Campagnolo shifters and front derailleur
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Campagnolo shifters and front derailleur
Relating to something I posted in the Touring section but also relevant here ( I hope ) is what would be best for a front derailleur with a combination Veloce QS levers and a compact crank set ( 48/34 ). Would it be better to use an older 8 speed version in either Campagnolo or say something like a Dura Ace 7410? I understand the cages are usually a bit wider and my concern is using a 9 speed Shimano mountain cassette ( 11-34 ) on the rear. The problem of possible chain rub and the ability to adjust with the Campy shifters - I've never used them before.
#2
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
Just wanted to say that I LOVE what the auto-censor did to the typo in your title.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Something tells me that two of those letters were typed by accident!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I would love to answer this but I have no idea if veloce works as record shifters. If they do you can use any darn FD in the market and it will shift fine as long it can the FD can manage compact. Since a few years ago shimano and campagnolo FD can handle regular and compact cranksets so you should be ok. Now, you mentioned a 8 speed campagnolo FD, probably it will work fine wide wise (crossing chain), the problem in my opinion could be that those FD's does not manage compact. So far were not designed for it, but since some stuff is really cloudy it would not be surprise if it works fine or the chain grains in the 34x15/14 position.
Good luck.
Test it and let is know
Good luck.
Test it and let is know
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
veloce QS? not the ultra shift 2009 and newer version?
There's no trim on the older veloce levers.
But it shouldn't be an issue with a double, even with a MTB cassette on the back.
Just try whatever you have sitting around, you'll never know if it will work or not by thinking it through.
There's no trim on the older veloce levers.
But it shouldn't be an issue with a double, even with a MTB cassette on the back.
Just try whatever you have sitting around, you'll never know if it will work or not by thinking it through.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Buffalo New York
Posts: 2,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I dont think the shifter will see a difference in which fd you use but if your using a 9 speed chain w/ that cassette I would use a fd made for 9 also.
__________________
2010 Kestrel RT900SL, 800k carbon, chorus/record, speedplay, zonda
2000 litespeed Unicoi Ti, XTR,XT, Campy crank, time atac, carbon forks
2010 Kestrel RT900SL, 800k carbon, chorus/record, speedplay, zonda
2000 litespeed Unicoi Ti, XTR,XT, Campy crank, time atac, carbon forks
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you for the suggestions everyone, I guess I should just try something half decent in perhaps a 9 speed.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i recently experimented using a campy 8spd FD with record 10 (39x52). it "worked" but not perfect under load. i swapped it out for a 10spd unit and it works great.
the best FD for your application is going to be a campagnolo compact qs unit. they can be found pretty cheap on e-bay and will have "ct" and "qs" wrote by the model name.
https://cgi.ebay.com/CAMPAGNOLO-XENON...ht_2206wt_1141
a "normal" campagnolo 10spd qs FD will work, but campagnolo says not as well (i personally have not tried it)
https://cgi.ebay.com/New-Campagnolo-M...9#ht_500wt_922
a non "qs" 10spd derailleur should also work but will require more shifter travel and wont be as good as the "ct" either
the best FD for your application is going to be a campagnolo compact qs unit. they can be found pretty cheap on e-bay and will have "ct" and "qs" wrote by the model name.
https://cgi.ebay.com/CAMPAGNOLO-XENON...ht_2206wt_1141
a "normal" campagnolo 10spd qs FD will work, but campagnolo says not as well (i personally have not tried it)
https://cgi.ebay.com/New-Campagnolo-M...9#ht_500wt_922
a non "qs" 10spd derailleur should also work but will require more shifter travel and wont be as good as the "ct" either
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Still a bit overwhelmed with the choices out there. I saw an inexpensive Veloce 9 speed changer but it says it is not for compact cranks. I know many use standard front changers with them anyway, and with the 34/48, I can't see any issues. Thank you for the links by the way, my problem is I need a 28.6 clamp on version, and there does not seem to be too many choices with Campagnolo. I see they have braze on clamp adapters, but 32mm seems to be the smallest.
Last edited by VintageRide; 01-14-11 at 09:20 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
to the the best of my knowledge, the only difference between a campagnolo 9spd FD and 10spd FD is the plastic "wear pad" on the outside of the cage. if you have any rubbing issues this could be removed.
#12
Cathedral City, CA
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cathedral City, CA
Posts: 1,504
Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
As I remember, this is because this model was designed (claimed) to better match the curvature of the smaller larger chainwheel (53t versus 50t).
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Still a bit overwhelmed with the choices out there. I saw an inexpensive Veloce 9 speed changer but it says it is not for compact cranks. I know many use standard front changers with them anyway, and with the 34/48, I can't see any issues. Thank you for the links by the way, my problem is I need a 28.6 clamp on version, and there does not seem to be too many choices with Campagnolo. I see they have braze on clamp adapters, but 32mm seems to be the smallest.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I decided on a Centaur braze on 10 speed QS changer which looked a little better than the Xenon and Mirage equivalents, as the prices were close enough.A Problem Solvers 28.6 adapter clamp in silver finish and a nice front pulley from Superfly Cycles. I almost decided not to spend the 50.00 odd dollars ( including shipping ) but what the heck, it's a nice sealed bearing piece. They probably will not include a bolt .At least now I will be set up for a bottom pull configuration and hopefully I will be able to get this project together before Spring. Thanks again everybody!
Last edited by VintageRide; 01-15-11 at 07:56 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I almost purchased the Xenon ct version in your first link but went for the slightly upscale Centaur, the description mentioned that it is compact compatible, but then I imagine one could get any number of other standard front changers to work also. I did realize the inner plate on that Xenon would probably facilitate somewhat better shifting, just hope I made the right choice. When the pulley costs more than the derailleur with shipping it seemed somewhat wasteful, but nobody else that I could see really bothered, they were all the friction type. Performance wise I am sure there is no tangible difference, but I can see it for the cyclo cross crowd when they get a lot of mud and debris around the pulley, a sealed design makes sense. Just a bit overkill for a touring bike with fenders.
Last edited by VintageRide; 01-15-11 at 09:28 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Barrettscv
Classic & Vintage
36
08-22-17 07:45 PM
robbied196
Bicycle Mechanics
4
12-13-10 02:41 AM