Schwinn Madison - Major Toe-overlap?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Schwinn Madison - Major Toe-overlap?
For a beater/commuter, I bought a Schwinn Madison today for $340. It's a nice bike for the price, but it has a good amount of toe-overlap. To the owners of the Madison, have you noticed this, too?
Even though it's a size small, the stand-over height is 31.5 and the top tube length is 21.5 inches (normal reach for me). The crank arms are 170mm. And although it's marketed as a road/track bike, the headtube angle is only 72.5 (not 74 like my Rush Hour), so it's not that tight in geometry. While doing track stand, my foot gets tangled with the front wheel (and I have a normal-size foot - 9.5).
Is this normal? Has Schwinn made an egregious design flaw? How have owners resolve toe-overlap?
Thank you!
Even though it's a size small, the stand-over height is 31.5 and the top tube length is 21.5 inches (normal reach for me). The crank arms are 170mm. And although it's marketed as a road/track bike, the headtube angle is only 72.5 (not 74 like my Rush Hour), so it's not that tight in geometry. While doing track stand, my foot gets tangled with the front wheel (and I have a normal-size foot - 9.5).
Is this normal? Has Schwinn made an egregious design flaw? How have owners resolve toe-overlap?
Thank you!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stevens Point/Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
how long are your clips? sometimes putting smaller clips on will help a bit. shorter cranks is a more expensive way as well I would say.. but for a beater I don't know.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The clips are normal length. In fact, I used the flat side of the pedals and moved my feet back as far as comfortable (basically the contact point was well fore of the ball of the foot), and overlap still occurred.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have some toe-overlapping with my other bike, the Rush Hour, but the overlapping with the Schwinn Madison seems more pronounced - I almost bit it while doing a track stand at a light. Anyway, I agree with you about compromising for good track geometry, but I wouldn't say the Madison has the tightest geometry. In fact, the toptube length on the Schwinn Madison is longer than the Raleigh Rush Hour (on which the crank arms are 165, instead of 170 like on the Madison), and I can't quite figure out where things went wrong mathematically. Can 170mm be that much longer than 165mm for crank arms to cause such severe toe-overlapping?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 280
Bikes: 1994 Trek 1200, 1984 Raleigh Prestige, 1980 Motobecane Grand Jubile, custom 531 track, and a bunch of tinker bikes of all type
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
but seriously, another thing to consider besides HT angle and wheelbase is your fork rake. i would be willing to bet the trail is different on these two bikes, but i am not about to go look it up to prove it to myself.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne in Australia
Posts: 568
Bikes: Old 12-speed commuter, When I earn enough I'll get a fixed KHS flite 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well Madison has no fork rake, its a straight blade. I have it and its funny that you bought it as a beater. This is the most expensive bike I've ever bought. But I guess you don't appreciate things as much when you got heaps of money. Anyway there is a bit of overlap, but I only feel it when I'm at a standstill, you never need to turn your wheel as much when you're actually riding. Although I do use clipless, so I don't have extra space for the cage to further pronounce the overlap.
Anyway keep riding, and not meaning to attack you for a 400 dollar beater bike, but simply that you should value it cause not everyone can afford to throw around that much for their second or third bike.
Anyway keep riding, and not meaning to attack you for a 400 dollar beater bike, but simply that you should value it cause not everyone can afford to throw around that much for their second or third bike.
#8
loves his IRO.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Downtown Albany
Posts: 470
Bikes: IRO Angus, all sorts of upgrades.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it can be straight bladed and have rake.
the fork itself is at a very different angle than the steer tube.
the fork itself is at a very different angle than the steer tube.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well Madison has no fork rake, its a straight blade. I have it and its funny that you bought it as a beater. This is the most expensive bike I've ever bought. But I guess you don't appreciate things as much when you got heaps of money. Anyway there is a bit of overlap, but I only feel it when I'm at a standstill, you never need to turn your wheel as much when you're actually riding. Although I do use clipless, so I don't have extra space for the cage to further pronounce the overlap.
Anyway keep riding, and not meaning to attack you for a 400 dollar beater bike, but simply that you should value it cause not everyone can afford to throw around that much for their second or third bike.
Anyway keep riding, and not meaning to attack you for a 400 dollar beater bike, but simply that you should value it cause not everyone can afford to throw around that much for their second or third bike.
Enough about my idealism and let's get back to the Madison. I put clipless pedals on this morning and rode to work. I was able to move the cleats forward of the shoes (effectively moving my feet back on the pedals) and now doing track stands are a little less risky.
I was referring to it being a problem during track stand. This is where I'm offended that you presumed to give me a riding lesson.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 280
Bikes: 1994 Trek 1200, 1984 Raleigh Prestige, 1980 Motobecane Grand Jubile, custom 531 track, and a bunch of tinker bikes of all type
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
fork rake != trail
but whatever. go about your business.
[EDIT]
by the way, not to nitpick too excessively, but moving your cleats around solely to avoid toe lap is probably not the best thing you can do for your power transfer. as a general rule you want your cleats somewhere in the vicinity of the ball of your feet.
but whatever. go about your business.
[EDIT]
by the way, not to nitpick too excessively, but moving your cleats around solely to avoid toe lap is probably not the best thing you can do for your power transfer. as a general rule you want your cleats somewhere in the vicinity of the ball of your feet.
Last edited by cizzlak; 06-16-08 at 04:19 PM. Reason: oh yeah...
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, not nitpicking at all. When I mountain bike, I had the cleats all the back as far as possible for what I felt was the best control for me. For the Madison, I moved the cleats forward more, which effectively places it right under the ball of my feet. It feels ok and I'm not doing crazy stuff that requires maximum control.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do, but I must admit I'm not 100% smooth with my track-stand and periodically require sudden adjustments. This was where I got into trouble with the toe-overlap. It's better now, since I've repositioned my cleats slightly forward, decreasing the amount of toe-overlap just enough to allow me to point the toes down so that, when making sudden adjustments, the wheel can pass right by the foot.
All good, and loving my "beater" Madison.
PS. "Madison" is a porn name, which makes me love my bike even more.
All good, and loving my "beater" Madison.
PS. "Madison" is a porn name, which makes me love my bike even more.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 280
Bikes: 1994 Trek 1200, 1984 Raleigh Prestige, 1980 Motobecane Grand Jubile, custom 531 track, and a bunch of tinker bikes of all type
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
it is also the name of the liberal mother-of-earth hippy town we call our capitol city here in wisco. though they do have an impressive bike culture out there. if only milwaukee was... more liberal and mother-of-earth hippy... haha (i just said that!!)
#19
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wash D.C.
Posts: 25
Bikes: trek mtb, surly steamroller
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
powerband - I had the 07 madison and yep, major toe overlap. Geometry is a bit diff compared to other bikes i have checked out. standover is pretty tall compared to the tt, all in all it was a great ride i just had to be real careful when i was going slow in traffic up to a light when the cars were packed in tight.. few times my front wheel would get caught in between the toe clip and catch.. you get comfortable not doing this after a while but yes, it's still in the back of your mind when you're riding. clipless is the way to go if you can w/ that bike. 165 crankarms would help, but a pricey option. I recently sold my madison to purchase a surly steamroller, test road a 53cm and 56 and no toe overlap.. Best of luck. ~kj
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks, kjunx. I definitely will have to be conscious of the overlapping when approaching slowly to a redlight or while maneuvering around packed cars. Since I put clipless pedals on, it has been a no issue, but probably only because I'm more aware of it. At worse, the overlapping is about half an inch, but with the foot cocked upward, the wheel and foot clear each other fine.
I really like the Madison as a casual daily ride. Here are some pictures of it:;
https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/430606-schwinn-madison-some-pictures-comments.html
Cheers!
I really like the Madison as a casual daily ride. Here are some pictures of it:;
https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/430606-schwinn-madison-some-pictures-comments.html
Cheers!