Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Riding a frame that is entirely too large:

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Riding a frame that is entirely too large:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-05, 10:55 AM
  #1  
Dismount Run Remount etc.
Thread Starter
 
12XU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Some Latitude and Some Longitude
Posts: 2,235

Bikes: A couple customs and some beaters.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Riding a frame that is entirely too large:

Is this an idiotic thing to do? I found a Taiwanese-made Bianchi frame sitting around at Free Ride which I was determined to build up even after I measured it at 61 cm C-T seat tube. Now I'm 6' and have decently long legs, but to have the bike adjusted to give me anywhere near the proper leg extension, I have to put the seat tube almost all the way down. Should I suck it up and throw the parts on a smaller, albeit crappier frame, or stick with this one because I'm a brand/mediocre quality *****? Basically, I want your responses to recall stories in which you've ridden too large frames and regretted it or loved it.
12XU is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 11:40 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
filtersweep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,615
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What is the top tube?
filtersweep is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 11:43 AM
  #3  
Gizmo
 
stronzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 312

Bikes: custom Moyer track bike, '94 Bianchi track bike, 99ish Bianchi Reparto Corsa 9speed record/chorus, '81ish Koga Miyata FullPro, '84 trek 720 touring bike, mid-80s Montagner slowly being built w/period campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i've tried damn near everything to get my beautiful 61cm guerciotti to fit me decently and only just recently accepted that it's not gonna happen. fit is too important to compromise, imho. i realized this midway through a crit race when i tried to adjust my position a little and felt like my back was being stretched on one of those medieval torture devices (can't remember what they're called for the life of me...).
stronzo is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 11:51 AM
  #4  
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think it's called "the rack".

If it doesn't fit, you must forget (it)!

I'd prefer to tote five pounds of extra weight rather than ride an ill-fitting bike. Keep looking!
Phantoj is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 12:06 PM
  #5  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
I ride a 62cm early 80s Centurion Frame that has been fixed. Its top tube is exactly the same length as my 57cm 2005 Lemond Poprad. So they fit me the same (correctly), even though the top tube of the Centurion is a nut buster. So check and adjust the reach (top tube, stem) of the frame, not the seat tube length.

Al
noisebeam is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 12:44 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 145

Bikes: Univega - fixed conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i'm about 6'1" but mostly leg. my bike is about 61cm (top tube is about 59cm). Although it looks huge, it fits me fine and neither the stem nor the seat is even close to being all the way down (though my stem is kinda stubby). I like how I am taller than all of the cars on my comute - some of the SUVs too.

all that to say ... it might be worth giving it a shot. it seems that a bigger problem is folks riding bikes that are too small for them.
Slartibartfast is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 12:51 PM
  #7  
griffin_
 
griffin_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: phila
Posts: 728

Bikes: raliegh "too lazy to make my own" rush hour

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
riding an incredibly tall bike can be quite glorious
i can barely stand over my raliegh but i still love to ride it
griffin_ is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 01:01 PM
  #8  
...
 
tlupfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I'm right around 6' and ride a 54x54 frame with a 90mm stem on my track bike and a 56x56 on my road bike. I really couldn't imagine riding a top tube longer than 56-57cm. I think it would be painful. Maybe your arms are really long and things work swimmingly. Only one way to find out.
tlupfer is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 01:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
filtersweep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,615
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A Taiwanese frame is a Taiwanese frame...

I have three bikes with the same top tube measurements- 61, 58, 57 - and I have no standoever issues with any of them. all that really matters is top tube, assuming you can straddle the thing. Bianchi measure theirs a bit strangely. As I recall, their 56 is more like a 54, etc... I'm guessing it will be a smallish 61- although, if it is a modern frame, it will probably have a longer TT than something a bit more vintage.

Unless they are giving it away, I'd skip it. Fit isn't something to comprimise on. There is nothing to love about a bike too big- although it seems many people tend to ride bikes that are too small (and would probably feel better riding something that fit).
filtersweep is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 02:26 PM
  #10  
.
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A lot of bike shops go through this. They have customers or customers of other shops bring in bikes that were improperly sized for whatever reason. The shops are pretty good with swapping out different size frames of the same models or even upgrading the kits to better frames. For a price of course. You might want to look into this if you want to salvage the rest of the bike.
jbonus is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 08:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 145

Bikes: Univega - fixed conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
while i do love the fit of my bike, i should admit that the standover hight keeps me from being able to perform sexy - or even mildly graceful - mounts and dismounts. thats alright though, if i started doing anything sexy, my friends and neighbors would be very confused.
Slartibartfast is offline  
Old 06-17-05, 09:23 PM
  #12  
The Silver Hammer
 
emayex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 787

Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Specialized Hardrock, Lynskey Cooper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im 6'3" and my surly frame is a 62cm....i think it is probably the "correct" size...but astheticaly...bah....i figure ill ride it like this for a year (becuase i love it anyway) then swap it for something a bit sexier
emayex is offline  
Old 06-20-05, 03:01 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
andrew young's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 505

Bikes: Trek road bike, schwinn fixed conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If anyone wants to give away a 61 or 62cm frame, I'm all over it! I'm 6'2", my Pista is 61 and fits me perfect. I would be willing to trade an old Ficell frame, which is probably a 56 or 57. The Ficell has most or all of the original components dating back to the 70's, according to it's previous owner. Let me know if anyone is interested.
andrew young is offline  
Old 06-20-05, 07:12 AM
  #14  
Shiftless bum
 
cavit8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 2,691

Bikes: Apollo fixed winter bike, Gazelle Cross, Baboe Cargo bike, Linskey Rouleur Road, Bridgestone Picnica, Tern C7, 2nd gen Strida

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Critical issue for height for me is whether there will be any critical issues for the likelihood of future issue. As long as your 'nads are safe during any quick stand-over maneouvres, does it really matter? If you think you look like a gump with the seat all the way down, then it may be meaningful to swap for a smaller frame.

As per Andrew, I've always got an eye out for 61cm framesets. PM me if something is taking up space....
__________________
Originally Posted by operator
truneo that tuned park internal nipple wrench work ??
cavit8 is offline  
Old 06-20-05, 08:35 AM
  #15  
Gizmo
 
stronzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 312

Bikes: custom Moyer track bike, '94 Bianchi track bike, 99ish Bianchi Reparto Corsa 9speed record/chorus, '81ish Koga Miyata FullPro, '84 trek 720 touring bike, mid-80s Montagner slowly being built w/period campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
never heard of ficell, any info?
stronzo is offline  
Old 06-21-05, 02:49 AM
  #16  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: L.A.
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IMO, stand over height means Nothing!, top tube length is the one that counts.

My point is that the traditional method of sizing bikes means nothing. How do you feel on it? are you stretching to reach the brakes? are you comfortable? Stand-over height is for mountain bikes or bike where you really need to bail out of the pedals from time to time. Otherwise, TT length and your comfort factor should decide.
zwxetlp is offline  
Old 06-21-05, 11:16 AM
  #17  
Dismount Run Remount etc.
Thread Starter
 
12XU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Some Latitude and Some Longitude
Posts: 2,235

Bikes: A couple customs and some beaters.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Everyone keep in mind that this frame was absolutely free and I would have no problems swapping it out for one of the many degenerate frames at Free Ride. The point was that this is a Bianchi and for free..why would I let it loose? Anyway, I must have measured it wrong because I haven't had any problems with standover height or with reach during my few commutes I've done on it so far. I like how sturdy the ride is with my seat rather low. I've never measured the TT, but I'll do that later this evening to see if there's a great discrepancy. I did consciously put a shorter stem on there so as to not maximize my reach, and with my flipped and chopped bars I've yet to have any reach issues. Yeah it's a bit of a strain to do a leg sweep over dismount, but I'm willing to sacrifice that for a nice, free frame. By the way, thanks for the tips everyone; I'll make sure to check both the TT and C-T in conjunction from now on.
12XU is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.