650 Rear/700 Front Fixed Gear
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
650 Rear/700 Front Fixed Gear
Has anyone tried running a 650 rear/700 front wheel combination? I’m going to build another set of wheels for a fixed-gear and thought this might be an cool way to give the bike a little more personality and possibly my increase cadence at the same time. Any thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 727
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you wanna increase your cadence just move to a smaller chainring or a larger cog.
the smaller wheel will look rather goofy in a 700c/27" frame. that's just my opinion though. i cant imagine it'd be very comfortable either, you'd have to tilt your saddle nose-down quite a bit.
the smaller wheel will look rather goofy in a 700c/27" frame. that's just my opinion though. i cant imagine it'd be very comfortable either, you'd have to tilt your saddle nose-down quite a bit.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: columbus oh
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It will screw up handling of bike a fair amount.....make the steering a little slower.It would be ridable though.More importantly it will make the BB that much closer to road,and that isnt good on a fixie.
#4
MaNiC!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Posts: 1,600
Bikes: 2004 Cervelo Soloist 105, 2005 Apollo Apex, 2006 SCOTT Speedster S30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought Marco Pantani rode a custom built in the 98 tour that had a 650C front and a 700C rear to get him aerodynamic for TTs cause he was such a small fulla
Brendon
Brendon
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought this would be a cool way to give the bike a little more rake without changing forks and add the sloping top tube look. I didn’t think there’d be that much difference in bottom bracket to ground clearance to matter but I guess so. The ‘80s Cannondale MTB bikes used a 24r/26f wheel combo that was really trick looking in its day.
Thanks for the comments.
Thanks for the comments.
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: richmond, va
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
lots of MTB's/dirt bmx bikes to that because the smaller back wheel will dig in for straight traction, and the fatter front wheel helps steering a lot.
*ps- that keith harring bike is nuts. i'll take 2 please*
*ps- that keith harring bike is nuts. i'll take 2 please*
Last edited by enderwaves; 07-10-03 at 04:22 PM.
#8
(Grouchy)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
that's my purstuit. i LOVE the way it handles. and when i say LOVE, i mean i would have sex with this bike if there was a suitable orifice.
you can't tell from the pic, but the top tube DOES slope, and the front wheel IS smaller than the rear...also it's about a 50cm seat tube, so the slope isn't all THAT dramatic...definitely not as dramatic as that other bike...i should really get taller frames...
oh wait...yeah, the topic...umm...650 rear/700 front would be bad. very bad, yes, unless the frame was built for it...maybe some nice builder would put it together for you on the cheap...then again, probably not. it also wouldn't be legal to ride on the track, but you probably don't care about that...even 650c fronts aren't legal anymore...stupid UCI...
#10
(Grouchy)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i don't see the topic that talks about bike lovin'.
i was just saying...that riding that bike is better than sex.
a few nights ago i went for a 3-speed cruise around the city with a friend. i borrowed my GF's dumpstered 3-speed, and we cruised for a bit. then i decided to come home and switch bikes. cause that bike is TWEAKED. so i hopped on that yellow monster and i said to my female companion as we rode down a darkened street "wow! this bike is like...i can't describe it...it's like..."
"yeah, it's really excellent," she said (i let her take a few laps in a parking lot earlier).
"IT'S LIKE SEX!!" i exclaimed.
she said: "uhm...yeah...i guess it is, it's really nice."
then i giggled and i think i weirded her out.
i was just saying...that riding that bike is better than sex.
a few nights ago i went for a 3-speed cruise around the city with a friend. i borrowed my GF's dumpstered 3-speed, and we cruised for a bit. then i decided to come home and switch bikes. cause that bike is TWEAKED. so i hopped on that yellow monster and i said to my female companion as we rode down a darkened street "wow! this bike is like...i can't describe it...it's like..."
"yeah, it's really excellent," she said (i let her take a few laps in a parking lot earlier).
"IT'S LIKE SEX!!" i exclaimed.
she said: "uhm...yeah...i guess it is, it's really nice."
then i giggled and i think i weirded her out.
#12
:)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: duluth
Posts: 3,391
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
But these bikes were designed with consideration to the wheel sizes.
#13
astrositupataphysicyclist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Media PA
Posts: 596
Bikes: too many now
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
bump de bump, yeah....but how does this combo on a road bike (if meant for climbing, thus, necessarily, descending!) not help? i realize geometry is affected a bit (how much?), but i would think that if the 69er idea works for some bikes, why not the 700-650er? adust the saddle, the bars a bit....
has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.
has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
bump de bump, yeah....but how does this combo on a road bike (if meant for climbing, thus, necessarily, descending!) not help? i realize geometry is affected a bit (how much?), but i would think that if the 69er idea works for some bikes, why not the 700-650er? adust the saddle, the bars a bit....
has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.
has anyone done this for road? not all that curious about fixie/cool looks. this is about performance.
Do you see anyone using that wheel setup in a professional racing setting? No. Not on a MTB not on a road bike. This should tell you something. If the R&D departments at bike manufacturers around the world see no use in it then it obviously isnt going to help your performance.
#17
astrositupataphysicyclist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Media PA
Posts: 596
Bikes: too many now
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you see anyone using that wheel setup in a professional racing setting? No. Not on a MTB not on a road bike. This should tell you something. If the R&D departments at bike manufacturers around the world see no use in it then it obviously isnt going to help your performance.
still, not worth the experiment since i don't have a rear 650 wheel.
#18
-
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Banned in DC
Posts: 454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are advantages to a 69er off-road, mostly that it allows you to spin up the lighter rear wheel and still have rock clearence with the front wheel. And that is for bikes and forks designed to use such a setup.
There are no advantages to this setup on the road, especially when the bike is not designed around the smaller rear wheel.
The only way it would be even remotely sensible is if you were using a very fat tire (50mm+) on a bike that could not otherwise use fat tires, and you didn't need a rear brake.
There are no advantages to this setup on the road, especially when the bike is not designed around the smaller rear wheel.
The only way it would be even remotely sensible is if you were using a very fat tire (50mm+) on a bike that could not otherwise use fat tires, and you didn't need a rear brake.
#19
Master of Ceremonies
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 27
Bikes: 2005 Lemond Versailles, 2010 Mercier Kilo OS fixed gear, 2008 Redline Monocog Flight, 1985 Peugot 700c conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I knew a guy once that rode a bike similar to what you are talking about. He had a Schwinn Cruiser with a 20" wheel on the back and a 26" wheel on the front. I don't see him anymore. He left town with the rest of the circus.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jacobrsp
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
2
10-25-12 09:04 PM