Anyone have Panaracer Fire XC Pro 2.1" tires?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Anyone have Panaracer Fire XC Pro 2.1" tires?
Could you do me a favor and measure the actual width of your tires? At the widest point, does it actually seem ot be 2.1", or is it narrower (or wider) than that? Thanks.
#3
I couldn't car less.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Originally Posted by notfred
Could you do me a favor and measure the actual width of your tires? At the widest point, does it actually seem ot be 2.1", or is it narrower (or wider) than that? Thanks.
Don't have that tire....or calipers.
2.10>on 26 rims fit most any mtb.
Why?
Last edited by jeff williams; 01-06-05 at 12:55 AM.
#5
Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
From: East coast
Bikes: hardtail, squishy, fixed roadie, fixed crosser
Originally Posted by jeff williams
2.10 is measured tire hight. Not width, that depends on the design.
Don't have that tire....or calipers.
2.10>on 26 rims fit most any mtb.
Why?
Don't have that tire....or calipers.
2.10>on 26 rims fit most any mtb.
Why?
that is the width.
they sit about 45mm tall, and measure right about 2" at the widest part of the tread.
#7
I drink your MILKSHAKE

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15,061
Likes: 3
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
#10
I drink your MILKSHAKE

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15,061
Likes: 3
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
#13
Time for a change.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Originally Posted by Cornish_Rdr_UK
I have panaracers, they're ok, nothing special though imo, pretty light, thats all they've got going for the them i reckon
On the tyre width, 2 sets on two different widths of rims. Funnily enough the two different widths of rim give two different widths of tyre. Differing by 3/16".
#14
I couldn't car less.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Originally Posted by scrublover
huh? what are you talking about with 2.10 being the height?
that is the width.
they sit about 45mm tall, and measure right about 2" at the widest part of the tread.
that is the width.
they sit about 45mm tall, and measure right about 2" at the widest part of the tread.
"Bicycle tire size is expressed as the wheel diameter by the tires widest width. Therefore 26x2.0 means that the tire is 26" in diameter and 2.0" wide. Maxxis also offers 16,” 20,” 24,” and 700c size tires in various disciplines."
https://www.maxxis.com/products/bicycle/faq.asp
How did I get mixed up? But the 2.25, 2.3, 2.5 nominal width are taller than 26 inches?
They sure lOOk taller. Maybe I can fit a 2.3 front.
The XC tires I like stop @ 2.1, currently my front (1.95 rear) I want to put 2.1 rear and 2.25-2.3 front but i've not bought the tire 'cause I thought it would be too tall, not wide. I have more width clearnce than hight.
Would a bike store return a tire that had been mounted and inflated,(not run) but didn't fit?
Last edited by jeff williams; 01-06-05 at 11:38 AM.
#15
Yorkshire, UK
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: York, UK
Bikes: 04 Marin Mount Vision, 04 Rock Lobster Tig Team SL
The fire xc's are sposed to be 2.1" but they look alot narrower in my eyes, more like a 1.95 maybe. They give ok traction but the width is really not what i was expecting im afraid.
#18
XC Rider
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Kidderminster, England
Bikes: Santa Cruz Heckler
At the end of the day, if you have a bike to which you're only go and XC ride, then any Tyre over 2.1 is an overkill. It'll slow you down and drag. Most of the top XC Pro's run 1.8 & 1.95
#19
I couldn't car less.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Originally Posted by TheTuNa
At the end of the day, if you have a bike to which you're only go and XC ride, then any Tyre over 2.1 is an overkill. It'll slow you down and drag. Most of the top XC Pro's run 1.8 & 1.95
It's just MY problem as I want a 2.25 dry dirt tire tread for my solid fork.
I have 1.95 rear, 2.1 front. Need to run 2.10 rear 2.25 front but IRC goes thick mud monster knob @ 2.25.
Any body seen xc (type\close) tread 2.25's ?
Last edited by jeff williams; 01-06-05 at 05:57 PM.
#20
the 2.1 Fire Xc's seem to be as rare as rocking horse crap here in aus. I have run the 1.8's and was pretty happy with them. They are quite pressure sensitive and the soft compound makes them ware a lil fast, but over all they suited me fine.
At the moment im about to try GEAX , will see how they go. if they dont work out then ill be heading back down the Panaracer path i think.
At the moment im about to try GEAX , will see how they go. if they dont work out then ill be heading back down the Panaracer path i think.
#21
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Bikes: '05 Yeti 575, , 01 Cannondale SI1000, 03 Felt F65, 07 Tarmac Pro
Originally Posted by jeff williams
Well I want xc tread on 2.25's. Period.
It's just MY problem as I want a 2.25 dry dirt tire tread for my solid fork.
I have 1.95 rear, 2.1 front. Need to run 2.10 rear 2.25 front but IRC goes thick mud monster knob @ 2.25.
Any body seen xc (type\close) tread 2.25's ?
It's just MY problem as I want a 2.25 dry dirt tire tread for my solid fork.
I have 1.95 rear, 2.1 front. Need to run 2.10 rear 2.25 front but IRC goes thick mud monster knob @ 2.25.
Any body seen xc (type\close) tread 2.25's ?
I'm currently running a Kenda Blue Groove 2.35 in front and a 2.1 Fire XC Pro in back. The Kenda is made out of a sticky rubber and is kind of a slow roller, but it grips roots and rocks like crazy. I like the Fire in back, but have never been too impressed with it in front. I've also run a WTB Weirwolf 2.5 on front before, it's kind of skinny for a 2.5 tire, but it rolls better than the Kenda.
Take a look at the specs page on this site: https://mtbtires.com
He has a ton of good info in there.
Dean
#22
Te mortuo heres tibi sim?
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
From: East coast
Bikes: hardtail, squishy, fixed roadie, fixed crosser
IRC Trailbear comes in a 2.25" size. using one on the rear of my singlespeed; very good tire in that size.
IRC also has a tire called the Backcountry in a 2.25" size, though i've not used it.
IRC also has a tire called the Backcountry in a 2.25" size, though i've not used it.
#23
Mine is 26" XC Pro 2.1 folding tire and the actual diameter is a bit less than 1.9" both ways, width and heigth (height including thread), when brand new and inflated to 50 psi.
By the way, I checked many tires of different kinds from road to mountain and in all cases width was the same as height.
By the way, I checked many tires of different kinds from road to mountain and in all cases width was the same as height.
#24
Moar cowbell


Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 7
From: The 509
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
^^ You DO realize that you are responding to a 7-year-old thread, right?
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stockae92
Mountain Biking
3
07-21-16 09:26 AM
Mr. Fly
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
06-18-12 01:02 PM
jonathanb715
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
3
05-17-11 09:50 AM







I dunno, they look like they've super tread on them though

