Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Need new chainrings

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Need new chainrings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-16, 06:41 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Need new chainrings

I have a 2013 Caad10 that came with an FSA SL-K Light crank and it has been flawless for the last few years but the 53t ring is showing signs of wear so I'm going to buy some new rings. I seem to have several choices out there for the 130bcd standard size crank and would like some feedback from anyone who tried something different like Praxis, Stronglight, Rotor, TA, etc... I'm currently running 10 speed Ultegra 6770 Di2 and while I'd like to go 11 speed, its slightly out of reach right now.

I've found some leftover Dura Ace 7800 chainrings in either a 50/39, 52/39, or 53/39 on sale for $100 (for both rings) and were the last generation Dura Ace to be sold using the standard 130bcd pattern so they should fit my crank. I could just order some exact replacements from FSA but assume the DA rings would be superior and maybe there's more rings out there to consider?

My thinking right now is get the 52/39 DA rings for $100, DA 7900 Cassette for $100, and DA7900 chain for $30 which should give me some sweet shifting for $230.00 unless someone can convince me otherwise? I will probably go with the 52 vs the 53 because I rarely ride on the 12t cog out back, not sure if one tooth will make enough difference to end up with a more usable range or if I should just go with a 50t instead and get an 11-25/27 cassette?

Last edited by dvdslw; 05-14-16 at 06:52 AM.
dvdslw is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 09:23 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by dvdslw
I have a 2013 Caad10 that came with an FSA SL-K Light crank and it has been flawless for the last few years but the 53t ring is showing signs of wear so I'm going to buy some new rings. I seem to have several choices out there for the 130bcd standard size crank and would like some feedback from anyone who tried something different like Praxis, Stronglight, Rotor, TA, etc... I'm currently running 10 speed Ultegra 6770 Di2 and while I'd like to go 11 speed, its slightly out of reach right now.

I've found some leftover Dura Ace 7800 chainrings in either a 50/39, 52/39, or 53/39 on sale for $100 (for both rings) and were the last generation Dura Ace to be sold using the standard 130bcd pattern so they should fit my crank. I could just order some exact replacements from FSA but assume the DA rings would be superior and maybe there's more rings out there to consider?

My thinking right now is get the 52/39 DA rings for $100, DA 7900 Cassette for $100, and DA7900 chain for $30 which should give me some sweet shifting for $230.00 unless someone can convince me otherwise? I will probably go with the 52 vs the 53 because I rarely ride on the 12t cog out back, not sure if one tooth will make enough difference to end up with a more usable range or if I should just go with a 50t instead and get an 11-25/27 cassette?
for a flatlander bike, I would go 50/30 with a 12-23 cassette. I use this on a 10spd setup, and it works great.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 09:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
FSA has rings now marked 10/11. Sone inexoensive ones appear on Amazon and ebay.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 09:52 AM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
for a flatlander bike, I would go 50/30 with a 12-23 cassette. I use this on a 10spd setup, and it works great.
Compact for Florida ??
I would use 53/39 with 12-23. maybe 12-25

Heck, I have used 53/39 and 12-25 in hilly CT for decades.

PS, How do you wear out a 53 tooth ring ??
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 09:59 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 1,935

Bikes: S works Tarmac, Felt TK2 track

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 179 Times in 111 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Compact for Florida ??


PS, How do you wear out a 53 tooth ring ??
By running chains too long. Unless he has 30K miles or more I doubt it is shot. Chains skip on the big ring also.
popeye is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 10:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Compact for Florida ???
Yes 50x12 is 30mph @90rpm. Unless you are in a final sprint, how often do you go faster than 30 on flatlands? Go with 11-23 if you need a little more.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 11:04 AM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
I was more concerned with the suggestion of a 30 tooth inner ring. That seems crazy.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 02:42 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
I was more concerned with the suggestion of a 30 tooth inner ring. That seems crazy.
Whoops. That would be crazy.

I miss typed 30. I meant to type 50x39. A 30t small chainring is unpossible on a 130bcd double crankset.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 03:30 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
PS, How do you wear out a 53 tooth ring ??
By riding. Mine was a 52T big ring, but it started to give problems due to wear at 60000 miles. At that point I turned it over (no pins/ramps on this one) and used it for another 35000 miles. But based on what I've seen FSA rings may not be as durable as most, so the OP may have worn his out more quickly.
prathmann is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 03:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
By riding. Mine was a 52T big ring, but it started to give problems due to wear at 60000 miles. At that point I turned it over (no pins/ramps on this one) and used it for another 35000 miles. But based on what I've seen FSA rings may not be as durable as most, so the OP may have worn his out more quickly.
I question your wear rate because I go through big rings faster than that. I do 99% of my riding in the big ring, and after 30k-35k miles it's time to replace it. Inner rings last forever because I live in the flatlands.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 04:27 PM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
I question your wear rate because I go through big rings faster than that. I do 99% of my riding in the big ring, and after 30k-35k miles it's time to replace it. Inner rings last forever because I live in the flatlands.
Maybe you should use a 53/52 crankset
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 05:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
Maybe you should use a 53/52 crankset


I really hate living in the flatlands, but I know what works for other flatlanders now. A 1x with a 50t big ring, and 11-21 cassette would be my dream setup here. I use 50-36 and 12-25 11spd now, but never need the 36t ring.

When I lived in the mountains, I used 53-39 with a 12-27 10spd cassette, and struggled a little.

Many roadies just need to HTFU, and get stronger. FFS, I did all the big TdF climbs with a 52/42 and 13-23

BTW, GET OFF MY LAWN!
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 07:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
To be honest, I'm not sure I really need new chain rings but the 53t looks worn compared to a new one and my bike has a rough sound to it when pedaling under moderate power. I recently had the bottom bracket serviced, new Ultegra cassette, along with a new Ultegra Chain so I believe it to be a worn chain ring. I'm also curious how a smaller ring might change the characteristics of the bike as far as shifting goes. I was hoping to hear from someone who has tried different brands to attest to their quality compared to what I have or if there's some brands to steer clear of?
dvdslw is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 10:35 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by dvdslw
To be honest, I'm not sure I really need new chain rings but the 53t looks worn compared to a new one and my bike has a rough sound to it when pedaling under moderate power. I recently had the bottom bracket serviced, new Ultegra cassette, along with a new Ultegra Chain so I believe it to be a worn chain ring. I'm also curious how a smaller ring might change the characteristics of the bike as far as shifting goes. I was hoping to hear from someone who has tried different brands to attest to their quality compared to what I have or if there's some brands to steer clear of?
no rings shift better than Shimano, and I doubt you would notice any improvement by going to a 50t or 52t big ring.

How often do you actually find yourself dropping down to the little ring? I use a 50t big ring in a mostly flat area, and almost never need to shift off the big.
noodle soup is offline  
Old 05-14-16, 11:08 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I bought a couple of pairs of Raceface rings 53/39 on sale from Nashbar for about $7 a set/pair (regular price $25). Nashbar has had the same deal several times since around Xmas.

$100 for set/pair of Dura Ace rings? No thanks, I'll take 14 sets/pairs of Raceface rings for the same price.
RoadGuy is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 05:06 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
There is nothing wrong with upper level FSA rings.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 05:44 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
no rings shift better than Shimano, and I doubt you would notice any improvement by going to a 50t or 52t big ring.

How often do you actually find yourself dropping down to the little ring? I use a 50t big ring in a mostly flat area, and almost never need to shift off the big.
That's the thing I think about while riding, I'm on the 53t ring 99% of my ride and only switch to the 39 on one or two hills but only if I'm tired that day. On the other end of the bike I only use the 12t cog going down those same few hills. Looking at the big picture, shifting once or twice a ride is no big deal really but if I'm buying new rings anyway, dropping one or three teeth just because I can given the choices available to me is something to consider. I also agree that Shimano has the best shifting and what's funny is the fact that I'm trying to end up with a gear combo that has me "not" shifting.
dvdslw is offline  
Old 05-15-16, 03:09 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 613

Bikes: Niner RLT 9 4 Star, Kona Splice, Nashbar Carbon road bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup


I really hate living in the flatlands, but I know what works for other flatlanders now. A 1x with a 50t big ring, and 11-21 cassette would be my dream setup here. I use 50-36 and 12-25 11spd now, but never need the 36t ring.

When I lived in the mountains, I used 53-39 with a 12-27 10spd cassette, and struggled a little.

Many roadies just need to HTFU, and get stronger. FFS, I did all the big TdF climbs with a 52/42 and 13-23

BTW, GET OFF MY LAWN!
Lower gears and higher cadence is the proven way to go. 50/34 and 11-28 or 11-32 at least if not larger cassette. I'm putting a 11-42 cassette on my road bike and I'm 30 and in very good shape.

Spin instead of grinding!
KonaRider125 is offline  
Old 05-16-16, 02:53 AM
  #19  
Full Member
 
Joeyseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Northwest
Posts: 416

Bikes: Fairdale Goodship

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I rarely ride on the 12t cog out back.Not sure if I need new chainrings.I'd like to go to 11 speed
Maybe test ride A bicycle with 50t ring and either A 11/25 or 28 cassette to see how you like the smaller rings.
I would go Ultegra or even 105 for bicycle components for average rider.DA cassettes use titanium for some of their cogs and it wears faster than steel if you ride a lot.
Also would save as much as your $ for new 11 speed bicycle or you could do A custom build if you are going with Ultegra or 105.Really nothing wrong with 10 if you are happy with your bicycle.

I went 11 speed for my new bike as my old road bike is A little to large for me.

Last edited by Joeyseven; 05-16-16 at 03:00 AM.
Joeyseven is offline  
Old 05-16-16, 05:40 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,672

Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,

Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,990 Times in 1,777 Posts
Originally Posted by noodle soup
no rings shift better than Shimano, and I doubt you would notice any improvement by going to a 50t or 52t big ring.

How often do you actually find yourself dropping down to the little ring? I use a 50t big ring in a mostly flat area, and almost never need to shift off the big.
Ummm, my Wickwerks 53/34 (not a typo) shifts better than the Dura Ace 53/39 it replaced. I don't even get through moving the lever and it's there. Honestly surprised by how good it shifts up .
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
jamesdak is offline  
Old 05-16-16, 07:37 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
noodle soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times in 998 Posts
Originally Posted by KonaRider125
Lower gears and higher cadence is the proven way to go. 50/34 and 11-28 or 11-32 at least if not larger cassette. I'm putting a 11-42 cassette on my road bike and I'm 30 and in very good shape.

Spin instead of grinding!
11-32 would suck for a flatlands cyclist.I spend the majority of the time in 16t-19t cogs, and enjoy the 1 tooth spacing that a12-25 11speed cassenter gives in that range.

Btw, you don't need to tell me anything about spinning. My average cadence on solo rides is consistently 92.
noodle soup is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hcgaloi
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-20-19 01:40 AM
prmbrown
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-06-18 07:18 AM
dvdslw
Road Cycling
16
03-25-16 05:51 AM
kenshireen
Road Cycling
6
02-15-16 10:35 PM
martytardy
Bicycle Mechanics
10
05-29-13 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.