Smaller vs. Larger Frame size?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Smaller vs. Larger Frame size?
I went out and tried a BUNCH of bikes today, and I've narrowed it down to two bikes (Giant TCR2, and LeMond Tourmalet) however I'm leaning towards the Lemond. The frame size I tried on the TCR was medium, and it was perfect, with a 55 cm top tube (I have no clue what true top tube vs. effective top tube means however), and also a 57 CM Tourmalet. The Tourmalet felt fantastic, however I felt that I would have been a bit more comfortable with a little more elbow bend (just a little!), so I felt the 57 CM may have been slightly too large for my 5 foot 11 build, but there was no 55 CM frame available in this specific bike. I'm wondering, since the Giant was a 55 CM and felt great, will the Lemond 55 work as well? The reason I ask is because there is a sale price now, and if I order immediately, I can receive the savings even after they receive their new batch.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,724
Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times
in
266 Posts
How long was the stem? You could shoten it by a centimeter and it may help.
#4
County sign fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Zanesville, Oh
Posts: 782
Bikes: Masi Gran Criterium (training), looking for the money for a racing bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i'm within half an inch of 5'11" and 55-56 frames are where its at for people our height. go to www.competitivecyclist.com and use their fit calculator. its all about top tube length. if you get a bigger frame, you'll be riding more upright. upright = comfy but less aero. choice is yours, just don't go too big (58 cm or above top tube)
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Originally Posted by pinetreeforest1
...(I have no clue what true top tube vs. effective top tube means however), ....
The horizontal line gives you an idea of what the 'reach' would be - just add the stem length (c-c) to the effective or horizontal top tube length to calculate reach. This, to me, is maybe the most important measurement to look at and compare. By spec'ing a top tube length, the fitting programs are putting you on a frame that will give you a reach you need with traditional (e.g 9 - 12 cm) stems.
The wrenchscience website has a fitting program which gives you reach as a spec. after you plug in your measurements.
You really don't know if the two bikes are comparable in this dimension unless you compare horizontal/effective top tube length of both. Then other factors come into play, most importantly (to me), how high or low you can put the handle bars relative to the seat (after it's adjusted of course). One frame might allow a higher or lower handle bar height, and you have to decide if the range is adequate for what you want to do. This has to do with the geometry as it relates to head tube.
Stand over is easy enough to 'eyeball' and chances are either will be adjustable for the seat height you need.
Perhaps both will be adjustable both in reach and height to what you want, therefore the color is the most important consideration
#6
Crawler
You need 55 for lemond. it has 56.5cm toptube and 57 has 57.5cm toptube I believe.
Giant medium toptube length is 55.5cm. Giant has more aggressive geometry because they use integrated headset and Lemond uses standard headset. Also if you race, compact is a great way to ride smaller frame.
Oh god....I know 5'11" but how the hell did I remember all the toptube numbers? I got to do something not related to bicycle for a while........
Giant medium toptube length is 55.5cm. Giant has more aggressive geometry because they use integrated headset and Lemond uses standard headset. Also if you race, compact is a great way to ride smaller frame.
Oh god....I know 5'11" but how the hell did I remember all the toptube numbers? I got to do something not related to bicycle for a while........
#7
Roman Killer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by snoboard2
i'm within half an inch of 5'11" and 55-56 frames are where its at for people our height.
#8
Knocking off the rust
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ICT
Posts: 349
Bikes: LeMond Tourmalet, Specialized Tarmac
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're finding the same relative sizing differences that I did last year when I bought my Tourmalet. Final choice for me was between a Bianchi in a 55, a Cannondale in a 54 and the LeMond in a 53. I rode the Tourmalet 3 separate times and it just seemed to be a custom fit for me. Great bike so far, but I'm in my first year of riding so what do I know.
Just for reference, I'm 5'9" with only 30" inseam so the unique LeMond geometry makes sense though I didn't know about it when I was shopping.
Just for reference, I'm 5'9" with only 30" inseam so the unique LeMond geometry makes sense though I didn't know about it when I was shopping.