please explain this: track vs. conversion
11-28-06, 05:55 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: los angeles
Posts: 66
Bikes: fuji track '06 61cm
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
please explain this: track vs. conversion
It seems to me that there is some stigma against conversions in comparision to a track bike. Could someone please explain this dichotomy to me? I don't see why a conversion would be viewed as inferior... if anything to me it seems like someone put forth the effort into constructing something they love... as opposed to just buying a track bike as is... would be respected?
Just something I don't understand, thanks.
Just something I don't understand, thanks.
Likes For urbanplanner19:
11-28-06, 06:01 PM
#3
huaraches es amor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA EEUU
Posts: 466
Bikes: n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
conversions and track bikes are both cool.
people just like to feel better about themselves and talk **** about other peoples bikes because the dropout aren't facing the right way.
anway, we just had a whole thread talking about this and it went on for pages.
just search for it, i'm sure you'll find it.
people just like to feel better about themselves and talk **** about other peoples bikes because the dropout aren't facing the right way.
anway, we just had a whole thread talking about this and it went on for pages.
just search for it, i'm sure you'll find it.
11-28-06, 06:13 PM
#5
Team Sohoku
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Not where I want to be.
Posts: 2,003
Bikes: BMC, Cannondale, '87 Nishiki Modulus, 3Rensho Keirin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gregg
Conversions are road bikes, road bikes have different geometry from track bikes and don't have horizontal dropouts. Thats the difference
11-28-06, 06:17 PM
#6
Senior Member
Originally Posted by SingleSpeeDemon
Then there's the onslaught of Taiwanese (not that there's anything wrong with that) bikes that are kind of like road bike with track ends. That's what I ride.
11-28-06, 06:19 PM
#7
Team Sohoku
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Not where I want to be.
Posts: 2,003
Bikes: BMC, Cannondale, '87 Nishiki Modulus, 3Rensho Keirin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jet sanchEz
Give us an example? You mean those ugly Leader frame?
11-28-06, 06:22 PM
#8
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by gregg
Conversions are road bikes, road bikes have different geometry from track bikes and don't have horizontal dropouts. Thats the difference
11-28-06, 06:27 PM
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: los angeles
Posts: 66
Bikes: fuji track '06 61cm
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i understand the geometric differences, and frame differences. i wasn't asking the difference between the two. i just want to know why conversions are often viewed inferior. i don't get it. where does the disdain come from?
11-28-06, 06:30 PM
#10
Team Sohoku
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Not where I want to be.
Posts: 2,003
Bikes: BMC, Cannondale, '87 Nishiki Modulus, 3Rensho Keirin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Who said conversions are inferior? It's a mixed bag on that subject. Some conversions just palin kick ass, some suck and some track bikes really aren't track bikes.
11-28-06, 06:39 PM
#12
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
Originally Posted by urbanplanner19
i understand the geometric differences, and frame differences. i wasn't asking the difference between the two. i just want to know why conversions are often viewed inferior. i don't get it. where does the disdain come from?
Speaking as an urban planner with a conversion myself.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
11-28-06, 07:01 PM
#14
or tarckeemoon, depending
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017
Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have no beef with conversions.
11-28-06, 09:26 PM
#18
Team Sohoku
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Not where I want to be.
Posts: 2,003
Bikes: BMC, Cannondale, '87 Nishiki Modulus, 3Rensho Keirin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jacobpriest
Man **** Conversions! All They Do Is Ruin Bikes And Bike Culture
11-28-06, 09:34 PM
#19
live free or die trying
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where i lay my head is home.
Posts: 6,999
Bikes: bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i think this thread needs more quiet time.
11-28-06, 09:35 PM
#20
live free or die trying
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where i lay my head is home.
Posts: 6,999
Bikes: bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
****! i just bumped it! and i'm doing it again!
at least i'm not continuing the insipid original discussion. just ride some bikes.
at least i'm not continuing the insipid original discussion. just ride some bikes.
11-29-06, 01:11 AM
#22
Car magnet
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 435
Bikes: 80's Hoffy track frame 49x15, 80's guerciotti track 47x15(destroyd by a car), '78 ross conversion(RIP, died of old age), '06 fuji track(RIP, hit by a trolley), '75 Alan Aluminum(in the works)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're not cool unless you have an intense amount of toe overlap and you've eaten ***** because of it.
11-29-06, 07:14 AM
#23
jack of one or two trades
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by urbanplanner19
i understand the geometric differences, and frame differences. i wasn't asking the difference between the two. i just want to know why conversions are often viewed inferior. i don't get it. where does the disdain come from?
11-29-06, 08:49 AM
#24
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Well, one reason why you might consider a conversion inferior, that i didn't see mentioned above is the BB height. A Track bike with a high BB will be easier to pedal fast through corners than most road bike frames with lower BB's.
Not necessarily a reason to be snooty against conversions, but one reason you might prefer a frame that was designed to be a fixed gear.
Not necessarily a reason to be snooty against conversions, but one reason you might prefer a frame that was designed to be a fixed gear.
