Tandem test ride impressions
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Tandem test ride impressions
We recently had the opportunity to test ride 3 tandems in quick succession: Santana Beyond, Calfee Dragonfly and Comotion Equator. Our base of comparison is our 2005 Trek T2000 that we really like but are wanting a coupled bike. Key frame test criteria for us are ride comfort and handling. Here are our personal impressions based on these few short (~30 minute) rides FWIW:
Beyond: it really does cut down on the high frequency road vibration and noise from chip seal and other rough surfaces. Felt almost like there was a layer of air between us and the road. I can definitely imagine this greatly reducing fatigue after riding more than a couple of hours. Larger bumps like expansion joints, etc. felt similar to our T2000, although the bike had 25 mm Conti 4 seasons vs the 28 mm 4KS2 we use. It was also fitted with Spinergy wheels. Could these have made a difference? Seated handling felt fine but a bit more of a handful out of the saddle vs our bike.
Dragonfly: wow, it really does absorb the bigger bumps. Stoker felt like this is the first bike we ever rode where she could imagine doing without a suspension seatpost. But higher frequency road noise came through as strong, if not louder, than our T2000. Almost "buzzy" through the feet and hands. Some speculation that this was a result of the "harsh" Zipp CF wheels on the bike. They were fitted with 25 mm 4KS2s. Seated handling was fine but became squirrelly when we stood up.
Equator: great handling. Sporty yet so easy to control even out of the saddle. The huge 35 mm tires absorbed big bumps well but did nothing to isolate chip seal buzz. We didn't like the Rohloff hub despite the appeal of a chainless drivetrain because it made too much noise, but understood that the frame characteristics are the same as the Speedster so that is still on our short list.
We are also seriously considering a custom build but will probably need to commit to that without benefit of a test ride. Tough to substitute for direct experience. I guess a lot of the beauty is in the eye (or other body parts) of the beholder since our impressions seemed somewhat different than what I've heard from others.
Beyond: it really does cut down on the high frequency road vibration and noise from chip seal and other rough surfaces. Felt almost like there was a layer of air between us and the road. I can definitely imagine this greatly reducing fatigue after riding more than a couple of hours. Larger bumps like expansion joints, etc. felt similar to our T2000, although the bike had 25 mm Conti 4 seasons vs the 28 mm 4KS2 we use. It was also fitted with Spinergy wheels. Could these have made a difference? Seated handling felt fine but a bit more of a handful out of the saddle vs our bike.
Dragonfly: wow, it really does absorb the bigger bumps. Stoker felt like this is the first bike we ever rode where she could imagine doing without a suspension seatpost. But higher frequency road noise came through as strong, if not louder, than our T2000. Almost "buzzy" through the feet and hands. Some speculation that this was a result of the "harsh" Zipp CF wheels on the bike. They were fitted with 25 mm 4KS2s. Seated handling was fine but became squirrelly when we stood up.
Equator: great handling. Sporty yet so easy to control even out of the saddle. The huge 35 mm tires absorbed big bumps well but did nothing to isolate chip seal buzz. We didn't like the Rohloff hub despite the appeal of a chainless drivetrain because it made too much noise, but understood that the frame characteristics are the same as the Speedster so that is still on our short list.
We are also seriously considering a custom build but will probably need to commit to that without benefit of a test ride. Tough to substitute for direct experience. I guess a lot of the beauty is in the eye (or other body parts) of the beholder since our impressions seemed somewhat different than what I've heard from others.
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Did the Spinergy rear wheel use disk brake? What kind of Zipp wheels were on the Calfee?
I think the Santana and Calfee would ride better with 28mm tires, especially with a coupled frame that will encounter variable road conditions.
I think the Santana and Calfee would ride better with 28mm tires, especially with a coupled frame that will encounter variable road conditions.
#3
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,535
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Still loving our Speedster after 9 years. We know there are lighter bikes but it handles perfectly under all conditions and is comfy. It is fitted with a WoundUp carbon fork. We are running 28mm 4KS2 tires at 105 lbs. on conventional 36H wheels, wide and deep alu rims. These tires really smooth out the chipseal. Stoker has a Specialized CoblGobr seatpost which she likes.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
The spinergy rear wheel on the Beyond was fitted with the huge disc brake used by Santana. I don't remember the model of Zipp wheels on the Calfee but they had very deep carbon fiber rims.
I agree that both the Calfee and Santana would ride better with wider tires, but I was impressed with the bump absorption of the Calfee and the vibration absorption of the Santana even with 25mm tires on both. On the Comotion the 35 mm tires absorbed bumps well as you would expect, but didn't seem to have much effect on the higher frequency vibrations.
I agree that both the Calfee and Santana would ride better with wider tires, but I was impressed with the bump absorption of the Calfee and the vibration absorption of the Santana even with 25mm tires on both. On the Comotion the 35 mm tires absorbed bumps well as you would expect, but didn't seem to have much effect on the higher frequency vibrations.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
Carbon fiber is an incredible material for a tandem frame.
Our c/f Zona custom tandem is now 13+ years old with 45,000+ miles on the odometer.
Stoker has never wanted/needed a shock absorbing seatpost on any of our tandems (5 of them) since 1975.
She is a real tough little cookie!
Pedal on TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Our c/f Zona custom tandem is now 13+ years old with 45,000+ miles on the odometer.
Stoker has never wanted/needed a shock absorbing seatpost on any of our tandems (5 of them) since 1975.
She is a real tough little cookie!
Pedal on TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
#6
Full Member
Equator: great handling. Sporty yet so easy to control even out of the saddle. The huge 35 mm tires absorbed big bumps well but did nothing to isolate chip seal buzz. We didn't like the Rohloff hub despite the appeal of a chainless drivetrain because it made too much noise, but understood that the frame characteristics are the same as the Speedster so that is still on our short list.
An Equator is on our short list.
Bob
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
Yes, that was us, but we didn't ride the equator until two days later at the Comotion factory. Great handling bike. We were told that the hub would get quieter with more miles, but would never get completely silent.
Coincidence, I'm also an engineer Bob.
Coincidence, I'm also an engineer Bob.
#8
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
The dragonfly is going to be the quickest handling of those 3 bikes, handling closest to a single race bike.
I think this explains what you perceived as "squirrelly" out of the saddle. With some miles, I think you'd likely find the bike to be great handling in or out of the sadldle.
We love the way our Dragonfly handles. But one person's squirrelly is another's responsive.
If your a big powerful team, the extra stiff option might also help
I think this explains what you perceived as "squirrelly" out of the saddle. With some miles, I think you'd likely find the bike to be great handling in or out of the sadldle.
We love the way our Dragonfly handles. But one person's squirrelly is another's responsive.
If your a big powerful team, the extra stiff option might also help
#9
Senior Member
We have been riding a Calfee Tetra since 2011 and love it.
We don't feel the high frequency noise you describe, in fact its the smoothest, quietest bike I have ever ridden.
As Merlin said you will get used to the handling after riding it for a while and wonder why you didn't do it sooner.
IME it is not squirrely at all.
I am not sure but the Dragonfly being constructed differently than the Tetra might also explain a difference in vibration.
We don't feel the high frequency noise you describe, in fact its the smoothest, quietest bike I have ever ridden.
As Merlin said you will get used to the handling after riding it for a while and wonder why you didn't do it sooner.
IME it is not squirrely at all.
I am not sure but the Dragonfly being constructed differently than the Tetra might also explain a difference in vibration.