Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

When is it more efficient to sit and spin, and when is it more efficient to mash?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

When is it more efficient to sit and spin, and when is it more efficient to mash?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-08, 08:40 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Spinning is really a fantasy on any real climb. Ask yourself this... Is it really spinning when you have to mash the pedals down really hard to keep that faster cadence? No, it's just fast mashing. What you want is to have the gears you need to keep pedaling as easily as possible while seated, for as long as possible when going up (not a racing situation).

Even then, no matter what the hill or how light or strong you are, you can only spin easily for so long until you start running out of gears. Eventually, before you get to the top, you're going to have to mash down those pedals, and you may have to stand. Standing lets you put a lot more weight down on the pedals, but it's also a lot more tiring for your legs. If you stand too early, you won't make it unless there's a flatter section between you and the top of the climb to provide a bit of recovery.
Longfemur is offline  
Old 10-14-08, 09:41 PM
  #77  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
Help me out here...

I am missing something. According to the posted study on pez, the variable is body position, and the control is 75%VO2Max. I can't find any mention of "maintaining same road speed". Sometimes I miss stuff though.
The article mentions similar cadence around 60rpm. This would indicate similar speed if we assumed the same gear, but I don't see that as a safe assumption based on what's in the article. I'm not claiming the speed will be the same, as aerodynamics will certainly slow you when out of the saddle, especially on a moderate climb of 5.3%, as mentioned in the article.

The big point of the article is that you're not burning any more energy up by standing. So any losses would have to be between the pedals and the rear tire, like from increased drag.

Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
As far as the above graph goes, it looks to me like speed is going up while power is going down. The initial acceleration of pedal RPM starts at T12:41: P1500: V24. next second shows peak power, then power falls off as efficiency increases and more of the forces are being used to accelerate the bike. Max RPM indicates the point right before efficiency goes to its highest level, and speed then levels off. I would be interested in seeing what the power requirements would be to maintain V33, after the acceleration phase is complete.

I do not see this as a contradiction of what I said earlier.
The speed in a PowerTap lags behind a bit in my experience. Power doesn't fall off as efficiency increases, it falls off because maintaining 1651W is damned tough, and my NMP is mostly gone at that point. What efficiency are you speaking of here? Mechanical?

Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
because a larger (meaning more frequent) number of accelerations have the advantage of working with, rather than against momentum. This is not rolling on a flat surface. The gravitational acceleration of the earth causes immediate backward acceleration at every moment that the bicycle is not under power.

Consider this:

Try pedaling one revolution of your crank per three seconds. Do a fast revolution, and then wait for three seconds "coasting". If you do it on a track, the bike will maintain velocity to a certain degree. If you do it on an uphill, the bike will possibly come to a complete standstill or even start to go backwards inbetween pedal strokes. Clearly this is an extreme example, but the physics are the same as what I am talking about. When you pedal out of the saddle in the traditional up-down way, there are stronger surges and longer "coasting" times per unit RPM than there are for spinning circles while seated.

These surges are not part of the mechanical inefficiency of the bicycle drivetrain. They are transmitted to the road. The only problem is that gravity is a constant acceleration pushing you literally backwards while you ride uphill. You need to have the most circular pedal stroke to overcome this and lose the least amount of forward (and upward) momentum, with the least energy expenditure. Also a faster cadence means that the dead spots in your stroke will have a lesser penalty since gravity has had less time to accelerate you backwards in each turn of the pedals.

We are speaking of climbing after all, and climbing is not anything like rolling on flats. The physical forces are vastly different.
If your average power is identical, there's no reason lower cadence will mean a lower speed.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 06:46 AM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 917

Bikes: Giant TCR/Surly Karate Monkey/Foundry FireTower/Curtlo Tandem

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 62 Posts
I am a new rider and I have a triple. The smallest sprocket is lovingly referred to as my surrender sprocket. There are times when I absolutely die on a hill and have to drop down to a 30-25 as I do not have the endurance to be able to get to the top.

My next bike will have a standard but I will try to keep a similar ratio range.
bakerjw is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 06:58 AM
  #79  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Longfemur
Spinning is really a fantasy on any real climb. Ask yourself this... Is it really spinning when you have to mash the pedals down really hard to keep that faster cadence? No, it's just fast mashing.
Have you actually been on one of those rides where people climb 15K feet or more in one day? Quite a few people spend the entire time spinning.
banerjek is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 11:03 AM
  #80  
Ride Lots
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
because a larger (meaning more frequent) number of accelerations have the advantage of working with, rather than against momentum. This is not rolling on a flat surface. The gravitational acceleration of the earth causes immediate backward acceleration at every moment that the bicycle is not under power.
I really liked what you had to say here and it made a lot of sense from a scientific standpoint. However, it caused me to wonder how other people climb while standing. While there is an obvious difference between standing and spinning, I don't think you need to give up your near constant acceleration just because you stand. It takes good form to have a good pedal stoke while standing just as it does while sitting. You need to work the upstroke every bit as much as the down stroke. For me standing is not about slacking and letting my weight do the work, it's about using that for half the stroke and ripping up and through on the back side of the stroke. I struggle at times just to keep my rear wheel on the ground because I'm pulling up so hard on a hill climb. What does your stroke look like when your standing?
koop is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 11:19 AM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
Allegheny Jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Medina, OH
Posts: 5,804

Bikes: confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
There is more to standing than pushing down and pulling up on the pedals. Doing that causes a pause in every 1/2 stroke that the body needs to wait on before firing again. Try to get in a position on the bike with some flex in your midsection and weight slightly back so you can push the pedals over the top using the hip flexor muscles. The reason some guys "rock the bike" while standing is to adjust the position so they can push over the top of the stroke.
Allegheny Jet is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 11:22 AM
  #82  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by koop
I really liked what you had to say here and it made a lot of sense from a scientific standpoint.
???
Phantoj is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 11:45 AM
  #83  
Drop Master
 
slyjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 221

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix / Scott CR-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadToNowhere
Ok, I'll bite.

I'm a spinning instructor; have been consistently for about 9 years. I've seen it all. I have seasoned roadies in my classes along side those looking for some variety in their gym workouts. Additionally, I do a weekly class through the winter that's essentially a 2-hour trainer workout for a group of roadies (some racers) who don't venture out into the cold. Again, I have seen it all on the spinning bikes.

Yet I have never seen a "300 pound lady" in class standing on the pedals for 45-60 minutes.

Probably because I would never design a class that would do that. There would be no value in it.

There is value in using a spinning bike to work on your climbing form. Obviously it's nothing like being on the bike on the road. But on that fixed-gear flywheel, you can use the ride to train cadence, breathing, upper body form, breathing, and smoothness of pedal stroke. Oh, and did I mention breathing? No distractions. In a class setting, an instructor who is worth their salt will be attentive to your position on the bike and your form, and will coach accordingly.

If you can't or won't get outside to ride through the winter, consider the spinner. Trust me...among those who I ride with on the road, I know who spins all winter and who doesn't. The difference is obvious on the spring rides.

Beth
Thanks for the reply Beth. I always wanted to know about the spinning classes and how it would help in cycling. I know that this is off topic, but one question for you. Do you feel that spin classes will help maintain my fitness through the winter to include improvement as well?

Thanks in advance for your input.
slyjackson is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 11:46 AM
  #84  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by koop
What does your stroke look like when your standing?
Usually when I stand up to give my butt a rest while in a paceline I pedal circles. When standing to accelerate I push and pull (sometimes the rear wheel jumps off the ground). But for climbing, I just let my weight do the work. Standing (for me) in a climb is a rest period for the legs. As I said before, I am mostly seated when climbing.

Also, for a sprint, I am probably doing some other kind of pedal stroke, so there are four different kinds of standing stroke, just for one rider, and likely many more variations. For climbing, I will stick with the easy-on-the-legs-method. If I want to use my legs more, I will just stay in the saddle.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 12:09 PM
  #85  
Ride Lots
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Then I would agree with you whole heartedly that standing is less efficient when climbing. My sprint and my climb are almost identical. When your just using your weight and not as much of your muscle to keep the bike propelling forward your right about having a greater amount of acceleration to take care of. Do you ever try sprinting your climbs?
koop is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 12:12 PM
  #86  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Yeah I won a KOM in a club race this year that way, also sprinted for the line at a few races that end on hills but for the most part, the climbs are long enough around here that if you sprint your way up, you blow up.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 12:20 PM
  #87  
Ride Lots
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Where abouts are you? Unless your in the mountains, I can't imagine it being worse than Wisconsin. I find sprinting a hill and coasting down the other side is faster and saves more energy than spinning up and spinning down. This is how I beat countless people. If your blowing up on longer hills do you practice them more? Don't get me wrong, I'll blow up on a long hill w/o question, but I've always just thought I needed to practice sprints/climb-sprints more. Or do you think that it's just a waste of time to try and increase your sprint/climb-sprint endurance?
koop is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 12:45 PM
  #88  
mamafitz
 
RoadToNowhere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Near Hershey...TMI...not in Central PA ;)
Posts: 1,878

Bikes: Serotta CDA, Cannondale R800, mid-80's Bianchi hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slyjackson
Thanks for the reply Beth. I always wanted to know about the spinning classes and how it would help in cycling. I know that this is off topic, but one question for you. Do you feel that spin classes will help maintain my fitness through the winter to include improvement as well?

Thanks in advance for your input.
Absolutely. Consider your alternatives. Chances are your road miles are reduced in the winter; spinning classes can take up the slack.

If your plan is to hang the bike up in November and dust it off in April, then absolutely get yourself into some classes; 2-3/week on alternate days. Mix it up with weight training and other forms of cardiovascular training and you'll be ready to climb from the first day out in the spring.

Without knowing your current fitness level, I don't want to get more specific than that. I'd suggest you research a couple of gyms/trainers to find a good fit. Also, ask for suggestions at your trusty bike shop; around here, some of them also run indoor training programs.

I have some contact with spinning instructors across the country; if you'd like some referral into, pm me.

Beth
RoadToNowhere is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 12:52 PM
  #89  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by koop
Where abouts are you? Unless your in the mountains, I can't imagine it being worse than Wisconsin. I find sprinting a hill and coasting down the other side is faster and saves more energy than spinning up and spinning down. This is how I beat countless people. If your blowing up on longer hills do you practice them more? Don't get me wrong, I'll blow up on a long hill w/o question, but I've always just thought I needed to practice sprints/climb-sprints more. Or do you think that it's just a waste of time to try and increase your sprint/climb-sprint endurance?
While it's certainly faster to overcook slightly on climbs and recover on descents (much faster), I think you're being a little liberal with "sprinting." A sprint will get you no more than 150 meters on a climb. Anything longer than 12s or so is not a sprint.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 01:26 PM
  #90  
Ride Lots
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
While it's certainly faster to overcook slightly on climbs and recover on descents (much faster), I think you're being a little liberal with "sprinting." A sprint will get you no more than 150 meters on a climb. Anything longer than 12s or so is not a sprint.
Point well taken. I'm fairly new to the BFs and not sure what the local colloquialisms are and how they are defined. Back in my running days in x-country 400 meters could be a sprint. It all depends on your definition of sprint. I'll mind my verbiage more in the future to make it more BF appropriate.
koop is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 01:39 PM
  #91  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I am just east of Binghamton, NY. Sort of between the Catskills and the Endless Mtns of PA.
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 10-15-08, 01:54 PM
  #92  
Wet Cyclist
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting thread.

If I'm going hard up a long hill I stand to recover from sitting and sit to recover from standing. I find that if I alternate appropriately I get up the hill the fastest with the freshest legs. Maybe each method uses muscles a little differently to allow a slight recovery from each one.
serac is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.