tires to chose from that I can ride down to ~22-25 psi without problems (have gone down to 15-20 psi but the tire rolls on itself due to the tall sidewalls, wider rims would help with that) And you get much lower rolling resistance and the tire is more supple without a tube inside. The improvement over tubed is huge, the penalty minimal. I don't know that tubulars would improve much, and for marathon/endurance events tubulars have the big "what do I do when I flat" issue.

For cyclocross, as a back-of-the-pack racer in Anchorage where we have a very short season I have a hard time justifying the expense of tubulars which would be a race only wheelset. If tubeless can offer me an improvement over clinchers it may be worth it. Even if the performance isn't at the level of tubulars.
FrozenK is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 12:01 PM
  #136  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by UnfilteredDregs
Yeah...road, why not sealant with tubular instead of tubeless?

Robert and I had a little convo about this a few months ago. The tubeless sealant in a tubular would work fine IF you were going to rock it for one season and be done with it. The sealant dries up over time and forms a ball. Here in the hot Texas climate, serious MTB riders will have to redo the sealant once every 4-6 months to avoid what's known as a "Stan's Ball" or more affectionately, a booger. It would be better to rock a tubular and only use sealant if you get a small puncture and want to save the tire without taking it off, opening it up to seal the tube, re-gluing, etc.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 12:06 PM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
Robert and I had a little convo about this a few months ago. The tubeless sealant in a tubular would work fine IF you were going to rock it for one season and be done with it. The sealant dries up over time and forms a ball. Here in the hot Texas climate, serious MTB riders will have to redo the sealant once every 4-6 months to avoid what's known as a "Stan's Ball" or more affectionately, a booger. It would be better to rock a tubular and only use sealant if you get a small puncture and want to save the tire without taking it off, opening it up to seal the tube, re-gluing, etc.
Thanks for that...supposedly Orange Seal, what I use, is booger free and evaporates with a negligible residue for the life of a tire across a riding season, even with maintenance replenishment- about 1 oz every 3 months. My thoughts are I go through a set of tires each year so it may make sense. I've sent a message to the Orange Seal folks as well.
UnfilteredDregs is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 12:34 PM
  #138  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
Tubeless for road has it's merits, but not for cyclocross.
Check out November's blog post from today. - November Bicycles: Race smart. - November Bicycles Blog
RJM is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 12:47 PM
  #139  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
Check out November's blog post from today. - November Bicycles: Race smart. - November Bicycles Blog
...and November and I will continue to disagree. The number of racers I have seen burp and lose it all when "real cross" starts (December/Jan - run up to Nationals, etc) is exceedingly high. Fact is you can run just about any tire system in nice to rainy conditions with about the same results as most riders don't even begin to ride their equipment near the limits and quite frankly if all you're doing is a Sunday ride in the park then tubeless might serve you well.

...but it has no place in serious cross racing as of the current state of technology. Even at the best it will get it will still be sup par to the supple response you get from tubulars. Period.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 12:48 PM
  #140  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
Check out November's blog post from today. - November Bicycles: Race smart. - November Bicycles Blog
The blog wasn't very convincing. Lots of unsupported, subjective statements.
colnago62 is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 05:08 PM
  #141  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
Robert and I had a little convo about this a few months ago. The tubeless sealant in a tubular would work fine IF you were going to rock it for one season and be done with it. The sealant dries up over time and forms a ball. Here in the hot Texas climate, serious MTB riders will have to redo the sealant once every 4-6 months to avoid what's known as a "Stan's Ball" or more affectionately, a booger. It would be better to rock a tubular and only use sealant if you get a small puncture and want to save the tire without taking it off, opening it up to seal the tube, re-gluing, etc.
For the road my take on tubulars for those who don't have to have them is, indeed, to use no sealant UNTIL you need to. I carry Pit Stop, and it did the job the one time I called on it.

On the other hand, if you would rather use sealant from the outset, who cares about "boogers" inside a tubular tube that will never be opened up? They are a mess in tubeless when you need to get in there, but that isn't the case with the tube in a tubular tire.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 11-11-15, 05:23 PM
  #142  
Senior Member
 
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC, duh Bronx.
Posts: 3,578

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
For the road my take on tubulars for those who don't have to have them is, indeed, to use no sealant UNTIL you need to. I carry Pit Stop, and it did the job the one time I called on it.

On the other hand, if you would rather use sealant from the outset, who cares about "boogers" inside a tubular tube that will never be opened up? They are a mess in tubeless when you need to get in there, but that isn't the case with the tube in a tubular tire.
Critical for sealant to work well is being in the tire to immediately work at the onset of a puncture. Many times I've come back from a ride and noticed way after the fact something has happened that's been completely mitigated by the sealant. It goes as far as slowing the egress of air due to a significant puncture, buying reaction time, something to consider safety wise; I've watched it happen to my front tire at significant speed. As far as boogers go, leaving them in the tire can impede the function of the sealant.

If I'm going to take the time by the side of the road to inject a sealant after the fact to repair a flat...I'd rather just change a tube.
UnfilteredDregs is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 03:49 AM
  #143  
Senior Member
 
Ice41000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Your choice, that's fine, but didn't you stop to wonder just for a second why you were pinch flatting so much? I understand you saw a solution and just decided to blow the tubed clinchers off and go tubeless. Makes perfect sense. But what about the fact that it isn't normal for tubed clinchers to pinch flat like that. There is a lesson in there somewhere if you would look for it: bad mounting technique (pinched tubes during mounting), insufficient pressure, bad riding technique, etc. I would have wanted to know why I was pinch flatting so much and had the option of fixing it without a change of tire type.

If, for example, the reason was bad riding technique (like lard-assing potholes), tubeless can prevent the pinch flats but won't protect your tires against cuts and rims against dings.
Thing is, even properly inflated decent quality tire will puncture if you hit edge of the pothole or a rock at some speed.
It doesn't happen that often but my peace of mind is worth it.

I ride and race since 1990's so it is not that I have no clue at all.
Ice41000 is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 06:05 AM
  #144  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ?
Posts: 2,300

Bikes: i may have bike(s)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been riding road tubeless for a bit over a year, IRC tires, daily and have tubulars, veloflex carbon, for racing and hammer rides. At this point, I feel that there is very little difference in the quality of the ride and the IRCs even feel a bit more supple and I feel more confident on tight turns with them. Now, I may change this view as I get more miles on the tubulars, as I have only had them for a couple of months.

But, overall I am done with tubes. The only downside of tubeless as of now is that the tires are a bit more expensive but otherwise, I am so happy to not have to deal with tubes anymore. I have had punctures on the tubeless that I kept riding as it sealed and that certainly would have cost me a race if it was a tube.
beatlebee is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 06:26 AM
  #145  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Ice41000
Thing is, even properly inflated decent quality tire will puncture if you hit edge of the pothole or a rock at some speed.
It doesn't happen that often but my peace of mind is worth it.

I ride and race since 1990's so it is not that I have no clue at all.
Yes, you are right, the TIRE will puncture under those conditions, not just the tube. No difference there between tubed and tubeless. All I can tell you is that I don't get pinch flats with tubed clinchers.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 11-12-15, 09:44 AM
  #146  
Senior Member
 
Ice41000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Yes, you are right, the TIRE will puncture under those conditions, not just the tube. No difference there between tubed and tubeless. All I can tell you is that I don't get pinch flats with tubed clinchers.
Well, I meant tube. I actually don't remember ever hitting something hard enough to damage the tire. Sidewall cuts don't count.
I guess you ride on better roads. Good for you.
Ice41000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bradleykd
Classic & Vintage
39
09-06-17 03:03 AM
rpenmanparker
Road Cycling
2
11-13-15 08:11 AM
rpenmanparker
Road Cycling
6
06-08-15 08:19 PM
Syncmaster
Cyclocross Racing
2
09-20-14 06:16 AM
jyl
Bicycle Mechanics
20
05-29-12 12:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.