Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Smaller vs. Larger Frame size?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Smaller vs. Larger Frame size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-07, 09:10 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smaller vs. Larger Frame size?

I went out and tried a BUNCH of bikes today, and I've narrowed it down to two bikes (Giant TCR2, and LeMond Tourmalet) however I'm leaning towards the Lemond. The frame size I tried on the TCR was medium, and it was perfect, with a 55 cm top tube (I have no clue what true top tube vs. effective top tube means however), and also a 57 CM Tourmalet. The Tourmalet felt fantastic, however I felt that I would have been a bit more comfortable with a little more elbow bend (just a little!), so I felt the 57 CM may have been slightly too large for my 5 foot 11 build, but there was no 55 CM frame available in this specific bike. I'm wondering, since the Giant was a 55 CM and felt great, will the Lemond 55 work as well? The reason I ask is because there is a sale price now, and if I order immediately, I can receive the savings even after they receive their new batch.
pinetreeforest1 is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 09:19 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
biker128pedal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Eastern VA
Posts: 1,724

Bikes: 2022 Fuel EX 8, 2021 Domane SL6, Black Beta (Nashbar frame), 2004 Trek 1000C for the trainer

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times in 266 Posts
How long was the stem? You could shoten it by a centimeter and it may help.
biker128pedal is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 10:04 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Would a test ride on the LeMond 55 answer the question.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 10:05 PM
  #4  
County sign fanatic
 
snoboard2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Zanesville, Oh
Posts: 782

Bikes: Masi Gran Criterium (training), looking for the money for a racing bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'm within half an inch of 5'11" and 55-56 frames are where its at for people our height. go to www.competitivecyclist.com and use their fit calculator. its all about top tube length. if you get a bigger frame, you'll be riding more upright. upright = comfy but less aero. choice is yours, just don't go too big (58 cm or above top tube)
snoboard2 is offline  
Old 04-20-07, 11:13 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times in 760 Posts
Originally Posted by pinetreeforest1
...(I have no clue what true top tube vs. effective top tube means however), ....
"Effective top tube length" = "Horizontal top tube length" and both terms are used with bikes with sloping top tubes. The measurement is the horizontal line from the center of the seat post to the center of the steering tube. It allows "apples to apples" comparison between sloping TT bikes and those built with traditional, horizontal top tube geometry.

The horizontal line gives you an idea of what the 'reach' would be - just add the stem length (c-c) to the effective or horizontal top tube length to calculate reach. This, to me, is maybe the most important measurement to look at and compare. By spec'ing a top tube length, the fitting programs are putting you on a frame that will give you a reach you need with traditional (e.g 9 - 12 cm) stems.

The wrenchscience website has a fitting program which gives you reach as a spec. after you plug in your measurements.

You really don't know if the two bikes are comparable in this dimension unless you compare horizontal/effective top tube length of both. Then other factors come into play, most importantly (to me), how high or low you can put the handle bars relative to the seat (after it's adjusted of course). One frame might allow a higher or lower handle bar height, and you have to decide if the range is adequate for what you want to do. This has to do with the geometry as it relates to head tube.

Stand over is easy enough to 'eyeball' and chances are either will be adjustable for the seat height you need.

Perhaps both will be adjustable both in reach and height to what you want, therefore the color is the most important consideration
Camilo is offline  
Old 04-21-07, 03:48 AM
  #6  
Crawler
 
linus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH~ CANADA
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
You need 55 for lemond. it has 56.5cm toptube and 57 has 57.5cm toptube I believe.

Giant medium toptube length is 55.5cm. Giant has more aggressive geometry because they use integrated headset and Lemond uses standard headset. Also if you race, compact is a great way to ride smaller frame.

Oh god....I know 5'11" but how the hell did I remember all the toptube numbers? I got to do something not related to bicycle for a while........
linus is offline  
Old 04-21-07, 04:26 AM
  #7  
Roman Killer
 
VT to CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by snoboard2
i'm within half an inch of 5'11" and 55-56 frames are where its at for people our height.
Not always... I'm 5' 11" and I usually ride a 54... right now I'm on a 53 (sloping).
VT to CA is offline  
Old 04-21-07, 05:01 AM
  #8  
Knocking off the rust
 
JayhawKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ICT
Posts: 349

Bikes: LeMond Tourmalet, Specialized Tarmac

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're finding the same relative sizing differences that I did last year when I bought my Tourmalet. Final choice for me was between a Bianchi in a 55, a Cannondale in a 54 and the LeMond in a 53. I rode the Tourmalet 3 separate times and it just seemed to be a custom fit for me. Great bike so far, but I'm in my first year of riding so what do I know.

Just for reference, I'm 5'9" with only 30" inseam so the unique LeMond geometry makes sense though I didn't know about it when I was shopping.
JayhawKen is offline  
Old 04-21-07, 05:05 AM
  #9  
Banned.
 
Turboem1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 883

Bikes: Lemond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
definately try a 55cm lemond before you buy anything
Turboem1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.