Why steel?
#26
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,004
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11971 Post(s)
Liked 6,651 Times
in
3,485 Posts
Good idea.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#27
Senior Member
#30
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
frame material has as much an impact on the ride quality as cooktop - gas vs induction vs coil - does on the finished food.
btw i prefer gas.
btw i prefer gas.
#31
Senior Member
Because it's still cheaper than carbon.
Because it doesn't beat the crap out of me on a long ride like mile 88 on the old CAAD10.
Because it won't dent as easily like the aforementioned CAAD10.
Because I don't care about weight, I care about it's nice solid springy feel.
Because I can make it a single-speed, an STI equipped 10 speed, or just stick to Downtube shifters and a 6 speed freewheel.
Because it doesn't come in generic "colorways" covered in logos.
Because I can slap on outboard cranks, or an old fashioned cup 'n cone bottom brackets. none of this 10 versions of proprietary BB whatever crap.
Because it looks like a bicycle. Not a sculpted plastic aero-thing.
Because it doesn't beat the crap out of me on a long ride like mile 88 on the old CAAD10.
Because it won't dent as easily like the aforementioned CAAD10.
Because I don't care about weight, I care about it's nice solid springy feel.
Because I can make it a single-speed, an STI equipped 10 speed, or just stick to Downtube shifters and a 6 speed freewheel.
Because it doesn't come in generic "colorways" covered in logos.
Because I can slap on outboard cranks, or an old fashioned cup 'n cone bottom brackets. none of this 10 versions of proprietary BB whatever crap.
Because it looks like a bicycle. Not a sculpted plastic aero-thing.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So defensive. Did I hit a nerve? Did you miss the part where I said "there are exceptions to every rule, I'm speaking in generalities?"
Steel is more IMPACT resistant than carbon. Carbon can only get close if it's specifically built to resist impacts. (Bike frames are not...)
Yes, carbon CAN be stronger in terms of resisting flex and pressure in the direction that the carbon is laid. But IMPACTS? No.
THIS is not an impact test and is not testing the impact resistance of the material. It's testing mostly the flexural strength.
THIS IS an impact test, and it tests a bunch of different material properties of the specimens.
(Now waiting for the "But the carbon fiber did the best" comments.)
Last edited by corrado33; 07-20-16 at 10:57 AM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Steel rides better than aluminum - period. As for carbon fiber, it is a personal thing. Some riders simply do not prefer the ride and feel of carbon fiber. For some, it feels "dead". I'm not trying to take sides, but to simply say steel has no advantages is BS. It depends on the individual.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 707
Bikes: Specialized Diverge E5 Comp, Specialized AWOL Comp, Scott Solace 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
20 Posts
That sounds like a great project, and I really like the look of that frame. One thing though: it appears that for 2017 Kona has changed up the steel lineup, and that bike is going to be simply called 'Tonk' (probably to get around forum censors ) but the website doesn't show it available as a frame any more. Not sure if that's an oversight or if it's only available as a complete build but you might want to grab a 2016 if you can.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
So defensive. Did I hit a nerve? Did you miss the part where I said "there are exceptions to every rule, I'm speaking in generalities?"
Steel is more IMPACT resistant than carbon. Carbon can only get close if it's specifically built to resist impacts. (Bike frames are not...)
Yes, carbon CAN be stronger in terms of resisting flex and pressure in the direction that the carbon is laid. But IMPACTS? No
Skip to the 5 minute mark if you want to see impact resistance
#42
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,004
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11971 Post(s)
Liked 6,651 Times
in
3,485 Posts
That sounds like a great project, and I really like the look of that frame. One thing though: it appears that for 2017 Kona has changed up the steel lineup, and that bike is going to be simply called 'Tonk' (probably to get around forum censors ) but the website doesn't show it available as a frame any more. Not sure if that's an oversight or if it's only available as a complete build but you might want to grab a 2016 if you can.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 1,445
Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've owned all the materials, and good steel/aluminum/carbon/titanium is good. Those materials can also make bad bikes due to poor design choices or poor quality control.
Currently I own a titanium and an aluminum road bike (Lynskey R240 and a CAAD10). The Lynskey currently sits on some Pacenti SL-23 wheels I built up myself, with Conti GP4000 tires in 25mm width. The CAAD is on the stock RS10 wheels with Schwable Luganos in 23mm width. Set up like that the Lynskey is definitely a better ride. Once put the Pacentis on the CAAD and the differences were almost unnoticed (the Ti is just a little smoother and less fatiguing).
Currently I own a titanium and an aluminum road bike (Lynskey R240 and a CAAD10). The Lynskey currently sits on some Pacenti SL-23 wheels I built up myself, with Conti GP4000 tires in 25mm width. The CAAD is on the stock RS10 wheels with Schwable Luganos in 23mm width. Set up like that the Lynskey is definitely a better ride. Once put the Pacentis on the CAAD and the differences were almost unnoticed (the Ti is just a little smoother and less fatiguing).
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
It's real? Anti establishment? I really don't have a preference but having my current steel bike that's lighter then my stock TCR Advanced SL was is cool. And always fun to pass people climbing when they are on their fancy $10k carbon bikes
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126
Bikes: Steel 1x's
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I see a lot of people on here that swear by steel. My question is simply what makes you so happy with steel? My next question is how much of a difference do you feel between the materials?
I am excited about the project for a few reasons. First it is fun to try to find all the parts on budget. Two it is fun to build the bike out and with the specific products that I want. Lastly, it will be great to compare this steel bike to my current bike.
For the record, at this point, I am probably going to build out a Kona ***** Tonk with Campy Veloce as the groupset. The rest will be stuff that is in my garage. I am still not completely decided on the frame but that is where my mind is trending.
I am excited about the project for a few reasons. First it is fun to try to find all the parts on budget. Two it is fun to build the bike out and with the specific products that I want. Lastly, it will be great to compare this steel bike to my current bike.
For the record, at this point, I am probably going to build out a Kona ***** Tonk with Campy Veloce as the groupset. The rest will be stuff that is in my garage. I am still not completely decided on the frame but that is where my mind is trending.
I started riding in town on an aluminum 2013 Specialized Secteur road bike. Same geometry and zertz as the Roubaix. Smooth roads and all was well. Completely happy with the bike. Once I outgrew city riding and wanted to ride from town to town, I started riding in the country on Texas' infamous chipseal roads.
If you are not familiar with chipseal, its an extremely cheap way to pave a road by essentially laying down gravel and tar. Fresh chipseal roads feel like bad gravel roads essentially. Over time car tires will press it down and smooth it out in the middle of the road, but the shoulder stays horrible.
When I started riding on chipseal with the aluminum Secteur, I started noticing some back pain and just a general fatigue after riding the bike that wasn't there before. Like I had been repeatedly punched in the kidneys. I went to my LBS and they suggested a new seatpost and bigger tires. That just slowed me down and did nothing for the ride quality.
I went back and they said go full carbon bike, so I did. Specialized Roubaix. Size size, same geometry as my Secteur but with smaller 25mm tires. It made a huge difference in comfort, but there was still sort of a rattly chatter to it as I rode on chipseal. I just assumed that was as good as it got and settled for it.
Flash forward, I bought a cheap Nashbar steel touring bike to try the touring thing. $800 I think, steel frame. One weekend, I went on a 3-day ride with my girlfriend. She wanted to ride the first day, but not the second or third. So my plan was to take the slow, steel touring bike to ride with her on day one and my uber cool, fast carbon fiber bike to do the rest of the rides.
So day 1 rolls around and I did the ride with her while I rode the cheap steel touring bike (w/25mm tires) all the while thinking, "man, these chipseal roads here are smoother than at home." Day 2 kicks off with me on my Roubaix (w/25mm tires) on the exact same roads and all the sudden they aren't as smooth anymore...
Based on that experience and several more back to back tests back home, I came to a painful realization. This cheap, outdated $800 steel touring bike was considerably more smooth riding on Texas chipseal roads than my $2500, uber cool, latest and greatest, Endurance geometry, smoothest carbon frame evah, Roubaix.
So then I thought, well steel weighs more, so it will slow me down. Then I weighed my Roubaix and found it was over 20 lbs. and that lots of modern steel framed bikes can be built in the 17-18 lb range fairly easily.
Flash forward again, expensive carbon bikes are gone. Garage is full of inexpensive, outdated steel framed bikes
There are plenty of other reasons I prefer steel, but the ride quality is the main one. It feels like nothing else.
Last edited by Jarrett2; 07-20-16 at 11:45 AM.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
here's another exception
https://youtu.be/xreZdUBqpJs
Skip to the 5 minute mark if you want to see impact resistance
https://youtu.be/xreZdUBqpJs
Skip to the 5 minute mark if you want to see impact resistance
Or a rock, or an asphalt edge, or a pothole, or a tree, or a root, or a branch....
Basically don't hit your carbon frame when it's loaded with anything. Basically don't crash... much.
Again, exceptions to every anecdote. I know there are people on here who have crashed plenty of times with their carbon frame and it's just fine. I also know plenty of people (personally) who have crashed ONCE with their carbon frame and had to replace it.
Carbon fiber is the indy car. Steel is the Bugatti. One is lightweight, fast, less comfortable, and relatively fragile, the other is heavy, fast, extremely comfortable, and sturdy.
Steel is good at everything. CF is good at being light, stiff, and strong. It's the highly specialized material that's very good at VERY specific things, but sacrifices are made because of it.
Last edited by corrado33; 07-20-16 at 11:42 AM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 342
Bikes: Trek FX 7.4 + Sirrus Expert Carbon X1
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyone makes titanium bicycle? Its better than carbon, steel and aluminum.