Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

FUJI vs Pinarello?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

FUJI vs Pinarello?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-10, 01:01 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: MTB: Stumpjumper FSR, Road: De Rosa King 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
Ok, we have gotten past the FUJI vs Pinarello issue. I don't really want to hi-jack this thread but I would like to explore this seat mast issue. I have bought and sold bikes and you say that it hasn't been an issue with resale but I think it would limit who can fit on the bike? The bike is more like a custom frame after the mast is cut. I have changed the height on my seat post a few times since I bought my bike. I know that you have some some adjustment that is still left in the mast however.

My concern is that it looks like these bikes are built to be disposable with parts that can not be replaced. Maybe people that race for a living or as a hobby are interested in their results and the bike is unimportant, but I keep my bikes for a long time. I have a bike in my garage that I bought new 32 years ago.

By the way, how much weight does an integrated seat mast save? My Tompson seat post weighs less than most if not all carbon fiber seat posts.
Seat masts often have a decent amount of adjustability to them. You can usually get a longer min-seat post or extender, depending on the style.
foresthill is offline  
Old 10-18-10, 01:13 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seriously, if you have to ask, don't get the Pinarello, and for goodness sake Do not go buy a CAAD9!!
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 10-18-10, 01:21 PM
  #28  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
Ok, we have gotten past the FUJI vs Pinarello issue. I don't really want to hi-jack this thread but I would like to explore this seat mast issue. I have bought and sold bikes and you say that it hasn't been an issue with resale but I think it would limit who can fit on the bike? The bike is more like a custom frame after the mast is cut. I have changed the height on my seat post a few times since I bought my bike. I know that you have some some adjustment that is still left in the mast however.

By the way, how much weight does an integrated seat mast save? My Tompson seat post weighs less than most if not all carbon fiber seat posts.
I think you might have it backwards...if you keep your bikes for a long time an ISP should be much less of a concern than if you resell them quickly.

Weight savings is small and depends on the frame and post, best case might be 100-200 grams, worst it might even be a touch heavier. The ISP lets the manufacturer play with ride characteristics and compliance; I can't run a Thompson post on one of my standard post bikes because it's too darn stiff. Softer posts flex in directions that aren't always optimal but it's what I've ended up with. The ISP never slips, never rotates. And there's no clamp torque issues that could damage the seat post or frame, snug is fine unless you're a really bad mechanic.

Figure 85% of the people who buy a certain size frame fit into a fairly small fit box, I've found that there's enough adjustment in the ISP using shims and a hacksaw to accommodate those folks. But certainly there's 15% it won't so you're narrowing that market. FWIW I recently switched over the Fizik Aliante from the Selle SLR Carbonio, pretty big difference in saddle height between the two but I can switch back with a shim. EDR has bought two of my ISP frames, he's quite a bit longer in the leg but has been able to shim the post up using the extended clamp.

But absolutely, you'll lose some perspective buyers and if you've got an atypical fit, the ISP might not be for you. And you're stuck with a clamping system you might not like; if I had my way everyone would use a Thompson style two bolt clamp. Other than that and the travel issue (as opposed to shipping), I haven't found any bad stuff.

Last edited by Racer Ex; 10-18-10 at 01:40 PM.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 10-18-10, 04:56 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
mikeE46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 452
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would go with Fuji.

I don't have an any complain on my SST.
mikeE46 is offline  
Old 10-18-10, 06:19 PM
  #30  
Jet Jockey
 
Banzai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 4,941

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Nashbar X-frame bike, Bike Friday Haul-a-Day, Surly Pugsley.

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 382 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Looking for something that will provide good acceleration.
Oh boy.

YGBSM.

Addressing this will take more time than I feel like investing right now.
__________________
Good night...and good luck
Banzai is offline  
Old 10-18-10, 06:21 PM
  #31  
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,656

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 1,868 Times in 1,064 Posts
Which one do you like better? People on these forums with those brands will vote for their own "I don't any complain on my SST. "

Do you want a bike that gets approval from the BF or one that fits your riding style, character, taste etc best?

At that price point, you are going to get more performance value for your buck with the Fuji, and more style, cool points etc (IMO) with the Pinarello. As has been pointed out, mid level Fuji and bottom of the range Pinarello.

Anyway, which bike stirs YOU and makes you want to ride it?

PS Pinarellos fit big so go with a 57. The 59 fits more like a conventional 62....
Rocket-Sauce is online now  
Old 10-20-10, 12:45 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi All -

First, thank you all for taking the time to respond and educate me. Here are a few more clarifications/comments:

- I have actually not road tested other bikes in the $2.5K range before narrowing my choices to Pinarello and Fuji. I was looking for a full-carbon bike at a substantial discount (as one usually gets ~ 30% towards the end of season) and these two seemed to offer good value. I totally agree and will road test other bikes in the same range before making a final decision, but as someone mentioned, test-rides have their own limitations
- Although it would be nice to get cool points riding a Pinarello (or an Italian make), ultimately I want a bike that offers 'more bike' for my money and is durable (good climbing and accelaration abilities) as well as I intend to keep my next purchase for a while. FWIW, I am 6'1" and weigh 178 lbs.
- I like my Felt F85 but I bought it a few years ago because it was my size on a huge sale and that was my first real bike. Want to try another make/bike if that makes sense
- I didn't think about the head-set length so that’s a good point. I have a "standard" headset in my Felt and don't have any neck-pain issues while riding.
- My current bike does not have an ISP so not familiar with how that will impact my riding
- RangerDavid adviced, "...for goodness sake Do not go buy a CAAD9". Funnily, a team rider actually "highly" recommened the Cannondale CAAD9 to me. I guess everyone has their preference and it gets confusing because many of these manufacturers make top quality bikes so its increasingly hard to make a decision

Appreciate all your inputs. Thanks again.
rainmaker is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 01:02 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Menel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 1,155

Bikes: Helix, HonkyTonk, NailTrail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Hi All -

First, thank you all for taking the time to respond and educate me. Here are a few more clarifications/comments:

- I have actually not road tested other bikes in the $2.5K range before narrowing my choices to Pinarello and Fuji. I was looking for a full-carbon bike at a substantial discount (as one usually gets ~ 30% towards the end of season) and these two seemed to offer good value. I totally agree and will road test other bikes in the same range before making a final decision, but as someone mentioned, test-rides have their own limitations
- Although it would be nice to get cool points riding a Pinarello (or an Italian make), ultimately I want a bike that offers 'more bike' for my money and is durable (good climbing and accelaration abilities) as well as I intend to keep my next purchase for a while. FWIW, I am 6'1" and weigh 178 lbs.
- I like my Felt F85 but I bought it a few years ago because it was my size on a huge sale and that was my first real bike. Want to try another make/bike if that makes sense
- I didn't think about the head-set length so that’s a good point. I have a "standard" headset in my Felt and don't have any neck-pain issues while riding.
- My current bike does not have an ISP so not familiar with how that will impact my riding
- RangerDavid adviced, "...for goodness sake Do not go buy a CAAD9". Funnily, a team rider actually "highly" recommened the Cannondale CAAD9 to me. I guess everyone has their preference and it gets confusing because many of these manufacturers make top quality bikes so its increasingly hard to make a decision

Appreciate all your inputs. Thanks again.
CAAD9 is a top quality, racing machine.
So is the Fuji SST.
So are certain models of Pinarello, take your pick.

The engine will matter far more than the bike.
Menel is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 01:03 PM
  #34  
Live to ride ride to live
 
Carbon Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Hi All -

First, thank you all for taking the time to respond and educate me. Here are a few more clarifications/comments:

- I have actually not road tested other bikes in the $2.5K range before narrowing my choices to Pinarello and Fuji. I was looking for a full-carbon bike at a substantial discount (as one usually gets ~ 30% towards the end of season) and these two seemed to offer good value. I totally agree and will road test other bikes in the same range before making a final decision, but as someone mentioned, test-rides have their own limitations
- Although it would be nice to get cool points riding a Pinarello (or an Italian make), ultimately I want a bike that offers 'more bike' for my money and is durable (good climbing and accelaration abilities) as well as I intend to keep my next purchase for a while. FWIW, I am 6'1" and weigh 178 lbs.
- I like my Felt F85 but I bought it a few years ago because it was my size on a huge sale and that was my first real bike. Want to try another make/bike if that makes sense
- I didn't think about the head-set length so that’s a good point. I have a "standard" headset in my Felt and don't have any neck-pain issues while riding.
- My current bike does not have an ISP so not familiar with how that will impact my riding
- RangerDavid adviced, "...for goodness sake Do not go buy a CAAD9". Funnily, a team rider actually "highly" recommened the Cannondale CAAD9 to me. I guess everyone has their preference and it gets confusing because many of these manufacturers make top quality bikes so its increasingly hard to make a decision

Appreciate all your inputs. Thanks again.
Four years ago I was in a similar situation. I went to three bike shops and tested three bikes from each shop. I also rode a used bikes that was on Craigslist. Of the ten bikes I rode, one of them just felt right and that is what I bought. If you ride several bikes and they feel the same or similar then maybe you buy the lowest cost bike that feels right.

Good luck with your research.
Carbon Unit is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 05:06 PM
  #35  
Retro-guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 285

Bikes: 1980 Raleigh Super Record

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To me, the decision is more about form versus function, or perhaps style versus substance.

There's no question that there is some amount of price premium that goes for the Pinarello name. To a lesser extent, the same is true if you were buying a Specialized or Trek.

Without even looking at the specs for the two bikes, I can say with a fair amount of certainty that if they are similarly priced, the Fuji will have better components than the Pinarello, and will weight less. (Lower-end Pinarello's are actually pretty heavy, in comparison to other brands of similar price and component gruppo.)

On the other hand, a Pinarello is a lot sexier.

If you recall the old movie "Breaking Away", the lead character fantasized about being an Italian bicycle racer, and even sang Italian songs while riding. I can't picture him having the same passion for learning Japanese, even if the Fuji is better than the Pinarello on most objective measures....

(This is not to disparage either bike choice, both of which are very nice machines!)
rschleicher is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 08:53 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
corbett1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Barnegat, NJ
Posts: 320

Bikes: 2009 Fuji roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i like the fact that i dont live anywhere close to a performance bike store, closest is 2 hours away, there are two shops that sell fuji within 40 miles of my house, i hardly ever see a fuji on the road.

go with the one that fits better
corbett1010 is offline  
Old 10-21-10, 09:36 PM
  #37  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Any experience with Jamis Xenith Endura series?
rainmaker is offline  
Old 10-25-10, 12:06 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi All -

Sorry to bug you again but I went to the bike store to look at a few bikes I had shortlisted. While looking at the bikes, I came across Wilier. Had not heard of them before and they seem really cool, albeit a bit expensive. Any thoughts, ideas on Wilier. I was looking a the Izoard line and here is the link:

https://www.racycles.com/product.aspx...3,917&pid=4247
rainmaker is offline  
Old 10-25-10, 12:56 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
mikeE46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 452
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocket-Sauce
Which one do you like better? People on these forums with those brands will vote for their own "I don't any complain on my SST. "

.......
PS Pinarellos fit big so go with a 57. The 59 fits more like a conventional 62....
Hum, I should put more detail on SST.

Alright.
1. I rode Cannondale CAAD R500 and was very stiff and wanted comfort ride.
2. I rode Felt F55 for one year and was nice but broken by a car accident.
3. BMC SLC01 - yes, very nice and very bling bling(so many people asked me about the bike.
4. Motobecane Lechampion - I found out that $90 frame can beat my BMC and wasn't so bad.
5. Fuji SST - best ride so far. very stiff and comfortable and fast.

So my point is I won't pay extra money for the brand(NAME)
If you can buy top model from Fuji compare with mid Pinarellos, I don't even think about it.
Anyway, good luck and try to ride both.
mikeE46 is offline  
Old 10-26-10, 04:46 PM
  #40  
is The Stig
 
pjn0629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 185

Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.2, 2003 Trek 5500, 2001 trek 8000 disc, 2006 Rocky ETSX-30, 1999 Raleigh R-700

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Hi All -

Sorry to bug you again but I went to the bike store to look at a few bikes I had shortlisted. While looking at the bikes, I came across Wilier. Had not heard of them before and they seem really cool, albeit a bit expensive. Any thoughts, ideas on Wilier. I was looking a the Izoard line and here is the link:

https://www.racycles.com/product.aspx...3,917&pid=4247


If you're in the NYC area, head on over to strictly, im looking at a wilier gt, they had an izoard there for you to ride, thing handled like a dream. But didn't feel as fast as the orca i rode.
pjn0629 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tavish
Road Cycling
20
04-04-13 09:11 AM
bikerjp
Road Cycling
12
11-16-10 07:15 PM
djlarroc
Road Cycling
60
09-16-10 10:39 PM
gus6464
Road Cycling
14
09-07-10 10:44 AM
djlarroc
Road Cycling
3
05-15-10 12:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.