Strava v Radar
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 526
Bikes: 2015 Redline Conquest Elite; 2014 Fuji Tahoe 1.1 27.5er; 2006 Scott Speedster S30 (sold); 2001 Specialized S-Works CX; 1990 Trek 750 (sold); 1999 Bianchi Volpe; 1988 Bianchi Campione D'Italia.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Strava v Radar
Wasn't quite sure which forum was best for this, but figured I'd get the most abuse here. On my commute home today I passed one of those radar contraptions that tells you your speed. It said 18mph. Checked strava on my Apple Watch and it was 15.6mph.
Who's lying?
Who's lying?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
Wouldn't use Strava as a speedometer. I've found my computer to be pretty consistent with radar signs.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Between those two I'd trust the radar sign. But I'd trust a simple magnet-based cyclometer with correct wheel size setting over either of them.
#5
Bonafide N00bs
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 442
Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Quick CX 4, 2014 Fuji Sportif 1.3C Disc, 2012 Fuji SST 2.0 Ultegra Di2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I use my Garmin watch on the bars and there's this radar on my way back home. Those two readings jive with each other.
#6
Flyin' under the radar
There's no real way to know. RADAR units have to be calibrated periodically, so it could have been an inaccurate reading. Besides, there could have been a data transmission delay between your phone and your watch, so you might have actually been going 18mph but the data on your watch hadn't yet caught up.
In terms of speed detection accuracy, I'd rate it accordingly:
1. As @prathmann mentioned, a wheel sensor (properly setup) is the most accurate.
2. RADAR
3. GPS-based cycling computer
4. GPS-based phone app
5. Time divided by distance
In terms of speed detection accuracy, I'd rate it accordingly:
1. As @prathmann mentioned, a wheel sensor (properly setup) is the most accurate.
2. RADAR
3. GPS-based cycling computer
4. GPS-based phone app
5. Time divided by distance
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I'll just add that my Garmin Edge shows ride elevations that are always short of reality. Example: I do a ride that shows 2300 ft. of elevation and it's really 2600 ft. Other Garmin models are more accurate.
#8
Senior Member
Strava polls GPS data once per second and extrapolates data based on two points. Not reliable for a single point in time reading.
#9
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
#13
Pokemon Master
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,584 Times
in
2,344 Posts
#15
Flyin' under the radar
#16
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,005
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11971 Post(s)
Liked 6,652 Times
in
3,485 Posts
This.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#18
Senior Member
My experience is that radar usually reads ~1 mph low compared to a Garmin (with speed sensor). I think probably just due to the angle between the radar and the direction I'm traveling.
#19
Fatty McFatcakes
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Krispy Kreme
Posts: 986
Bikes: Aero Cheeseburger w/ Sr(h)am eBacon
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 245 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Who the heck has time to look at a radar when passing it, much less also look at your watch/computer and then compare the two?
I mean, even at my leisurely 500 watts, I blink and it's like loooong gone. Didn't even see it. Radar? What radar?
I mean, even at my leisurely 500 watts, I blink and it's like loooong gone. Didn't even see it. Radar? What radar?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Turn off your GPS and see how well Strava works. Using cell tower triangulation to determine location is even more unreliable and something Strava would not have access to anyways.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,552
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,584 Times
in
2,344 Posts
#23
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Yes, many phones have real GPS that's further assisted by tower triangulation. That said, I've found my Garmin to be far more accurate.