Steamroller or Kilo WT?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Steamroller or Kilo WT?
Steamroller complete or Kilo WT?
I'm looking to replace my 70s 62cm conversion with something more my size (53cm). As I understand it, these bikes have exactly the same geo, and similar frame and component quality.
The main differences I am aware of is:
Price difference ~= $250
WT has fender/rack mounts
WT has weird seat tube sizing
Logos over clearcoat on Steamroller, under on WT
I plan to ride as a fixed with a front brake, I have full planet bike road fenders on my current bike, I live in a rainy area right now but I've heard about some decent clip on fenders that planet bike also sells. Ideally I'd like to be able to take off all the logos or cover them up? Have people successfully done this on Kilos?
I ride around town a lot (don't have a car) and play polo occasionally. I am just having trouble deciding between these two bikes. Am I missing some glaring difference?
I'm looking to replace my 70s 62cm conversion with something more my size (53cm). As I understand it, these bikes have exactly the same geo, and similar frame and component quality.
The main differences I am aware of is:
Price difference ~= $250
WT has fender/rack mounts
WT has weird seat tube sizing
Logos over clearcoat on Steamroller, under on WT
I plan to ride as a fixed with a front brake, I have full planet bike road fenders on my current bike, I live in a rainy area right now but I've heard about some decent clip on fenders that planet bike also sells. Ideally I'd like to be able to take off all the logos or cover them up? Have people successfully done this on Kilos?
I ride around town a lot (don't have a car) and play polo occasionally. I am just having trouble deciding between these two bikes. Am I missing some glaring difference?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
clip on fenders have nothing on real full coverage ones if you're actually riding in the rain a lot. overall the kilo is a more versatile option but the steamroller is definitely more refined stylistically. the seatpost isn't really that big of a deal. if you really feel the need to upgrade, thomson has a 26.8 one. if it were me i'd get the kilo and put the $250 towards making the changes/upgrades to suit your style.
#3
Pants are for suckaz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 2,578
Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
WT
Short of repainting, no. You can wrap the tubes in tape or something to cover the logos but there is no way to remove them without repainting.
Short of repainting, no. You can wrap the tubes in tape or something to cover the logos but there is no way to remove them without repainting.
#4
Senior Member
https://ecom1.planetbike.com/7001.html
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Surly can do full fenders using p-clips.
The glaring difference is the factor of: do you want "cheeze" or "balls". You know what I'm talking about or you wouldn't be asking about taking off the BD logos. No they don't come off. The best you can do is cover them up with some dark reflective tape or something. Or you can get at them under the clearcoat but I do not recommend that.
Surly all the way if you can afford it.
#7
Utilitarian Boy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 3,235
Bikes: Check the sig to find out
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I was in exactly your same situation when considering. I went with the WT due to price. You get a full bike for less than a Surly frameset.
The WT is surprisingly quick in handling, but it has more toe overlap. The plus is it has larger tire options (which was another big point that had me sold). Strangely, the seatpost can fit a 27.2 on my bike, but I don't know if it's an exception (of course I had to drill my own compression slot due to a factory defect). Overall, I thoroughly enjoy it. You're going to have to paint over it if you want the logos gone/
The WT is surprisingly quick in handling, but it has more toe overlap. The plus is it has larger tire options (which was another big point that had me sold). Strangely, the seatpost can fit a 27.2 on my bike, but I don't know if it's an exception (of course I had to drill my own compression slot due to a factory defect). Overall, I thoroughly enjoy it. You're going to have to paint over it if you want the logos gone/
Last edited by Gyeswho; 03-04-10 at 07:06 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,041
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Get the WT and save the money. Surly makes a great frame but not $250 better than any Kilo frame. Only style differences are the curved chain stays on the Surly and again that to me isn't worth another $250.
#10
thread derailleur
Join Date: May 2008
Location: beyond Thunderdome
Posts: 1,095
Bikes: 82 Bianchi ECO Pista, Pake, Kilo TT, some *** bmx i found underneath an old house
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you could also get this:
https://bikeisland.com/cgi-bin/BKTK_S...ls&ProdID=1184
and build form the frame. just an option to throw out there.
https://bikeisland.com/cgi-bin/BKTK_S...ls&ProdID=1184
and build form the frame. just an option to throw out there.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 927
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the aesthetics are an issue, look for some powdercoaters in your area. There's a guy around here who supposedly does frames starting from $40 and I've heard good things (though I've never seen his work). $250 of savings is definitely enough to get some custom color going, and your options are virtually unlimited.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was in exactly your same situation when considering. I went with the WT due to price. You get a full bike for less than a Surly frameset.
The WT is surprisingly quick in handling, but it has more toe overlap. The plus is it has larger tire options (which was another big point that had me sold). Strangely, the seatpost can fit a 27.2 on my bike, but I don't know if it's an exception (of course I had to drill my own compression slot due to a factory defect). Overall, I thoroughly enjoy it. You're going to have to paint over it if you want the logos gone/
The WT is surprisingly quick in handling, but it has more toe overlap. The plus is it has larger tire options (which was another big point that had me sold). Strangely, the seatpost can fit a 27.2 on my bike, but I don't know if it's an exception (of course I had to drill my own compression slot due to a factory defect). Overall, I thoroughly enjoy it. You're going to have to paint over it if you want the logos gone/
If the frames are the same size, and cranks the same length, how is there more toe overlap? Is that just because the kilo ships with larger tires?
Any thoughts on how noticeable throwing some white primer or even like nail polish would have over the Mercier logos? White duct tape?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the frames are the same size, and cranks the same length, how is there more toe overlap? Is that just because the kilo ships with larger tires?
Any thoughts on how noticeable throwing some white primer or even like nail polish would have over the Mercier logos? White duct tape?
Any thoughts on how noticeable throwing some white primer or even like nail polish would have over the Mercier logos? White duct tape?
If you get a white WT just put some white reflective tape over the logos.
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got the 62cm WT in white. Really like it thus far.. Comes with fixed and the freewheel. Wheels seem pretty good thus far..
Overall the quality is much higher than I was expecting. I ride a 63cm C-dale road bike and find the 62 to be pretty close in sizing. The steerer tube comes extra long, which gives you alot of options on stem height without having to run a stupid high rise stem.. you may want to cut steerer down eventually.. great to have the option.
The saddle it comes with is crap.. but that's to be expected.. I got the white colored rise sette saddle for $40.. the bike is perfect with it.
Have no clue what they're talking about with pedal overlap.. like I said, its pretty much same as my crack-n-fail.
Kept up with my riding friends on their geared bikes with NO PROBLEM.. amazing.. the big tires really didn't slow me down at all.. zilch..
You would have a sweet bike with the SteamRoller as well.. also a good bike, my friend has one, not sure how well it would fit someone tall like me.. in terms of headtube/steerer length.. I usually have troubles with that..
Overall the quality is much higher than I was expecting. I ride a 63cm C-dale road bike and find the 62 to be pretty close in sizing. The steerer tube comes extra long, which gives you alot of options on stem height without having to run a stupid high rise stem.. you may want to cut steerer down eventually.. great to have the option.
The saddle it comes with is crap.. but that's to be expected.. I got the white colored rise sette saddle for $40.. the bike is perfect with it.
Have no clue what they're talking about with pedal overlap.. like I said, its pretty much same as my crack-n-fail.
Kept up with my riding friends on their geared bikes with NO PROBLEM.. amazing.. the big tires really didn't slow me down at all.. zilch..
You would have a sweet bike with the SteamRoller as well.. also a good bike, my friend has one, not sure how well it would fit someone tall like me.. in terms of headtube/steerer length.. I usually have troubles with that..
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 2,280
Bikes: klein quantum, litespeed tuscany, bianchi pista concept, centurion comp ta, centurion super le mans, traitor ringleader
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
the miche seatpost looks nice with that saddle. nice ride!
DOH! edit: meant for gyeswho.
DOH! edit: meant for gyeswho.
Last edited by illdthedj; 03-05-10 at 06:42 PM. Reason: im a moron
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massanutten, VA
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got a 53cm WT and with clipless pedals and size 10.5 shoes the pedal overlap is a non issue. If I actually try really hard I can make the front tire barely catch the toe of my shoe. In normal riding, even circling at stop signs waiting for traffic to clear (one of these days I've got to work on my track standing), I've never caught my toe with the front wheel. I'm sure that with toe clips there is a little bit more of an issue but not a whole lot.
I really, really like my WT. I had a Motobecane Messenger for about a year and then upgraded to the WT because I wanted to spend some time exploring a bunch of gravel roads near me. Rode 29 miles yesterday with about 6 miles of freshly graveled roads and the bike did great, but my legs not so much. Definitely in my fat and out of shape winter mode. I'm even impressed with the stock tires and they've held up well, as well as everything else on the bike, over the first 500 miles I've put on it. My 27.2 Thompson seatpost fit fine on the WT. I really think the 26.8 spec on the Bikes Direct site is a typo.
The bottom line is I don't think you can go wrong with either bike. I had the same decision and went with the WT due to the cost savings.
Roland
I really, really like my WT. I had a Motobecane Messenger for about a year and then upgraded to the WT because I wanted to spend some time exploring a bunch of gravel roads near me. Rode 29 miles yesterday with about 6 miles of freshly graveled roads and the bike did great, but my legs not so much. Definitely in my fat and out of shape winter mode. I'm even impressed with the stock tires and they've held up well, as well as everything else on the bike, over the first 500 miles I've put on it. My 27.2 Thompson seatpost fit fine on the WT. I really think the 26.8 spec on the Bikes Direct site is a typo.
The bottom line is I don't think you can go wrong with either bike. I had the same decision and went with the WT due to the cost savings.
Roland
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 136
Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Schwinn Continental II
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got the 62cm WT in white. Really like it thus far.. Comes with fixed and the freewheel. Wheels seem pretty good thus far..
Overall the quality is much higher than I was expecting. I ride a 63cm C-dale road bike and find the 62 to be pretty close in sizing. The steerer tube comes extra long, which gives you alot of options on stem height without having to run a stupid high rise stem.. you may want to cut steerer down eventually.. great to have the option.
The saddle it comes with is crap.. but that's to be expected.. I got the white colored rise sette saddle for $40.. the bike is perfect with it.
Have no clue what they're talking about with pedal overlap.. like I said, its pretty much same as my crack-n-fail.
Kept up with my riding friends on their geared bikes with NO PROBLEM.. amazing.. the big tires really didn't slow me down at all.. zilch..
You would have a sweet bike with the SteamRoller as well.. also a good bike, my friend has one, not sure how well it would fit someone tall like me.. in terms of headtube/steerer length.. I usually have troubles with that..
Overall the quality is much higher than I was expecting. I ride a 63cm C-dale road bike and find the 62 to be pretty close in sizing. The steerer tube comes extra long, which gives you alot of options on stem height without having to run a stupid high rise stem.. you may want to cut steerer down eventually.. great to have the option.
The saddle it comes with is crap.. but that's to be expected.. I got the white colored rise sette saddle for $40.. the bike is perfect with it.
Have no clue what they're talking about with pedal overlap.. like I said, its pretty much same as my crack-n-fail.
Kept up with my riding friends on their geared bikes with NO PROBLEM.. amazing.. the big tires really didn't slow me down at all.. zilch..
You would have a sweet bike with the SteamRoller as well.. also a good bike, my friend has one, not sure how well it would fit someone tall like me.. in terms of headtube/steerer length.. I usually have troubles with that..
I have 62cm Steamroller and I'm 6 foot 3". It fits fine, I'm sure somebody even taller would be good on it as well.
#20
manonthemoon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 748
Bikes: Current custom builds: FG=KHS Flite 100 DH=Transition Blindside FR=Transition Bottlerocket
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
WT or FCU, hands down from a value perspective.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 175
Bikes: 2009 Schwinn Cutter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I never understood why people would want to hide the logos? Is it because you want people to think your not riding a no name brand like Mercier? Because 99% would probably think you have really aexpensive bike since american logic is anything french sounding=expensive. If its for style, I don't see it it either. I rather have a generic logo than a dinky anomaly on the frame. I think the logos look great, much better than a lot of others on BD. Personally I think if you have to money always go for the better brand like Surly, because I am sure the parts would be better than the WT if I was going to get a bike that I would at least get the WT5.
Last edited by Noir Lethal; 03-31-10 at 11:01 AM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 55
Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Cannondale Synapse 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Surly Steamroller and I really love it. The stock saddle was terrible IMO but other than that the bike has been great. I have the creamroller and the paint job is great. The super thick paint hides scratches pretty well. If you do want stickers they don't last long since you can scratch them off with your fingernail. I left the main "Surly" on the down tube and scratched them off everywhere else. I don't know much about the WT but the Surly frame is really solid.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, why hide the logos? I want everyone to think my $400 Mercier is really a $1500 bike that way I can have a lot of them stolen and brag about how many bikes I have to replace 'cause I'm all posh.
#25
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
t
There is one option to repainting if you want to cover up logos. You can get an uncut vinyl kit like this for $20 and you can either try to match the color or make striped "panels" in a different color. If you're patient you can make some pretty cool designs.