I need a new bike, but I can't decide :(
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I need a new bike, but I can't decide :(
Hello there,
So I'm about to buy my first fixed gear bike, but I'm struggling with making that final decision.
I'm stuck between the Motobecane Track, the Windsor Hour, or the Kilo TT.
From what I've read the Moto Track and the Windsor Hour are basically the same (and they're the same price), but still, which should I get?
And is the 100$ more worth it to get the Kilo TT? I mean, I'm only a newbie, and the main reason why I'm buying a fixie bike is for commuting. I might learn a couple of tricks here and there, but nothing more.
Please help me, ahaha
Thanks!
So I'm about to buy my first fixed gear bike, but I'm struggling with making that final decision.
I'm stuck between the Motobecane Track, the Windsor Hour, or the Kilo TT.
From what I've read the Moto Track and the Windsor Hour are basically the same (and they're the same price), but still, which should I get?
And is the 100$ more worth it to get the Kilo TT? I mean, I'm only a newbie, and the main reason why I'm buying a fixie bike is for commuting. I might learn a couple of tricks here and there, but nothing more.
Please help me, ahaha
Thanks!
#2
I go I go I go I go I go
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I took a lot of time reading about those bikes and figuring which one I should get. People like the Kilo and I was almost going to get it but I decided on the Motobecane Track. The main reason I bought mine was for commuting too and this is my first fixed, so I just decided to go cheapest. My budget was $400 so that left room for tools, wheel truing and innertubes.
I picked the Track over the Hour because of no decals. I like the clean look. But you may not care about that.
But people seem to think the Kilo is good for the money.
So in essence I have probably not helped to narrow down your choice.
I know, you pick!
I picked the Track over the Hour because of no decals. I like the clean look. But you may not care about that.
But people seem to think the Kilo is good for the money.
So in essence I have probably not helped to narrow down your choice.
I know, you pick!
#3
I go I go I go I go I go
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So basically:
If you like no decals, go with Track
If you want a probably more popular bike with cool colors, go with Kilo if you don't care about spending a bit more. I mean, grape soda is pretty sweet! It does come with two brakes as well.
If you don't care about decals, enie menie miney moe Track and Hour.
Or find a 3 year old to pick for you, it don't matter too much.
Or go insane. That happened to me. Is happening?
If you like no decals, go with Track
If you want a probably more popular bike with cool colors, go with Kilo if you don't care about spending a bit more. I mean, grape soda is pretty sweet! It does come with two brakes as well.
If you don't care about decals, enie menie miney moe Track and Hour.
Or find a 3 year old to pick for you, it don't matter too much.
Or go insane. That happened to me. Is happening?
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ahah I'm going insane just trying to pick! I feel like this decision is the difference between happiness and sadness. lol
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
Last edited by thekidwho; 08-14-10 at 09:58 AM.
#5
i smell bacon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,574
Bikes: Geekhouse Deerfield, GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, TET Track, Ritchey P-650b, Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
ahah I'm going insane just trying to pick! I feel like this decision is the difference between happiness and sadness. lol
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
#6
Junk Collector
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 973
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Circuit, 2012 Colnago M10, 1990 Schwinn CrissCross
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The Kilo also has the nicest fork of the 3.
I have a Windsor and the ride is pretty dead. Not sure if that's a big deal, but it just seems to sap your energy.
I have a Windsor and the ride is pretty dead. Not sure if that's a big deal, but it just seems to sap your energy.
Last edited by duane041; 08-14-10 at 10:18 AM. Reason: edited for more info
#7
I go I go I go I go I go
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ahah I'm going insane just trying to pick! I feel like this decision is the difference between happiness and sadness. lol
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
but thanks! you made my decision a little bit easier. i don't think im going for the hour anymore, it's probably gonna come down to the kilo tt vs the moto. track.
hmm, let's see what other people think!
oh, and also, i'm about 5'5 - 5'6 with an inseam of 30 - 301/2. According to the frame size calculator on ebicycles.com, I should either get a 52 or a 53. So does this mean that a 54 is out of the question? And should I be fine if I go with either the 52 or the 53?
#8
I go I go I go I go I go
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Whatchu mean by dead anyway?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 191
Bikes: Current: Wabi Classic, '91 Bridgestone Rb-1. Past: '92 Bridgestone RB-1, '02 Lemond Zurich, '91 Trek 520, '85 Schwinn Madison, '80s Panasonic conversion fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For me, I got the Dawes SST AL. What won me over was the carbon fork and the fact that like 80% of the components were branded. Most of the components on the Hour, TT, and Track have no brand names. Generic parts are usually not as trust-able as known parts. But that's just what I think. I'm a complete newbie to bikes, but this is how computers and cameras are.
#11
Noob
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 357
Bikes: '86 Schwinn Paramount
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Definately take top tube length into consideration. It would have more of an impact on fitment than standover. Keep in mind Kilo frames run larger so size down if you go that route.
Top tube length
Top tube length
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Out of your original 3 choices I say Hour. Track = Hour frame, but you can expect slightly better components with the Hour (from what I've read, and I've been forum hunting about this bike for months.) I've heard that Kilo TT is a better investment. But from what I've gathered Hour has better wheels (sealed formula hubs, as opposed to just sealed ball bearing hubs with mercier), a slightly slacker track geometry (which is better for communing), and I personally prefer to spend $280 rather than $360, and use the extra $80 on upgrades. I'm about to get an Hour myself, deciding on size. I'm 5'10" / 5'10.5" with 33.5" / 40" inseam, deciding between 54cm and 56cm. Any advice from owners?
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmm. I'm still undecided! I think I'll just go with the Kilo TT just because people say it's the best budget fixie bike. And I read somewhere that someone who got the moto. track wished they had spent some more money and gone with the kilo. It's either that or the Dawes.. that bike sounds solid as well.
Thanks everyone for their help so far! I think most of this indecisiveness is just me being paranoid about my first fixed gear bike. But since my last bike was a walmart mountain bike that weighed like 100 lbs, I think I'll be happy with anything!
#15
.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus
Posts: 2,027
Bikes: Pegueot UO8, Tommaso Augusta
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Kilo is a fine bike. And they last. Many members have them and have upgraded every part, which is really what I believe it is designed for.
#16
Junk Collector
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 973
Bikes: 1987 Schwinn Circuit, 2012 Colnago M10, 1990 Schwinn CrissCross
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
But it's cheap.
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hey thanks guys for all your help!
Before I make my final decision, I was just wondering. If I do end up doing tricks and stuff, would the Kilo TT be an okay bike for that? I read that there is some toe overlap problems, and I was worried that this would affect the performance during tricks. Also would the bike in general hold up?
Before I make my final decision, I was just wondering. If I do end up doing tricks and stuff, would the Kilo TT be an okay bike for that? I read that there is some toe overlap problems, and I was worried that this would affect the performance during tricks. Also would the bike in general hold up?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dmt
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
18
02-01-10 03:57 PM