Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Hill Repeats Vs Power Training

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Hill Repeats Vs Power Training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-16, 02:54 AM
  #26  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,421
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times in 494 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
For me, personally, the problem with decreased cadence is knee pain. You might not have problems with your knees, but I do.
When climbing or riding on the flat, speed decreases with decreased cadence (in any given gear ratio). Power decreases with decreased speed. Crank torque and pedal force are almost constant with decreased power (in any given gear ratio, on the flat or while climbing a hill) -- to the extent it isn't constant, it decreases; it doesn't increase. So less crank torque and less pedal force makes your knees hurt? Woah. When you coast down hill (or, when you sit in a chair or sleep at night), your cadence and crank torque are zero. Do your knees hurt then? That would be bad. My condolences.
RChung is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 02:57 AM
  #27  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
When climbing or riding on the flat, speed decreases with decreased cadence (in any given gear ratio). Power decreases with decreased speed. Crank torque and pedal force are almost constant with decreased power (in any given gear ratio, on the flat or while climbing a hill) -- to the extent it isn't constant, it decreases; it doesn't increase. So less crank torque and less pedal force makes your knees hurt? Woah. When you coast down hill (or, when you sit in a chair or sleep at night), your cadence and crank torque are zero. Do your knees hurt then? That would be bad. My condolences.
Hmm ... guess you have no idea.
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:20 AM
  #28  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,421
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times in 494 Posts
Ah, so when climbing a steep hill in a given gear ratio (like, your lowest), you're saying you (and many others?) increase your cadence in order to avoid knee pain? My goodness gracious.
RChung is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:21 AM
  #29  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Ah, so when climbing a steep hill in a given gear ratio (like, your lowest), you're saying you (and many others?) increase your cadence in order to avoid knee pain? My goodness gracious.
Nope, that's not what I'm saying.
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:31 AM
  #30  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,421
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times in 494 Posts
Ah, so you're saying that *both* decreasing and increasing your cadence hurts your knees? What's your magic cadence that you have to hold constant in order to avoid knee pain? That must be very restrictive.
RChung is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:35 AM
  #31  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Ah, so you're saying that *both* decreasing and increasing your cadence hurts your knees? What's your magic cadence that you have to hold constant in order to avoid knee pain? That must be very restrictive.
Nope, that's not what I'm saying.


Probably best to accept that you just simply have no idea.
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:38 AM
  #32  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by Gege-Bubu
I am considering to sign up for a century with a lot of elevation gain. however the area I live has no hills.
Normally, I am training with power.

One day I drove to closest hill I know and I did several hill repeats.
Back to the topic at hand ...

How close is your closest hill?
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 03:50 AM
  #33  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,421
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times in 494 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
Nope, that's not what I'm saying.


Probably best to accept that you just simply have no idea.
Well, I can see how you've averaged 9 posts a day for 13 years. You must have a lot of time to post since riding at any cadence whatsoever hurts your knees.
RChung is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 04:02 AM
  #34  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Well, I can see how you've averaged 9 posts a day for 13 years. You must have a lot of time to post since riding at any cadence whatsoever hurts your knees.
And I know that you are able to use your exceptional math skills to figure out how much time it takes me to make 9 posts when I can type one up in about a minute. Just in case you're having trouble figuring it out ... that's about 9 minutes of my day.

Thanks for noticing!!


Now ... do you think it's possible for you to address the OP's question?
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 05:36 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Gege-Bubu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 803
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Machka
Back to the topic at hand ...

How close is your closest hill?
Great answers, thanks!

The closest hill is about 20 miles, it is short, but step hill 8%
https://www.strava.com/segments/613503
I had to take a car to park closer to it, because about an hour warm up and another hour of cool down do not make much sense to me.


When I did the hill repeat, I just climbed up and went down to do it again. The lap was about 8 min,
I could do probably do it up to 10 times

I dropped my weight about 9-10 lb since last year, I dont think I can drop more (I am 135lb at 5'6" 170cm)

I thought only about watts, but did not think that climbing will engage other muscles - great advise, thanks
Also, what you said about heat, eating and drinking on climb was valuable.

Descends is another story, probably it is a good idea to check my brakes.

And this is the event I am thinking to sign up:
https://ridewithgps.com/routes/9387530

I am thinking to get new cassette 11-28, instead of 11-25 I have now. But for just one ride I don't really want to change crankset. I have now 53/39, I hope I will survive on 39/28 combination.

I probably will do the same hill repeats and will try to make it in weekly basis, other than that I will stick to my regular plan.
Gege-Bubu is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 06:14 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
kbarch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by RChung
Oh, I wasn't asking why the cadence would decrease on the inside line. I was asking why decreased cadence is a problem. You also think it's a problem to be avoided. So perhaps you can explain where Rowan cannot: What is the problem with decreased cadence that you're trying to avoid?
. The answer should be clear: loss of momentum and slowness. There are times when dropping cadence on a climb is advisable to regulate HR, but if you're already in your biggest cog and making your way up OK, normally you look for opportunities to increase cadence (and maybe regain a cog), not lower it.
kbarch is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 06:25 AM
  #37  
Perceptual Dullard
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,421
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,156 Times in 494 Posts
Originally Posted by Machka
And I know that you are able to use your exceptional math skills
No, no, I don't think I have exceptional math skills. I think the only thing that's evident is my math skills (modest though they are) are superior to yours. But I'm pleased that you've recanted and are now saying that you're NOT saying that lower cadence hurts your knees. Phew. Glad we finally got that straightened out.

As for the OP, I think he's gotten pretty good advice thus far: if he has the choice, he should train on terrain that matches as closely as possible the terrain on his target ride. That will help him both with his power and his bike handling. If that's not possible he can train on the flat. It's not ideal but I've ridden in the Alps and Pyrenees on the basis of training on the flats, and while there were moments when I wished I'd done more mountain training I've never regretted those trips, nor would I have passed them up simply because I hadn't had mountains on which to train.
RChung is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 06:36 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
kbarch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by RChung
Ah, so when climbing a steep hill in a given gear ratio (like, your lowest), you're saying you (and many others?) increase your cadence in order to avoid knee pain? My goodness gracious.
You may have been facetious there, but it's no joke. It's exhausting, but I DO frequently increase my cadence (speed up) to get over hills because it is preferable to the agony and frustration of low cadence. But in my case it's not knee pain, just the feeling of getting bogged down, struggle to maintain a straight, smooth line, etc.
kbarch is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 06:51 AM
  #39  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
No, no, I don't think I have exceptional math skills. I think the only thing that's evident is my math skills (modest though they are) are superior to yours. But I'm pleased that you've recanted and are now saying that you're NOT saying that lower cadence hurts your knees. Phew. Glad we finally got that straightened out.
Nope, that's not what I'm saying.
Machka is offline  
Old 07-04-16, 06:52 AM
  #40  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by Gege-Bubu
Great answers, thanks!

The closest hill is about 20 miles, it is short, but step hill 8%
https://www.strava.com/segments/613503
I had to take a car to park closer to it, because about an hour warm up and another hour of cool down do not make much sense to me.


When I did the hill repeat, I just climbed up and went down to do it again. The lap was about 8 min,
I could do probably do it up to 10 times

I dropped my weight about 9-10 lb since last year, I dont think I can drop more (I am 135lb at 5'6" 170cm)

I thought only about watts, but did not think that climbing will engage other muscles - great advise, thanks
Also, what you said about heat, eating and drinking on climb was valuable.

Descends is another story, probably it is a good idea to check my brakes.

And this is the event I am thinking to sign up:
https://ridewithgps.com/routes/9387530

I am thinking to get new cassette 11-28, instead of 11-25 I have now. But for just one ride I don't really want to change crankset. I have now 53/39, I hope I will survive on 39/28 combination.

I probably will do the same hill repeats and will try to make it in weekly basis, other than that I will stick to my regular plan.
Good plan!
Machka is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
potuz
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
8
04-21-17 08:45 AM
Equinox
Training & Nutrition
8
02-20-16 11:55 PM
Nick Bain
Training & Nutrition
11
07-09-13 07:52 AM
Gege-Bubu
Road Cycling
49
06-03-13 04:11 PM
hhnngg1
Road Cycling
22
10-24-11 06:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.